Jian-Wen Bao (NOAA/ESRL/PSD) Sara A. Michelson (NOAA/ESRL/PSD) S. G. Gopalakrishnan (NOAA/AOML/HRD) In Collaboration with Frank Marks (NOAA/AOML/HRD) Vijay.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact of cumulus parameterization on motion, structure, intensity: preliminary results Robert Fovell and Yizhe Peggy Bu University of California, Los.
Advertisements

Sensitivity of the HWRF model prediction for Hurricane Ophelia (2005) to the choice of the cloud and precipitation scheme Yuqing Wang and Qingqing Li International.
Wayne Schubert, Gabriel Williams, Richard Taft, Chris Slocum and Alex Gonzalez Dept. of Atmospheric Science Workshop on Tropical Dynamics and the MJO January.
Department of Physics /Victoria Sinclair Structure and force balance of idealised cold.
Impact of environmental moisture on intensification of Hurricane Earl (2010) Longtao Wu, Hui Su, and Robert Fovell HS3 Science Meeting May 2014.
Hurricane Dynamics 101 Roger K. Smith University of Munich.
Mesoscale Convective Vortices (MCVs) Chris Davis (NCAR ESSL/MMM and RAL) Stan Trier (NCAR ESSL/MMM) Boulder, Colorado 60-h Radar Composite Animation (00.
Operational Hurricane Model Diagnostics at EMC Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop NHC, Miami, FL 4 May 2009 – 6 May 2009 Vijay Tallapragada,
Cold Fronts and their relationship to density currents: A case study and idealised modelling experiments Victoria Sinclair University of HelsinkI David.
Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations SCOTT A. BRAUN AND WEI-KUO TAO PRESENTATION.
Dynamical similarities and differences between cold fronts and density currents Victoria Sinclair University of Helsinki
5/22/201563rd Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference, March 2-5, 2009, St. Petersburg, FL Experiments of Hurricane Initialization with Airborne Doppler.
© red ©
Realtime Analysis of Model ICs Wallace Hogsett, NHC 1.
1 Progress Towards Developing a Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean Framework for Research and Operational Hurricane Models Isaac Ginis B. Thomas, R. Yablonsky,
Hurricane forecasts with Regional NMMB: Impact of HWRF Physics Weiguo Wang and Vijay Tallapragada EMC/NCEP/NOAA, College Park, MD Mar
Hurricane forecasts with Regional NMMB: Impact of HWRF Physics Weiguo Wang and Vijay Tallapragada EMC/NCEP/NOAA, College Park, MD TCRF/69th IHC Mar.
HWRF Model Sensitivity to Non-hydrostatic Effects Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop May 4, 2009 Katherine S. Maclay Colorado State University.
Some Preliminary Modeling Results on the Upper-Level Outflow of Hurricane Sandy (2012) JungHoon Shin and Da-Lin Zhang Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic.
The Hurricane Weather Research & Forecasting (HWRF) Prediction System Next generation non-hydrostatic weather research and hurricane prediction system.
Hurricane Model Transitions to Operations at NCEP/EMC 2007 IHC Conference, New Orleans  Robert Tuleya*, V. Tallapragada,  Y. Kwon, Q. Liu, W. O’Connor,
Chris Birchfield Atmospheric Sciences, Spanish minor.
2011 operational HWRF model upgrades EMC/NCEP/NWS/NOAA Young C. Kwon, V. Tallapragada, R. Tuleya, Q. Liu, K. Yeh*, S. Gopal*, Z. Zhang, S. Trahan and J.
19 December ConclusionsResultsMethodologyBackground Chip HelmsSensitivity of CM1 to Initial θ' Magnitude and Radius Examining the Sensitivity of.
Prediction of Atlantic Tropical Cyclones with the Advanced Hurricane WRF (AHW) Model Jimy Dudhia Wei Wang James Done Chris Davis MMM Division, NCAR Jimy.
Evaluation and Development of Ensemble Prediction System for the Operational HWRF Model Zhan Zhang, V. Tallapragada, R. Tuleya, Q. Liu, Y. Kwon, S. Trahan,
Sensitivity of Tropical Cyclone Inner-Core Size and Intensity to the Radial Distribution of Surface Entropy Flux Wang, Y., and Xu, 2010: Sensitivity of.
IMPACTS OF TURBULENCE ON HURRICANES (ONR-BAA ) PI: Yongsheng Chen, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Co-PIs: George H. Bryan and Richard.
1/11/20101 Vortex Initialization of the Atmospheric Model in HWRF HWRF Tutorial, 2014 Qingfu Liu, Vijay Tallapragada, Xuejin Zhang (HRD) Mingjing Tong,
Sensitivity of Simulated Tropical Cyclone Structure and Intensity to Horizontal Resolution Speaker: Wang, Jian-Cyuan Advisor: Prof. Yang, Ming-Jen Megan.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Jian-Wen Bao Christopher W. Fairall Sara A. Michelson Laura Bianco NOAA/ESRL/Physical Sciences Division in collaboration with N. Surgi, Y. Kwon and V.
Energy Production, Frictional Dissipation, and Maximum Intensity of a Numerically Simulated Tropical Cyclone 4/ 蘇炯瑞 Wang, Y., and J. Xu, 2010: Energy.
Richard Rotunno NCAR *Based on:
Jonathan L. Vigh and Wayne H. Schubert January 16, 2008.
Predictability and dynamics of the rapid intensification of Hurricane Edouard (2014) Erin Munsell and Fuqing Zhang (Penn State) Jason Sippel (EMC/IMSG)
How Small-Scale Turbulence Sets the Amplitude and Structure of Tropical Cyclones Kerry Emanuel PAOC.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer 4:
How Do Outer Spiral Rainband Affect Tropical Cyclone Structure and Intensity? The working hypothesis is based on the fact that the outer rainbands are.
Tropical Transition in the Eastern North Pacific: Sensitivity to Microphysics Alicia M. Bentley ATM May 2012.
Research on the HWRF Model: Intensification and Uncertainties in Model Physics Research on the HWRF Model: Intensification and Uncertainties in Model Physics.
Ligia Bernardet 1, V. Tallapragada 2, Y. Kwon 3, S. Trahan 3, Q. Liu 2, Z. Zhang 3, X. Zhang 4, S. Gopalakrishnan 2, R. Yablonsky 5, B. Thomas 5, T. Marchok.
Acceleration of high winds in idealised simulations of extratropical cyclones. Tim P. Slater Prof. David M. Schultz Prof. Geraint Vaughan 3 Jan 2012 UTC.
Jets Dynamics Weather Systems – Fall 2015 Outline: a.Why, when and where? b.What is a jet streak? c.Ageostrophic flow associated with jet streaks.
An Examination Of Interesting Properties Regarding A Physics Ensemble 2012 WRF Users’ Workshop Nick P. Bassill June 28 th, 2012.
Sensitivity of Tropical Cyclone Intensity to Ventilation in an Axisymmetric Model Brian Tang, and Kerry Emanuel J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2394–2413.
Urad_Budget_Part_I All variables shown are taken from 5-min data, averaged over a 1 h period F_AGRA = PGF + CenCorf Diff + Error = Diffusion + Calculation.
Monkey, Monkey In the Tree. Monkey, monkey in the tree Throw the yellow coconut down to me!
Idealized Tropical Cyclone Structure. Tropical Cyclone Extension of the Warm Core middle –level vortex to the surface. Inducement of Ekman pumping Non-linear.
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
Numerical Simulation and Prediction of Supercell Tornadoes Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of.
Yuqing Wang Department of Meteorology, University of Hawaii The 65 th IHC, February 28-March 3, 2011.
Dynamics and predictability of the rapid intensification of Hurricane Edouard (2014) Erin Munsell Summer 2015 Group Meeting August 17 th, 2015.
Hurricane Model Transitions to Operations at NCEP/EMC 2006 IHC Conference, Mobile, AL Robert Tuleya, S. Gopalkrishnan, Weixing Shen, N. Surgi, and H.Pan.
10/25/ th Cyclone Workshop1 Analysis of the potential vorticity budget of a tropopause polar cyclone Steven M. Cavallo and Gregory J. Hakim University.
INNER CORE STRUCTURE AND INTENSITY CHANGE IN HURRICANE ISABEL (2003) Shuyi S. Chen and Peter J. Kozich RSMAS/University of Miami J. Gamache, P. Dodge,
Tangential Wind vs Radial Wind Local Changes All variables shown are taken from 5-min data, averaged over a 1 h period Vtan = tangential wind component,
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer 2:
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Three-dimensional airborne Doppler analyses at HRD
Average Number of Photons

