FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012

THEMES for Data Collection, Analysis, Dialogue and Response Shared Leadership--Shared Ownership Shifting Culture to Collaborative Inquiry Implementation and Monitoring School Improvement Initiatives Assessing Impact

FSI Materials New Participants, White Binder New Participants, MI-CSI Journal New Participants, Plastic Folders All, Book Talk: got data? NOW WHAT All Flashdrive Macombfsi.net

Connector Activity #1 Finding Common Ground Task: This activity will be done with your school team. Find (3) things in common amongst you. They CANNOT be things that are obvious…ex. We are all Teachers Be ready to share out with larger group.

Connector Activity #2 Shoe-In Mixer: Find someone on the opposite side of the room as you, that is wearing completely different style shoes. When you travel, take 3 sticky notes and a writing tool Introduce yourself and find a place to sit for the next task. Movie and Popcorn Task: View the 14 minute video Think about the following question and use your sticky notes to record important ideas. What evidence can you site that students and teachers are working at an increased Depth of Knowledge (DOK)?

Smarter Balanced Videos Elementary School Video Middle School Video High School Video

Connector Activity #2 Movie and Popcorn Continued Task: Have a conversation with your partner on notes taken. Discuss the evidence you have that students and teachers were working at an increased Depth of Knowledge. What structures do you see that are in place for these DOK to be accomplished? Be ready to “pop” up and share.

Today’s Outcomes Receive updates Explore the streamlined SI, ASSIST through AdvancED Check to see where you are with implementing the CCSS School-wide implementation and progress monitoring Explore 6 tools to navigate the SI process Decommissioned-ACT Data Analysis HS only

Today’s Roadmap Welcome 2011 Themes and Updates What has Changed Due Dates and Professional Learning Common Core State Standards Monitoring the Impact of Strategy Implementation SI Progress Monitoring Data 4 SS/Data Director/MISchooldata Tool Tools and More Tools Network and Planning TAB TWELVE

Key Working Agreements A Facilitation Tool Respect all Points of View Be Present and Engaged Honor Time Agreements Get All Voices in the Room These breathe life into our Core Values

Parking Lot A Facilitation Tool Rest questions that do not benefit the whole group Place questions that do not pertain to content at this time Place questions that pertain, but participants do not want to ask at this time

LIVING BELIEF STATEMENT “Networking is not an option, but a critical part of how Facilitators of School Improvement learn and share their learning.”

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice (MI-CSI)

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile  I. Diagnostics  II. School Process Profile Analyze Data  I. Diagnostic Analysis  II. School Process Analysis  III. Executive Summary/Goals  and Plan Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Develop Action Plan Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Improvement Plan Gather Study Plan Do

Stage One GATHER Step 1: Getting Ready 4 Considerations School Culture –Collaborative Inquiry Process –Vision, Mission, Core Values and Belief Statements School Decision Making –From Decide and Announce to Consensus Team Building –Stakeholder Analysis –Group vs. Team School Current Reality – ‘Where Are We?’ GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

Getting Ready, Data Collection/Analysis Implement and Monitor SI PLAN GATHER, STUDY, &DO GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Document I (SDP/A) School Data Profile/Analysis Due Online: Document III (Summary Report/Goals Management) Summary Report/School Improvement Plan Due Online: Document II (SPP/A) School Process Profile/Analysis Due Online: a. MDE: School Process Rubrics 90 b. MDE: School Process Rubrics 40 c. NCA: Self Assessment (SA) d. NCA: Self Assessment Inventory (SA) NEW DYNAMIC and INTIATIVE SYSTEM To INFORM our School Improvement DECISIONS

Michigan School Improvement Framework Strand IStrand IIStrand IIIStrand IVStrand V Teaching for Learning Leadership Personnel & Professional Learning School and Community Relations Data and Information Management Standards (12) and Benchmarks (26) 1. Curriculum Aligned, Reviewed & Monitored Communicated 2. Instruction Planning Delivery 3. Assessment Aligned to Curriculum and Instruction Data Reporting and Use 1.Instructional Leadership Educational Program · Instructional Support 2.Shared Leadership School Culture and Climate Continuous Improvement 3.Operational Resource Management Resource Allocation Operational management 1.Personnel Qualifications Requirements Skills, Knowledge, Dispositions 2.Professional Learning Collaboration Content & Pedagogy Alignment 1.Parent/Family Involvement Communication Engagement 2.Community Involvement Communication Engagement 1.Data Management Data Generation, Identification & Collection Data Accessibility Data Support 2.Information Management Analysis & Interpretation Applications

