The pilot area approach as a basis to develop a network Meeting on Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps JRC Ispra 1-2 July 2004 Ialina Vinci and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project manager: Leonello Serva Corresponding author: ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS DEVELOPMENT FOR ITALIAN.
Advertisements

1 SOMIS: Schruns 11/10/2004 A Part of the European Soil portal - A step towards harmonization of Soil Information in Europe Panos.
EXCHANGE FORMAT Ialina Vinci EXCHANGE FORMAT Ialina Vinci Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra 3-4 February 2005.
1 SOMIS: ISPRA 25/11/2004 A step towards harmonization of Soil Information in Europe Marc Van Liedekerke, Panos Panagos Eusoils.jrc.it:
VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra 3-4 February 2005.
Attribute values are classified, e.g. DR = Depth to rock. S = Shallow ( < 40 cm) M = Moderate ( cm) D = Deep ( cm) V = Very deep ( > 120.
Project Eco-pedological Map for the Alpine Region SUMMARY 1. The Alpine Convention context 2. Ecopedological map project proposal 3. Preliminary APAT approach.
VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber VENETO REGION PILOT AREA Silvia Obber Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra - February 6-7, 2006.
Ecological soil map of the Alps A cross-border pilot area between Italy and Slovenia Sara Zanolla Stefano Barbieri Giuseppe Michelutti Borut Vrščaj.
Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps The ECALP Project: Results and Prospects Lombardia Pilot Area Stefano Brenna, Alberto Rocca ERSAF – Agency.
Development of a High-Resolution Global Soil Depth Dataset Jon D. Pelletier Geosciences Dept., University of Arizona Deliverable: gridded high-resolution.
How do soils form? Soil Profiles
MA Envirothon Soils Glenn Stanisewski, Soil Resource Specialist, USDA-NRCS West Wareham, MA.
Soil Mapping and Erosion
SOILS INVENTORIES We can consider two basic approaches: A. Samples points extracted from a population of points. B. Mapping. For the first an example (at.
The Nature Of Soil Ms. Scerra
Topic 14 – Landscape Development and Environmental Change
1 Integration of Turkish Soil Database into European Soil Database Ece AKSOY.
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
JRC Ispra - IES 1 Overview of soil data at European scales F. Carré & T. Mayr.
Experiences with WRB in the 1:250,000 mapping in Italy Institutional Framework and Soil Classification Systems Numerous authorities are active in many.
Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Romania Catalin Simota Research Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Bucharest - Romania.
7.1 Glaciers.
Chapter 7 Weathering and Soil
Towards participatory approaches to a Multiscale European Soil Information System Nicola Filippi, Panagos Panos, Borut Vrscaj EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT.
Soil Productivity and Conservation THE GMIS. Importance of Soil As the key resource in crop production It supports the physical, chemical, and biological.
JRC-AL: WORKSHOP, DATE DNDC-EUROPE Adrian Leip, Joint Research Centre 1.DNDC-EUROPE: quick description of concept and status 2.Improvement of HSMU-layer.
Ag I.  Outline the process involved in soil formation  Describe a mature soil profile  Discuss the 8 land capability classes.
Properties of the Soil Wt. Tn. Workshop-Liberty July. 13, 2005.
Building a EUROPEAN DATABASE SOTER 1:5M from the EUROPEAN DATABASE EUSIS 1:1M An example of generalization of a soil geographical database (1) INRA Soil.
World Geography Unit 1: Land and Water Forms Glaciers as Agents of Erosion.
1 Miskolc, 1 st Digital Soil Mapping WG Danube basin profile Database Beata Houšková Jean Dusart Luca Montanarella Soil & Waste Unit Institute for Environment.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Norman B. Bliss, ASRC Federal InuTeq Contractor to the USGS 6/4/2015 A continental view of soil.
Soils: The Critical Resource Higher Geography Biosphere.
EEA 2006 Accounts Update Tables. PART 1 Table 1.1: Classifying land cover and land cover change for land accounting.
Chapter 21: The Glacier Systems and the Ice Age Presentation.
CORRELATOR: a Software to Store and Correlate Soil Resource Information CORRELATOR: a Software to Store and Correlate Soil Resource Information Edoardo.
Groundwater. Groundwater is water that completely fills (saturates) the pore spaces of soil or rock formation below the water table. Water that shares.
Topic 14 – Landscape Development and Environmental Change Landscapes, or topography are the features of the Earth’s surface. There are Four main ways to.
The “Ecopedological project of the Alps”: general description Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps JRC, Ispra1 – 2 July 2004 Francesca Ferraro,
The Nature of soil. Dirt is what you find under your fingernails. Soil is what you find under your feet. Think of soil as a thin living skin that covers.
Glaciers.
Soils & Soil Formation-The Results of Weathering
Characteristics of Soil 5.2 Soil  Soil is part of the regolith that supports the growth of plants. Regolith is the layer of rock and mineral fragments.
Soil Section 5.2.
1 Slide 1 Soil Atlas of Europe. 2 Slide 2 What are we trying to produce? Topical and Timely Publication  Soil protection legislation  Enlargement of.
Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS.
Land Management and Natural Hazards Unit Incontro tecnico su Indicatori e metodologie a supporto della strategia tematica per il suolo: Studi Pilota in.
Introduction to Land Evaluation Basic Soil Science AFNR-BAS-6: Describe soil formation and management and assess its relevance to plant/animal production.
Project “Eco-pedological Map for the Alpine Region” APAT- Agency for Environmental Protection and Technical Services Harmonization of Soil Information.
Weathering, Soil, and Mass Movements Chapter 5. Mechanical Weathering physical forces break rock into smaller and smaller pieces.
Soils Evaluation.
Topic 14 – Landscape Development and Environmental Change
Mass Movements, Wind, and Glaciers
The Nature of soil.
The ecopedological map of the alpine territory the pilot area of the Veneto Region Ispra February 2005 Ialina Vinci and Silvia Obber Agency for.
The Ground Beneath Our Feet
Towards a Pan European ecosystem assessment
Pilot Area of Veneto Region (Italy)
Soil.
Soil Regolith – layer of rock and mineral fragments produced by weathering Soil – part of regolith that supports plant growth.
Soil Section 5.2.
1st European Summer School on Soil Survey July 2003
Soil
Erosion and Depistion BY GLACIERS!.
SOTER Soils and Terrain Digital Database
Soil.
Food, Soil, and Pest Management
Do First Actions: Get Ch.5-6 packet due Identify the below features:
Soil organic carbon (SOC) can significantly influence key soil functional properties and improve soil quality by increasing water holding capacity, reducing.
Presentation transcript:

