Emission Update Verifiable Cost Task Force August 21, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Provisions of the Federal Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA February 20,
Advertisements

Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Requirements for SIPs Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Elizabeth Hendler November 20, New NAAQS Overview.
REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen.
1 Appeal to ERCOT Board Regarding Use of Fuel Oil Index Price (FOIP) Larry Gurley TXU Wholesale June 19, 2007.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Split Generation Resources (SGRs) (Also known as Jointly Owned.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
December 4, Utility MACT Air & Waste Management Association/EPA Information Exchange December 4, 2002 William H. Maxwell Combustion Group/ESD.
Air Quality Challenges In South Central Texas Issues and Demand to Infrastructure in the Eagle Ford Region Eagle Ford Consortium Peter Bella, Natural Resources.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
1 Regulatory Concepts Related to the Control of NOx and SOx From Fossil- fired Electric Generating Units Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Colorado May 2013.
Department of the Environment A History of Power Plant Controls in Maryland What Did We Learn? – Where do We go Next? Part 2 - NOx Issues.
Cooperative, Local Government Efforts to Reduce Energy Consumption Presented to National Air Innovations Conference August 10-12, 2004 Gregg A. Cooke Guida,
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
CHICAGO CLIMATE EXCHANGE, INC. © 2006 Chicago Climate Futures Exchange ™ U.S. Sulfur Financial Instrument Futures and Nitrogen Financial.
Guidelines for Verification of Resource Specific Fuel Adders RCWG Paul Vinson.
ALTERNATIVES TO BART -TRADING- Lily Wong USEPA – Region 9 September 1, 2005.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1 DISCLAIMER Please note that this is a summary of a draft report of TERC Research Project H60. In order to fully respond to comments on the draft report.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Connecticut July 2013.
Area Source Emissions Inventory Improvement Update Michael Ege, Emissions Inventory Specialist Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Central States May 2013.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Clean Air Act  The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the national air pollution control effort.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Alabama May 2013.
1 OTC Regional Attainment Strategy Danny Wong OTC November 2005 Meeting Wilmington, DE.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Model Cap and Trade Rules: Unique Elements and Flexibilities Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Emissions Banking and Trading (EBT) Overview/Update Melissa Ruano Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting.
1 NSR Rule Review and Guidance 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review The Allegheny Mountain Section.
Local Reductions Incentive Program (LRIP) Encouraging Collaborative Solutions for the Future.
Resource Cost Working Group October 7, 2015 WMS Update.
FINAL CLEAN POWER PLAN Before the Virginia Energy Efficiency Council Virginia Department of Environmental Quality November 12, 2015.
TPTF Verifiable Cost Sub-group Summary Report to TPTF 1/21/2008 Jim Galvin- TPTF VC Sub-group Chair.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Air Quality Division Emissions Inventories SAW: May 3, 2016 Page 1 Point Source Emissions Inventories Air Quality Division Susan Wampler May 3,
Emissions Banking and Trading (EBT) Programs Melissa Ruano Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2016.
Update on the 2015 Ozone Standard Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair May 3, 2016.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
RACT 2 – Source Testing and Monitoring Requirements Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA Tom Wolf, GovernorPatrick McDonnell,
Ozone Redesignation Substitutes for the HGB and DFW Areas
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
Enron Emissions Services
NPRR 816 / Vendor Index Definitions
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Planning to Achieve the 8-Hour Ozone Standard
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
EPA Technical Analysis of NOx Combustion Controls in the West
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

Emission Update Verifiable Cost Task Force August 21, 2008

Current Activities  On July 28 th, emission experts from different companies met to discuss emission costs as it effect generating assets in ERCOT Developed summary matrix Drafted cost methodology for applicable emission costs  Today, we are requesting approval to include the emission cost methodology drafted by the team to be included in verifiable cost manual

Emissions Summary Matrix  NOx State programs- SB7-east and west; State Implementation Plan (SIP) east; Non-attainment areas (Dallas-Ft. Worth, Beaumont-Port Arthur, Houston- Galveston-Brazoria) No federal program  SO2 State Program- SB7-east (9 units) Federal program- Federal acid rain

