Hecht WCGIC 2007 An Interim Analysis of Efficacy And Safety From A Randomized Controlled Trial of Panitumumab With Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab (Bev)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “ VELOUR” Study Author: J Tabernero et al Reviewed by: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October.
Efficacy and Safety of Conatumumab Plus AMG 479 in Patients With Advanced Sarcoma S Chawla,1 AC Lockhart,2 N Azad,3 E Elez,4 F Galimi,5 N Baker,6 YJ.
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
ASCO 2009 Safety and Efficacy of AMG 655 Plus Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) and Bevacizumab (B) for the First-line Treatment of Patients (Pts) With Metastatic.
Clinicaloptions.com/oncology Expert Insight Into the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer N016966: Efficacy Results  PFS significantly.
Van Cutsem E et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract LBA4509. (Oral Presentation)
GICS 2012 Final skin toxicity and patient ‑ reported outcomes results from PRIME: A randomized phase 3 study of panitumumab + FOLFOX4 for 1 st ‑ line metastatic.
Hecht ASCO GI 2008 An updated analysis of safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin (Ox)/bevacizumab (bev) +/- panitumumab (pmab) for 1 st ‑ line treatment (tx)
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
ASCO 2011 A. Sobrero, 1 M. Peeters, 2 T. Price, 3 Y. Hotko, 4 A. Cervantes, 5 M. Ducreux, 6 T. André, 7 E. Chan, 8 F. Lordick 9 Y. Tian, 10 R. Sidhu 10.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 Final STEPP results of prophylactic versus reactive skin toxicity (ST) treatment (tx) for panitumumab (pmab)-related.
Predictive value of skin-toxicity severity for response to panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a pooled analysis of 5 clinical.
E2100 A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab as First- Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Results From Panitumumab Regimen Evaluation in Colorectal Cancer to Estimate Primary Response to Treatment (PRECEPT): Second-Line Treatment With Panitumumab.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Updated results of STEPP, a phase 2, open‑label study of pre-emptive versus reactive skin toxicity treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.
Monoclonal Antibodies EGFR Inhibitors for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Where are we and What’s next Discussion of Abstracts Jeffrey Meyerhardt,
Kang Y et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA4007.
ASCO 2010 CONFIDENTIAL DO NOT DISTRIBUTE Randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI alone as 2nd ‑ line treatment.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
until tumour progression until tumour progression
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation (PACCE) Update Authors: Hecht et al at ASCO GI 2008 Date posted: April
ASCO 2011 Final Results From PRIME: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Panitumumab (pmab) With FOLFOX4 for 1st ‑ line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Jean.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
North Central Cancer Treatment Group Randomized Phase II Trial of Panitumumab, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine (PGE) versus Erlotinib-Gemcitabine (GE) in Patients.
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
May 29 - June 2, 2015 Borealis-1: Apatorsen + Gemcitabine/Cisplatin for Pts With Advanced Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015.
May 29 - June 2, 2015 Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A) Shows Favorable Tolerability, Promising Activity in Urothelial Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference.
Cathy Eng, MD Assistant Professor Department of Gastrointestinal
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
J Clin Oncol 28: R2 소예리 / Prof. 이재진. INTRODUCTION EGFR is overexpressed in 70-80% of pts with advanced colorectal cancer EGFR dysregulation:
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “VELOUR” Study
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
This study was funded by Amgen Inc.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The.
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Presentation transcript:

Hecht WCGIC 2007 An Interim Analysis of Efficacy And Safety From A Randomized Controlled Trial of Panitumumab With Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab (Bev) for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) J. Randolph Hecht, 1 Tarek Chidiac, 2 Edith Mitchell, 3 Philip Stella, 4 Allen Cohn, 5 David McCollum, 6 Mansoor Saleh, 7 John Marshall, 8 Seta Shahin, 9 Robert Deeter 9 1 UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; 2 Mid Ohio Oncology/Hematology, Inc, Columbus, OH; 3 Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; 4 St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI; 5 Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; 6 Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; 7 Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta, GA; 8 Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; 9 Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

