Lecture 16 Simulating from the Sun to the Mud. Space Weather Modeling Framework – 1 [Tóth et al., 2007] The SWMF allows developers to combine models without.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MURI,2008 Electric Field Variability and Impact on the Thermosphere Yue Deng 1,2, Astrid Maute 1, Arthur D. Richmond 1 and Ray G. Roble 1 1.HAO National.
Advertisements

Plasmas in Space: From the Surface of the Sun to the Orbit of the Earth Steven R. Spangler, University of Iowa Division of Plasma Physics, American Physical.
Non-magnetic Planets Yingjuan Ma, Andrew Nagy, Gabor Toth, Igor Sololov, KC Hansen, Darren DeZeeuw, Dalal Najib, Chuanfei Dong, Steve Bougher SWMF User.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Valeriy Tenishev, Dmitriy Borovikov, Nicolas Fougere, Yuni Lee, Michael R. Combi, Tamas Gombosi, Martin Rubin.
Space Weather Forecast Models from the Center for Integrated Space Weather Modeling The Solar Wind Forecast Model Carrington Rotation 1896Carrington Rotation.
Coupling the RCM to LFM Frank Toffoletto (Rice) and John Lyon (Dartmouth)
Ionospheric Electric Field Variations during Geomagnetic Storms Simulated using CMIT W. Wang 1, A. D. Richmond 1, J. Lei 1, A. G. Burns 1, M. Wiltberger.
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Magnetospheric Modeling Mary K. Hudson and the CISM Magnetospheric Modeling Team.
The tribulations and exaltations in coupling models of the magnetosphere with ionosphere- thermosphere models Aaron Ridley Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
Center for Space Environment Modeling W. Manchester 1, I. Roussev, I.V. Sokolov 1, 1 University of Michigan AGU Berkeley March.
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March Ionosphere-Thermosphere Modeling Tim Killeen, Stan Solomon, and the CISM Ionosphere-Thermosphere Team.
MHD Modeling of the Large Scale Solar Corona & Progress Toward Coupling with the Heliospheric Model.
Overview of CISM Magnetosphere Research Mary Hudson 1, Anthony Chan 2, Scot Elkington 3, Brian Kress 1, William Lotko 1, Paul Melanson 1, David Murr 1,
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Julie A. Feldt CEDAR-GEM workshop June 26 th, 2011.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Semi-Empirical MHD Modeling of the Solar Wind Igor V. Sokolov, Ofer Cohen, Tamas I. Gombosi CSEM, University of Michigan Ilia I Roussev, Institute for.
How does the Sun drive the dynamics of Earth’s thermosphere and ionosphere Wenbin Wang, Alan Burns, Liying Qian and Stan Solomon High Altitude Observatory.
R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.
29 April 2010 Space Weather Workshop 2010 From Research To Operations: Transitioning CISM Models W. Jeffrey Hughes Center for Integrated Space Weather.
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
Multi-fluid MHD Study on Ion Loss from Titan’s Atmosphere Y. J. Ma, C. T. Russell, A. F. Nagy, G. Toth, M. K. Dougherty, A. Wellbrock, A. J. Coates, P.
Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections
The Solar Wind.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Heliosphere: The Solar Wind March 01, 2012.
Global Simulation of Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth's Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Tatsuki Ogino Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory.
Space Weather: Magnetic Storms 31 October 2011 William J. Burke Air Force Research Laboratory/Space Vehicles Directorate Boston College Institute for Scientific.
Ionospheric Electrodynamics & Low-Earth Orbiting Satellites (LEOS) J-M Noël, A. Russell, D. Burrell & S. Thorsteinson Royal Military College of Canada.
PAPER I. ENA DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS. The Imager for Magnetopause-to- Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) missionis the first NASA Mid-size Explorer (MIDEX)
In Situ Measurements of Auroral Acceleration Regions Wu Tong
Validation of the SWMF Coupled Model for Solar Corona – Inner Heliosphere – CME With the Observations of the May 12, 1997 Event Ofer Cohen(1), Igor V.
Team Report on integration of FSAM to SWMF and on FSAM simulations of convective dynamo and emerging flux in the solar convective envelope Yuhong Fan and.
CSI 769 Fall 2009 Jie Zhang Solar and Heliospheric Physics.
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
Global MHD Simulation with BATSRUS from CCMC ESS 265 UCLA1 (Yasong Ge, Megan Cartwright, Jared Leisner, and Xianzhe Jia)
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Magnetospheric Current System During Disturbed Times.
First-principles-based modeling of geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) at mid- and low-latitudes Pulkkinen, A., N. Buzulukova, L. Rastaetter, M. Kuznetsova,
Particle precipitation has been intensely studied by ionospheric and magnetospheric physicists. As particles bounce along the earth's magnetic fields they.
Data-constrained Simulation of CME Initiation and Propagation Antonia Savcheva ESPM 2014 September 11, 2014 Collaborators: R. Evans, B. van der Holst,
Lecture 15 Modeling the Inner Magnetosphere. The Inner Magnetosphere The inner magnetosphere includes the ring current made up of electrons and ions in.
Energy inputs from Magnetosphere to the Ionosphere/Thermosphere ASP research review Yue Deng April 12 nd, 2007.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
30 April 2009 Space Weather Workshop 2009 The Challenge of Predicting the Ionosphere: Recent results from CISM. W. Jeffrey Hughes Center for Integrated.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
GEM Student Tutorial: GGCM Modeling (MHD Backbone)
Solar Wind and CMEs with the Space Weather Modeling Framework
Xuepu Zhao Oct. 19, 2011 The Base of the Heliosphere: The Outer (Inner) Boundary Conditions of Coronal (Heliospheric) models.
W. D. Cramer1, J. Raeder1, F. R. Toffoletto2, M. Gilson1,3, B. Hu2,4
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Ionosphere, Magnetosphere and Thermosphere Anthea Coster
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Heliosphere - Lectures 5-7
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
Introduction to Space Weather
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 16 Simulating from the Sun to the Mud

