Presentation to the Providence School Board: June 18, 2012 2012-2013 Federal Budget: Preliminary Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTENT OF FUNDS. INTENT OF TITLE I A Title I Director salary and benefits Title I Administrative Assistant/Secretary salary and benefits Teachers Educational.
Advertisements

Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Marina Taylor Title I Director Aberdeen School Dist. #58 November 10, 2011.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
 The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) requires equitable services to be provided to private schools.  Why? Federal programs are supported.
Uses and Budgeting of Title I, II, III and VI Funds January 13, 2010 Bambi Perrigin and Edmund Moore.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Title 1, Part A Local Consolidated Plan (LCP) Application May 2009.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
Understanding Title I. Title I Defined A federal allocation of funds for schools classified as low income for the purpose of assisting students to demonstrate.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Federal Program Funding to Improve Student Outcomes Consolidated Application Spring Report District Learner Advisory Commitee (DAC) Meeting June.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Presentation to the Providence School Board January 14, 2013 Federal Budget Overview.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Recognition that Education is the key to a better economy.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Coordinating Nonpublic School Services Jack Clark Allentown City School District Cindy Rhoads Regional Coordinator, DFP.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
BAGGETT ELEMENTARY Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Baggett Elementary September 16, 2015.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
New Georgia Elementary Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Tuesday, September 29, 2015, 8:15 a.m. New Georgia Elementary School, Art Room 5800 Mulberry.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
WVDE Office of Federal Programs
Brand Message.
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Title 1 Annual parent Meeting
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Federal Programs Public Hearing
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to the Providence School Board: June 18, Federal Budget: Preliminary Overview

Federal Funding Sources – CRP Funding Source Purpose FY12 Allocations FY13 AllocationsChange from ‘12 Title I Improving the academic achievement of disadvantaged students $ 21,639,989 $ 19,812,945 $ (1,827,044) Title II Teacher Quality/Class Size $ 3,579,927 $ 3,403,697 $ (176,230) Title III Limited English Proficient $ 886,846 $ 955,187 $ 68,341 IDEASpecial Education $ 6,546,810 $ 6,171,612 $( ) IDEA Preschool Special Education $ 203,645 $ 197,635 $ (7,480) TOTAL: $32,857,217 $ 30,539,606 $ (2,317,611)

How is Education Funded in Rhode Island? 1. Local money: funds from Providence property taxes, car taxes, etc. 2. State Money: funds from the State of Rhode Island 3. Federal money: funds provided from the federal government for additional programs and support

Federal funds can be used to: Federal funds cannot be used to: Fund “supplementary” programs; Fund “supplementary” materials and staff; and Fund programs that specifically support students with the greatest academic need. Federal funds should be used to carry out activities in the School Improvement Plan (SIP) Federal funds cannot be used to: Carry out activities that are required by State law, regulations or union contracts; Replace or rehire teaching positions or local other activities that have been cut; or Purchase “core” materials or services for students and classrooms; Use of Federal Funds

“Supplement, Not Supplant” What does “Supplement, Not Supplant” mean? federal funds must enhance or increase the level of funding which is normally available from state or local sources; federal funds must not replace state and local funds.

Title I Required Reserves Choice/Supplemental Education Services – 20% of total allocation (Note: The U.S. Department of Education approved Rhode Island’s request for flexibility under NCLB; details regarding the granting of this waiver are forthcoming). Professional Development – 10% for districts/schools in need of improvement Parental Involvement – not less than 1%, 95% of the 1% must be distributed to schools Private School Services – sufficient for the provision of equitable services as compared to Providence students, to include parental involvement services Neglected/Delinquent Youth – as necessary to provide comparable services; PSD reserves $15K for additional services to students living in neglected facilities Homeless Services – not required, however PSD sets aside approx. $10K-$15K to provide additional services to support students experiencing homelessness

