Chapter 13 – Weighted Voting Lecture Part 2. Chapter 13 – Lecture Part 2 The Banzhaf Power Index –Counting the number of subsets of a set –Listing winning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 11: Weighted Voting Systems Lesson Plan
Advertisements

Theory Of Automata By Dr. MM Alam
Chapter 2: Weighted Voting Systems
Weighted Voting, Algorithms and Voting Power
Weighted Voting When we try to make collective decisions, it is only natural to consider how things are done in society. We are familiar with voting for.
Chapter 11: Weighted Voting Systems Lesson Plan
Presented by: Katherine Goulde
Chapter 13 – Weighted Voting Part 4 Appropriate applications of measures of power Minimal winning coalitions Classification of weighted voting systems.
Math for Liberal Studies.  In many voting systems, the voters are not treated equally  Juries: If one voter votes “not guilty,” then the result is “not.
V OTING W EIGHTS SYSTEM Chapter 12 sec 3.. V OTING P OWER Def. The probability that a single vote is decisive Is affected by the rule for aggregating.
DM.8. Is a set of numbers that are listed in the following format: [ quota: weight of voter 1, weight of voter 2,…weight of voter 3] Ex: [8:5,4,3,2]
Effort Games and the Price of Myopia Michael Zuckerman Joint work with Yoram Bachrach and Jeff Rosenschein.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 16 Mathematics of Normal Distributions 16.1Approximately Normal.
§ The Banzhaf Power Index
1 Message to the user... The most effective way to use a PowerPoint slide show is to go to “SLIDE SHOW” on the top of the toolbar, and choose “VIEW SHOW”
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Manipulation and Control in Weighted Voting Games Based on: Bachrach, Elkind, AAMAS’08 Zuckerman, Faliszewski, Bachrach, Elkind, AAAI’08.
§ 2.1 Weighted Voting Systems. Weighted Voting  So far we have discussed voting methods in which every individual’s vote is considered equal--these methods.
Homework Discussion Read Pages 48 – 62 Page 72: 1 – 4, 6 TEST 1 ON THURSDAY FEBRUARY 8 –The test will cover sections 1.1 – 1.6, and 2.1 – 2.3 in the textbook.
§ The Shapley-Shubik Power Index
Computing the Banzhaf Power Index in Network Flow Games
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 9 COUNTING AND PROBABILITY.
The Distributive Property Using Tiles © Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved next #4 Taking the Fear out of Math.
Intro to Set Theory. Sets and Their Elements A set A is a collection of elements. If x is an element of A, we write x  A; if not: x  A. Say: “x is a.
1 Codes, Ciphers, and Cryptography-Ch 3.1 Michael A. Karls Ball State University.
Survey of Mathematical Ideas Math 100 Chapter 2 John Rosson Thursday January 25, 2007.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 The Mathematics of Power 2.1An Introduction to Weighted Voting.
Chapter 7 Logic, Sets, and Counting Section 4 Permutations and Combinations.
Positional Number Systems
A SEARCH-BASED APPROACH TO ANNEXATION AND MERGING IN WEIGHTED VOTING GAMES Ramoni Lasisi and Vicki Allan Utah State University by.
Calculating Power in Larger Systems Nominal, Banzhaf and Shapley-Shubik.
Chapter 13 – Weighted Voting
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 9 COUNTING AND PROBABILITY.
Chapter 13: Weighted Voting Banzhaf Power Index Shapley-Shubik Power Index Equivalent Systems Examples.
Weighted Voting Systems Brian Carrico. What is a weighted voting system?  A weighted voting system is a decision making procedure in which the participants.
Extending the Definition of Exponents © Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved next #10 Taking the Fear out of Math 2 -8.
Equations, Inequalities, and Mathematical Models 1.2 Linear Equations
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 The Mathematics of Power 2.1An Introduction to Weighted Voting.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We want to measure the influence each voter has  As we have seen, the number of votes you have doesn’t always reflect how.
MAT 105 Spring  We want to measure the influence each voter has  As we have seen, the number of votes you have doesn’t always reflect how much.
The Single Transferable Vote*: Mechanics and Implications FairVote’s Election Services Group Robert Richie, Executive Director
2.1 Sets and Whole Numbers Remember to Silence Your Cell Phone and Put It In Your Bag!
Weighted Voting Systems
Manipulating the Quota in Weighted Voting Games (M. Zuckerman, P. Faliszewski, Y. Bachrach, and E. Elkind) ‏ Presented by: Sen Li Software Technologies.
Comparing Sets MATH 102 Contemporary Math S. Rook.
Naïve Set Theory. Basic Definitions Naïve set theory is the non-axiomatic treatment of set theory. In the axiomatic treatment, which we will only allude.
Chapter SETS DEFINITION OF SET METHODS FOR SPECIFYING SET SUBSETS VENN DIAGRAM SET IDENTITIES SET OPERATIONS.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 The Mathematics of Power 2.1An Introduction to Weighted Voting.
Keystone Problem… Keystone Problem… next Set 14 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
Theorem: Equal weight implies equal power but not the converse.
Section 1.1, Slide 1 Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 11.3, Slide 1 11 Voting Using Mathematics to Make Choices.
Chapter 7 Sets and Probability Section 7.1 Sets What is a Set? A set is a well-defined collection of objects in which it is possible to determine whether.
Chapter 11. Weighted Voting Systems  Goals Study weighted voting systems ○ Coalitions ○ Dummies and dictators ○ Veto power Study the Banzhaf power index.
Weighted Voting Systems Chapter 2 Objective: Calculate the Banzhaf power Index for a weighted voting system. Learn additional notation and terminology.
Fraction Multiplication And Cancelation. Fraction Multiplication Here are some fraction multiplication problems Can you tell how to multiply fraction.
Weighted Voting Systems Chapter 2 Objective: Recognize the notation for weighted voting system and be able to define quota, player, dictator, dummy and.
EXCURSIONS IN MODERN MATHEMATICS SIXTH EDITION Peter Tannenbaum 1.
Chapter 2 Sets and Functions.
The Banzhaf Power Index
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Chapter 11: Weighted Voting Systems Lesson Plan
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Dr. David Matuszek Heapsort Dr. David Matuszek
Warm Up – 5/27 - Monday How many people voted in the election?
Weighted Voting.
Homework Collection Homework Discussion Page 35: 35, 38, 63, 64
Chapter 11: Weighted Voting Systems Lesson Plan
The Banzhaf Power Index
Discrete Math Weighted Voting.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 13 – Weighted Voting Lecture Part 2

