INDEXATION CRITERIA Christian Kieling, MD Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Get Published European Journal of Human Genetics www. nature
Advertisements

NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE PubMed Central Edwin Sequeira National Library of Medicine May 26, 2004.
Criteria for quality assessment of medical information resources EAHIL Workshop Alghero June 7 - 9, 2001 Marie Monik Christine Wickman Karolinska Institutet.
NIH Public Access Compliance Cleveland Health Sciences Library Case Western Reserve University Kathleen C. Blazar.
Search Strategy and Information Retrieval By Rekha Gupta, NIC
What happens after submission? Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
NCBI/WHO PubMed/Hinari Course NCBI Literature Databases: PubMed Background.
Introduction to PubMed® (pubmed.gov)
PubMed Central ANCHASL Spring Meeting April 1, 2005 Robert James Associate Director of Public Services Duke University.
PubMed Central Mahyar Ahmadpour-B. Kowsar Publicatin Corp. Kowsar Editorial Meeting 1 September 19th, 2013 Tehran, Iran.
The National Library of Medicine online resources Salima M’seffar INH- Bibliotheque
| 0 World-Class Scientific Journals – 2014: Improving quality and expanding presence in the world information resources Moscow, May 19 – 21, 2014 Karen.
ROLE OF THE REVIEWER ESSA KAZIM. ROLE OF THE REVIEWER Refereeing or peer-review has the advantages of: –Identification of suitable scientific material.
Accessing Sources Of Evidence For Practice Introduction To Databases Karen Smith Department of Health Sciences University of York.
Jukka-Pekka Suomela 2014 Ethics and quality in research and publishing.
T H O M S O N S C I E N T I F I C Editorial Development James Testa, Director.
American Medical Association Journals include: JAMA (journal of the American Medical Association.), Archives of surgery, Archives of ophthalmology and.
Evaluating and Citing Internet Sources Pamela Fried, MBA, Director Diana Winters, BA, Associate Director Academic Publishing Services and Gary M. Childs,
New Web of Science Rachel Mangan Customer Education
SCOPUS AND SCIVAL EVALUATION AND PROMOTION OF UKRAINIAN RESEARCH RESULTS PIOTR GOŁKIEWICZ PRODUCT SALES MANAGER, CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE KIEV, 31 JANUARY.
Current Psychiatry (Egypt) Official Journal of Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
LILACS database: eighteen years indexing Latin American and Caribbean health sciences journals Regina C. Figueiredo Castro BIREME/PAHO/WHO 10th International.
Shobna Bhatia.  Telephone instrument  Computer  Software Instructions nearly always provided However, frequently not read At least, not until things.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
Thomson Scientific October 2006 ISI Web of Knowledge Autumn updates.
BIO1130 Lab 2 Scientific literature. Laboratory objectives After completing this laboratory, you should be able to: Determine whether a publication can.
Bio-Medical Information Retrieval from Net By Sukhdev Singh.
T H O M S O N S C I E N T I F I C Marian Hollingsworth Manager, Publisher Relations July 18, 2007 Using Metrics to Improve your Journal Veterinary Journal.
Nursing 386. Your Assignment:  Summarize two research articles that address the clinical issue. Acquire these articles by searching various databases.
Declaring the Publication Ethics (Scopus Comments) Razieh Moghadam, Kowsar Corporation,
SCOPUS AND SCIVAL EVALUATION AND PROMOTION OF UKRAINIAN RESEARCH RESULTS PIOTR GOŁKIEWICZ PRODUCT SALES MANAGER, CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE LVIV, 11 SEPTEMBER.
April 9, 2003Santiago, Chile The ISI Database: Reflecting the Best of International and Regional Research Keith R. MacGregor Sr. Vice President The Americas,
Passive vs. Active voice Carolyn Brown Taller especializado de inglés científico para publicaciones académicas D.F., México de junio de 2013 UNDERSTANDING.
Click on the tab to find journals by Subjects. From the drop down menu, we will select Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases.
Thomson Reuters ISI (Information Sciences Institute) Azam Raoofi, Head of Indexing & Education Departments, Kowsar Editorial Meeting, Sep 19 th 2013.
Online Editorial Management On-line Management of Scholarly Journals Mahmoud Saghaei.
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals Berlin March 2006.
대한소화기학회지 Medline 등재경험 경희의대 소화기내과 김 병 호. Medline  Online counter part of Index Medicus  Bibliographic citation database of NLM to provide access to the.
Revised 7/19/10.  This policy states that, as of April 7, 2008, all articles resulting from U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) funds must be submitted.
Journal Searching Nancy B. Clark, M.Ed. Director of Medical Informatics Education FSU College of Medicine 1 All recourses are available online in Medical.
INANE Meeting –Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing Charon Pierson Geraldine Pearson August 5, 2015.
Scope of the Journal The International Journal of Sports Medicine (IJSM) provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with basic or applied information.
To find journals by language of publication, click on the Languages bar in the horizontal frame. The Languages drop down menu appear and we will choose.
Access to Research Data: NIH Public Access and PMC International Seminar on Open Access for Developing Countries 21 September 2005 Jane Bortnick Griffith.
MEDLINE®/PubMed® PubMed for Trainers, Fall 2015 U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) and NLM Training Center An introduction.
The Thomson Reuters Journal Selection Policy – Building Great Journals - Adding Value to Web of Science Maintaining and Growing Web of Science Regional.
| 0 Scopus content selection and curation processes Susanne Steiginga, MSc. Product Manager Scopus Content 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference.
DATABASES. Learning outcomes for today By the end of this session you will be able to: ◦ Use boolean operators ◦ Understand the structure of information.
Getting Academic Works Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals
Indexing (and other good ideas)
BIO1130 Lab 2 Scientific literature
How to Find Systematic Reviews
Open Access Journals Perspective from a former Editor-in-Chief
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
Emerging Sources Citation Index
The National Library of Medicine and its databases
Lívia Vasas, PhD 2018 The National Library of Medicine and its databases Mozilla Firefox/Google Chrome Lívia Vasas, PhD.
HOW TO WRITE A SYSTEMATIC/NARRATIVE REVIEW
African Journal Partnership Project
How to Find Systematic Reviews
BIO1130 Lab 2 Scientific literature
What the Editors want to see!
PubMed.
The National Library of Medicine and its databases
Advice on getting published
EDITORIAL SELECTION JOURNAL COVERAGE – ESCI
MANUSCRIPT WRITING TIPS, TRICKS, & INFORMATION Madison Hedrick, MA
Joyce Backus Associate Director, Library Operations
Presentation transcript:

