TIM-GSD 13 June 20061 GSD Weather Modeling Efforts in Support of RSA Christopher J. Anderson ESRL/GSD/FAB 10-km grid valid 09 UTC 12 Jun1.1-km grid valid.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Estimated Mixing Depth Daily Maximums R. L. Buckley, A. Dupont, R. J. Kurzeja, and M. J. Parker Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River.
Advertisements

R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.
Meteorologisches Institut der Universität München
A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
WRF Modeling System V2.0 Overview
LAPS Analysis & Software by Steve Albers. 2 Basic Solution LAPS coupled with MM5 NWP model Use diabatic initialization (“hot start”) Utilize parallel.
Rapid Refresh and RTMA. RUC: AKA-Rapid Refresh A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of off-time or continuous observations.
Wettzell WVR Workshop1 October 9-10, 2006 Use of NWM forecasts for converting T B to delay Arthur Niell MIT Haystack Observatory Mark Leidner AER, Inc.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Update of A Rapid Prototyping Capability Experiment to Evaluate CrIS / ATMS Observations for a Mesoscale Weather Event Valentine G. Anantharaj Xingang.
Huang et al: MTG-IRS OSSEMMT, June MTG-IRS OSSE on regional scales Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen and Xin Zhang National Center.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
This is the footer WRF Basics Weather Research and Forecasting.
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
Consortium Meeting June 3, Thanks Mike! Hit Rates.
Global Forecast System (GFS) Model Previous called the Aviation (AVN) and Medium Range Forecast (MRF) models. Global model and 64 levels Relatively primitive.
Roll or Arcus Cloud Squall Lines.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Hongli Jiang, Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Zoltan Toth
Incorporation of TAMDAR into Real-time Local Modeling Tom Hultquist Science & Operations Officer NOAA/National Weather Service Marquette, MI.
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 An Operational Configuration of the ARPS Data Analysis System to Initialize WRF in the NWS Environmental Modeling System 31.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
1 What is the “NAM”? David Novak Science and Operations Officer NOAA/NCEP/ Hydrometeorological Prediction Center.
Thompson Runs Precipitation Comparison John D. McMillen.
Space and Time Multiscale Analysis System A sequential variational approach Yuanfu Xie, Steven Koch Steve Albers and Huiling Yuan Global Systems Division.
Validation and Sensitivities of Dynamic Precipitation Simulation for Winter Events over the Folsom Lake Watershed: 1964–99 Jianzhong Wang and Konstantine.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Operational Mesoscale Model History Early: LFM, NGM (history) Eta (mainly history) MM5: Still used by some, but.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Experiences with 0-36 h Explicit Convective Forecasting with the WRF-ARW Model Morris Weisman (Wei Wang, Chris Davis) NCAR/MMM WSN05 September 8, 2005.
Seasonal Modeling (NOAA) Jian-Wen Bao Sara Michelson Jim Wilczak Curtis Fleming Emily Piencziak.
LAPS / STMAS Verification Activities Steve Albers, Isidora Jankov ESRL / GSD Verification Summit September 2011 Updated Sep 7, 2011.
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
A Portable Regional Weather and Climate Downscaling System Using GEOS-5, LIS-6, WRF, and the NASA Workflow Tool Eric M. Kemp 1,2 and W. M. Putman 1, J.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Major U.S. High-Resolution Mesoscale Models (all non-hydrostatic ) WRF-ARW (developed at NCAR) NMM-B (developed.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Easy Deployment of the WRF Model on Heterogeneous PC Systems Braden Ward and Shing Yoh Union, New Jersey.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
5 th ICMCSDong-Kyou Lee Seoul National University Dong-Kyou Lee, Hyun-Ha Lee, Jo-Han Lee, Joo-Wan Kim Radar Data Assimilation in the Simulation of Mesoscale.
Progress Update of Numerical Simulation for OSSE Project Yongzuo Li 11/18/2008.
Real-Time High-Resolution MM5 and WRF Forecasts during RAINEX John P. Cangialosi 1*, S. S. Chen 1, W. Zhao 1, D. Ortt 1 W. Wang 2 and J. Michalakas 2 1.
An Investigation of the Mesoscale Predictability over the Northeast U.S.        Brian A. Colle, Matthew Jones, and Joseph Olson Institute for Terrestrial.
Status and Plans for the RSA LAPS/MM5 Implementation – July 2005 John McGinley, Steve Albers*, Ed Szoke*, Dan Birkenheuer NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2015 Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington.
Status and Plans for the RSA LAPS/MM5 Implementation – July 2004 Brent Shaw*, John McGinley, Steve Albers* NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory *In collaboration.
Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.
Assimilation of Lightning Data Using a Newtonian Nudging Method Involving Low-Level Warming Max R. Marchand Henry E. Fuelberg Florida State University.
Module 17 MM5: Climate Simulation BREAK. Regional Climate Simulation for the Pan-Arctic using MM5 William J. Gutowski, Jr., Helin Wei, Charles Vörösmarty,
1 RUC Land Surface Model implementation in WRF Tanya Smirnova, WRFLSM Workshop, 18 June 2003.
August 6, 2001Presented to MIT/LL The LAPS “hot start” Initializing mesoscale forecast models with active cloud and precipitation processes Paul Schultz.
Recent and Future Advancements in Convective-Scale Storm Prediction with the High- Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Forecast System NOAA/ESRL/GSD/AMB Curtis.
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC. RUC A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of offtime or continuous observations (not a 00.
CWB Midterm Review 2011 Forecast Applications Branch NOAA ESRL/GSD.
Numerical investigation of the multi-scale processes inducing convection initiation for the 12 June 2002 IHOP case study Preliminary study: testing the.
Higher Resolution Operational Models
1 WRF Configuration for Ukraine  Input & boundary conditions from NCEP GFS model  3 day forecasts every 6 hours  10 km horizontal grid, 200x200 gridpoints.
15 June 2005RSA TIM – Boulder, CO Hot-Start with RSA Applications by Steve Albers.
Land-Surface evolution forced by predicted precipitation corrected by high-frequency radar/satellite assimilation – the RUC Coupled Data Assimilation System.
WINDSOR TORNADO STUDY - STMAS (updated 10/21/2009 by Huiling Yuan and Yuanfu Xie)
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
WRF model runs of 2 and 3 August
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC
Grid Point Models Surface Data.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Tucson, AZ Initial Results 8/10/2011 – 8/15/2011
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC Rapid Refresh-RR High Resolution Rapid Refresh-HRRR RTMA.
New Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Start Hot-Start Section
Presentation transcript:

TIM-GSD 13 June GSD Weather Modeling Efforts in Support of RSA Christopher J. Anderson ESRL/GSD/FAB 10-km grid valid 09 UTC 12 Jun1.1-km grid valid 18 UTC 11 Jun

TIM-GSD 13 June Model Overview MM5 version 3.5 –No cumulus parameterization –Schultz bulk microphysics parameterization –MRF PBL parameterization –RRTM radiation parameterization –Soil temperature model –Triple one-way nest –Source code is customized, and executable distributed on a single CD.

TIM-GSD 13 June Model Implementation Perform 2-hr forecast every hour for LAPS analysis –97x97 gridpoints –10-km gridpoint spacing –Boundary conditions: ETA –Initial conditions: LAPS Perform 24-hr forecast every 6 hours ( UTC) –Boundary conditions: ETA –Initial conditions: LAPS –Triple grid (each 97x97 gridpoints) Forecast length –10-km: 24-hours –3.3-km: 12-hours –1.1-km: 9-hours Run time –10-km: 1 hr 42 min –3.3-km: 1 hr 34 min –1.1-km: 1 hr 26 min

TIM-GSD 13 June Technical Support October Problem –MM5 software failed. –Notified Oct. 6 by April Hawkins. Response – correspondence with April Hawkins to diagnose run-time errors.

TIM-GSD 13 June Technical Support October Actions (6-11 October) –Confirmed the shared directories and communications were active. –Confirmed the MM5 exectuble was invoked. Resolution (21 October) –/var had filled, inhibiting proper communication among compute nodes.

TIM-GSD 13 June Technical Support November/December Problem –MM5 software failed to execute after OS upgrade. Response – correspondence with April Hawkins and Steve Cunningham to diagnose run- time errors. –On-site visit to Vandenberg AFB.

TIM-GSD 13 June Technical Support November/December Actions –Confirmed shared directories and communication were active. –Examined log files from failed execution. –Two-day on-site visit: traced error to an incompatible node list syntax Resolution (22 December) –Rewrote two scripts so as to be compatible with latest software for MAUI/TORQUE.

TIM-GSD 13 June Improvements to RSA MM5 Software Lowell upgraded OS at FSL 31 Oct - 3 Nov. –Ugraded MM5 CD to allow “wipe clean” install. Tested with the MM5test routine, and MM5 2-hr update for LAPS. Visited WR to provide patches for software compatibility with new OS. –Corrected node list syntax for compatibility with MPICH b and GM Elsmp- i686.

TIM-GSD 13 June Improvements to RSA MM5 Software Created new boot disk –Boots from a complete reinstall –Incorporates patches made during WR visit and Lowell’s visit to GSD in 2005 Oct –Considerably streamlines the install process

TIM-GSD 13 June Why Upgrading to WRF is Recommended Faster numerics –Shorter running time –Greater accuracy at high-resolution, especially clouds and precipitation Rapidly becoming industry standard –NCEP is running WRF as of mid-June 2006 –NCEP will run 4-km CONUS WRF within the next couple of years. MM5 development is frozen –Support of MM5 has ended. –WRF is effectively the next generation MM5.

TIM-GSD 13 June Why Upgrading to WRF is Recommended WRF MM5

TIM-GSD 13 June WRF v. MM5 Errors Model gridpoint compared to rain gauge observations within the American River Basin

TIM-GSD 13 June What Upgrading to WRF can do for RSA More accurate 1-km forecasts Shorter cycle between 1-km forecasts –1-km forecasts can be provided more frequently, taking advantage of hourly or sub-hourly LAPS. Larger, intermediate domain –More detailed information over a larger area –More accurate forecasts beyond 12-hour lead time –Two nests rather than three Decreases computing time; improves timeliness of forecasts. May use the current 10-km LAPS or create a new LAPS domain