Karen Peifer PhD, MPH, RN Roopa Iyer PhD Ann Kaskel RN Does Place Matter For Healthy Early Child Care Environments?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Overview of revised standards and initial pilot design.
Advertisements

1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding Board Presentation April 10, 2012.
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) December 2009.
Quality Rating & Improvement Systems Powerful Policy for Improving and Unifying Early Care and Education Anne Mitchell Early Childhood Policy Research.
Self Study Orientation Community Living Burlington.
DURHAM COUNTY CHILD CARE HEALTH CONSULTATION PROGRAM Targeting Quality Child Care For the Healthy Success Of Children.
A C OUNT FOR Q UALITY : C HILD C ARE C ENTER D IRECTORS ON R ATING AND I MPROVEMENT S YSTEMS Karen Schulman National Women’s Law Center NARA Licensing.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Sponsored by the Colorado Department of Public Health and EnvironmentContent provided by Boulder County Public Health The Child Health Liaison Course in.
Early Achievers Overview Starting Strong – August 15, 2012.
1 Using Research to Assess, Build and Collaborate with Partners in Child Development Friday, January 28, 2011 Southern Early Childhood Association Savannah,
Embedding the Early Brain & Child Development Framework into Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Meeting Name Presenter Name Date 1.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
School Climate Policy Levers for Mental Health Services Kelly Vaillancourt-Strobach, Ph.D, NCSP National Association of School Psychologists Director,
Child Care: Lessons from the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project January 2003.
Delaware Stars TQRIS Verna Thompson Delaware Department of Education Mary Sonnenberg University of Delaware.
QRIS Oregon's Quality Rating and Improvement System Overview OREGON’S QUALITY RATING AND IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM The Teaching Research Institute Center on Inclusion.
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultants Early Childhood Consultation Partnership® Funded and Supported by Connecticut’s Department of Children and Families.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Research to Practice: Implementing the Teaching Pyramid Mary Louise Hemmeter Vanderbilt University
Project LAUNCH: Child Well-Being 0 to 8 years, A National, State and Local Initiative California Screening Collaborative December 2009.
Beth Rous, University of Kentucky Rena Hallam, University of Delaware Verna Thompson, Delaware Department of Education Donna Spiker, SRI Measuring Child.
After the Grant: Sustainability & Scale-up of the NC/CSEFEL Initiative NC/CSEFEL Panel Norman Allard Lanier DeGrella Brenda Dennis Khari Garvin Marta Koesling.
SUPPORTING CHILDREN USING THE PYRAMID MODEL AND POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT Kellie Nketiah Luba Bezborodnikova Claire Wilson Puget Sound Educational Service.
EQUIP is a public & private initiative to improve the quality of early care and education in Oregon. August, 2010 EQUIP is a public & private initiative.
EEC Board Policy Committee May 6, 2013 Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Grant Performance Measures.
1 QUALITYstarsNY Field Test Community Information Session 2010 WELCOME!
Carol Berg College of Staten Island. PROBLEM Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) classrooms receiving minimal scores on the Early Childhood Environmental.
A Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) for Early Care and Education Settings.
The Value of PA’s Early Learning System. OCDEL promotes opportunities for all Pennsylvania children and families by building systems and providing supports.
ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSION Background: Georgia rates the quality of early childcare learning centers using a tiered quality improvement system.
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System.
Oregon’s Quality Rating and Improvement System and Education Service Districts OAESD Spring Conference May 15, 2015.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Early Learning Challenge Transformation Zone Supports to Families Support to Early Learning and Development Programs Jonathan Kotch and Jackie Quirk May.
Kelly Maxwell, Ph.D. Senior Scientist and Associate Director Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute TQRIS 2012 Inclusion.
Quality Improvement in Care Coordination for Very Young Children June 19, 2012 Communities Coordinating for Healthy Development Minnesota’s ABCD III Initiative.
Cabinet for Health and Family Services 2 What can I expect to learn from viewing this slideshow?... Have a general understanding of the STARS for KIDS.
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation Early interventions with very young children (birth to 6 years of age) at risk of experiencing serious emotional.
OREGON’S QUALITY RATING AND IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM AND SUPPORTING CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES AND THEIR FAMILIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR EI/ECSE PERSONNEL Gary Glasenapp.
Standards, Assessment and Accountability: Administration of Environmental Rating Scales by EEC Regional Staff Board of Early Education and Care December.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
The Iowa Distance Mentoring Model (DMM) for Early ACCESS promotes the systematic implementation of family guided routines based intervention (FGRBI) for.
1 Report for Early Learning Council Presentation to WERA December 5, 2008 Access to High Quality Early Learning for Washington’s Young Children “Forging.
1 Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment. Common Core Pre-K Standards Mounting evidence supports that a child’s earliest years, from birth to age eight,
Participation, Pathways, and Supports for Infants and Toddlers.
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs that Promote the Social and Emotional Development of Young Children Part II Roxane Kaufmann, Karen Blase,
The Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Moniquin Huggins Child Care Bureau December 8, 2009.
1 Early Education and Care Advisory Council September 20, 2013 Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) UPDATES.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
1 Inclusion Standards in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS) …experiences in Delaware OSEP National Early Childhood Conference Arlington, Virginia.
Healthy Children, Healthy Weights Onsite Technical Assistance and Healthy Policies in Early Care and Education Jamie Turner, MPH Healthy Children, Healthy.
Designing Pre-K to Meet Great Expectations: Some Considerations in Governance and Delivery for States Rachel Schumacher Senior Policy Analyst Center for.
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health PRENATAL TO FIVE PROGRAM Sam Chan, Ph.D. District Chief Child Youth & Family Program Administration Ilda.
Collaboration Between 619 and Delaware Stars Verna Thompson and Rena Hallam.
EARLY CHILDHOOD CONSULTATION PARTNERSHIP A COLLABORATION BETWEEN ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH & THE THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES. FUNDED BY THE.
Trends in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems September 2013.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
What is quality first??.
Organizational Conditions For Excellence
Virginia Head Start/Early Head Start
The Ohio CoIIN June 17, 2015 St. Louis, MO.
Presentation transcript:

