Bridging the Gap: Understanding the Academic Preparation of High School Graduates for College Admission Rick Kroc, University of Arizona Scott Andrew Schulz,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
Advertisements

Arizona Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
State Regents Meeting January 31, Adults with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher (2011) Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey. 84%
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
1 Partnering for Greater Access to Higher Education.
1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
What is MESA?. M athematics MESA stands for E ngineering S cience A chievement.
California Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 17, 2004 School Report Card Data 2002–2003.
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
GOVERNOR’S INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HEALTH DISPARITIES Emma Medicine White Crow Association of Public Hospital Districts, Membership Meeting June 24, 2013.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
Achieve Data Profile: Washington January AMERICAN DIPLOMA PROJECT NETWORK The Big Picture n To be successful in today’s economy, all students.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California’s Teaching Force 2004 Key Issues and Trends Research conducted by SRI International California.
APRIL 2014 Nevada Advanced Placement 2014 Report 1.
Data Driven: Using District Comparisons Capital Region ESD October 22, 2014 Tim Stensager, Director of Data Governance Division of Assessment and Student.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
High School Reform in Florida FCAN Conference 2008 Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
Post-Secondary Success – the Growing Challenge… A Closer Look Prepared by the Community Service Council with support from the Metropolitan Human Services.
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
THECB 7/2004 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Progress Report, July 2004.
Oklahoma State Regents Meeting January 30, Adults with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher (2012) Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 American Community Survey.
Louisiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Indiana Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Students with Disabilities in the P-16 Framework: Outcomes and Improvement Strategies Rebecca H. Cort VESID October 2007 Statewide Meeting.
Factors Influencing Preparation in Mathematics for Selective Admission to College in High Schools with Low College-going Rates Faith G. Paul Student Affairs.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Undergraduate Enrollment Growth Study Interim Report Presented to the Board of Trustees March 27, 2008.
By: Andres Herrejon UNST 399 Fall  In there were 4.4million ESL students enrolled in ESL programs.  California alone had 1.4million,
USING CCSSE DATA TO IDENTIFY EQUITY GAPS Office of Student Equity and Success Student Equity Committee December 11, 2015.
SAMPLE REPORT. Introduction A team of Administrators, Registrar, and Counselors teamed up with a representative from the Riverside County Office of Education.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
1 School Report Cards 2002–2003 An Overview. 2 School Report Card: Overall Trends Elementary school achievement is up in English and math over Middle.
SENIORS! If you missed the Counselor Informational Meeting, stop and make an appointment or stop in the college and career center!!!
WOODY L. HUNT, CHAIRMAN HIGHER EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS July 23,
Closing the Gaps Progress Report Julie Eklund Interim Assistant Commissioner Strategic Planning and Funding Presentation to Coordinating Board July 23,
THECB 10/2007 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Presentation for: 2007 Governing Board Conference David W. Gardner October 29, 2007.
Heart of Texas Area Profile Heart of Texas P-20 Summit December 1, 2014.
College Going and Completion of Arizona Public High School Graduates
A V I D College Readiness System A Bright Future for California Pupils
Trends in Public US Education: Challenges & Opportunities
A V I D College Readiness System A Bright Future for California Pupils
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Washington could have a bright future in STEM
The U.S. Higher Education Landscape: Equity Lens Applied
Assessing Progress Towards Meeting NAUTeach Program Goals
North Texas Regional P-16 Gap Analysis for the School Year of
Will Alabama seize the future?
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Joint Elementary and High School Counselors’ Articulation Meeting
Health of Wisconsin: Report Card 2016
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
FY 2017 Nursing Workforce Diversity (NWD) Program Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Pre-Review Call January 17, 2016 Tara D. Spencer, MS, RN Project.
African American.
A 50 Year Tradition of Excellence
Texas State Accountability
2013 Texas Accountability System
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Disproportionate Impact Study
T = Texas A = Academic P = Performance R = Report
When we look at Massachusetts as a whole, there is much to celebrate
Presentation transcript:

Bridging the Gap: Understanding the Academic Preparation of High School Graduates for College Admission Rick Kroc, University of Arizona Scott Andrew Schulz, University of Southern California 2008 AIR Forum – Seattle, Washington

Background and Purpose Purpose of Today’s Presentation: –Provide a framework for institutions/institutional systems to gauge eligibility in states where student data is not currently collected annually

Background and Purpose Eligibility is defined as the percentage of Arizona high school graduates who meet the criteria for university admission Eligibility is an important part of the access pipeline –Underrepresented populations –Changes to university admission criteria –Accountability measures –Enrollment projections and demand studies

Arizona Tri-University Admission Standards

Project History Arizona Board of Regents has commissioned the state’s three public universities to collect/analyze student eligibility every few years Studies have analyzed 1989, 1996, 1998, 2002, and 2006 Arizona high school transcripts Database containing high school course-level data available for modeling the impact of policy changes

Selecting a Sample -Wanted a stratified sample with at least a 95% confidence interval –Needed at least n = 400 for each ethnic group Calculations based on anticipated grad rate and response rates –Grad rate for students entering senior year reported by state to be 87% –Response rate assumed to be about 70%, ended up being 73% Budget constraints

Established Multipliers AsianBlackHispanicNative AmWhite Total 12TH GRADE ENROLLMENT ,3379,2242,09213,76127,219 AsianBlackHispanicNative AmWhite Total Anticipated 12th Grade Graduation Rate (87%) 700 1,163 8,025 1,820 11,972 23,681 AsianBlackHispanicNative AmWhite Total Expected Response Rate (70%) ,617 1,274 8,380 16,576 Transcripts RequestedAsianBlackHispanicNative AmWhite Total All (1)490 (526) All (1) 814 (749) 1 of 9 (.11) 618 (615) 1 of 2 (.5) 637 (617) 1 of 13 (.0769) 645 (762) 3,204 (3269)

Permission and Credibility School District Offices of Institutional Research Letters of Support –Superintendent of Public Instruction –UA Office of Enrollment Research

Packets Mailed Addressed to School Principals Included Instructions for Transcript Selection Follow-up Phone Calls and Reminder Cards Consistent Credibility Challenge

Findings African American32%31%27%40%32% American Indian26%21% 40%22% Asian American70%66%62%74%66% Hispanic35%30%29%42%31% White57%52%49%61%50% Total48%44%42%55%44% History of Eligibility Rates Five new high school units added to requirements in 1998

Findings

EngMathSciSoc SciLangArts African Am.70%27%47%77%47%74% Am. Indian66%20%49%73%37%64% Asian Am.86%68%82%92%75%91% Hispanic65%26%50%78%51%71% White81%48%69%89%64%87% Total75%40%62%84%59%81% Completion Rate for 2006 Eligible Graduates

Findings Eligibility by Gender

Findings Total Competency Area Attainment

Findings

Conclusions Eligibility has improved for all ethnic groups since 2002, but substantial gaps continue to exist Women’s eligibility rates continue to be substantially higher than rates for men Eligibility rates in rural areas of Arizona lag behind rates in Maricopa and Pima Counties

Conclusions Completion of the required units of math would have the greatest impact on eligibility, followed by completion of the science and foreign language requirements Enrollment projections based on current eligibility rates are consistent with those made previously for university system and statewide planning purposes

Questions and Comments??? Presentation available at: Click on: CERPP Presentations