Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation Capstone Project

Project instructors Mr. Nguyen Tat TrungMr. Huynh Anh Dung

Project team Nguyen Cong Danh DanhNC00739 Dang Tuan Thanh ThanhDT00730 Tran Duc Tri Quang QuangTDT00756 Nguyen Thi Thuy Quynh QuynhNTT00419 Hoang Van Tuyen TuyenHV00608 Le To Trang TrangLT00601

Project Organization Project Manager Tech. Lead/Dev QA/TesterDeveloper Tech. Lead/Dev QA/Tester

Agenda Project Idea Project Plan Software Requirement Specification Software Design Testing Project Results Lesson learned and future development Demonstration

PROJECT IDEA Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation

Project Idea FPT Corporation 11 Subsidiaries and Associates Large-scale Procurement processes are different and complicated

Project Idea One FPT Leading global corporation in Vietnam Forbes’s top 500 businesses Synergy and unity

Project Idea Idea Unify procurement processes Group purchasing for discounts

Project Idea One of the first B2B e- commerce in Vietnam Establish Group Purchasing- Alliance in Vietnam. Can be applied in a larger scale Highly appreciated by CEO of FPT Corp., Mr. Truong Dinh Anh

Literature review Groupon is being known as a very successful deal-of-the-day website

Literature review Group purchasing organization (or GPO) in US Used in many industries to purchase raw materials and supplies In 2010, Non-Profit Purchasing Group was introduced The annual saving for a company which has membership in NPGP may up to 25% * *: As calculated with NPPG’s Savings Calculator

Benefit of Group Purchasing Group Purchasing Significant cost savings No need to negotiate Choose the best offer

Benefit of Group Purchasing Group Purchasing No minimums Improved operational efficiency Centralized procurement process

Different points in GP-F The two ways communication between supplier and buyers Collect demands from departments internally Reverse-auction ability

Disadvantage and potential risks Require changes in enterprise’s processes. Especially for asset management department Buying decision of Vietnamese people is often based on “touch and feel” Low commitment from Suppliers and Members

PROJECT PLAN Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation

Project Management Goal Scope goal Time goal Cost goal

Project Plan

Team Management Project plan: update daily, inform progress via , meetings Weekly meeting: Monday & Thurday 6pm at FUMeeting minutes and follow-up actionsCommunication: mail group, Facebook group, Skype...

Software Development process model Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team22

Risk Management User Involvement Executive management support Integration with current system Project Management skill Hardware availability Resource Experience

SOFTWARE REQUIREMENT SPECIFICATION Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation

Central Offers Operator Supplier Requests Orders Internals Requests Orders User Manager Offers Domain Model Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team25 ProductsCategories…

Business Process Model Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team26

Central Business Process Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team27 Supplier submit Offer Operator approve Offer Operator close Offer

Central Business Process Supplier submit Offer Operator approve Offer Operator close Offer Supplier confirm Order User make Order on Offers

Internal Business Process Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team29 User submit Requests Manager consolidate Requests Manager public Requests Manager close Requests

Internal Business Process Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team30 User submit Requests Manager consolidate Requests Manager public Requests Manager close Requests Supplier create Offer for Request User make Order on Offers Supplier confirm Order

Central Business Process Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team31 Supplier submit Offer Open Operator approve Offer Approved Operator close Offer Closed

Central Business Process Supplier submit Offer Open Operator approve Offer Approved Operator close Offer Closed Supplier confirm Order Processed User make Order on Offers Order Made

Internal Business Process Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team33 User submit Requests Manager consolidate Requests Manager public Requests Submitted Public Manager close Requests Closed

Internal Business Process Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team34 User submit Requests Manager consolidate Requests Submitted Manager public Requests Public Manager close Requests Closed Offer Created Supplier create Offer for Request User make Order on Offers Supplier confirm Order Awaiting Confirmation Successful

Central Functional requirements Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team35 Actors Functions SupplierOperator View “Request”XX Manage “Offer”XX Approve “Offer” X View “Order”XX Confirm “Order”X Close “Offer”XX Manage “Category” X Manage “Product” X Manage “Supplier” X Manage “Member” X Manage “User” X Export to ExcelXX Refine Product List X

Internal Functional requirements Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team36 Actors Functions UserManager Manage “Request”XX Consolidate “Request” X Public “Request” X Close “Request”XX View General “Offer”XX Order on Specific “Offer”XX Order on General “Offer”XX Cancel “Order”XX Manage “User” X Export to ExcelXX

Business Process Model Offers Operator Supplier Requests Orders User Manager Create Approve Cancel Create Public Close Make Offers Requests Order Confirm Cancel

Non-functional requirements Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team38 UsabilityPerformanceSecurity

SOFTWARE DESIGN Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation

Frameworks & IDE Developing Environment 4 Version Q released 07/12/2011

Developing Environment Built on top of Microsoft ASP.NET AJAX framework Rich client-side capabilities; nearly identical client-side and server-side APIs Built-in support for LINQ, Entity Framework, ADO.NET/WCF Services… Performance optimization helper controls and HTTP compression

Workspace & Productivity tools Developing Environment Testing and deploy

System Context Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team43

Executive Summary Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team44

Architecture Overview Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team45

Central Components Diagram Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team46

Internal Components Diagram 47Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team

Class Diagram Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team48

Sequence Diagram Copyright © 2011 GP-F Team49

Database Design

Audit tracking Active/inactive instead of deletion

Database Access Pros High Performance Flexibility in building object Cons Longer developing time High code-prone error ADO.NET Entity Framework

Database Access Pros Time-saver Strongly typed object Almost no code-prone error Cons Low performance Inflexible

Win-service Automation data retrieving task Low memory cost, suit long running time task

Web-service WCF Pros Performance Flexibility Cons Complex

Web-service security Central Internal Hello hash Hello hash Internal’s private key Central’s private key Central’s public key Internal’s public key transfer Digital Signature

SOFTWARE TESTING Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation

Test types User Interface testFunction testPerformance testSecurity and access control

Test stages Start: End: Unit test & Prototype test Start: End: Integration test Start: End: System test

Bug’s life cycle Log to Excel file Commit to SVN Announce to all Bug detected Dev. Confirm bug Update status daily Bug fixing Dev. inform tester Tester re-test Close Reopen Bug fixed

Test Execution Summary

Test results CentralInternalTotal Test case Passed Bugs

Outstanding Incidents

Incidents report

PROJECT RESULTS Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation

Project result Complete all core business functions Out of scope Consolidate Request notification Refine Product list …

LESSON LEARNED AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation

Lessons learned

Future development Complete all requirements Users credit assessment Apply enterprise architecture Establish GP Company

DEMONSTRATION Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation

Q&A Group Purchasing for FPT Corporation

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING