June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA Natural Language Querying of the Semantic Web SRI International Information Science Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
Advertisements

Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
PSL and SWSL Michael Gruninger Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland Michael Gruninger Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland.
UML-Based Ontology Toolset Dr. Paul Kogut Lockheed Martin Management & Data Systems Valley Forge, PA.
Modelling with expert systems. Expert systems Modelling with expert systems Coaching modelling with expert systems Advantages and limitations of modelling.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [INTELLIGENT AGENTS PARADIGM] Professor Janis Grundspenkis Riga Technical University Faculty of Computer Science and Information.
Introduction to Computational Linguistics
Introduction to Computational Linguistics
2013 Parenthetical Citing For Library Research Country Powerpoint
Pointing at Places in a Geospatial Theory Richard Waldinger and Peter Jarvis Artificial Intelligence Center SRI International Jennifer Dungan Ecosystem.
Semiautomatic Generation of Data-Extraction Ontologies Master’s Thesis Proposal Yihong Ding.
Using the Semantic Web to Construct an Ontology- Based Repository for Software Patterns Scott Henninger Computer Science and Engineering University of.
CSE 425: Logic Programming I Logic and Programs Most programs use Boolean expressions over data Logic statements can express program semantics –I.e., axiomatic.
K S L W i n e A g e n t : Testbed Application for Semantic Web Technologies Deborah McGuinness Eric Hsu Jessica Jenkins Rob McCool Sheila McIlraith Paulo.
Ontologies and the Semantic Web by Ian Horrocks presented by Thomas Packer 1.
DARPA Agent Markup Language Ashish Jain University of Colorado at Boulder.
Proof System HY-566. Proof layer Next layer of SW is logic and proof layers. – allow the user to state any logical principles, – computer can to infer.
Understanding SVG Diagrams Interim Presentation Vivek Ramakrishna Honours Program, Computer Science
1 Information Integration and Source Wrapping Jose Luis Ambite, USC/ISI.
Editing Description Logic Ontologies with the Protege OWL Plugin.
1 Consistency Checking of Semantic Web Ontologies Kenneth Baclawski, Northeastern U. & VIS Mieczyslaw M. Kokar, Northeastern U. & VIS Richard Waldinger,
Intelligent Tutoring Systems Traditional CAI Fully specified presentation text Canned questions and associated answers Lack the ability to adapt to students.
Amarnath Gupta Univ. of California San Diego. An Abstract Question There is no concrete answer …but …
Web Document Analysis: How can Natural Language Processing Help in Determining Correct Content Flow? Hassan Alam, Fuad Rahman and Yuliya Tarnikova Human.
revised CmpE 583 Fall 2006Discussion: OWL- 1 CmpE 583- Web Semantics: Theory and Practice DISCUSSION: OWL Atilla ELÇİ Computer Engineering.
An approach to Intelligent Information Fusion in Sensor Saturated Urban Environments Charalampos Doulaverakis Centre for Research and Technology Hellas.
Information Need Question Understanding Selecting Sources Information Retrieval and Extraction Answer Determina tion Answer Presentation This work is supported.
From Question-Answering to Information-Seeking Dialogs Jerry R. Hobbs Artificial Intelligence Center SRI International Menlo Park, California (with Douglas.
EXCS Sept Knowledge Engineering Meets Software Engineering Hele-Mai Haav Institute of Cybernetics at TUT Software department.
Knowledge representation
University of Dublin Trinity College Localisation and Personalisation: Dynamic Retrieval & Adaptation of Multi-lingual Multimedia Content Prof Vincent.
Author: William Tunstall-Pedoe Presenter: Bahareh Sarrafzadeh CS 886 Spring 2015.
Machine Translation, Digital Libraries, and the Computing Research Laboratory Indo-US Workshop on Digital Libraries June 23, 2003.
Developing an improved focused crawler for the IDEAL project Ward Bonnefond, Chris Menzel, Zack Morris, Suhas Patel, Tyler Ritchie, Mark Tedesco, Franklin.
NLP And The Semantic Web Dainis Kiusals COMS E6125 Spring 2010.
Abstract Question answering is an important task of natural language processing. Unification-based grammars have emerged as formalisms for reasoning about.
From Question-Answering to Information-Seeking Dialogs Jerry R. Hobbs USC Information Sciences Institute Marina del Rey, California (with Chris Culy, Douglas.
EU Project proposal. Andrei S. Lopatenko 1 EU Project Proposal CERIF-SW Andrei S. Lopatenko Vienna University of Technology
CORPORUM-OntoExtract Ontology Extraction Tool Author: Robert Engels Company: CognIT a.s.
From Question-Answering to Information-Seeking Dialogs Jerry R. Hobbs USC/ISI Marina del Rey, CA with Douglas Appelt, David Israel, Peter Jarvis, David.
From Question-Answering to Information-Seeking Dialogs Jerry R. Hobbs Artificial Intelligence Center SRI International Menlo Park, California (with Douglas.
October 2005CSA3180 NLP1 CSA3180 Natural Language Processing Introduction and Course Overview.
AQUAINT Kickoff Meeting Advanced Techniques for Answer Extraction and Formulation Language Computer Corporation Dallas, Texas.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [INTELLIGENT AGENTS PARADIGM]
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
Metadata Schema for CERIF Andrei Lopatenko Vienna University of Technology
ES component and structure Dr. Ahmed Elfaig The production system or rule-based system has three main component and subcomponents shown in Figure 1. 1.Knowledge.
Querying Web Data – The WebQA Approach Author: Sunny K.S.Lam and M.Tamer Özsu CSI5311 Presentation Dongmei Jiang and Zhiping Duan.
Kansas State University Department of Computing and Information Sciences CIS 730: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Lecture 17 Wednesday, 01 October.
Tool for Ontology Paraphrasing, Querying and Visualization on the Semantic Web Project By Senthil Kumar K III MCA (SS)‏
Computing & Information Sciences Kansas State University Monday, 25 Sep 2006CIS 490 / 730: Artificial Intelligence Lecture 14 of 42 Monday, 25 September.
Trustworthy Semantic Webs Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Lecture #4 Vision for Semantic Web.
ICT-enabled Agricultural Science for Development Scenarios, Opportunities, Issues by ICTs transforming agricultural science, research & technology generation.
Faculty Faculty Richard Fikes Edward Feigenbaum (Director) (Emeritus) (Director) (Emeritus) Knowledge Systems Laboratory Stanford University “In the knowledge.
Explainable Adaptive Assistants Deborah L. McGuinness, Tetherless World Constellation, RPI Alyssa Glass, Stanford University Michael Wolverton, SRI International.
Services of the Formal Digital Library (FDL) NA-MKM 2004 January 6, 2004 Lori Lorigo, Cornell University.
Distance Education Network & Information Sciences Institute USC Viterbi School of Engineering Presented by Erin Shaw Research Computer Scientist Center.
Explainable Adaptive Assistants Deborah L. McGuinness, Tetherless World Constellation, RPI Alyssa Glass, Stanford University Michael Wolverton, SRI International.
Semantic Web COMS 6135 Class Presentation Jian Pan Department of Computer Science Columbia University Web Enhanced Information Management.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
© 1990—2006 Visual Knowledge Software® | Private and Confidential | 2 Semantic Agent Wikis For Engineering.
AQUAINT Mid-Year PI Meeting – June 2002 Integrating Robust Semantics, Event Detection, Information Fusion, and Summarization for Multimedia Question Answering.
©2003 Paula Matuszek CSC 9010: AeroText, Ontologies, AeroDAML Dr. Paula Matuszek (610)
OKBC (Open Knowledge Base Connectivity) An API For Knowledge Servers
CS 4700: Foundations of Artificial Intelligence
Information Integration for Digital Libraries
Policy reasoning A policy is a set of norms that define optimal behavior of agents in a system What does policy reasoning usually entail ? Proving that.
Workshop Organization Support SAR Environment Schematic
ONTOMERGE Ontology translations by merging ontologies Paper: Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web by Dejing Dou, Drew McDermott and Peishen Qi 2003.
Representations & Reasoning Systems (RRS) (2.2)
Presentation transcript:

