Being The Best We Can Self-evaluation workshop Key results for Victoria’s public library services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C4EO Support for Regional Developments Gill Taylor Regional Associate 1.
Advertisements

Business Improvement Review Knowledge Understanding Action.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Looking forward to new vocational qualifications and the Sector Skills Agreement … for the Libraries, Archives and Information Services workforce Liz Bevins.
Excellence with Impact Declan Mulkeen January 2011.
Being The Best We Can A self-evaluation and improvement process for libraries Melanie McCarten State Library of Victoria Euan Lockie ACIG.
Morag Ferguson and Susan Shandley Educational Projects Managers
Using training packages to meet client needs Facilitator: Gerard Kell.
Developing a self evaluation and improvement model
1.Humanitarian Library 2.Humanitarian Training 3.Humanitarian Meeting 4.Policy Development Shelter Centre Current Activities Shelter Centre is an NGO that.
Business Excellence within The University of Bolton Strategic Planning Process 17 th October 2006.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Introducing Universities that Count Simon Cooper.
Anne O’Donnell, Head of Citizen Participation
Customer Focus Module Preview
Customer Service Excellence Standard – adding value for your students Helen Loughran Libraries and Learning Innovation Leeds Metropolitan University
1 National Training Programme for New Governors 2005 Module 3 Ensuring accountability.
The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.
How good is our third sector organisation? Elizabeth Morrison March 2014.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
Lucy Akhtar, Children, Young People and Families Communities and Tackling Poverty Welsh Government Family Support– Welsh Government Perspective.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 …continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director Caroline Lansdown – Senior.
Excellence in Vocational Teaching Symposium 23 & 24 September 2013 Qingdao, P.R. China.
Investors in People Champions. Interpretation of the Standard Purpose To give a brief overview with the necessary background information on the Investors.
Another New Framework Major Changes: No more satisfactory 2 strikes and you are out All criteria changed Very short notice No pre-inspection brief.
Southend Borough Council Children’s Safeguarding Peer Review 30 April 2010 Review findings and prioritisation conference Appendix 1.
Your opportunity to influence development. Where are we up to? Current UKMi audit processes and documentation have been in use since 2010, now significantly.
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
IAEVG Quebec June Career Development Benchmarks-Tertiary Programmatic rather than practitioner competencies Compare o UK Matrix standard o AGCAS.
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Charlie Henry HMI National.
Nef (the new economics foundation) Co-producing Lambeth what’s possible? Lucie Stephens and Julia Slay nef, October 2011.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.
How well is the Strategic Funding Partnership model working? Aspect Review Elizabeth Morrison March 2014.
Peer reviewer Basic Workshop Prof. Dr. Gamalat M. Ali Director of Tanta Quality Assurance Center, Tanta University.
Workforce sustainability in regional and rural networks NGO Regional Quarterly Forums, August/September 2010 round.
IMPORTANCE OF QUALITY AND HIGH STANDARDS? degree of public investment in education economic competitiveness social equity personal self-esteem place on.
Development Team Day 4c Disseminating Practice April/May 2009.
Quality & Involvement Aims of the day To explore how to involve service users To explore how to evidence involvement in your work To explore the links.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Mary Rayner HMI Lesley.
Disability Services Value for Money and Policy Review 29/11/20151 Value for Money and Policy Review of Disability Services in Ireland Presentation to the.
Improvement Planning for Centre Managers Rachel Carpenter Area Manager Huntingdonshire 9 September 2015.
TCF and FCF-Online How can help you generate MI you need to satisfy FSA requirementswww.fcf-online.com.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
The Risk Management Process
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Nottinghamshire Health & Wellbeing Board Peer Challenge Cathy Quinn Associate Director of Public Health.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
How good is our school? (4 th edition) Professional learning events November 2015.
Inspection of the EYFS Liz Elsom Children’s policy and frameworks 19 May 2009.
Quality Standards for Supported Employment Wednesday 09 November 2005 NIUSE Facilitators:- Teresa Hazzard & Heather Logan.
PowerPoint Guidance Layout for title or holding page By Creative Services Text should be ranged left, used in white only and main headings be set in 30.
The National Quality Standard The National Quality Standard (NQS) is a key aspect of the NQF and sets a national benchmark for early childhood education.
C4EO – Ways of Working Heather Rushton, Planning and Performance 1.
Being The Best We Can A self-evaluation & improvement process for libraries Key results for Victoria’s public library services.
Assisting African countries to improve compilation of basic economic statistics: an outline of the UNSD strategy Vladimir Markhonko United Nations Statistics.
Developing the people who operate SA’s public libraries.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
Impact and the REF Consortium of Institutes of Advanced Study 19 October 2009 David Sweeney Director (Research, Innovation and Skills)
Clerks’ Annual Conference 2010 Clerking towards an “Outstanding” Governing Body Steve Telfer Leadership & Governance.
The Lead Agency Council Sports Trust (Sport Otago) Cluster of clubs Interested parties / other.
The Big lottery Fund THCVS Voluntary Sector Conference th March 2016.
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
Self-Evaluation Cycle for Governing Bodies
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

