Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners Christina V. Schwarz, Brian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Advertisements

Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Objective Develop an understanding of Appendix B: CA ELD Standards Part II: Learning About How English Works.
Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Launch Event November 16, 2013.
USING MODELS TO ASSESS STUDENTS’ PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND PARTICIPATE IN SCIENCE PRACTICES Model Based Inquiry.
Understanding the Research Base Presentation to CSSS October 1, 2011.
Teacher - Learner Continuum Teacher-DirectedGuided InquiryLearner-Directed Less MoreSelf- Direction.
MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Major Outcomes of Science Instruction
Examining the Teacher’s Role in Supporting Elementary Students’ Meaningful Engagement in Scientific Modeling Li Ke and Christina V. Schwarz Michigan State.
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Paper Gliders. Science and Engineering Practices 1. Asking questions (science) and defining problems (engineering). 2. Developing and using models. 3.
Science and Engineering Practices
The 5 E Instructional Model
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Framework for K-12 Science Education
NGSS EQuIP Rubric SMD EPO PD
School Innovation in Science Formerly Science in Schools An overview of the SIS Model & supporting research Russell Tytler Faculty of Education, Deakin.
Preparing for the A2 exam Summer 2014 English Language B.
ZUZANA STRAKOVÁ IAA FF PU Pre-service Trainees´ Conception of Themselves Based on the EPOSTL Criteria: a Case Study.
Achieving Authentic Inquiry in Your Classroom Presented by Eric Garber.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
The Four Strands of Scientific Proficiency Students who understand science:  Know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world  Generate.
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
CSTA Presentation detail information. Your Presenters Marie Bacher – Science Coach (SCUSD) Dawn O’Connor – Science Coordinator (ACOE) Sabrina Robbins.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Michael Brown Regional Science Coordinator ESD 105.
INVESTIGATIVE SCIENCE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (ISLE) Eugenia Etkina Alan Van Heuvelen Rutgers University Moscow, Idaho, April 1st, 2011
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
TEA Science Workshop #1 September 27, 2012 Kim Lott Utah State University.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
The Next Generation Science Standards: 4. Science and Engineering Practices Professor Michael Wysession Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Washington.
EDN:204– Learning Process 30th August, 2010 B.Ed II(S) Sci Topics: Cognitive views of Learning.
Outstanding Teaching and Learning R Pilgrim. Objectives To consider what to look for in an outstanding session.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Philosophy National 5.
VELS The Arts. VELS (3 STRANDS) Physical, Personal and Social Learning Discipline-based Learning Interdisciplinary Learning.
Basics of Research and Development and Design STEM Education HON4013 ENGR1020 Learning and Action Cycles.
Welcome Science 5 and Science 6 Implementation Workshop.
Science and Engineering Practices: Models and Argumentation “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
IN:  What is science?  What is engineering?. The Scientific Method = organized approach to problem-solving (Old View)  Observation  State the Problem.
1 Modeling in MS Science. 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS Q3 Assessments, scantrons due back Apr 13 th end of day (drop off at security if needed) Q4 Assessments: May.
Learning Cycle. a method of planning a sequence of lessons and a unit that is consistent with research on how people learn.
Programme design and student assessment David Baume 1.
National Research Council Of the National Academies
AAAS Michigan State University Northwestern University University of Michigan Center for Curriculum Materials in Science This work is funded by the National.
Next Generation Science Standards –
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2015.
NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS (NGSS) Millard E. Lightburn (Ph.D.) Science Supervisor Ms. Mary Tweedy and Ms. Keisha Kidd Curriculum Support Specialists.
Click to edit Master title style Overview of the NGSS Framework.
Using Simulations and Inquiry to Teach Nature of Science Jennifer Maeng, Lindsay Wheeler, & Amanda Gonczi VAST 2015 Chantilly, VA.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Preparing for NGSS: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Add your information here:
What is Research?. Intro.  Research- “Any honest attempt to study a problem systematically or to add to man’s knowledge of a problem may be regarded.
Major Outcomes of Science Instruction Proficiencies: 1.Conceptual knowledge & understanding in science 2.Abilities to carry out scientific inquiries 3.Understandings.
Science and Engineering Practices K–2 Condensed Practices3–5 Condensed Practices6–8 Condensed Practices9–12 Condensed Practices Developing and Using Models.
Modeling in the NGSS NGSS: Students should have opportunities to – Use models – Develop models – Test, evaluate, and revise models.
A research and policy informed discussion of cross-curricular approaches to the teaching of mathematics and science with a focus on how scientific enquiry.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Welcome to the STEM Task Force Funding provided by:
KNOWING THE MIDDLE YEARS LEARNER Tuesday, January 13.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Craig Gabler Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113.
William G. Jackson Center for Teaching and Learning Thursday, February 11, 2016 Library East Reading Room 3:30-4:30 PM Next Generation Science Standards.
 Continue to develop a common understanding of what STEM education is/could/should be here at Killip.
1 Digging into the 2 nd Draft of the Next Generation Science Standards January 31, 2013 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant.
Formative assessment of the Engineering Design process
Michael Heinz, Science Coordinator NJDOE Science Homepage
Engaging in Argumentation and Explanation Through Questions, Claims, and Evidence Secondary Science Teachers Professional.
A Challenge: The Cultural Landscape
Joe Krajcik Kristin Mayer CREATE for STEM Michigan State University
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners Christina V. Schwarz, Brian J. Reiser, Elizabeth A. Davis, Lisa Kenyon, Andres Ache´r, David Fortus, Yael Shwartz, Barbara Hug, Joe Krajcik Presented by : Bushra Tawfiq Chowdhury Engineering Education, Virginia Tech