Hecht WCGIC Introduction  Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) and is approved in the US for the treatment of refractory mCRC  The US standard of care for first-line treatment of mCRC is the combination of bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin- or irinotecan- based chemotherapy (Ox-CT or Iri-CT)  Preclinical and preliminary clinical studies have suggested that combining EGFr, VEGF inhibitors, and chemotherapy may improve efficacy 1,2  The PACCE study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and chemotherapy +/- panitumumab for first-line treatment of mCRC 1 Shaheen et al. Brit J Cancer 2001;85: Saltz LB et al. ASCO Abstract #3508 (BOND2)

Hecht WCGIC Study Schema PACCE: Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Phase 3b Trial Stratification Factors: ECOG score, prior adjuvant tx, disease site, Ox doses/Iri regimen, number of metastatic organs Tumor assessments: Q12W until disease progression or intolerability Panitumumab 6 mg/kg Q2W Ox-CT Bevacizumab Ox-based CT (eg, FOLFOX) N = 800 Inv choice Iri-basedCT (eg, FOLFIRI) N = 200 Inv choice Ox-CT Bevacizumab Panitumumab 6 mg/kg Q2W Iri-CTBevacizumab Iri-CTBevacizumab RANDOMIZERANDOMIZE 1:1 SCREENINGSCREENING

Hecht WCGIC Key Eligibility Criteria  Age  18 years old  Measurable mCRC per modified RECIST criteria  ECOG status 0 or 1  Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function  No prior chemotherapy or biologic therapy for mCRC  No adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 months  No major surgery within 28 days of randomization or elective and/or planned major surgical procedures during the trial  No clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 1 year prior to randomization  No EGFr testing required

Hecht WCGIC  Primary endpoint:* –Progression-free survival (PFS) by central review in the Ox-CT cohort  Secondary endpoints: –Objective response rate by central review –Time to treatment failure (TTF) –Overall survival (OS) –Safety profile  Design Characteristics –To detect a 30% improvement in median PFS in the panitumumab plus bev/Ox-CT vs the bev/Ox-CT 80% power and  = 0.05 (2-sided) for 462 PFS events (disease progression or death) Planned interim analysis at ~231 PFS events Study Endpoints and Design Characteristics *Powered for oxaliplatin cohort only; descriptive for irinotecan cohort

Hecht WCGIC Independent DMC Analyses 25 Pts Safety 75 Pts 150 Pts SafetySafety RR Unplanned Safety Efficacy Safety RR Safety Efficacy 500 Pts 800 Pts ~231 PFS events ~231 OS Q3 07 DMC recommended continuation without protocol modification Mar 2005 Panitumumab dosing was discontinued DMC recommended changes to informed consent 1 st pt randomized

Hecht WCGIC Baseline Demographics and Characteristics pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=407) bev/Ox-CT (N=405) pmab+ bev/Iri-CT (N=68) bev/Iri-CT (N=67) Male, % Race, % White Black Hispanic Age, median, years Range Age  65, % Baseline ECOG, % Prior Adjuvant Therapy, % Metastatic organs, % 1 >

Hecht WCGIC PACCE INTERIM ANALYSIS: SAFETY

Hecht WCGIC Summary of Adverse Events (Ox-CT Cohort) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=401) bev/Ox-CT (N=392) Any event, %100 Grade Grade Grade 5* 43 Any serious (SAE), %5637 Ended first-line treatment due to AE, % 1920 Ended panitumumab treatment due to AE, % 26n/a Panitumumab treatment- related SAE, % 19n/a Safety set included all patients who were dosed. Graded per NCI CTCAE v3.0 *Not including disease progression (ie, neoplasms) n/a= not applicable