Broad Parameters for Reinvestment Funds may not be used to: Focused on clearly defined school and district improvement strategies.  Explicit connection to improvement plans for Priority, Focus and Warning schools Responsive to the needs of traditionally underserved populations. Focused upon direct services to students and classroom teachers. Support improvement initiatives  in which the primary beneficiary are non- identified schools;  With little or no clear relationship to the reasons for school or district identification; or  That focus primarily upon building district level capacity without corresponding investment in building-level support. Funds Previously Reserved for Choice and SES

School Level Allocation FY11 SLA--$11,535,750 FY12 SLA--$11,933,400 Schools receive per pupil based upon poverty bands. 90% or higher—Band 1 80%-89%--Band 2 70%-79%--Band 3 Per pupil determined by amount needed to support all initiatives and stable amount of discretionary funds. 1. Enrollment data used to calculate poverty % at each school. 2. Office of Federal Programs constructs budgets based upon District initiatives that result in direct services benefiting schools (programs, services and personnel) 3. Principal receives a summary of data used to calculate the school level Title I allocation inclusive of District initiatives and discretionary funds. 4. Discretionary funds result from the balance of District initiatives and school –level personnel costs. Schools are responsible for preparing and submitting a budget for approval; Budgeted activities must support school- wide Title I plan/school improvement plan.

Non-Public Schools FY12 78 School contacted to participate in Title I 30 accepted invitations to participated 24 actually participated 726 non-public students met Title I poverty guidelines resulting in an allocation of $441, Non-Publics received a total of $247,500 in Title II allocations District receives enrollment report from RIDE for all schools in RI that have Providence resident students. The District contacts all the schools to see if they would like to participate in Title I.  PPSD determines school attendance area of each non public student that qualifies for free/reduced lunch.  The non public school receives a per pupil amount that is equivalent to the public school in the students attendance area.  The non public schools also receive Title I funds for parent involvement and PD. District contacts 38 Non Public/Private Providence schools to see if they wish to participate in Title II.  29 out of 38 agreed to participate.  18 of the 29 also received Title I funds. In total between Title I & Title II the District engages 35 non public/private schools.

Focus of the FY13 CRP Implementation of key district strategies and initiatives to create dramatic positive improvement in student outcomes: I. Curriculum, Instruction & Assessment o Rigorous and relevant curricula aligned to performance standards for K-12 instruction o Transition to Common Core in English language arts o Research-based instructional programs, strategies, practices and tools o Comprehensive Assessment System which supports screening, progress monitoring, benchmarking, and end-of-course assessments of student learning across time II. Student Supports and Services o Multi-tiered Support System providing Academic and Social/Emotional programs and interventions o Programs to support English Language Learners o Virtual Credit Recovery and Learning Recovery o Transition Supports and Programs III. Aligned and Differentiated Professional Development o Comprehensive, ongoing training aligned to district initiatives and targeted school-based needs o Educator evaluation supports IV. School Intervention and Innovation Initiatives o Lead partners and EMOs provide direct support and oversight of clusters of schools V. Expanded Learning Opportunities o Investing in innovations that promote in-school and out-of-school learning opportunities

Federal Funding Sources – Other Allocations Funding SourcePurposeFY12 AllocationsFY13 Allocation Perkins to develop more fully the academic, career, and technical skills of secondary and postsecondary students who elect to enroll in CTE programs $ 1,270, $ 1,300, SIG 1003(a) to provide support to schools that have missed Adequate Yearly Progress by providing resources to help schools overcome barriers to improving academic performance $ 1,309,200.00TBD SIG 1003 (g) – Cohort 1 to provide public school districts with additional funds and resources to assist their persistently lowest-achieving schools $ 3,972,909.99TBD SIG 1003(g) – Cohort 2 $ 1,101,406.00TBD RTTT Supports state and district initiatives in the following areas: curriculum and instruction, instructional management system, educator evaluation, human capital management, and school transformation $ 8,518, (Total direct allocation to district covering 4 year grant period)

Overview of All Federal Funding