Karen Peifer PhD, MPH, RN Roopa Iyer PhD Ann Kaskel RN Does Place Matter For Healthy Early Child Care Environments?

Disclosure The following personal financial relationships with commercial interests relevant to this presentation existed during the past 12 months: We have no conflicts to report

State Board Statewide: Policy, Infrastructure, Programs, Coordination and Collaboration Regional Partnership Councils Local Decision making, Community Coordination and Collaboration, Targeted Programs Grantees and Partners Programs and Services to Children and Families First Things First Governance Model

What impacts quality and does place Matter? Quality First- QRIS Child Care Health Consultation Improve health and safety standards in child care settings –Standards based on Caring for Our Children, 3 rd Edition CCH Consultant : –National Training Institute (NTI) trained and certified professionals- post BA or BSN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Environmental Rating Scales: ECERS-R; ITERS and FCCERS Personal Care Routines Subscale CLASS: Classroom Assessment Scoring System Quality First Rating Scale FTF Quality First Point Scale Staff Qualifications Administrative Practices Curriculum

Personal Care Routines Scale Greeting and departing Meals and snacks Nap and rest Toileting and diapering Health practices Safety Practices

Child Care Health Consultation Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1  CCHC collaborate with QF Coaches  Telephonic technical assistance and resource  Expert mode consultation (short term)  + Tier 1 services  National Health and Safety Assessment  Collaborative model of consultation  Individualized instruction & training: Clinical pathway  Identify & train an on-site Health & Safety Specialist  + Tier 1 and 2 services

Hypothesis: Does Place Matter? Location of a child care center make a difference in quality of child care environments. H1: The scores on the Environmental Rating Scale (ERS) subscale for personal care routines (PCR) will vary in high poverty areas compared to non-poverty areas in the state. H2: The scores on the ERS and PCR will differ based on level of CCHC services. H2: The Center quality rating scores is illustrated by ERS and PCR scores

Methodology Child care centers enrolled in the Quality First Program (n = 670) Scores on ERS for Personal Care Routines sub-scale Calculated low poverty areas based on poverty of geographic region where the center is located (ACS ). Comparing the tier levels of CCHC services – Tier 1 (less intensive) to tier 3 (more intensive services) Quality Rating scores by PCR and ERS scores

Limitations Administrative data Limited Data Sub-categories for poverty Dose of CCHC intervention - New data system ERS subscale scores in relation to length of program participation and assessment by different time points

Center-based Child Care Centers CentersNumber of Centers Cohort 1  CCHC Tier 2 & 3 (n = 299) Public : School based, Head Start and early childhood special education 57 (19%)15 Head Start, (7 are tribal Head Start) Private child care242 (81%) Cohort 2  CCHC Tier 1 (n = 371) Public : School based, Head Start and early childhood special education 119 (32%) Private child care252 (68%)

Results Cohort 1 Centers (299) n FPLAverage ERS by poverty level ERS PCR scores Exposed to CCHC Tiers 2 & 3 (On-site consultation) 171< 150% FPL >= 150% FPL Cohort 2 Centers (371) Exposed to CCHC Tier 1 (Phone consultation only) 262 < 150% FPL >= 150% FPL

Results Cohort 1: Centers (299) CCHC Tiers 2 & 3 PCR scoresAverage ERS 210 (Star rating 1-2) (Star rating 3-5) Cohort 2:Centers (371) CCHC Tier 1 PCR scoresAverage ERS 215 (Star rating 1-2) (Star rating 3-5)

Conclusion We expected that low poverty areas with limited CCHC services would have lower PCR scores than in higher poverty levels. Scores varied but not in the direction we assumed when more intensive CCHC services were delivered. Goals for CCHC interventions are similar but slightly different from the PCR rating scores. Importance in aligning goals between coaches, CCHC and other specialized technical assistants. Lessons learned.

Next Steps Quality First Implementation and Validation study Are the quality first improvement components implemented as intended (fidelity of implementation)? Which ones or what combination works best in moving programs to higher quality levels (star ratings)? Consulting Team: CCHC, Mental Health consultation in some regions Coaching consultation model Professional development Financial incentives

Questions/Comments

Thank you Karen Peifer PhD, MPH, RN Roopa Iyer PhD Ann Kaskel RN