SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY Department of Social Services Local Efforts to Achieve the Vision.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To Eliminate Poverty and Family Violence in El Paso County.
Advertisements

“Strategic Plan ( ) and Agency Accreditation”
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
AN OVERVIEW September The Case for Change 650,000 reported cases of child abuse/neglect each year 700,000 children in contact with CWS annually.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
Child Welfare Practice Model
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Safe & Equitable Foster Care Reduction in Multnomah County CCFC Commission Mtg Tuesday, Dec 8 th 2009.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
2 3 Regional Manager Employment Services Supervisors Employment Services Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Adult Services.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
AN OVERVIEW California Workforce Association Youth Conference February 2004.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
Ionia County Great Start Collaborative Strategic Planning Reviewing trends from new information & data Setting Priorities for Goals & Strategies.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Linkages: CalWORKs and Child Welfare Collaboration to Improve Outcomes.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
Source: CWS/CMS Business Objects Report Data As Of: 11/30/ San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services “Change a Lifetime – Create a Lifelong.
Belinda Benassi Child Welfare Services Program Manager CalWORKs and Child Welfare Services Linkages Coordinator Julie Lemen Information Technology Team.
Stanislaus County Children and Family Services Families In Partnership After Care Program A Parent Mentor Program.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Stemming the Tides Minnesota’s Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs Seventh Annual Citizen Review Panel Conference May 22, 2008 Brenda Lockwood, MN Dept.
Lori Clarke Convergent Horizons February 6, 2015.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
A Valuable Bridge How Linkages Can Advance Other Initiatives Leslie Ann Hay, MSW Hay Consulting (206)
Tehama Linkages Commitment Presented by LaDeena Coates, Employment & Training Worker, II Richard Phillips, Social Worker, II.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Linkages: CalWORKs and Child Welfare Collaboration To Improve Outcomes Child Welfare Conference 2008 Monterey, California.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
1 RBS Implementation Preparation Forum Wednesday  March 4, 2009 The RBS Evaluation: Reviewing the Basics.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
LA County Department of Children & Family Services
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
LA County Department of Children & Family Services
Office of Children's Services
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
NEXT STEPS IN DEVELOPING CULTURALLY-COMPETENT
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Presentation transcript:

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY Department of Social Services Local Efforts to Achieve the Vision

Vision: A responsible and caring community: Safe, Resilient & Healthy Mission: We partner with the community to enhance self-sufficiency while ensuring that safety and basic human needs are met for the people of San Luis Obispo County. CWS Goal: To provide for the safety and stability of children who are at risk of abuse or neglect. San Luis Obispo County Dept. of Social Services

Children & Families Family Centered Team-Driven Community

Family-Focused, Team Driven Principles of Best Practice Family Centered Strength Based Needs Driven Solution Oriented Community Based

Utilizing Strategies to Achieve AB636 Outcomes

Children & Families Family Well-Being Child Safety Child Well-Being Child Permanency DSS Linkages Family to Family AB636/ C-CFSR Community CWSOIP

Key Strategy: Linkages “The CalWORKs & Child Welfare Partnership” A strong partnership between CalWORKs and Child Welfare will ensure that DSS staff work together with families to prevent poverty, and enhance child safety and family well-being. Staff effectively assess needs and link families to community-based resources early on so that families can be safe and strong.

Linkages: Why Should We Do This?  Children from families with annual incomes below $15,000 (as compared to children from families with annual incomes above $30,000) were over 22 times more likely to experience some form of maltreatment.  In 2004, nearly half (42%) of all substantiated reports were due to neglect; of these 53% consisted of children 5 years old or younger

San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services CWS and Linkages Quarterly Report WELL BEING & SELF-SUFFICIENCY Welfare to Work Participation Rates The Welfare-to-Work participation rate for San Luis Obispo County remains significantly higher than the Federal/State standard. (Note: There is a delay of 2 months in data reporting. Atascadero Services Area determined by CDS worker number.) Linkages Outcome #2: WTW participation rates will increase. Page 28 of 424th Quarter 2005 (New ) Source Linkages Outcomes Report (data from CDS/GIS Download)

Key Strategy: Family to Family “Rebuilding Our Foster Care System” 9 Outcomes: 1)Fewer children placed in foster care However, if foster care placement is necessary: 2)More children placed in their own neighborhoods & communities 3)Fewer children placed in institutional care; shift resources to kinship care, family foster care & family-centered services.