Being The Best We Can Self-evaluation workshop Key results for Victoria’s public library services

Outputs of self-evaluation  Improvement plan to help use resources effectively  Report to stakeholders, improved understanding of services  Benchmarks – for ourselves and others  Training resources  Case studies of good practice  Foundations for a culture of quality

Today’s workshop  Work in teams  Read information on KRAs  Discuss what our library service does in each KRA/theme  Determine sources of evidence for the information  Discuss service provision strengths  Brainstorm areas for improvement  Make overall assessments, by theme & KRA  Agree next steps

Key result areas  Each key result area has information to guide the self-evaluation, grouped under themes  Each theme is introduced by a statement explaining its importance  To focus enquiry, a key question relating to the theme is outlined  Further questions are posed as ‘Things to think about’ to prompt the evaluation team

Key result areas – users 1. Providing gateways to information, learning & leisure 2. Building individual skills, capability & wellbeing 3. Developing social capital  Adults  Children  Youth  Special needs  Groups  Businesses

Key result areas – enablers 4. Demonstrating leadership 5. Designing, managing & improving systems & processes  Staff  Management  Boards & committees  Council  Suppliers

‘What we do’  List services & programs relevant to the theme  List any relevant recent initiatives or projects

Evidence  List sources of evidence according to the themes in each key result area  Brainstorm likely sources of evidence that can be used to provide corroboration of ‘strengths’ and ‘areas for improvement’, and support your star rating assessment  Use the key question and things to think about to examine aspects of the theme

Gathering supporting evidence Can be done by:  Examining documentation & resources  Consulting users, non-users & staff  Observing activities  Considering measurable outcomes

Examples of evidence  Council and community plans  Library service strategic plan  Best Value reports  Program documentation  Customer feedback  Surveys  Materials used in service & program delivery  Observations of the library environment, incl. usage patterns  Observations of specific program delivery  Statistics  Marketing & publicity strategies & documentation  Local media coverage  Reports of innovative practice  Evaluation reports of externally-funded programs  Photographs of activities & environments More in the Framework and Toolkit…

Strengths  Identify the key strengths for each of the themes in the KRAs  ‘Strengths’ are simply the things we do well  Consider though, is ‘every-day’ a strength?

Areas for improvement  Identify areas for improvement for each theme  Consider the questions: What can we do better? What do we need to do better?  Try to frame the statement in terms of what needs to be improved, rather than a specific solution

5-star rating system  The 5-star rating system should be used to allocate a performance rating for each theme under a KRA  An overall rating for the KRA is then derived from the combined ratings for its themes  This provides a broad rating for performance which can be used in reporting

5 star ratings  Outstanding delivery of core & a range of enhanced services Excellent World-class Sector leading & worthy of wider dissemination  Major strengths High standard of provision Any weaknesses do not impact on users’ experience

 Important strengths that have a positive impact Weaknesses do not have substantial adverse effect Weaknesses are recognised & action is being taken to improve  Satisfactory provision of core services A few strengths & examples of good practice Weaknesses have some adverse effects on some users 5 star ratings continued

 Limited range of services or weaknesses in a core service Weaknesses have a significant impact on the quality of the users’ experiences 5 star ratings continued

Initial self-evaluation  Read the KRA information in the Framework  Examine the information on the KRA’s first theme  Discuss, then list on the wall-chart ‘what we do now’ using the sticky notes  In the same way, list sources of evidence  Brainstorm ‘strengths’ & ‘areas for improvement’  Discuss & agree a consensus on a star rating for the theme  Repeat for the other themes for the KRA  Combine the themes’ ratings for an overall star rating for the KRA

Self-evaluation continued  Review other groups’ sheets at the end: Read each theme Write your comments on sticky notes and place on the sheet (initial your note so it can be followed up later)

Next steps  Agree action plan to: Review initial self-evaluation Engage with staff Collect & review evidence Draft self-evaluation report & improvement action plan Host peer reviewers’ visit Finalise report

Thank you!