Project Manager Training. Agenda Revised Consultant Selection Process Invoicing Overtime, Travel and Vehicle Reimbursement Policies Performance Evaluations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Purchasing and Contracts Research Funded Procurement Outreach Training Level III Procurements $50,000 and Above.
Advertisements

RFP AND CONTRACT PHASE Jeff Wassenaar, P.E., HQ Project Development Benjamin Acimovic, P.E., Region 1.
Panel Reviewer Training Overview 1 ANA Objective Panel Review Process Each year, ANA convenes panels of experts to objectively analyze and score eligible.
Request for Proposal - Best Value Generally RFP’s are created for large dollar technical purchases, services and consultants.  Consideration in addition.
Presented by: Kathryn Hodges, NH
PURCHASING & SUSTAINABILITY SERVICES. What does Humbers’ Purchasing & Sustainability Services do? We acquire the goods and services for all the schools.
How to Submit a Winning Bid for State Goods & Services Corinna Cooper, CPPB Contracts Consultant May 22, 2014.
Lunchtime Topics Craig Weise Construction Reform Program Director Lisa Conomy Construction Counsel OSU Office of Legal Affairs.
Procurement.
1 Last update: February 12, 2009 Is Your Selection Process Attracting the Right Consultants? Best Practices, Benefits and Insights to Using a Qualifications.
1 Use and content of the RFP  Request for Proposals (RFP) is similar to bidding documents and include all information of the assignment, selection of.
Roadmap to Success How to become a business partner with MCPS!
Getting Certified In Consultant Selection Steps and Processes Diana Foster.
New Procurement Rules Training Purchases Greater Than $25,000.
Q Comp Peer Reviewer Training Covering: Job Description and Expectations Norms and Confidentiality Agendas Interviews Rubric and Debriefing Wrap-up.
Purchasing 101 A guide for department administrators presented by: Heidi Williams January, 2012.
1 Business Opportunities Istanbul, Turkey 30 April 2010 Asian Development Bank.
THE EVALUATION PROCESS FOR RFP’S: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL RFP AND A GENERAL SERVICE RFP TREENA BRADLEY, ROOSEVELT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
1 Purchasing and Procurement Processes Module Four Revision Date: 2/06/2015.
WELCOME TO THE PROCUREMENT SEMINAR Procurement and Contracts An Overview of Contract Administration.
Department of Economic Opportunity WelcomeTo Contract Review Form Training.
Thank you for joining! The meeting will start shortly. If you have not yet joined by phone, please call the number shown on the screen to the right. Dial.
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
1 Public Outreach October 2008 By Adelina Murtezaj – Public Relation Officer For Inaugural Partnership Activity between ICC and ERO.
Reviewing the 2015 AmeriCorps Applications & Conducting the Review AmeriCorps External Review.
Purchasing Overview. Fundamentals of Purchasing Procedures.
Pitfalls and Lessons Learned: Advanced Implementation Strategies for a Compliant Grant Process National CME Audioconference December 9, 2008.
STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION FUND 2011 Updates February 1, 2011.
Indiana Hoosier Lottery Lottery Draw Witness Pre-Proposal Conference September 14, 2012 Stan Judson IDOA Strategic Sourcing Analyst.
United Nations Procurement Division
1 HRSA Division of Independent Review The Review Process Regional AIDS Education and Training Centers HRSA Toni Thomas, MPA Lead Review Administrator.
WELCOME TO UNB. MARK McGEEHAN Assistant Manager, Procurement Services 3 plus years with UNB 28 years in Healthcare Procurement Current member of APPA.
Federal Financial Participation (FFP) Overview Office of Family Planning Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program.
Region 5: RAB Meeting National Co-op Program 3/25/03 Region 5: RAB Meeting National Co-op Program 3/25/03.
Distance Calculus Program Overview. Minimum Requirements vs. Competitive Admission Minimum Requirements: 3.5 overall GPA (GT recalculated scale) 3.5 math.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
1 Presented to the Simplified Acquisition Committee on August 28, 2013 NIHCATS II electronic Government Ordering System (eGOS): An Overview.
E-Rate Training for TASBO Members October 8, 2008 Presented by Susan Sullivan Director of Technology/Media.
Click to add text Dealer Pre-Qualification Information Session STATE OF MICHIGAN Department of Technology, Management and Budget Purchasing Operations.
Request For Qualifications (RFQ) Missouri Local Programs How to Complete the RFQ & Get it Advertised.
11 Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds Funding Guidelines for Agencies that Administer California Climate Investments September
A/E Acquisition Process 1 Architect – Engineer Acquisition Process Robert Theel – Director Arch. & Eng. Programs Division (Reg. 5) Regional Chief Architect.
JEOPARDY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT EDITION Documentation Procurement Mystery Cost Principles Administrative Requirements Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
Contracting Process Overview Agenda Item #12 July 2007.
CSO Observer Member of the Evaluation Committee. Civil Society Organization May have representation in the Evaluation Committee As a member of the Evaluation.
Reviewing the Applications & Preparing for the Review School Turnaround AmeriCorps FY13 Peer Review Orientation Session IV.
Pre-Proposal Conference Welcome! New York State Department of Transportation Conference Room A/B 50 Wolf Road May 30, :00 PM to 3:30 PM JOB ORDER.
HOW TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH January 12, 2015.
CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE TOWN OF MIAMI LAKES Construction Services October 28, 2013.
EuropeAid/152087/DD/ACT/LB Cultural activities 2016 Information Session 13 th June 2016.
PURCHASING 101 SECTION 1 - How to Begin. Is the purchase available from your agency or from other state agencies? ⋆ State Surplus Property ⋆ State Fleet.
1 Office of Procurement Presents Request for Proposal (RFP) Process.
1. 2 Cost & Price Analysis Breakout Session # 312 Beverly Arviso, CPA, Fellow, CPCM, CFCM, Arviso, Inc. Melanie Burgess, CPA, CFCM, Burgess Consulting,
Compliance with CCNA F.S..  Advertisement  Longlist  Shortlist  Request for Proposal  Scope of Services Meeting  Technical Proposal Review.
Processes and Procedures for Contracting at UO
Training for Faculty Search Committees
Light Rail Transit Project
Processes and Procedures for Contracting at UO
Award Management Services
Call for competition process
Request for Proposal - Best Value
Department of Community Development
THE OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACT TRAINING MAY 2018
Solicitation Step by Step Process
Request for Proposal - Best Value
OCPS CCNA SELECTION COMMITTEE TRAINING
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Diversity management system (DMS)
TRAVEL TRAINING You may access our travel guidelines and forms by visiting:
Presentation transcript:

Project Manager Training

Agenda Revised Consultant Selection Process Invoicing Overtime, Travel and Vehicle Reimbursement Policies Performance Evaluations Efficient Contracting Process Negotiations – Best Practices

Revised Consultant Selection Process

Basis for Changes To ensure a fair, competitive Qualification Based Selection Process for Consultants Improve the overall objectivity of the process Strengthen transparency and accountability

I.New Selection Tiers TiersCurrent LimitsNew Limits Under $25,000$0 - $25,000$0 - $50,000 I$25,000 - $100,000$50,000 - $150,000 II$100,000 - $250,000$150,000 - $1,000,000 IIIOver $250,000Over $1,000,000

FY 2012 Selection Statistics Selection Breakdown based on Current Process by Tier and Dollar Amount for FY 2012 Tiers Number of Selections Breakdown on Number of Selections Breakdown of Dollar amount Total Dollar Amount per Tier % of Total Dollar Amount Under $25k Selections72$1,072, Tier I Selections (25k-100k)22$1,766, (25k-50k) =$210, (50k-100k) =$1,556, Tier II Selections (100k-250k)62$10,767, (100k-150k) =$3,816, (150k-250k) =$6,950, Tier III Selections (Over 250k)105$115,745, (250k-500k) =$15,934, (500k-1mil) =$27,196, (over 1mil) =$72,614, Total261 $129,352,830.78

FY 2012 Selection Statistics If New Tiers were inplace last year: Number of Selections Total Dollar Amount per Tier % of Total Dollar Amount Under 50k78$1,282, Tier I (50k-150k) =46$5,373, Tier II (150k-1,000,000) =115$50,082, Tier III (over 1,000,000) =22$72,614, Total261$129,352,830.78

II.New Dollar Amount Change $0 - $50,000 *No changes to the Selection Process*  Continue to require contacting a minimum of three prequalified consultants to select the most qualified consultant using evaluation criteria appropriate for service.  If low bid, lowest bidder will be selected.  Review and approval of the recommended consultant will be performed by the Chair of the Central Selections Review Team (CSRT)