Key Strategy: Family to Family 9 Outcomes (continued): 4)Shorter stays in placement 5)More children reunified with their birth families 6)Fewer children re-entering placement 7)Fewer moves when in placement 8)More siblings placed together 9)Reduce disparities associated with race/ethnicity, gender, or age in these outcomes

Family to Family: Key Components to Meet the Outcomes Team Decision-Making Meetings (TDM’s) Recruitment & Retention of Foster/ Resource Parents Self-Evaluation/Data Analysis Building Community Partnerships

Family to Family: Why Should We Do This?  In January 2005, there were 373 children in foster care (SLO)  Between January 2004 and December 2004, 5% of children in foster care experienced 3 or more moves (SLO)  Most children in foster care (77%) were removed from their homes for neglect- related reasons i.e., not abuse (Calif.)

San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services Children in Foster Care CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE AS OF 11/30/2005

San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services Children in Foster Care San Luis Obispo County’s goal is to transition children out of foster care and into safe and stable families sooner than in the past. LENGTH OF TIME IN FOSTER CARE FOR CHILDREN IN CARE AS OF 11/30/2005

PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN WITHIN THEIR HOME COMMUNITY FOR CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE AS OF 11/30/2005 San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services Children in Foster Care Family-to-Family Outcome: More children placed in their own community. Ideal Placement Codes are based on Service Area as opposed to individual cities. All cities in the county are included in one of the six service areas. For instance, children from Grover Beach, Pismo Beach and Oceano are included in the Arroyo Grande Service Area. Note: Ideal Placement Codes are not appropriate in all cases.

Key Strategy: CWS Outcome Improvement Project California’s plan to “Build Upon the Best, Reinvent the Rest”  San Luis Obispo County is one of 11 counties chosen by the State as an “Early Implementer” county  Began January 2004  5 years to implement key components  Requires county & community leadership

CWSOIP: Key Components to Meet the Outcomes  Youth Permanency and Transition  Standardized Assessments  Structured Decision-Making (SDM)  Differential Response

What is Differential Response?  An important component of the CWS Outcomes Improvement Project  A new intake & response structure that allows CWS and/or community responders to assess referrals of suspected child abuse or neglect  DR assesses the needs, resources and circumstances of each unique family and focuses on engaging and assessing families by utilizing 3 initial “response paths”.

SLO County Department of Social Services Intake & Differential Response Structure Reporting Party Calls in (805) 781-KIDS Reporting Party Calls in (805) 781-KIDS CWS Intake RED Team  Review  Evaluate  Determine Intake decides first face-to-face Response Path CWS Intake RED Team  Review  Evaluate  Determine Intake decides first face-to-face Response Path Path 3 CWS Only High to Very High Safety Risk Path 3 CWS Only High to Very High Safety Risk Path 2 CWS & Community High to Moderate Safety Risk Path 2 CWS & Community High to Moderate Safety Risk Path 1 Community Only NO known safety issues Low Risk Path 1 Community Only NO known safety issues Low Risk Subsequent Referrals (Assessed by assigned CWS Social Worker) Written feedback to Mandated Reporters only.

CWSOIP-Differential Response Why Should We Do This?  Every year in Calif., approx 650,000 reports of suspected child abuse or neglect are received. 92% are closed after initial contact and do not receive any support or services.  CWS Intake has become a revolving door where CWS SW’s respond to repeat referrals. About 1/3 of all referrals represent re-referrals.

DR/Path 1 A Positive Affect on Outcomes Before DR/Path 1 10/1/03- 3/31/04 (6 month period) 894 Children in referrals e’d out 288 Re-referred within 6 months 32% Continued CWS involvement After DR/Path 1 3/1/05- 8/31/05 (6 month period) 1,036 Children in referrals e’d out 251 Re-referred within 6 months 24% Continued CWS involvement

Improved Outcomes: Reports Investigated Year #of Reports Investigated Children in Foster Care Percentage % % % % % % %

New Referrals and Re-Referrals San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services CWS and Linkages Quarterly Report SAFETY Linkages Outcome #6: CWS re-referrals will decrease. Breakthrough Series Outcome #1: Decrease in the number & percentage of CPS re-referrals. In the current quarter, the rates for 6-month and 12-month re-referrals did not change significantly. It is possible that the high rate of 6-month re-referrals in the Atascadero/Linkages services area is due to increased child safety awareness on the part of ERS and community partner staff. This increase awareness (due to the Linkages project) could be causing more hotline reports of abuse or neglect. Ultimately we would expect the number of re-referrals to drop as we provide more after-care services to families. Page 8 of 424th Quarter 2005 (New ) Source Business Objects Report

