AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, 1999 1 Objectives of these slides: l What ethics is,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
Advertisements

E THICS Chapter 2 Relativism. C ULTURAL R ELATIVISM 1. Different societies have different moral codes. 2. The moral code of a society determines what.
The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
What is deontology?.
Business Ethics What you really need to know!. What is Ethics?  A practice of deciding what is right or wrong.  Ethical decisions must affect you or.
A2 Ethics How to assess arguments and theories. Aims  To discuss various methods of assessing arguments and theories  To apply these methods to some.
Moral Philosophy A2 How is knowledge of moral truth possible? To what extent can moral truths motivate or justify action?
Relativism Michael Lacewing
Meta-Ethics Slavery is evil Honesty is a virtue Abortion is wrong ‘Meta’ from Greek meaning ‘above’ or ‘after’
Categorical Imperative Universal Maxim Respect of Persons
Moral Reasoning Making appropriate use of facts and opinions to decide the right thing to do Quotations from Jacob Needleman’s The American Soul A Crucial.
Moral -Introduction -“Right and wrong as clue to the meaning of the universe.” C.S. Lewis (Mere Christianity) -If there is a moral “law”, then there is.
African Ethics.
Week 2: Major Worldviews January 10, 2007
Phil 160 Kant.
Moral Relativism, Cultural Differences and Bioethics Prof. Eric Barnes.
Philosophy 223 Relativism and Egoism. Remember This Slide? Ethical reflection on the dictates of morality can address these sorts of issues in at least.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 6 Ayer and Emotivism By David Kelsey.
360 Business Ethics Chapter 4. Moral facts derived from reason Reason has three properties that have bearing on moral facts understood as the outcomes.
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 1 The problem of knowledge.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
Professional Context of ICT INFO3020 Lecture 1. Introduction l Structure and delivery of the module l Assessment l Resources l Why do this module? l Influences.
Argumentation - 1 We often encounter situations in which someone is trying to persuade us of a point of view by presenting reasons for it. We often encounter.
Week 2: Major Worldviews January 10, 2007
Moral Problems Chapter 1. Moral Problems What is Ethics?
This ppt gives you examples of the kind of questions you will be asked in your examination. It tells you what you need to do to gain marks. It shows you.
AS Philosophy & Ethics Mrs Sudds What are your expectations?
Types of Ethics LO’s: To describe a number of ethical theories.
Euthyphro Dilemma Revision.
CSE3PE: Professional Environment Introduction to Ethical Theory.
Ethics of Administration Chapter 1. Imposing your values? Values are more than personal preferences Values are more than personal preferences Human beings.
What is right for you may not be right for someone else. Ethical Relativism.
Business Ethics Lecture Rights and Duties 1.
1 Ethics of Computing MONT 113G, Spring 2012 Session 18 Ethical reasoning.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
READING #1: “What This Book is About” Chapter One from The Ethics of Teaching.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1 (Intro.) By David Kelsey.
Philosophy 2803 – Health Ethics Andrew Latus. Introduction Ethics Study of right and wrong/good and bad A Branch of Philosophy Central Question = “How.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l to describe an.
Moral Reasoning Part II 3/8/2012. Learning Objectives Use knowledge and analyses of social problems to evaluate public policy, and to suggest policy alternatives,
Business Ethics Chapter # 3 Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, and Decision-Making Guidelines  The best kind of relationship in the world is the one in.
Morality in the Modern World
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Calvin Gotlieb, Professor Emeritus, Department of Computer Science University of Toronto York University October 18, 2006.
ETHICS in the WORKPLACE © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Welcome to Ethics.
Descriptive (Empirical Claims)
Inter-relationships Religion and Morality. Relationships Is it true that morality depends on religion, even that it cannot be understood in the context.
Philosophy An introduction. What is philosophy? Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle said that philosophy is ‘the science which considers truth’
Introduction  Based on something other than the consequences of a person’s actions  Unlike Egoism  People should act in their own self-interest  Unlike.
META-ETHICS: NON-COGNITIVISM A2 Ethics. This week’s aims To explain and evaluate non-cognitivism To understand the differences between emotivism and prescriptivismemotivismprescriptivism.
4/10/ DOES GOD EXIST?  THE MORAL ARGUMENT Objective realities Objective realities Objective (definition) Objective (definition) expressing or dealing.
Chapter 9 Personal ethics
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society Week 2 Topic Outlines.
The objective of this 10 slide presentation is to:  Identify “roadblocks” to moral discourse.  Give your “roadblock” in class  Evaluate the content.
Lecture 1 Introduction to Ethics. Chapter Overview Introduction Review of some ethical theories Comparing workable ethical theories 1-2.
Review for Exam 1.
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
What is ethics?. What is ethics? “Ethics is about my feelings” Agree or disagree?
Lecture 01: A Brief Summary
Ethical Dilemmas in Leadership
Ethics and the Examined Life
Recap Key-Terms Cognitivism Non-Cognitivism Realism Anti-Realism
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
Ethics and Philosophy Unit 1 - An Introduction.
2. Knowledge and relativism
Is murder wrong? A: What is murder? B: What is the law on murder in the UK? A: Do you think murder is wrong? B: Do you think murder is wrong? ‘Garment.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1 (Intro.)
Professional Ethics Exercise Questions.
Presentation transcript:

AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l What ethics is, what it isn’t, and ethical relativism 2. Introduction to Ethics