III.New Dollar Amount Change Tier I ($50,000 - $150,000) *No changes to the Selection Process*  Selections Team will continue to submit a short listing of the highest, qualified consultants, with justification for the recommendation.  The list must have a minimum of three consultants, unless fewer than three respond.  CSRT will select the consultant to perform the work based on:  Year-to-date workload  Past Performance  Provisional Ratings  Market Entry

IV.Selection Process Changes Tier II ($150,000 - $1 Million) Current Proposed  Selection team assembled by Project Manager  Selections team meets and scores submittals  CSD reviews score sheets  CSD sends scoring documentation to CSRT for final approval  Selection team assembled by Project Manager  A pool of MDOT staff will be chosen to alternately participate in selection teams as CSRT Delegates  Projects requiring a CSRT delegate will be randomly selected and will represent 25% of advertised (posted) projects  CSD reviews score sheets  CSD sends scoring documentation to Region Engineer/Bureau Director/Office Administrator for final approval  CSRT will no longer approve Tier II selections

V.Selection Process Changes Tier III (Over $1 Million) Current Proposed  Selection team assembled by Project Manager  If project estimated is greater than $1 million dollars, one CSRT member is included on selection team  Selections team meets and scores submittals  CSD reviews score sheets  CSD sends scoring documentation to CSRT for final approval  Selection teams (assembled by Project Manager) shortlist proposals to three to five vendors  Selection team submit all score sheets – (comments only for short listed vendors) to CSD and provide cut-off score  CSD submits the shortlisted proposals and score sheets to two CSRT members to review proposals, edit comments accordingly, provide scores and make the recommendation  Score sheets submitted to CSRT for final approval

Debriefing Process Current  For Tier II and Tier III projects, feedback provided at the discretion of the Project Manager via phone, , or in person Proposed  Tier II – Feedback provided by Project Manager via phone, e- mail or in person, at the discretion of the Project Manager  Tier III - Project Manager will provide feedback to vendors not shortlisted  Tier III – Feedback provided by one of the CSRT members via phone or in person, for the short listed vendor

Things to Remember!!! Tier I No change in selection process Change in dollar amount Tier II CSRT Delegate will be assigned to 25% of projects advertised (posted) CSD will notify (via )Project Manager of the selected CSRT Delegate, typically on Mondays Project Manager is responsible for including the CSRT Delegate in selection meetings All completed forms (5100C and 5100E) still come to CSD Region Engineer/Bureau Director/Administrator (OPT) will be approving selections

Things to Remember!!! Tier III Teams score proposals Selection teams shortlist proposals to three to five vendors and clearly denotes the cut-off score Selection team submits all score sheets to CSD, including those vendors that are not shortlisted CSD submits the shortlisted proposals and score sheets to two CSRT members to review and score proposals. PM may be asked to attend CSRT selection meeting. Score sheets submitted to CSRT for final approval Results will be posted to website after selection process has been completed

Invoicing

Invoicing Workgroup Workgroup, Comprised of MDOT and ACEC Representatives began Meeting in April, 2012 Team Developed with the purpose of Re-engineering and Developing Improvements to the New Invoicing Process To Develop a Process to Ensure Consistency and reduce Unnecessary Paperwork

Invoicing Workgroup Team Goals Standardize Invoicing  To Include:  Revised Payment Voucher Summary Form  Revised Job Number Summary Form  Newly Developed Other Direct Cost Summary Page  Revised Invoice Defined Review/Processing Timeframes Accuracy and consistency of Invoice Content Joint Training

Standardize Invoice Forms (Please refer to Handouts)

Invoice Review Project Managers have a 10 day turn-around time- frame to return invoices Invoice Timeline (Green sheet) Reports for Management PM is responsible for verification of charges For as-needed contracts, MFOS sheets must be included with the invoices when returned to CSD, showing the remaining balance per job number

Overtime, Travel and Mileage Reimbursement Policies (Please refer to handouts)

Performance Evaluations

Final Performance Evaluations must be completed at the conclusion of a project Evaluations must be attached to the final invoice Interim Evaluations must be completed when there is a significant performance issue For all projects that extend one year, an interim evaluation must be completed by December of each year Post Final Evaluations are to be completed if there were issues during construction that was a result of the design

Efficient Contracting Process

Factors that Ensure an Efficient Contracting Process Use the most current forms posted on CSD Website Timely response to CA and OCA questions Advanced planning: (include key stakeholders) Adhere to deadlines for Agendas and approvals Priced proposals meet guideline rules Avoid Retroactive services

Negotiations Best Practices (Open discussions)

QUESTIONS