Me : Bushra Undergrad: Computer Science, Dhaka University Graduate school: Security Informatics, Johns Hopkins Teaching: BRAC University Consulting: UNDP, Government of Bangladesh Now: PhD student, Engineering Education, Virginia Tech Future: Work with a group of people with same beliefs: technology should make things easier not harder

What is the paper about ? How is it relevant to Computational Thinking

This paper is about Scientific modeling Learning progression

Annotation paragraph The paper is good starting point for understanding modeling and its implications. The findings of the paper defines 4 levels of use of models as generative tools for explaining and predicting and another 4 levels which shows the differences between changes in models as understandings improve. …… will add a line or two after presentation

Scientific Modeling is…..

What is scientific modeling ? 1.Abstracts 2.Simplifies a system 3.Focuses on key features 4.Explain 5.Predict scientific phenomena

Learning progression WHEN WHY HOW

This paper investigates the following questions 1.What aspects of modeling practice can be made meaningful and productive for science learners? 2.What successes and challenges emerge when students engage in modeling practices?

The framework used Integration of metamodeling knowledge and elements of the practice sensemaking and communicative aspects of the practice

What is metamodeling knowledge ? 1.how models are used 2.why they are used 3.what their strengths and 4.limitations

For this study “the practice of modeling” means 1.Students construct models consistent with prior evidence and theories to illustrate, explain, or predict phenomena. 2.Students use models to illustrate, explain, and predict phenomena. 3.Students compare and evaluate the ability of different models to accurately represent and account for patterns in phenomena, and to predict new phenomena. 4.Students revise models to increase their explanatory and predictive power, taking into account additional evidence or aspects of a phenomenon.

Sensemaking and communicative aspects of the practice Sensemaking for themselves to try to understand a phenomenon articulating their understanding as an expressed model to help clarify their thinking and develop group consensus Communicative the learners are at the point where they are readyto share their ideas with others, articulating their model to see if others agree try to persuade others or help them understand the phenomena.

How ? 5 th and 6 th grades students Modeling evaporation and condensation phenomena, Can I believe my eyes? How can I smell things from a distance? Focus group interviews by the researchers

What are the differences ?

Results Models as Generative Tools for Explaining and Predicting Models Change as Understandings Improve

Where do you see Computational Thinking ? Or Elements of Computational thinking ?

The definition of scientific modeling The learning progression The way it has been assessed Can computational thinking help students to model better ?

Thank you