Bell, M. M. , M. T. Montgomery, and W. -C
Conservation of Momentum (horizontal)
What Color is it?.
©
©
Impacts of Air-Sea Interaction on Tropical Cyclone Track and Intensity
Scott A. Braun, 2002: Mon. Wea. Rev.,130,
Presentation transcript:

Jian-Wen Bao (NOAA/ESRL/PSD) Sara A. Michelson (NOAA/ESRL/PSD) S. G. Gopalakrishnan (NOAA/AOML/HRD) In Collaboration with Frank Marks (NOAA/AOML/HRD) Vijay Tallapragada (NOAA/NCEP/EMC) Controlling Factors of the Radius of Maximum Winds in HWRF Presented at The 65 th Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference Miami, FL, 02 March 2011

Outline 1. Motivation and methodology 2. Sensitivity to the size of the initial vortex 3. Sensitivity to vertical and horizontal diffusion 4. Sensitivity to diabatic forcing 5. Summary

Courtesy of M. Shapiro Motivation: a holistic understanding of the HWRF model characteristics

Courtesy of M. Shapiro Motivation: a holistic understanding of the HWRF model characteristics

Methodology: idealized case study f plane located at 12.5ºN A prescribed axisymmetric vortex: — maximum sfc tangential wind: 15 m/s — radius of sfc maximum wind: 90 km Quiescent environment thermally corresponding to the Jordan sounding with a constant sea surface temperature of 29ºC Initial mass and wind fields derived by solving the nonlinear balance equation for the prescribed vortex (Wang 1995, MWR) Model grid spacing: dx = dy = 0.06, 0.02 (~9 km, ~ 3 km) kx = 43 (NMM sigma-p levels) 9 km 3 km 55 o

Yellow Squares = Initial vortex:50 km Lime Green Squares = Initial vortex:70 km Magenta Squares = Initial vortex:90 km Light Blue Circles = Initial vortex:110 km Brown Circles = Initial vortex:130 km Purple Squares = Initial vortex:150 km Black Squares = Knaff and Zehr (2007) Sensitivity to the size of the initial vortex Minimum SLPMax. Surface Wind speedPressure-Wind Relationship Radius of Maximum Surface Wind Boundary Layer Scheme Radiation Scheme Convective Parameterization Scheme Microphysics Scheme GFSNCARSASFerrier

Initial vortex radius: 90 kmInitial vortex radius: 50 km Initial vortex radius: 150 km Sensitivity to the size of the initial vortex: hour Azimuthally Averaged Tangential and Radial Wind Speed and Circulation Vectors Initial vortex radius: 70 km Initial vortex radius: 110 kmInitial vortex radius: 130 km

Sensitivity to Horizontal Diffusion Magenta Squares = Default Horizontal Diffusion Blue Squares = 0.5 × Horizontal Diffusion Green Squares = 1.5 × Horizontal Diffusion Gray Squares = 2.0 × Horizontal Diffusion Dark Brown Squares= 4.0 × Horizontal Diffusion Black Squares = Knaff and Zehr (2007) Max. Surface Wind SpeedPressure-Wind Relationship Radius of Maximum Surface Wind Boundary Layer Scheme Radiation Scheme Convective Parameterization Scheme Microphysics Scheme GFSNCARSASFerrier Minimum SLP

Sensitivity to Horizontal Diffusion: hour Azimuthally Averaged Tangential and Radial Wind Speed and Circulation Vectors 0.5 × Hor. Diffusion1.5 × Hor. DiffusionDefault Hor. Diffusion 4.0 × Hor. Diffusion 2.0 × Hor. Diffusion

Sensitivity to Vertical Diffusion Magenta Squares = Default Light Blue Squares= 2 × DKU, 2 × DKT Brown Squares= 0.5 × DKU, 1 × DKT Dark Blue Squares=0.5 × DKU, 0.5 × DKT Black Squares = Knaff and Zehr (2007) Max. Surface Wind speedPressure-Wind Relationship Radius of Maximum Surface Wind Boundary Layer Scheme Radiation Scheme Convective Parameterization Scheme Microphysics Scheme GFSNCARSASFerrier Minimum SLP

Default 2 × DKU and 2 × DKT 0.5 × DKU and 0.5 × DKT0.5 × DKU and 1 × DKT Sensitivity to Vertical Diffusion: hour Azimuthally Averaged Tangential and Radial Wind Speed and Circulation Vectors

Sensitivity to Diabatic Heating Black Filled Squares = GFS BL scheme, GFDL Radiation scheme, Ferrier, SAS on both domains Dark Green Squares= GFS BL scheme, GFDL Radiation scheme, Ferrier, SAS on outer domain. No convection scheme on domain2 Black Open Squares = Knaff and Zehr (2007) Max. Surface Wind speedPressure-Wind Relationship Radius of Maximum Surface Wind Minimum SLP

Sensitivity to Diabatic heating: hour Azimuthally Averaged Tangential and Radial Wind Speed and Circulation Vectors SAS convection scheme on outer domain, none on domain2 SAS on both domains

Black Filled Squares = Ferrier Orange Squares= WSM5 Pink Squares= WSM6 Dark Red Squares= Thompson Black Open Squares = Knaff and Zehr (2007) Max. Surface Wind speedPressure-Wind Relationship Radius of Maximum Surface Wind Boundary Layer Scheme Radiation Scheme Convective Parameterization Scheme GFSGFDLSAS Sensitivity to Diabatic Heating (cont’d) Minimum SLP

Ferrier (control) WSM5 WSM6Thompson Sensitivity to Diabatic Heating (cont’d)

Summary 1.There is a significant sensitivity of RMW to the size of the initial vortex. 2.RMW’s sensitivity to vertical diffusion is much greater than the horizontal. 3. The slope of RMW is also dependent on the variation in diabatic forcing. 4. Further observational analysis and theoretical understanding are needed to determine an “optimal” operational physics.