Hecht WCGIC Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events of Interest (Ox-CT Cohort) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=401), % bev/Ox-CT (N=392), % Gr 3Gr 4Gr 3Gr 4 Skin toxicity33<110 Diarrhea Dehydration14241 Hypokalemia8231 Hypomagnesemia3100 Neutropenia Neuropathy9<110<1 Nausea1004<1 Infections a Deep venous thrombosis6070 Pulmonary embolism b 0604 MedDRA v9.0 preferred terms; Graded per NCI CTCAE v3.0 a Grade 5 infections occurred in 2 (1%) pmab + bev/Ox-CT pts and 3 (1%) bev/Ox-CT pts b Grade 5 pulmonary embolism occurred in 2 (1%) pmab + bev/Ox-CT pts

Hecht WCGIC Deaths (Ox-CT Cohort) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT N=401 n (%) bev/Ox-CT N=392 n (%) Deaths on study83 (20)58 (15) All cause deaths within 60 days of first dose 10 (2)6 (2) All cause deaths within 30 days of last dose of 1 st line tx 26 (6)13 (3) Safety set included all patients who were dosed

Hecht WCGIC PACCE INTERIM ANALYSIS: EFFICACY

Hecht WCGIC Objective Response Rate By Cohort (Central Review) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=407) % bev/Ox-CT (N=405) % pmab+ bev/Iri-CT (N=68) % bev/Iri-CT (N=67) % Best ORR Complete response 0<100 Partial response Stable disease Progressive disease6494 Not done/Unevaluable* ITT set *Included missing and unreadable scans

Hecht WCGIC Partial Response 39% Stable Disease 31% Progressive Disease 6% Pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=305) Max % Change in Sum of Longest Diameters bev/Ox-CT (N=310) Max % Change in Sum of Longest Diameters Maximum % Change in SLD of Target Lesions (Ox-CT Cohort, Central Review) Complete/Partial Response 41% Stable Disease 33% Progressive Disease 4%

Hecht WCGIC Objective Response Rate By Cohort (Investigator Review) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=407) % bev/Ox-CT (N=405) % pmab+ bev/Iri-CT (N=68) % bev/Iri-CT (N=67) % Best ORR Complete response 4574 Partial response Stable disease Progressive disease75410 Not done/Unevaluable* ITT set *Included missing and unreadable scans

Hecht WCGIC Interim Rates of Metastases Intervention (Ox-CT Cohort, Oct 2006 Data Cutoff) pmab+ bev/Ox-CT (N=407) bev/Ox-CT (N=405) Resection or radiofrequency ablation of metastases (ie, liver, lung, other) 27 (7%)12 (3%) ITT set *Included missing and unreadable scans

Hecht WCGIC Interim PFS – Ox-CT Cohort (Central Review, Oct 2006 Data Cutoff) # PFS events (%) Median (95%CI), mos 147 (36)8.8 ( ) 110 (27)10.5 ( ) HR=1.44 (95% CI: ) p =0.004 Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT Proportion Progression-Free 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ITT set; for this planned interim analysis, the nominal alpha as specified by the Lan-DeMets alpha spending function and the O’Brien-Fleming stopping boundaries was

Hecht WCGIC Limited Update of PFS – Ox-CT Cohort (Central Review, Apr 2007 Data Cutoff) # PFS events (%) Median (95%CI), mos 206 (50)9.0 ( ) 172 (42)10.5 ( ) Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT HR= 1.29 (95% CI: ) Proportion Progression-Free 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ITT set

Hecht WCGIC Unplanned Interim Overall Survival (Ox-CT Cohort) # OS events (%) Median (95%CI), mos 127 (31)18.6 ( ) 95 (23)NE Proportion Alive HR= 1.44 (95% CI: ) *Interpretation of statistical significance is limited by the lack of a prespecified significance boundary Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT HR= 1.56 (95% CI: ) Oct 2006 Data Cutoff*Apr 2007 Data Cutoff # OS events (%) Median (95%CI), mos 83 (20)18.4 (13.8-NE) 58 (14)NE Proportion Alive Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT NE = not estimable; ITT set

Hecht WCGIC PACCE INTERIM ANALYSIS: ADDITIONAL ANALYSES (Ox-CT Cohort )