AdvancED Michigan 5 Standards STANDARD 3. Teaching and Assessing for Learning. The system’s curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning across all grades and courses. (Continued on next page) 3.1 The system’s curriculum provides equitable and challenging learning experiences that ensure all students have sufficient opportunities to develop learning, thinking, and life skills that lead to success at the next level. 3.2Curriculum, instruction, and assessment throughout the system are monitored and adjusted systematically in response to data from multiple assessments of student learning and an examination of professional practice. 3.3Teachers throughout the district engage students in their learning through instructional strategies that ensure achievement of learning expectations. 3.4System and school leaders monitor and support the improvement of instructional practices of teachers to ensure student success. 3.5The system operates as a collaborative learning organization through structures that support improved instruction and student learning at all levels.

School Process Profile (SPP) document two Two Road Maps MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT EDUCATION MDE AdvancED Michigan School Process Rubrics (SPR) 90 Rubrics (Required in the 5 th year of your cycle) Self Assessment (SA) 56 Rubrics (Required for the year of the ER) EDYES! 40 Process Rubrics 40 Rubrics (Required Cycles 1-4) Self Assessment Inventory (SAI) 56 Rubrics (Required Cycles 1-4) External Review (ER)

Data and Data Analysis AdvancED Michigan Diagnostic Student Performance Diagnostic Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostic (perception surveys) External Review (ER) 5thYear MDE Diagnostic Performance Diagnostic The Student Diagnostic will be ‘live’ after the ER date has been assigned.

Executive Summary Components Vision Mission Belief Statements Strengths/Weaknesses Complete every Year Due

Adaptive System School Improvement Support Tool ASSIST moves to

Accessing ASSIST – Option 1 ©2012 AdvancED24

NEW ASSIST TABS

Accessing ASSIST – Option 2 ©2012 AdvancED26 Log into the Management System and use one of the ASSIST links

©2012 AdvancED27 ASSIST Overview Appropriate task will be assigned to priority and focus school

©2012 AdvancED28 ASSIST Overview Click here to view the task details

©2012 AdvancED29 These diagnostics are marked optional because only one is required, not both

©2012 AdvancED32

LABELING is EVERYTHING

©2012 AdvancED34

Noteworthy Elementary Professional Learning Opportunities MI School Data New Data Availability Handout Parent Involvement and Title I – MISD MI Professional Learning Standards

Noteworthy Secondary Professional Learning Opportunities MI School Data New Data Availability Handout Parent Involvement and Title I – MISD ACT FREE online Prep Student ACT Preparation Class – or

Explore, Plan, and ACT Middle and High Schools D-EXPLORE 7 th Grade 120 minutes Explore 8 th Grade 120 minutes D-PLAN 9 th Grade 120 minutes PLAN 10 th Grade 120 minutes Testing Window

Macomb County PLC Self Help Group Facilitator: Dr. Rick Repicky These meetings take place on the FOUR Tuesdays of the month at 10:00 am at the MISD. They are open to District and School Administrators and teachers. DATESROOM # A/B

AdvancED MI Fall Conference Lansing Center, Lansing MDE Fall Conference :00-7:00 pm Lansing Center, Lansing :30 -4:00 pm Lansing Center, Lansing Important Dates Register at:

REMINDER to REGISTER School Improvement Teams Work Day Title I only Title I only Title I only Non Title I Non Title I Non Title I Non Title I

Alternative Dates Make-up Days: must register SB-CEUs: 2.7 completed in MAY

Mathematics

Smarter Balanced Consortium Have you SHIFTED to the Common Core? Career and College Readiness Standards Transition Guidance 2012

Common Core (Communicator) Implementation Checklist for Principals Leadership, Awareness Building, and Communication Professional Learning Implications for Student Learning Capacity Building Special Considerations for Your School

One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement Stages and Steps Study Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice

Stage Four: DO Step 9: Implement Plan DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Identifying Activities MATRIX 1 Connection to SPR 40/90, SA/Assist SA* Getting Ready to Implement Implement Monitoring Fidelity of Implementation and Impact How will you address the targeted areas in your Summary Report (SPP) ? How will you ensure readiness for implementation? How will you ensure that participants have the knowledge and skills to implement? POSSIBILE ACTIVITIES  Professional development around strategy  Purchase materials  Planning for implementation – Identify schedule for strategy use, personnel, mechanism for monitoring, rollout, etc.  Communication vehicles How will you ensure successful implementation for your selected activities? POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES  Communication – to whom? How?  Instructional technology*  Activities to support at-risk students (For Title One students)* Parent Involvement *Required Components How will you ensure the program/activity is implemented with fidelity? How will you monitor the programs impact on student achievement? POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES  Walkthroughs  PLC/CASL meetings  Documentation of impact  Demonstration classrooms  Gathering achievement data