Space Weather Modeling Framework – 1 [Tóth et al., 2007] The SWMF allows developers to combine models without completely rewriting them. Currently there are 9 modules in the SWMF at CCMC. Solar corona model (SC) - solar surface to 20Rs. –Cartesian -24R S <x,y,z<24R S –Magnetic field from magnetograms –Model of temperature and mass density at the Sun to give realistic results at 1AU –Line-tying at the solar surface. –Only one SC model. –Flow at the outer boundary is super fast. Eruptive event generator (EE) – used to model CMEs. –Embedded in the corona. –Represented as a boundary condition or perturbation on solar coronal model.

Space Weather Model Framework - 2 Inner heliosphere (IH) – Describes the heliosphere from the outer boundary of SC up to several astronomical units. –Extends from 20R S –Box -240R S <x,y,z<240R S –Uses BATS-R-US with Cartesian grid –Inner boundary from SC component. –Upstream boundary is super fast –Sets boundary conditions for magnetosphere component. Solar energetic particles (SP) – One-dimensional magnetic field lines. Transport equations describe the acceleration and spatial diffusion of particle distributions in fields obtained from SC and IH.

Space Weather Modeling Framework - 3 Global magnetosphere (GM) – Describes the Earth’s magnetosphere and is driven either by upstream satellite data or imbedded into the IH module of SWMF. –32R E dayside to 224R E nightside, -64R E <y,z<64R E –BATS-R-US –Inner boundary at 2.5R E. –Inner boundary conditions determined by Ionosphere Electrodynamics component (IE) which provides the electric potential at the inner boundary. – Pressure and density corrections from Inner Magnetosphere (IM) component. –Used to “nudge” the MHD solution toward more accurate inner magnetosphere values. –Provides field aligned currents to the IE component. –Provides the IM component with field line volume, average density and pressure.

Space Weather Modeling Framework - 4 Inner magnetosphere (IM) – Represents the inner region of the magnetosphere and is modeled by the RCM. –Solves equations describing the drift motion of keV ions and electrons. –The IM module obtains the information on closed field lines from the GM and electrostatic potential from IE –Provides pressure corrections back to GM (nudging).

“Nudging” (De Zeeuw et al., 2006)

Upper Atmosphere Upper atmosphere (UA) – Global Ionosphere- Thermosphere Model (Ridley et al., 2006). –Multi-species non-hydrostatic hydrodynamics – viscosity, thermal conduction, photochemistry, chemical reactions, ion-neutral friction, coupling of the ions to electric field, solar radiation. –Obtains gradient of potential from IE. This gradient is used to drive ion motion. –Auroral precipitation used to calculate ionization rates. –Provides Hall and Pedersen conductivities to IE – from electron density and integrated along field lines.