SAFETY San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services CWS and Linkages Quarterly Report Recurrence of Maltreatment SIP Goal: DSS to intervene as early as possible and to work longer with families to prevent recurrence of maltreatment. SIP Goal: Staff will engage the family in strength-based assessments, while maintaining priority of evaluating safety of children. SIP Goal: Remove barriers to ensure children/families receive appropriate priority for services across county systems. The most recent quarter’s recurrence of maltreatment rate increased, however it should be noted that this rate is still 6.9% lower than our rate in June San Luis Obispo County’s maltreatment rates are directly related to our high rate of referrals per 1,000 children in the population and our high rate of substantiations. In 2004 the state overall received 51.4 referrals per 1,000 children in the population, while San Luis Obispo County received 81.3 referrals per 1,000. During the same time period, the number of substantiated referrals per 1,000 children in the population was 11.5 for the state overall and 24.0 for SLO County. Page 9 of 424th Quarter 2005 (New ) Source State AB636 Report Baseline June 2003 SLO: 22.5% State: 9.7% Fed: 6.1%

Standardized Assessments Structured Decision Making (SDM)  Intake  Safety  Family Strengths and Needs  Reunification  CalWORKs

OUTCOMES  First and foremost, children are protected from abuse & neglect  Children are safely maintained in their own homes whenever possible and appropriate  Children have permanency and stability in their living situations  The continuity of family relationships and connections is preserved for children  Families have enhanced capacity to provide for their children’s needs  Children receive appropriate services to meet their educational needs  Children receive adequate services to meet their physical and mental health needs  Youth emancipating from foster care are prepared to transition to adulthood DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE  SDM-Structured Decision Making  Path response assessed at Intake  Response made to all families  Path 1 – Community Response (No known safety issues)  Path 2 – Child Welfare & Community Response (Moderate to high risk)  Path 3 – Child Welfare Response (High to very high risk) FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS  Network of neighborhood-based, co- located resources  Wide array of no/low-cost services  Community and family driven  Prevention focused  SAFE system of care U Understanding standardized assessments (The CalWORKs & Child Welfare partnership)  CalWORKs assesses for potential risk  Child Welfare assesses for self-sufficiency  Coordinated case plans  Aftercare plans  Reduction of child maltreatment Best practice Principles  Family centered  Team driven  Strengths based  Needs driven  Solution oriented  Community based FAMILY ENGAGEMENT  Sharing results of SDM  Family team meetings  Family advocates  Youth and parent involvement  Utilizing the wisdom of families and the people they trust in assessment, safety and case planning processes PERMANENCY  Achieving permanence (through strong family supports, reunification, adoption, guardianship) as quickly as possible for children and youth who have been separated from their families.  Using TDM’s (Team Decision-making Meetings) to reduce the number of placements into foster care.  Court Stakeholders/ Improvement Child safety, permanency & Well-being LINKAGESLINKAGES

Permanency California Permanency for Youth Project (CPYP) technical assistance Permanency case managers Local California Youth Connection (CYC) chapter Youth teaching foster/resource parents and social workers

San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services CWS and Linkages Quarterly Report PERMANENCY AND STABILITY FR Cases Exceeding Time Limits The percentage of family reunification cases in San Luis Obispo County which have exceeded the mandated time limits has consistently been under the 10% threshold required for compliance since March The county has been focusing on terminating parental rights within 12 to 18 months, as required by the Adoption & Safe Families Act. This has directly contributed to the high number of FR cases that have met the established FR time limits. Page 23 of 424th Quarter 2005 (New ) Source CWS/CMS FC1561-PMFRXDUR & CWS Monthly Summary (data from Business Objects)

San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services CWS and Linkages Quarterly Report AGE DISPARITY Children in Placement Family-to-Family Outcome # 9: Reduce disparities associated with race/ethnicity or age. San Luis Obispo County is working on decreasing the length of time teens spend in foster care and is focusing on supporting teens as they transition to adulthood. Over the most recent quarter the age of children in placement has remained relatively stable. Note: Actual Number of Children shown in Red Page 39 of 424th Quarter 2005 (New ) Source Business Objects Report

San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services CWS and Linkages Quarterly Report PERMANENCY AND STABILITY Placement of Children by Facility Type San Luis Obispo County’s percentage of children in relative placements significantly exceeds the State average of 37%, while the percentage of children in group home placements is significantly below the average of 8%. The fact that our Foster Family Agency placement rate is lower than the State average of 34.5% is particularly impressive since our rate includes placements made into our FFA-contracted emergency shelter homes. These figures validate the success of the Family-to-Family project in our county. Family-to-Family Outcome # 3: Fewer children in institutional and group care. Page 12 of 424th Quarter 2005 (New ) Source Business Objects Report

Achieving the Vision What Will Success Look Like? Children are safer Families are stronger Youth are supported Services are more responsive Results are more fair and equitable Children experience greater stability Communities share responsibility for child welfare Families realize their potential Outcomes are being met

Children & Families Family Well-Being Child Safety Child Well-Being Child Permanency DSS Family to Family CWSOIP Linkages Schools Drug & Alcohol AB636/ C-CFSR Community This way to the Vision Mental Health Public Health EOC Family Resource Centers SAFE CASA,etc