Grade Level or Content Area Strategy Implementation MATRIX 2

Stage Four: DO Step 10: Monitor Plan DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

So…we’ve written a stellar school improvement plan… Overarching Questions How do we know we’re implementing it? How do we know the strategy is impacting student achievement? Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

MONITOR MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN (Formative) IS IT WORKING? EVALUATE EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Summative) DID IT WORK? ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED WITH FIDELITY ? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO? DID WE IMPLEMENTTHE PLAN/STRATEGIES CORRECTLY & CONSISTENTLY? IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? DID WE GIVE IT ENOUGH TIME? ENOUGH RESOURCES? Implementation: Adult FocusedImpact: Student Focused MONITOREVALUATE MONITOR DID OUR STRATEGIES RESULT IN INCREASED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? WHAT UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES (GOOD AND BAD) HAVE OCCURRED? Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

MONITOR MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN (Formative) IS IT WORKING? EVALUATE EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Summative) DID IT WORK? ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED WITH FIDELITY ? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO? IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? Implementation: Adult FocusedImpact: Student Focused MONITOREVALUATE MONITOR Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Just Do IT! Monitor ImplementationMonitor Implementation Evaluate ImplementationEvaluate Implementation Monitor ImpactMonitor Impact Evaluate ImpactEvaluate Impact Adult Focused Student Focused Do Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

Progress Monitoring Anchor Bay Middle School North Kris Deagan Sarah Kessel-Glassford

Tools Tools Tools School Self Assessment of SI Planning Processes Protocols for Dialoging Text Developing Individual Learning Goals Culture of Trust/Collegial Visit Family and Community Partnership Systems and Collaboration Inventory

Directions Each participant reads about one tool Identify ways to use the TOOL to support SI initiatives ‘Use the SI Tools Use’ form to record Report out to hole group Meet in school teams to create a plan for use

Stage One: GATHER Step 1: Getting Ready GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

“In God we trust, everyone else brings DATA”

One Common Voice – One Plan Stage One Gather: Step 2 Collect School Data What do you already know? What data do you need to know? What additional information/data do you need to know? Where can the information/data be found? Definitions Achievement Student Outcome Data How our students perform on local, state and federal assessments (subgroups) Demographic or Contextual Data Describes our students, staff, building, and community Process Data The policies, procedures, and systems we have in place that define how we do business Perception Data Opinions of staff, parents, community and students regarding our school

What types of data are/are not readily available in your building? 64 Demographic DataAchievement/ Outcome Data Process DataPerception Data Enrollment Subgroups of students Staff Attendance (Students and Staff) Mobility Graduation and Dropout Conference Attendance Education status Student subgroups Parent Involvement Teaching Staff Course enrollment patterns Discipline referrals Suspension rates Alcohol ‐ tobacco ‐ drugs violations Participation extra ‐ curriculars Physical, mental, social and health Local assessments: District Common Assessments, Classroom Assessments, Report Cards State assessments: MME, ACT, MEAP, MI-Access, MEAP Access, ELPA National assessments: ACT Plan, ACT Explore, ACT WorkKeys, NWEA, ITBS, CAT, MET NAEP, PSAT GPA Dropout rates College acceptance Policies and procedures (e.g. grading, homework, attendance, discipline) Academic and behavior expectations Parent participation – PT conferences, PTO/PTA, volunteers Suspension data School Process Profile Rubrics (40 or 90) or SA/SAR (NCA) Event occurred: Who, what, when, where, why, how What you did for Whom: Eg. All 8th graders received violence Prevention Survey data (student, parent, staff, community) Opinions Clarified what others think People act based on what they believe How do they see you/us?

Stage One: Gather Step 2: Collecting School Data Step 3: Build School Profile Data Director D4SS MISchooldata.org Presenter Dr. Jennifer Parker-Moore Personnel Skilled in Technology Assessment This is an annual survey. Assessment window will open Technology Assessment due: December 2012 GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

Stage Two: Study Step 4: Analyze Data Decommission ACT Data Analysis Presenter Tesha Thomas STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Obj. Research Best Practice