Principles of Accreditation Dr. Claude Pressnell TICUA, Nashville, Tennessee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)
Advertisements

Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Governance Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2010 Annual Conference Philadelphia,
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
Alexandria, 2005 NQAAC Quality Assurance and Accreditation for Higher Education Dr. Salwa EL Magoli National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Higher Learning Commission (North Central Association) Comparison/Evaluation of AQIP and PEAQ Michelle Johnston.
Tempus Workshop Zagreb pag. 1 Quality Assurance in Higher Education Flanders in a European Context.
European University Association By Nureddin Kırkavak & Mohammad Mesgarpour Department of Industrial Engineering.
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Using Accreditation to Support Your Goals Fall Institute for Academic Deans and Department Chair Charleston, SC October 18, 2004.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Developing a National Qualifications Framework: the Georgian experience General Overview Nodar Surguladze Deputy Minister Ministry of Education and Science.
SACS: Gatekeeper to the Flow of Federal Aid. UK’s Accrediting Body The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), Commission on Colleges, is.
Peering into the Future of Higher Education Claude Pressnell President Tennessee Independent Colleges and Universities Association.
HOW CAN YOU HELP EMU TOWARDS INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION BY EUA?
Europeanization v. academic freedom in higher education in Poland
The Bologna Process The UK HE Europe Unit Tish Bourke.
CCSSE and SENSE for Accreditation
The UK Credit Framework and the Bologna Process Tim Cobbett Director of Quality and Governance.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
Quality Assurance at the University St. Kliment Ohridski Elizabeta Bahtovska National Bologna promoter TEMPUS SCM C-032B06 West Balkan Bologna Promoters.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
Reaffirmation of WCU General Orientation Wednesday, June 22, 2005 Carol Burton, Director, SACS Review.
The Bologna Process: A quick review The Bologna Process is primarily designed to construct a European Higher Education Area, thereby promoting the mobility.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
From a galaxy far, far away... The Compact Process A View from 40,000 feet Laura Coffin Koch Associate Vice Provost University of Minnesota.
New Cultural Environment in the European Higher Education Area: Degree equivalence as a driving force for the international labour market Friedrich Roithmayr.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
1 February 2005 Briefing Sessions Draft Regulations Using Water for Recreational Purposes.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
 SACSCOC REAFFIRMATION FALL  OBJECTIVES: 1.List key facts related to the SACSCOC reaffirmation process. 2.Verbalize understanding of SACSCOC Principles.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
University of Novi Sad Quality, curricula, credit system short overwiew Radmila Marinkovic-Neducin
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Articulation and Transfer Report 2011 Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall Quarterly Meeting November 10, 2011.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION MERI/ NCDTVET - PIU Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO RO2006/
SACS Accreditation Process Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President Commission on Colleges---SACS.
Curriculum reform Tirana 16th-17th March. A bit about ESIB ESIB-the National Unions of students in Europe is an umbrella organization representing over.
NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN AZERBAIJAN Prof. Dr. Natig YUSIFOV Azerbaijan University.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
SACS Review and WCU Training and Orientation Thursday, February 24, 2005 Carol Burton, Director, SACS Review.
Importance of Essentials of Baccalaureate Nursing Education into Professional Nursing Practice American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) Commission.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
Slide 1 Accounting Education Requirements and Implementation of the EU Directive on Statutory Audit Wim Moleveld Education Subgroup of the Liberalization/Qualification.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008.
Ministry of Education and Science Republic of Armenia Levon Mkrtchyan Minister of Education and Science of Armenia IMPLEMENTATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BOLOGNA.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Implementing the LLL Charter Michael H örig EUA Programme Manager Nicosia, Cyprus 22 November 2010.
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Comprehensive Review for Reaffirmation of Accreditation Presentation to Campus Forum October 21, 2015 Christopher Oberg, Vice President/COO.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
Mobility in Serbia: regulatory framework and the main characteristics University of Belgrade – Faculty of Political Sciences November, 2014.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Finding balance between academic requirements and accommodations
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Faculty of Engineering Latvia University of Agriculture
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Racing to Reaccreditation
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
Presentation transcript:

Principles of Accreditation Dr. Claude Pressnell TICUA, Nashville, Tennessee

Overview May Conference in Budapest, HU Presenters –Marjorie Lenn Peace –Stephen Spangehl Focus on broad aspects of institutional accreditation

Overview Next Steps –Focus on the institution level –Understanding the principles of accreditation –Accreditation is a collaborative process

Introduction Bologna Declaration of 1999 –Easily readable and comparable degrees –Two main cycles Undergraduate – three years Graduate – five years –Masters – two years –Doctorate – three years –System of credits (ECTS) –Student mobility –International cooperation in quality assurance

Introduction United States Model of Accreditation –Higher Learning Commission –Southern Association of Colleges and Secondary Schools Regional Accreditation concept

Introduction Participation in the United States is voluntary Member institutions of the regional bodies develop, amend, and approve accreditation policies The process of accreditation is representative, responsive, and appropriate to the types of institutions accredited.

Introduction Accreditation is self- regulation Requires institutional commitment and engagement Based upon the peer- review process Requires commitment to student learning and achievement

Introduction Acknowledges an institution’s prerogative to articulate its mission within the recognized context of higher education and its responsibility to show that it is accomplishing its mission.

Introduction Expects an institution to develop a balanced governing structure designed to promote institutional autonomy and flexibility of operation. Expects an institution to ensure that its programs are complemented by support structures and resources that allow total growth and development of its students.

Fundamentals of Accreditation Institutional Mission Governance and Administration Educational Programs Faculty Library and Other Learning Resources Financial and Physical Resources

What to Expect? Tuesday and Wednesday –Cover the basic principles of accreditation and gain a working understanding of how those principles are measured Thursday and Friday –Workshops using the working understanding of the principles you will begin to grapple with how to measure these issues on your campus

Tuesday Morning Sessions –Overview and Introduction –Mission, Purpose, Goals – Basis for Institution Evaluation Afternoon Sessions –University Governance and Administration –Begin Discussions on Education Programs

Wednesday Morning Sessions –Finish session on Education Programs –Faculty Afternoon Sessions –Library and Other Learning Resources –Student Affairs and Services –Financial and Physical Resources

Thursday and Friday Workshops will parallel the sessions from Tuesday and Wednesday Each session will begin with a 10 to 15 minute briefing and then there will be one hour planning sessions followed by a 15 minute group debriefing.

Final Word When you leave you should: –Have a working knowledge of the core principles of accreditation and institutional self studies –Have a cursory understanding of where your institution matches up to these principles –Begin the framework of a game plan on how to implement a self-study at your university –Begin to identify key stakeholders for the process

Principles of Accreditation Dr. Claude Pressnell TICUA, Nashville, Tennessee