Space Weather Modeling Framework - 5 Radiation belt (RB) – The RB module is implemented using the Rice Radiation Belt Model. –Solves adiabatic transformation of phase space density on a 2D spherical grid. –Does not return information to other modules. Control and Coupling –Control module determines the overall time-stepping of the code, parallel decomposition of the models, the initiation and termination of runs and saving of restart files. –Determines when coupling should occur, how it happens, does grid interpolation, passes messages between components and synchronization.

Halloween Storm Simulation – The Sun Use 90 th order spherical harmonic MDI synoptic map centered around time of eruption. Use rotating coordinate system – include Coriolis and centrifugal acceleration in MHD. Highly refined grid – 3X10 -3 R S in active region. Use local time stepping to get steady state model (25000 steps) Green contours for positive B r, neutral lines dashed, active region that caused CME blue circle,

Initial Condition for the Heliosphere Since SC has converged to steady state only IH needs to run. Flow is superfast so steady state for IH is fast (2000 steps). During time accurate part of calculation – go to inertial frame with Earth in –XZ half plane. Cell sizes ½ to 1R S out to 60R s – largest cell 4R S. Separating IH and SC domains gives efficiency – SC lots of grids but small, IH huge but course grid.

Generating Eruptions Started simulation 2 days before major eruption to include effect of smaller CMEs in pre-conditioning the heliosphere. Inserted flux rope in EE component at location of eruption.

Switch to Time Dependent Simulation 20 minutes after insertion of flux rope CME is at 5.5R S and moving at 2100 km/s. When the CME reaches 20R s it is moving at 1500km/s as observed. Grid coarsened by factor of 4. Reached Earth at 0430 Oct. 28, Refined the active region back to 3X10 -3 R S for launch of second CME. Very time consuming so developed partial steady model with only part of simulation advancing. Temperature in simulated CME reached 10 9 K-included artificial cooling with limit of 5X10 7 K.

Propagation Through the Heliosphere-1 Isosurfaces where density is 3 times ambient Color coding is velocity Gray lines are IMF

Propagation Through the Heliosphere -2 First CME just missed the Earth Second CME –Arrived at Earth after 17.5 hours about 1.8 hours earlier than observed. –Simulation gave 1200km/s and 15nT -25nT increases. –Observations gave 2000km/s and 40nT changes. –Moved the Earth by 9 0 along its orbit so it would meet the strongest part of CME (1800km/s and 40nT). –Shifted the simulation time by 3.4 hours.

Comparison with Observations Data black, original simulation red, moved simulation green. Move improves fit of density and velocity. Magnetic field is bad fit.

Interaction of CME with the Earth Use the shifted solar wind. BATSRUS has minimum resolution of 1/4R E. IM/RCM component runs on a nonuniform latitude- longitude grid with 78X48 cells with 150 energy bins. IE/RIM grid has 1 o resolution in latitude and longitude. The UA model has 40 altitude levels between 95km and 600km. Note since there is no feedback between the heliosphere and the solar corona the SC component has only a small role – it is the most expensive part of the calculation. ACE data at L1 augmented by Geotail data were used for the control run – the Geotail data were needed because of a problem with ACE density.

Magnetospheric Results One hour after the shock arrives at Earth. Black solar wind flow. Colored tubes last closed field lines. Color contours are current density. Dark red is the 100nPa isosurface.

Large ring current – essential for driving region 2 currents. Significant differences Sun to Mud Simulation and Control Simulation

Observed and Simulated White Light Images Density was used as a proxy for the image. In both cases the difference before and ~one hour after eruption is plotted. At this time the positions are similar. Comparison of solar wind observations with the simulation – fluid parameters match beyond Earth but magnetic field does not.

(top) AMIE polar cap potential black, control simulation red, solar simulation green. (bottom) Dst- observed black. Agreement is very good in control case and solar simulation early. Ionosphere and Ground Magnetic Comparison

Ionospheric Density Champ satellite data black, AMIE results red and solar simulation green. Agreement is reasonable.

What did they Learn For the next decade the MHD models will be the primary tool for analysis of data. –Modeling frameworks will allow physics not in MHD to be included in the simulations. –There are now three framework systems available (SWMF, NCAR, CISM) Initiation of CME is major unsolved problem – I got the same impression at the CISM meeting this week. Preconditioning of heliosphere important.