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 2 Overview 1. What is Ethics? 2. The Ethical Method 3. What Ethics Isn’t 4. Ethical Relativism 5. More Details

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ What is Ethics? §“I lied about the exam being next week – it’s now. Close your books.” l what’s your reaction? §Ethics is about investigating and evaluating actions. Which actions are right, which wrong? §Ethics == morality

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 4 Ten Hard Ethical Questions §1. Are there any differences between moral laws and society’s laws. If there are, why is this? §2. What are human beings really like: selfish and greedy or generous and kind? §3. Are there good ways of teaching children to behave morally? continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 5 §4. Does anyone have the right to tell anyone else what good and evil are? §5. Are there certain kinds of acts (e.g. torturing children) that are always wrong? If so, what are they? §6. What do you think is the best answer to the question, “Why should I be a good person?” continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 6 §7. Is ethics a special kind of knowledge? If so, what sort of knowledge is it and how do we get hold of it? §8. Is morality about obeying a set of rules or is it about thinking about consequences? §9. When people say “I know that murder is wrong”, do they know it is wrong or just believe it very strongly? continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 7 §10. Are some people “better” at morality than others, or is everyone equally capable of being good?

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ The Ethical Method §Ethics uses reason, logic, concepts, rational explanation and public discussion to analyse problems and (try to) find answers. §The aim of an ethical argument is to get someone else to freely agree with you for good reasons continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 9 §Ethics demands that you present an argument that shows your analysis and explains your points of view: l what counts most is what you think §Explanations must be public so that they can be debated and understood by others.

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 10 Ethics as a Process §An ethical investigation is an ongoing process: l formulate an argument (with attached reasons) l critically examine the argument and any counter-arguments l reformulate the argument §This process is sometimes called a “dialectic”. continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 11 §The examination moves back and forth between cases (examples) and principles/theories. §No conclusion may be reached but negative and positive knowledge is discovered: l what arguments are inadequate l development of common frameworks for discussion

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 12 Descriptive and Normative §Descriptive statements are factual l e.g. 90% of Americans like baseball l they can be checked by observation l sometimes called empirical statements §Ethics is a normative science l it is concerned with the norms (standards) of human conduct (behaviour) continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 13 §Ethics is sometimes called prescriptive since it talks about what people ought to do. §It is not possible to answer prescriptive questions by using facts (descriptive statements) alone l e.g. what facts “prove” the truth of “people ought not to murder”?

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ What Ethics Isn’t 3.1. Ethics and Emotions 3.2. Ethics and Authority 3.3. Ethics and the Individual 3.4. Ethics and the Law 3.5. Ethics and Religion

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ Ethics and Emotions §Ethics is about what you think, not feel. §Thinking statements are very different from feeling statements l they give reasons for an opinion l they answer why §Feelings can change suddenly for no reason l not suitable as the foundation of an argument continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 16 §Sincerity (or any strong emotion) has nothing to do with the correctness of an argument. §Emotions have a small role as a guide when searching for reasons.

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ Ethics and Authority §Ethics is only concerned with rational argument. §Ethics ignores: l the authority of tradition l the personal authority of the speaker §Authoritarian arguments are often really just threats or bribery.

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ Ethics and the Individual §“What counts most is what you think” l but only if you are rational §A speaker’s use of personal superiority and/or authority invalidates their argument.

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ Ethics and the Law §Ethics and the law (legal rules) are different. §Laws change over time, and can be contradictory l e.g. apartheid l e.g. censorship and freedom of speech

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ Ethics and Religion §Religion is useful as a context for moral statements. §But religion must be excluded from ethical arguments because: l religion is spiritual; ethics is intellectual l religion often relies on authority or faith l what religion is accepted by everyone so it can be used as part of an argument?

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ Ethical Relativism §Examples: l “What is right for you may not be right for me.” l “I can decide what is right for me, but you have to decide for yourself.” §Ethical relativism has two components: l the negative: “there are no universal moral rules” l the positive: “right and wrong is relative to the society in which the person lives”

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 22 Supporting Evidence §1. Cultures vary over what they consider is right and wrong. §2. Moral rules change over time. §3. Moral ideas develop in people as they grow and learn.

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 23 Response §The diversity of moral rules does not prove there are no universal moral rules. §The diversity may be superficial. §Some people’s moral rules may simply be incorrect. continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 24 §There do seem to be some universals: l never intentionally harm another person l respect peoples’ rights (e.g to freedom, privacy) §Ethical relativists contradict themselves since their ideas imply that everyone follows the moral rules of their society l a universal rule! continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 25 §Ethical relativists usual intention is that we should not judge others by our standards. We should respect other people’s right to choose their own rules l another universal! §Ethical relativism is a very poor ethical theory since it cannot be used to justify any moral beliefs except by reference to society.

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 26 §Absolutists argue that there are basic universal rules l e.g. “murder is wrong” §Sometimes called universalists or realists. Absolutists

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/ More Details §Books on ethics: l Right and Wrong: A Brief Guide to Understanding Ethics Thomas I. White Prentice Hall, 1992 l Ethics for Beginners Dave Robinson and Chris Garratt Icon Books, 1996 continued

Comp. Ethics: Intro to Ethics/2 28 §Chapter 2 of: Computer Ethics Deborah G. Johnson Prentice Hall, 2nd ed., 1994