The pilot area approach as a basis to develop a network Meeting on Harmonization of Soil Information in the Alps JRC Ispra 1-2 July 2004 Ialina Vinci and Silvia Obber Agency for Environmental Prevention and Protection of the Veneto Region

ECOPEDOLOGICAL MAP OF ITALY

SOIL MAP OF VENETO REGION 1: scale

Eco-pedological map for the Alpine territory PROJECT AIMS: to create a network among regional and national institutions which own and manage soil data to develop common procedures to allow data exchange, updating and evaluation for application purposes have soil data available

Eco-pedological map for the Alpine territory PROJECT ACTIVITIES: first draft of an ecopedological map for the entire alpine territory (10 Km pixels) develop a format for exchanging data to be tested in pilot areas (1km pixels) have soil data available

PILOT AREAS should: be representative of the Alpine environment be located near the national border, to allow comparison of landscapes and soils have an extension of ca. 200 Km 2 have soil data available

for each PILOT AREA partners should: Keep contact with transnational partner, exchanging information about data availability (soil maps, DEM, geological maps, etc.) Organize some field excursion for correlation Fill in data exchange format for each pixel of the area

PILOT AREAS proposed: Slovenia – Friuli-Venezia Giulia Austria - Veneto Switzerland - Lombardia France - Piemonte

PIXEL EXCHANGE FORMAT Will allow exchange of data, for pixels, on: parent material rootable depth water regime WRB classification topsoil and subsoil texture topsoil and subsoil organic carbon content topsoil and subsoil bulk density physiography land use Derived from dominant Soil Typological Unit

SMU/STU EXCHANGE FORMAT Will allow exchange of data, for Soil Mapping Units and Soil Typological Units, as in traditional soil maps. A specific description of soil and environment features will be given, preserving information on SMU complexity (SMU coverage table).