NOx Emissions

NOx Summary ProgramApplicable Units SummaryVerifiable Cost methodology consideration NOx SB7- east, west and El Paso Grandfathered units pre 1970 that were not originally permitted State program implemented by TCEQ based on 1997 heat input & emission rate to determine the allowances (SIP east & west allowance) SIP East Texas East Texas units except non- attainment areas and units built after 1995 State program implemented by TCEQ based on rate base limit that can be converted into a ton base limit with annual cap (Discrete Emission Reduction Credits can be submitted to meet requirements, but are not currently trade liquidly)

NOx Summary ProgramApplicable Units SummaryVerifiable Cost methodology consideration Non- attainment Area for Houston- Galveston- Brazoria All units & allowance allocated to pre-2001 units State program implemented by TCEQ with has 24-hour maximum system cap, 30-day rolling average system cap & annual cap. The annual cap is traded and the 24-hr cap is not currently traded, but will be eligible for verifiable cost if a market develops. EGU NOx limit for gas-fired units is lb/mmBtu. For coal- fired units the limits are 0.05 lb/mmBtu for wall-fired units and lb/mmBtu for tangentially-fired units. DERCs can be used to meet the requirements, but MECT are more liquidly traded in the Houston- Galveston-Brazoria. MECT allowances are usable for the vintage year & following year as well. Non- attainment Area for Beaumont- Port Arthur All units & allowance allocated to pre-2001 units State program implemented by TCEQ & each unit that can emit 0.10 lbs NOx/mmBtu (daily average) or less can have unlimited operation. The system cap values are a 24-hour maximum cap and a 30-day rolling average cap.

NOx Summary ProgramApplicable Units SummaryVerifiable Cost methodology consideration Non- attainment Area for Dallas- Ft. Worth All units & allowance allocated to pre-2001 units State program implemented by TCEQ with EGU limit for a large system unit (Luminant’s or Exelon’s) of lb/mmBtu, and for a small system unit (Garland) of 0.06 lb/mmBtu. The system caps are a 24-hour maximum (lb/day), and a 30-day rolling average (lb/day). DERCs can be used to assist in meeting the system.

NOx Verifiable Cost Language  Non-attainment Area for Houston- Galveston- Brazoria ERCOT should use Argus or Platts published average of the monthly mid-point annual index for the current and previous year’s Mass Emission Cap and Trade (MECT) to determine the price for the current month. For verifying the emission rate, the QSE will submit the historic calendar annual average for the unit specific emission rates reported to TCEQ and or EPA by April 30 of the applicable year, if deemed necessary by the QSE.  Non-attainment Area for Dallas-Ft. Worth & Beaumont-Port Arthur area As a trading market develops pertaining to emissions limits at a state and or regional level, the costs associated to comply with emission restrictions may be eligible to be recovered and be part of the verifiable cost methodology. At the appropriate time, any market participant may propose a methodology to the Verifiable Cost Working Group to recuperate the emission costs in the applicable non-attainment area, which will be addressed in the Verifiable Cost manual.

SO2 Emissions

SO2 Summary ProgramApplicable Units SummaryVerifiable Cost methodology consideration SO2 SB7 East Grandfathered units pre 1970 that were not originally permitted State program implemented by TCEQ that allows cap and trade based on allowances; goal was to provide reductions for grandfathered units SO2 Federal Acid Rain All unitsFederal cap and trade program implemented by EPA based on federal legislation (new facilities, built after 1990, are not allocated allowances)

SO2 Verifiable Cost Language  SO2 Federal Acid Rain ERCOT should use Argus or Platts or other Index to determine monthly price for SO2 Each QSE that requests reimbursement for SO2 will submit lbs/mmBtu emitted per the unit’s emission monitoring system If Argus or Platts or other Index stops publishing a monthly price for SO2, the QSE shall submit emission allowance to ERCOT as described in the extraordinary event section of the VC manual.

Other Related Emission Costs  TCEQ charges an annual emission fee based on tons emitted for each generation resources. Same $/ton rate for each generation and capped at 4000 tons per year. Current rate for 2008 is $32.73 per ton. For verifying the emission rate, the QSE will submit the historic calendar annual average for the unit specific emission rates reported to TCEQ by April 30 of the applicable year, if deemed necessary by the QSE.  Potential exposure Highly Reactive Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)- Houston area Other emission fee programs as developed by regulatory authorities