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA Natural Language Querying of the Semantic Web SRI International Information Science Institute

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA Beyond Single Question Single Source Answers Most question answering systems to date have been limited to querying a single kind of source, a corpus of texts, for answers to a given question. Most have been limited to answering single questions with single factual answers. Aim: to move beyond these limits  Use of multiple (semi-)structured sources  Information-gathering dialogues

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA QUARK Natural language front end  Gemini: Unification Grammar (CFG backbone) Mediated by powerful reasoning tool  SNARK: Full FO Theorem Prover Powerful resource description and access capabilities  OAA: Intelligent delegation-based middleware Visualization capabilities  TerraVision: Terrain Viewer

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA Multiple Sources Access to multiple knowledge sources  ADL Gazetteer  CIA World Factbook  NASA data sources  TextPro IE engine

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA Goal: To Integrate DAML Search into QUARK Agent Semantic Communications Service (ASCS) Developed by Teknowledge. Searches the Web for DAML pages. Provides GUI for search. Provides inference capability aimed at broadening and relaxation of queries.

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA The ASCS Search Page

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA ASCS: A Use Case pred: capital arg1: arg2:Syria ?x Searches entire Semantic Web Also conjunctive queries: population of capital of Syria To find the capital of Syria, a user must input Problem: Doesn’t support natural language input; using ASCS requires knowing some logic. capital(?x,Syria)

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA How to Use ASCS in QUARK Questions parsed by Gemini to yield logical form. Logical form submitted to SNARK as conjecture. Conjecture proved in application-domain theory. Capabilities of ASCS and other sources advertised in theory. ASCS provided with OAA wrapper. Resources invoked as appropriate by procedural attachment. Answer, as extracted from proof. Presented textually Visualization tool invoked

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA “Show the capitals of Islamic countries that border Iraq.” Logical form produced by Gemini: (and country (?x) islamic (?x) bordering-relation (?z) goal (?z, iraq) source (?z, ?x) capital-of (?u, ?x) show (?v) patient (?v, ?u)) Answer: ?v

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA Conjecture decomposed by SNARK To show a country is Islamic, use the axioms in the application-domain theory: if religions (?country, Muslim, ?percent) and ?percent > 50 then islamic (?country) if (SunniMuslim ?x, then Muslim ?x) A country that is more than 50 percent Muslim is Islamic. A SunniMuslim is a Muslim.

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA ASCS Reveals Basic Facts borders(Iraq, Syria) borders(Iraq, Turkey), ….. religions(Syria, SunniMuslim, 74) religions(Syria, Christian, 10), … capital(Syria, Damascus)

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA Other Agents Reveal other Facts Alexandria Digital Library Gazetteer: place-to-latlong(Damascus, capital, Syria; 33.5, 36.3)

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA Answer visualization by Terrain Viewer Damascus (capital),Syria; 33.5,36.3

June 12, 2003AQUAINT 18 Month Meeting San Diego CA Future Plans To move beyond single, one-off questions to scenario-based information-seeking dialogues. Scenario description presents a sketch of a situation/problem; much is left unsaid. To be filled out by a combination of application-domain theories and clarification/expansion dialogues. Ground further question-answering on the resulting situation model.