Chapter 13 – Lecture Part 2 The Banzhaf Power Index –Counting the number of subsets of a set –Listing winning coalitions and blocking coalitions –Listing a coalition’s critical voters

Counting Subsets – Finding Banzhaf Power Index A set of n elements will have 2 n subsets and will have 2 n – 1 proper subsets. Thus, for a weighted voting system with n voters, there are 2 n possible coalitions. We count both the set of all voters and the empty set as coalitions. The set of all voters is sometimes called the grand coalition. The subset consisting of no voters is called the empty coalition. To determine the Banzhaf power index for a given system we list all of a voting system’s coalitions (or sometimes to save time we list only the winning coalitions.)

Banzhaf Power Index – Finding Winning Coalitions We determine the weight of each of the winning coalitions and the number of extra votes that coalition has above the quota. That is, we determine the number of votes the coalition could lose and still be a winning coalition. A particular voter is critical in a given coalition if it’s weight is greater than the extra votes of that coalition. A certain voter would not be critical if its weight was equal or less than the extra votes of the coalition.

Banzhaf Power Index – An Example Consider the voting system [ 51: 26, 26, 26, 22 ]. There are 2 4 = 16 different coalitions including both the grand and empty coalitions. We are interested in those coalitions that are winning (and the ones that are blocking). We will create a list of all coalitions (later we might try to be quicker by listing only winning coalitions). We list the coalition of all voters, coalitions of 3 voters, coalitions of 2 voters, coalitions of only 1 voter, and the empty coalition.

Banzhaf Power Index – An Example coalitioncoalition weight (w)extra votes ( w – q )winning ?critical voters A, B, C, D10049yesnone A, B, C7827yesnone A, B, D7423yesA, B A, C, D7423yesA, C B, C, D7423yesB, C A, B521yesA, B A, C521yesA, C A, D48no B, C521yesB, C B, D48no C, D48no A26no B26no C26no D22no empty0no A = 26, B = 26 C = 26, D = 22 q = 51

Banzhaf Power Index – An Example coalitionweight (w)extra votes: blocking (w – bq)blocking ?critical voters A, B, C, D10050yesnone A, B, C7828yesnone A, B, D7424yesA, B A, C, D7424yesA, C B, C, D7424yesB, C A, B522yesA, B A, C522yesA, C A, D48no B, C522yesB, C B, D48no C, D48no A26no B26no C26no D22no empty0no A = 26, B = 26 C = 26, D = 22 q = 51 bq = 50

Banzhaf Power Index – An Example coalitioncoalition weight (w)extra votes ( w – q )winning ?critical voters A, B, C, D10049yesnone A, B, C7827yesnone A, B, D7423yesA, B A, C, D7423yesA, C B, C, D7423yesB, C A, B521yesA, B A, C521yesA, C B, C521yesB, C A = 26, B = 26 C = 26, D = 22 q = 51 Here we list only the winning coalitions. Note that A is critical in 4 of the winning coalitions, B is also critical in 4 winning and likewise, C is critical in exactly 4 winning coalitions. Notice that D is not critical in any winning coalitions.

