Theorethical considerations about Innovation in the Public Sector - potentials, consequences and misunderstandings PhD student Laia Martinez, Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 2 Comparing Political Systems. How we Study Politics Describe Describe Predict Predict Explain Explain A. Description Conceptual Framework – set.
Advertisements

CSHE & LH Martin Institute Seminar PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND PERFORMANCE-BASED FUNDING FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING IN AUSTRALIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Contributing.
Instructional Technology vs. Educational Technology
The role of Technology and Innovation Parks in Europe European Economic and Social Committee – Exploratory Opinion.
The concepts/mechanisms/tools for developing a Joint Programme: Critical issues and UNDG Joint Programme Guidance and formats.
Professor Stephen P Osborne,
‘Desperately seeking Susan..?’ In search of innovation in the New Public Governance Professor Stephen P Osborne, Chair in International Public Management,
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
Normative Belief Jessica Seifert H517 Principles of Health Behavior
A brief overview What is program evaluation? How is an evaluation conducted? When should it be used? When can it be used? Used with Permission of: John.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
1 Bulgaria Delegation. 2 Societary evaluation context Globalization Increasing complexity of governance Better governance Global competition Budget deficits.
5 th General Meeting WELLCOME TO OUR AND WISHES OF A PROFITABLE ONE!
New frontiers Evaluation methods Theory of change Project cycle and risk management Jesper Johnsøn, CMI, U4 Bergen, February 4, 2014.
Norm Theory and Descriptive Translation Studies
Interest Groups D. Brown/ Pol Sci 222 St Francis Xavier University January 2013.
Guidance on Evaluation of Youth Employment Initiative
Reconciling institutional theory with organizational theories How neoinstitutionalism resolves five paradoxes? Ms.Chanatip Dansirisanti ( 陳美清 ) MA2N0204.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Strategic Commissioning
TEACHING FOR CIVIC CAPACITY AND ENGAGEMENT : How Faculty Align Teaching and Purpose IARSLCE 2011 | CHICAGO Jennifer M. Domagal-Goldman | November 3, 2011.
Quality Management.  Quality management is becoming increasingly important to the leadership and management of all organisations. I  t is necessary.
Funding Structures some ideas for designing innovative funding instruments Brigitte Hatvan.
Understanding MYP Criteria
Basic Impact Evaluation Course Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) World Bank Institute Attacking Poverty Program.
Introduction to Political Sciences Repetition for Midterm 1.
European Broadband Portal Phase II Application of the Blueprint for “bottom-up” broadband initiatives.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
Regulation and the Governance Agenda in the 21 st Century Josef Konvitz, Public Governance Directorate.
NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida.
The Book – our masterpiece Outcomes from groupwork by Jack, Stash, Ani, Jan, Andre and not forgetting Claus)
The Trust Company Strategic Partners Symposium Partnership & Collaboration October 2013.
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Summary of Changes
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
Housing association objectives need to be under one roof Jan Veuger BSc MRE PhD FRICS NoorderRuimte, Centre of Research and Innovation for Build Environment,
European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 1 The Development of the E.U. and of E.U. Public Policy.
Interest Groups D. Brown/ Pol Sci 221 St Francis Xavier University January 2011.
Gene L. Theodori, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Extension Specialist for Community Development, & Associate Department Head Program in Rural Sociology & Community.
Imaginative Curriculum
Bioss Southern Africa Application of MWR in Assessment Centre and Competence Design Jacques Haworth.
OECD Water Programme Pillar 1, Output 1 “Pricing Water Resources and Water & Sanitation Services” World Water Week Stockholm, August 2008.
Lecture notes Prepared by Anton Ljutic. © 2004 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited The Economic Problem CHAPTER ONE.
National Public Health Institute, Finland Open Risk Assessment Lecture 2: General assessment framework Mikko Pohjola KTL, Finland.
Understanding Policy Contexts CEP:ELM, 2011 Mombasa.
Expert Group Meeting on Enabling Measures for an Inclusive Green Economy in Africa September, 2014 Introduction to the breakout sessions.
Chapter 2 “Comparing Political Systems” Comparison is the scientific study of politics Theories are developed on political processes.
Introduction to Research. Purpose of Research Evidence-based practice Validate clinical practice through scientific inquiry Scientific rational must exist.
Science K–10 Early Stage 1 outcome A student: Stage 1 outcome A student: Stage 2 outcome A student: Stage 3 outcome A student: Stage 4 outcome A student:
PQRI Work Project Concept Title of Work Project Date of Submission.
UNIT –V Presented By Senthil kumar.N. Today's Discussion Review of last class Organizational development & organizational effectiveness UNIT V O & B.
Module Road Safety Program Management Identify strategies for establishing and sustaining effective multidisciplinary collaborative relationships.
National Public Health Institute, Finland Open Risk Assessment Lecture 2: General assessment framework Mikko Pohjola KTL, Finland.
4th Ph.D. School on Innovation and Economic Development Globelics Academy 2007 “Innovation capabilities in the manufacturing industry of an underdeveloped.
Practical Experiences - Evaluation of Program 1 Geneva January 29, 2016.
Department of Social Development National Conference Early Childhood Development Conference “Tshwaragano Ka Bana” 29th March 2012 The National Integrated.
SPANISH LAW on SOCIAL ECONOMY 5/2011 Miguel Ángel Cabra de Luna, PhD Member of the European Economic and Social Committee, Spanish Enterprise Confederation.
Perceptions Of Executive Government Leadership In The Age Of Engagement and Community Based Decision Making Andrew Leader Flinders University.
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making
UNDG Coordination Toolkit
Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines
Organizational Effectiveness
Basic Economic Concepts
A Focus on Outcomes and Impact
DHET/NSDS III RME Capacity Building Workshop
Professor (ret.), PhD, Stockholm University/ Resilience Center
School Development Planning
What to include in your personal evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Theorethical considerations about Innovation in the Public Sector - potentials, consequences and misunderstandings PhD student Laia Martinez, Institute for Society and Globalisation, Roskilde University

Theme and type of the paper Innovation in the Public Sector with emphasis on collaboration and on innovation management Theorethical paper

Contributions Theory development about innovation Descriptive definition of innovation and not normative Analysis of innovation as a dependent variable of collaboration and innovation management Criteria for evaluating innovation

Purpose of the paper To reflect on the concept of innovation in the public sector and to problematise it To explain potentials of innovation to break up deadlocks, silos, improve the policies and services, etc. To explain consequences of innovation: innovation as a process, managed chaos (innovation management), collaborative dimension To explain misunderstandings of innovation: normative vs. descriptive, as a goal in itself or a process?, understanding innovation in general terms

Context of the paper The paper is part of my PhD project Ambition to convert the paper into an article

Findings of the paper I Innovation needs to be understood as a crossdiscipline Innovation needs to be defined descriptive and not normative: Innovation is the complex process of creating and implementing new ideas to a particular context with the intentional purpose of improving the quality of public policies and services

Findings of the paper II Innovation requires a collective effort due the complexity, the risks and ressources that it takes. It implies a process of socialisation. Innovation need to be negociated and is not achieved through contracts!

Findings of the paper III Criteria for evaluating outputs and outcomes of innovation: 1. Compare the initial purposes of innovation 2. Use criteria based on social capital 3. Efficiency terms (labour costs reduced or less bureocracy) 4. Quality terms 5. Digital technologies 6. Organisatorial terms (shared communication)

Findings of the paper IV Innovation processes are complex and requires management: innovation management Innovation management is an open concept with a pluralistic view of the roles