INDEXATION CRITERIA Christian Kieling, MD Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil WPA International Congress Beijing, September 2010

Medline Decision whether or not to index a journal is made by the Director of the National Library of Medicine (NLM), based on considerations of both scientific policy and scientific quality The Literature Selection Technical Review Committee (LSTRC) reviews journal titles and assesses the quality of their contents (incorporating advices of outside experts in the subject area) As a result of these reviews, currently indexed titles may be dropped and new titles added

Medline criteria Scope, coverage, audience, and quality of content  predominantly on core biomedical subjects, targeted to the health professions; scientific merit is the primary consideration in selecting journals for indexing Types of content 1.original research 2.original clinical observations with analysis and discussion 3.analysis of philosophical/social aspects of health sciences 4.critical reviews 5.statistical compilations 6.descriptions of evaluation of methods or procedures 7.case reports with discussions

Medline criteria Production quality  quality of layout, printing, graphics, and illustrations Geographic coverage  “special attention is given to research, public health, epidemiology, standards of health care, and indigenous diseases”  journals will generally not be selected if contents are already well represented or if they are being published for a local audience Foreign language journals  same criteria as for those written in English  however, the majority of published articles should contain an English-language abstract

Medline criteria Quality of editorial work  objectivity, credibility, and quality of contents information about the methods of selecting articles, especially on the explicit process of external peer review statements indicating adherence to ethical guidelines evidence that authors disclose financial conflicts of interest timely correction of errors explicit responsible retractions as appropriate opportunity for comments and dissenting opinion advertising/commercial sponsorship should not raise questions about the objectivity of the published material sponsorship by national or international professional societies

How to get reviewed The editor should (1) request a journal review by using the MEDLINE Review Application Form and (2) send the review issues (according to how frequently the journal is published) to the indicated address It is also helpful to provide a subscription of the journal (no need to send CVs or letters to LSTRC members) What if the journal is available only in electronic format?  Request can be made after the journal has been accessible for at least six months (necessary >20 articles published online)  Digital archive: MEDLINE wants to ensure that users will always have access to the full text of every article - permanent archive must be in PubMed Central or another site that is acceptable to NLM  Publisher must be able to submit data electronically in XML format

The application process

The review process The LSTRC meets three times a year and ~190 titles are examined at each meeting  Requesters are not informed of the specific date  Notification is sent to the editor weeks after the meeting Rating scores range from 0 to 5  Scores 3.75 or greater required to be selected for indexing  Overall, about 20% to 25% of the titles reviewed are selected for indexing

If the journal is not selected LSTRC conducts re-examinations upon request  Titles may be re-examined after a minimum of two years following the first review date  After subsequent reviews, titles may be re-examined after a minimum of three years following the prior review date Intervals should allow editors and publishers time to implement improvements to their journal It also guarantees that the majority of the LSTRC membership will have changed by the time of the next review

If the journal is selected When will indexing begin?  If a journal is in its third volume or less when selected, MEDLINE will index the articles in all volumes  If in its fourth year or more, indexing will begin with the current year (articles in earlier volumes will not be retrospectively indexed) Congratulations! - What about other indexation databases?

Web of Science® Includes  Science Citation Index Expanded™  Social Sciences Citation Index®  Arts & Humanities Citation Index® Annually reviews over 2,000 journal titles, and selects around 10% to 12% Major criteria  timeliness of publication (three consecutive issues)  international editorial conventions (optimize retrievability of source articles)  full text (or at least bibliographic information) in English  peer review process  each article should publish information on funding source International diversity  contributing authors  editors and editorial advisory board members

Web of Science® In 2008, 700 new regional journals were included  Selection criteria: “same as for international journals although citation analyses play a somewhat different role in the outcome” Uniqueness of WoS inclusion process: analyses of citation data  citations to the journal itself  citation record of contributing authors Other databases

Helpful guidelines The ICMJE has produced the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals  The CSE has produced the Editorial Policy Statements 

Thank you.