The 1: Geographical Soil Database, at present the only harmonized database at continental scale A Manual of Procedures (MOP) for a Georeferenced Soil Database for Europe (1: ), worked out by the European Soil Bureau in 1998 REFERENCE DATABASES AND PROCEDURES

18,000 km 2 total surface 6,000 km 2 mountainous area Veneto

pilot area: localization PILOT AREA LOCATION

pilot area: altitude max: 2700 (m a.s.l.) min: 1000 (m a.s.l.) ALTITUDE

Morphology MORPHOLOGY (dem 30 m)

geological map 1: of Veneto Region GEOLOGY

soil map 1: of Veneto Region PIXEL_id SOIL MAP

SMU MA1.2 SMU MA1.1 1 km PIXEL DESCRIPTION STU1ZMB 40% STU2 SDP1 25% STU3ORN1 20% Bare deposits 15% STU1SDP1 30% STU2 ZMB 25% STU3CTA1 20% Bare deposits 10% Dominant STU ZMB1 Dominant STU ZMB1

PIXEL EXCHANGE FORMAT Description based on dominant STU

PIXEL EXCHANGE FORMAT SOIL QUALITIES AND INDICATORS To be estimated for the whole pixel

PIXEL EXCHANGE FORMAT

Easier to be filled Easier to be updated Suitable to represent output data (policy relevant information) Useful to support updating in a multiscale approach (bottom-up) Suitable to be used for environmental indicators Easy to be integrated with other environmental indicators on different layers (INDIQUASOLS) ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES OF THE PIXEL APPROACH Extremely simplified approach Not suitable for representing soil coverage complexity

Soil Mapping Units of the 1: soil map

DO35: Lastoni di Formin, Croda da Lago, Becco di Mezzodì Surface: km 2 Elevation: 1,800-2,600 m a.s.l. Phytoclimatic zone: subalpine and alpine Bedrock: 75% Sciliar Dolomite 15% Principal Dolomite (Croda da Lago - Cima Ambrizzola) 10% Raibl Group, local flows, limited to: Forca Rossa, Fedaia Lake; easily erodible Unconsolidated material: 70% of the total surface (dolomitic) 70% dolomitic rockfall deposits, with debris flows; concentrated at the bottom of the rock walls 30% glacial deposits, on benches between 2,000 and 2,300 m a.s.l. ca., locally rock glaciers Morphology: dolomitic high mountain area; scree, at the bottom of the rock walls, partially active; basal tills on hanging benches of structural origin (Mondeval di sopra, malga Prendera, Federa Lake) shaped by the glaciers; secondarily rock glacier and debris flows % no soil: 30% Vegetation: alpine grassland and pastures Soilscape polygon description

Slope classe s (%) Surface rate (%) > Surface rate (%) >90 Slope classes (%) Soilscape polygon description (continued) Slope – Elevation classes (delineation DO35)

code%distribution SPM130 Dolomitic scree stabilized by pioneer vegetation or mugo pine (Pinus mugo) FOC130 Steep slopes with dolomitic glacial deposits, pastured VGA110 Moderately steep slopes with thick colluvial mantle of fine materials (Raibl), pastured No soil30 Scree and rocks FOC1 Soilscape polygon description (continued) Soil Typological Units (STU) (delineation DO35)

STU Forcella Giau (FOC1) Rendzic Leptosol SOIL TYPOLOGICAL UNIT Environment description morphology, bedrock, vegetation, land use… Soil Properties depth, rock outcrops, water-table depth, drainage, available water capacity… Horizon properties colour, particle size, coarse fragments, carbonate content… Representative profile description with analysis

SOIL MAP EXCHANGE FORMAT SMU_IDITD30543 STU140% STU220% STU320% Bare deposits15% Water5% STU COVERAGE TABLE SMU_IDITD30543 Physiography Parent material Land Cover SMU TABLE STU_IDITD3013 WRB classif. Parent material Land use Drainage STU TABLE STU_IDITD3013 HR_ID1 HorizonA Clay25% pH6.5 Organic carbon4.2% HORIZON TABLE

More suitable to describe soil coverage complexity Reference description by means of MOP manual Similar to traditional soil map approach Extended description of landscape, soil and profile ADVANTAGES/DISADVANTAGES OF THE EXTENDED APPROACH Higher complexity of description Higher data requirements More harmonization work needed Resource consuming