Hecht WCGIC No PD PD Alive Died Exposure-Adjusted Adverse Event Incidence (Events per month) Bev/Ox-CT Pmab + Bev/Ox-CT Number of events per month

Hecht WCGIC Overall Survival By Age (  80 yr vs >80) (Exploratory Analysis) Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, <80 yrs n=389Bev/Ox-CT, <80 yrs n=395 Months Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, >80 yrs n=18Bev/Ox-CT, >80 yrs, n=10 Proportion Surviving

Hecht WCGIC Overall Survival By Comorbidities (0 vs 1+) (Exploratory Analysis) Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, Comobidity 0 n=119Bev/Ox-CT, Comobidity 0 n=104 Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, Comorbidity 1+ n=288Bev/Ox-CT, Comorbidity 1+ n=301 Proportion Surviving Months

Hecht WCGIC Overall Survival of ECOG (0 vs 1) (Exploratory Analysis) Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, ECOG 0 n=254Bev/Ox-CT, ECOG 0 n=237 Pmab+bev/Ox-CT, ECOG 1 n=153Bev/Ox-CT, ECOG 1 n=168 Months Proportion Surviving

Hecht WCGIC Treatment Exposure (Ox-CT Cohort) Dose Delays % Pts Dose Reductions % Pts Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) % pmab+ bev/Ox n=401 bev/Ox n=392 pmab+ bev/Ox n=401 bev/Ox n=392 pmab+ bev/Ox n=401 bev/Ox n=392 Panitumumab62n/a31n/a870 Bevacizumab Oxaliplatin FU52 a 45 a 23 a 16 a 82 b 87 b % Pts Inf 5-FU/ Ox/Bev ≥ 85% n/a 3644 a Bolus 5-FU b Infusional 5-FU n/a=not applicable

Hecht WCGIC Reasons for First-Line Treatment Discontinuation (Ox-CT Cohort) Patients discontinued first-line tx, n/ N total pmab + bev/Ox-CT (300/407) bev/Ox-CT (293/405) Progressive events, n (%)108 (36)79 (27) Disease progression91 (30)68 (23) Deaths17 (6)11 (4) Non-progressive events, n (%)192 (64)214 (73) Adverse events69 (23)76 (26) Protocol violation9 (3)5 (2) Refused treatment47 (16)55 (19) Other67 (22)78 (27)

Hecht WCGIC Time to Treatment Failure (Ox-CT Cohort) HR = 1.03 (95% CI: ) Survival Distribution Function Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT Patients at risk: Pmab+bev/Ox-CT Bev/Ox-CT

Hecht WCGIC SUMMARY  This phase 3b open-label, US community-based study investigated the potential benefit of adding an anti-EGFr antibody (panitumumab) to an anti-VEGF-A antibody (bevacizumab) and chemotherapy for first-line mCRC  A planned interim analysis on the Ox cohort demonstrated an unfavorable risk:benefit profile for panitumumab+ bev/Ox-CT based on reduced PFS time and additional toxicity  These efficacy data suggest that there is a lack of biological synergy between panitumumab and bevacizumab in combination with Ox-CT  Additional toxicity was observed in the panitumumab + bev/Ox-CT arm –Dual pathway inhibition may have potentiated toxicity  Lower dose intensity was observed in the panitumumab + bev/Ox- CT arm

Hecht WCGIC SUMMARY (cont.)  In an exploratory, post-hoc analysis, specific populations, particularly patients who were elderly, had poor performance status, or had comorbidities > 1, had worse outcomes  Most patients withdrew due to non-progressive events (64% on panitumumab + bev/Ox-CT arm, 73% on bev/Ox-CT arm)  Further data collection and analyses are ongoing, including subset analyses based on biomarkers  Phase 3 registrational studies are currently ongoing to investigate panitumumab with chemotherapy alone in first- and second-line mCRC –Independent data monitoring committees for these studies have recommended continuation without protocol modification

Hecht WCGIC ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  Patients who participated in this study and their families  All investigators, co-investigators, and study staffs at 194 sites across the US  The Amgen study team