Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
Advertisements

Webinar June 24th, questions to: Copies of the PowerPoint:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
New Legislation In March of 2010, the Washington State legislature passed Engrossed Second Senate Bill 6696 (E2SSB 6696), a law requiring the following:
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Phase II Kick-off Introduction by Commissioner Virginia M. Barry, Ph.D.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation July, 2014.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot – Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Visit our blog & resource site: – Follow.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Math Summit II Held on August 11 th, 12 th, and 13 th, 2010 at Baker College.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Choosing a Reform Model District Wide Stakeholder Meeting 1.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Our time today… 10/7/11PSESD Assistant Superintendent CCSS Update 2  Updates on CCSS  Implementation discussion….  What do curriculum directors want.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Principal Evaluation Update
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Implementing Race to the Top
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher-Principal Evaluation Pilot K-20 Presented by: Jim Koval and Michaela Miller Teacher-Principal Evaluation Project Manager Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction TPEP K-20 November 18th, 2010

Slide 2 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction K-20 Agenda 1. Report from Districts- Districts/Consortium 2. TPEP Overview and Update- Jim & Michaela – RFP Update (multiple student growth measures & educator forums) – Practitioner Workgroup Update – Summative Evaluation Rubric Review 3. Planning for January- Michaela & Jim 4. Report from MERIT Districts- Leslie

Slide 3 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Part 1 Report from TPEP Districts/Consortium

Slide 4 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction TPEP November Report What follow-up district/consortium meetings have taken place since the October f-2-f event? Discuss the development of your district’s rubrics related to the new teacher and principal criteria. In planning for our January meeting, we are hoping districts will have rough drafts of their rubrics (At least a fairly solid draft of a “4” and a “1”). We would like to have a discussion and suggestions for sharing with the other districts about accomplishing this task. Other suggestions for district development and any feedback for the steering committee on supporting the work of the pilot sites.

Slide 5 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Part 2 TPEP Overview and Update

Slide 6 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Identification of multiple measures of student growth Charges of E2SSB 6696 is the examine and report to the legislature the use of student data in evaluations. (7(c)) OSPI contracting with American Institutes for Research (AIR) to assist districts with student growth analysis. AIR (Learning Point Associates) has worked with hundreds of districts around the country and have been following/involved in the work of WA State.

Slide 7 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Identification of multiple measures of student growth As required by the legislation, OSPI is charged with analyzing the “use of student data in evaluations.” AIR was chosen (in final negotiation) by the steering committee and has the capacity and knowledge to assist the whole project with this task in the spring. Commitment to work with individual districts and provide feedback.

Slide 8 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Educator Forums Information and updates regarding the new evaluation system to the wider stakeholders (179 other districts, higher education, community members) Feedback from those stakeholders for the pilot sites, steering committee and legislature. Create a “evaluation development resource toolkit”

Slide 9 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Educator Forums Details OSPI will work with AIR, ESD 113, 121 and 101 to plan and coordinate forums starting January-June. 10 forums (1 in each ESD with 2 in 121) Create a toolkit that other districts wanting to start the discussion in their own district can use to facilitate discussion, guide bargaining and ultimately prepare for full state-wide implementation in

Slide 10 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Practitioner Workgroup Practitioners with specific expertise in instruction, leadership, data, finance, human resource and professional development that will support the project, give feedback on development and be able to provide specific technical support around that area of expertise. Practitioners chosen by the steering committee organizations to compliment the expertise of the pilot districts.

Slide 11 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Updates: Final Thoughts OSPI and the Steering Committee are finalizing documents around the following and will send out a final document when completed: RFP- multiple student growth measures & educator forums Practitioner Workgroups TPEP Glossary (models, rubrics etc)

Slide 12 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Part 4 Planning for January

Slide 13 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction E2SSB 6696 Description of “Model” Collaborative district development workgroup Rubric development for evaluation criteria and ratings Identification of multiple measures of student growth Development of professional development for principals and classroom teachers regarding content of new evaluation system Participation in evaluator training Evaluation and feedback on new system effectiveness You are here

Slide 14 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction January Planning In order to accommodate district travel etc: Thursday, January 20 th - Eastside (Spokane) Friday, January 21 st – Westside (TBD) Charlotte Danielson- both days Whole group and individual district work More details to follow in homework…

Slide 15 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Homework & Other Items December Homework Summative Evaluation Rubric Language Attached are the report out documents from October Revised versions due Tuesday, December 7 th (5pm) January Homework In order to get the most out of the January f-2-f day we are asking districts to have rubric documents prepared for feedback from Danielson (if desired) by Thursday, January 13 th. We will be providing more information on January’s meeting in early December. Budgets (TPEP District Leads) New district budgets will be provided along with a budget survey by Tuesday, November 23 rd.

Slide 16 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Part 6 MERIT Report

Slide 17 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction EVALUATION UPDATE Nov. 18, 2010

Slide 18 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Evaluation Requirements for SIG/MERIT Schools’ Teachers and Leaders Implement rigorous, transparent and equitable evaluation systems for teachers and principals which are: – Developed with staff; and – Use student growth as a significant factor. Identify and reward school leaders and teachers who have increased student achievement and graduation rates; Identify and remove those who, after ample opportunities to improve professional practice, have not done so. Implement such strategies as financial incentives and career ladders for recruiting, placing and retaining effective teachers. 10/19/201518

Slide 19 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Turnaround Model Overview Teachers and Leaders Replace principal Use locally adopted “turnaround” competencies to review and select staff for school (rehire no more than 50% of existing staff) Implement strategies to recruit, place, and retain staff Instructional and Support Strategies Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs Provide job- embedded Professional Development designed to build capacity and support staff Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction Time and Support Provide increased learning time Staff and students Social-emotional and community- oriented services and supports Governance New governance structure Grant operating flexibility to school leader May also implement any of the required or permissible strategies under the Transformation Model

Slide 20 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Transformation Model Overview Teachers and Leaders Replace principal Implement new evaluation system Developed with staff Uses student growth as a significant factor Identify and reward staff who are increasing student outcomes; support and then remove those who are not Implement strategies to recruit, place and retain staff Instructional and Support Strategies Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs Provide job- embedded Professional Development designed to build capacity and support staff Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction Time and Support Provide increased learning time Staff and students Provide ongoing mechanisms for community and family engagement Partner to provide social-emotional and community- oriented services and support Governance Provide sufficient operating flexibility to implement reform Ensure ongoing technical assistance An LEA with nine or more Tier I and Tier II schools may not implement the Transformation Model in more than 50% of those schools.

Slide 21 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Support

Slide 22 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Cross MERIT Meetings Took place this past summer – additional meetings may take place Hosted by Seattle Optional Focus on Student Growth Issues – Ran district data (value added and Colorado Growth Model) – Discussions around multiple measures – Current thinking around attribution

Slide 23 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction BERC Group HR Training Outcomes Increase awareness of research-based framework for teacher recruitment, development, evaluation, and retention Reflect on how the framework impacts the quality of teachers and the leadership role of administrators

Slide 24 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Slide 25 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Current Status Implementing new system including student growth factors Just starting - Plan to use current model – add student growth All schools Only MERIT schools

Slide 26 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Slide 27 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Questions

28 Questions? & Thank you!