1 Exploratory & Confirmatory Factor Analysis Alan C. Acock OSU Summer Institute, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G Lecture 10 SEM methods revisited Multilevel models revisited
Advertisements

1 Regression as Moment Structure. 2 Regression Equation Y =  X + v Observable Variables Y z = X Moment matrix  YY  YX  =  YX  XX Moment structure.
Structural Equation Modeling. What is SEM Swiss Army Knife of Statistics Can replicate virtually any model from “canned” stats packages (some limitations.
SEM PURPOSE Model phenomena from observed or theoretical stances
Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling: An Overview P. Paxton.
1 General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models Week #2 Class #2.
Exploratory Factor Analysis
Structural Equation Modeling
Psychology 202b Advanced Psychological Statistics, II April 7, 2011.
A Method for Estimating the Correlations Between Observed and IRT Latent Variables or Between Pairs of IRT Latent Variables Alan Nicewander Pacific Metrics.
Factor analysis Caroline van Baal March 3 rd 2004, Boulder.
Factor Analysis Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
Common Factor Analysis “World View” of PC vs. CF Choosing between PC and CF PAF -- most common kind of CF Communality & Communality Estimation Common Factor.
When Measurement Models and Factor Models Conflict: Maximizing Internal Consistency James M. Graham, Ph.D. Western Washington University ABSTRACT: The.
“Ghost Chasing”: Demystifying Latent Variables and SEM
Structural Equation Modeling
The Autoregressive Model of Change David A. Kenny.
LECTURE 16 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING.
Correlation 1. Correlation - degree to which variables are associated or covary. (Changes in the value of one tends to be associated with changes in the.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Structural Equation Modeling Continued: Lecture 2 Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Factor Analysis Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Item response modeling of paired comparison and ranking data.
MEASUREMENT MODELS. BASIC EQUATION x =  + e x = observed score  = true (latent) score: represents the score that would be obtained over many independent.
Introduction to CFA. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Upon completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following: Distinguish between exploratory factor.
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.
2 nd Order CFA Byrne Chapter 5. 2 nd Order Models The idea of a 2 nd order model (sometimes called a bi-factor model) is: – You have some latent variables.
SEM: Testing a Structural Model
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
ROB CRIBBIE QUANTITATIVE METHODS PROGRAM – DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COORDINATOR - STATISTICAL CONSULTING SERVICE COURSE MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT:
Advanced Correlational Analyses D/RS 1013 Factor Analysis.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Highlights for Quiz 2.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Construct Validity: MTMM ● Assessed via convergent and divergent evidence ● Convergent – Measures of the.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Full Structural Models Kline Chapter 10 Brown Chapter 5 ( )
Controlling for Baseline
G Lecture 7 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Advanced Statistics Factor Analysis, II. Last lecture 1. What causes what, ξ → Xs, Xs→ ξ ? 2. Do we explore the relation of Xs to ξs, or do we test (try.
Latent Growth Modeling Byrne Chapter 11. Latent Growth Modeling Measuring change over repeated time measurements – Gives you more information than a repeated.
Measurement Models: Identification and Estimation James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
G Lecture 81 Comparing Measurement Models across Groups Reducing Bias with Hybrid Models Setting the Scale of Latent Variables Thinking about Hybrid.
CFA: Basics Beaujean Chapter 3. Other readings Kline 9 – a good reference, but lumps this entire section into one chapter.
MEASUREMENT. MeasurementThe assignment of numbers to observed phenomena according to certain rules. Rules of CorrespondenceDefines measurement in a given.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Part Two STA431: Spring 2013.
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
SEM Basics 2 Byrne Chapter 2 Kline pg 7-15, 50-51, ,
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 291 Lecture 3 – CFA and Hybrid Models Oct. 12, 2009.
ALISON BOWLING CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS. REVIEW OF EFA Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Explores the data All measured variables are related to every.
Advanced Statistics Factor Analysis, I. Introduction Factor analysis is a statistical technique about the relation between: (a)observed variables (X i.
Evaluation of structural equation models Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 9: Putting it All Together.
The SweSAT Vocabulary (word): understanding of words and concepts. Data Sufficiency (ds): numerical reasoning ability. Reading Comprehension (read): Swedish.
CFA: Basics Byrne Chapter 3 Brown Chapter 3 (40-53)
Advanced Statistical Methods: Continuous Variables
EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS (EFA)
Exploratory Factor Analysis
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
عنوان عنوان فرعی.
Structural Equation Modeling
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) With Latent Variables
Exploratory Factor Analysis. Factor Analysis: The Measurement Model D1D1 D8D8 D7D7 D6D6 D5D5 D4D4 D3D3 D2D2 F1F1 F2F2.
Causal Relationships with measurement error in the data
Structural Equation Modeling
Presentation transcript:

1 Exploratory & Confirmatory Factor Analysis Alan C. Acock OSU Summer Institute, 2009

2 EFA — One Dimension (Depression) Latent variables appear in ovals Latent variables are not observed directly Latent variables represent the shared variances of a set of indicators In SEM, latent variables can be predictors or outcomes

3 EFA — One Dimension (Depression) y 1 - y 7 are called indicators of the latent variable y 1 - y 7 could be 7 observed scores Could be 7 individual items Could be 4 items, 2 scales, & 1 observer rating

4 EFA — One Dimension (Depression) e 1 - e 7 are called errors or unique variances e 1 - e 7 sometimes labeled as δ’s or ε’s Arrow shows the errors explain part of the variances in the indicators How is this error variance? How is this unique variance?

5 EFA — One Dimension (Depression) Your depression and your e i each explain how you score on the observed variable All arrows go to the observed indicators. Your score on y 1 depends on your true level of depression and your error/unique variance

6 EFA — One Dimension (Depression) Errors/Unique variances may be correlated e 1 and e 6 might be measured the same method; hence a methods effect e 4 and e 5 might both deal with suicide ideation

7 EFA EFA seeks to explain relationships between the y’s based on two sources variance y i explained by your true level of depression and error/unique variance covariance y i & y j, cov(y i,y j ) explained by: loadings of y i on Depression Variance of Depression Loadings of y i on errors Correlated errors

8 Algebra

9 EFA with 2 Factors

10 CFA--with 2 Factors

11 EFA with 2 Factors Internalizing loads strongly on first three y’s Externalizing loads strongly on last four y’s Internalizing and Externalizing are correlated, represented by ϕ Correlating errors adds another link, reducing lambdas

12 How are coefficients estimated? The equation on the last slide has several parameters that form a vector: λ’s for the loadings, The variances of latent variables (1 in a standardized solution), and The covariances of the latent variables (r’s in the standardized solution)

13 How are coefficients estimated? Mplus iteratively tries different values in the vector that try to reproduce the covariance matrix Σ In EFA there are mathematically convenient assumptions that let us identify the model In CFA there are theoretical restrictions that identify the model

14 How are coefficients estimated? With 7 indicators, Σ has (7*8/2 = 56 variances and covariances We could write 56 equations. r y21 = λ 1I ⋄ λ 2I r y41 = λ 1I ⋄ϕ⋄ λ 4E

15 How are coefficients estimated? We need to estimate 7 λ’s, 7 e’s, and ϕ for a total of 15 parameters. We have = 41 degrees of freedom from over identifying restrictions. These include our theoretical assumptions: λ 4I = 0.0 λ 42 = 0.0 etc.

16 Identification Rules of Thumb 3 indicators of each latent variable and CFA is okay—4 would be even better 2 indicators of some latent variables will be identified if there are 3 or more indicators of other latent variables 1 or 2 indicators are okay if you can fix the error at some value, e.g. 0