Banzhaf Power Index – An Example coalitionweight (w)extra votes: blocking (w – bq)blocking ?critical voters A, B, C, D10050yesnone A, B, C7828yesnone A, B, D7424yesA, B A, C, D7424yesA, C B, C, D7424yesB, C A, B522yesA, B A, C522yesA, C B, C522yesB, C A = 26, B = 26 C = 26, D = 22 q = 51 bq = 50 Here we list only the blocking coalitions. Notice that A, B and C are each critical in exactly 4 blocking coalitions. Also, notice that D is not critical to any blocking coalition.

The Banzhaf Power Index – An Example A is critical in 4 winning and blocking coalitions. Thus, we say the Banzhaf Power of voter A is 8. This is the same for voters B and C. We found that D was critical in 0 winning and 0 blocking coalitions. D’s Banzhaf Power is 0. The Banzhaf Power Index for the system [ 51: 26, 26, 26, 22 ] is given by the numbers ( 8, 8, 8, 0 ). Sometimes the Banzhaf Power Index is written so that each term represents the fraction of times each voter is critical out of the total number of times all voters are critical. In this case, the total number of times all voters are critical is = 24. Thus, we could write the Banzhaf index as ( 8/24, 8/24, 8/24, 0/24 ) or as, after reducing, ( 1/3, 1/3, 1/3, 0 ). In a sense, voters A, B and C each share 1/3 of the power while D really has no power in this system.

Banzhaf Power Index - Shortcuts The number of blocking coalitions to which a voter is critical equals the number of winning coalitions to which that voter is critical. –If a voting member is critical to a winning coalition, that member is therefore also critical to the opposing coalition – that is, to the coalition of voters who’d hope to block that measure. –And likewise, for any blocking coalition to which a voter is critical, that voter is also critical to the opposing coalition – that is, to the coalition of voters who’d hope to pass that measure. –For each coalition that a voter is critical there is exactly one opposing coalition to which that voter is also critical. Thus, once a voter is critical to a coalition, that voter is critical to an equal number of winning and blocking coalitions.

Banzhaf Power Index - Shortcuts The number of blocking coalitions to which a voter is critical equals the number of winning coalitions to which that voter is critical. To determine the Banzhaf power index for a weighted voting system, we list winning coalitions, count the number of times each voter is critical to each winning coalition and double that number. We can begin by considering all coalitions of each possible size and determine which of those are winning.

Banzhaf Power Index – An example Let’s return to the voting system given by [ 16 : 9, 9, 7, 3, 1, 1 ]. There are 2 6 = 64 coalitions, however not all of them are winning coalitions. There are = 1 coalition of 6 = 6 coalitions of 5 = 15 coalitions of 2 = 20 coalitions of 3 = 15 coalitions of 4 = 6 coalitions of 1

Banzhaf Power Index – An example Coalitions of 1: none are winning Coalitions of 2: s1, s2182s1, s2 s1, m160s1, m s2, m160s2, m Coalitions of 3: s1, s2, m259none s1, s2, I215s1, s2 s1, s2, L193s1, s2 s1, s2, e193s1, s2 s1, m, I193s1, m s1, m, L171s1, m s1, m, e171s1, m s2, m, I193s2, m s2, m, L171s2, m s2, m, e171s2, m Note: tables list winning coalitions, weight, extra votes, and critical voters, in that order, from left to right. Let’s refer to the Smith’s as s1 and s2 and the others by the first letter of their last name.

Banzhaf Power Index – An example Coalitions of 4: s2, m, L, e182s2, m s2, m, I, e204s2, m s2, m, I, L204s2, m s1, m, L, e182s1, m s1, m, I, e204s1, m s1, m, I, L204s1, m s1, s2, L, e204s1, s2 s1, s2, I, e226s1, s2 s1, s2, I, L226s1, s2 s1, s2, m, e2610none s1,s2, m, L2610none s1, s2, m, I2812none

Banzhaf Power Index – An example Coalitions of 5: s2, m, I, L, e215s2, m s1, m, I, L, e215s1, m s1,s2, I, L, e237s1, s2 s1,s2, m, L, e2711none s1,s2, m, I, e2913none s1,s2, m, I, L2913none Coalitions of 6: There is only one (all voters) and no voter is critical to that coalition.

Banzhaf Power Index – An example s2, m, L, e182s2, m s2, m, I, e204s2, m s2, m, I, L204s2, m s1, m, L, e182s1, m s1, m, I, e204s1, m s1, m, I, L204s1, m s1, s2, L, e204s1, s2 s1, s2, I, e226s1, s2 s1, s2, I, L226s1, s2 s1, s2, m, e2610none s1,s2, m, L2610none s1, s2, m, I2812none s1, s2, m259none s1, s2, I215s1, s2 s1, s2, L193s1, s2 s1, s2, e193s1, s2 s1, m, I193s1, m s1, m, L171s1, m s1, m, e171s1, m s2, m, I193s2, m s2, m, L171s2, m s2, m, e171s2, m s1, s2182s1, s2 s1, m160s1, m s2, m160s2, m s2, m, I, L, e215s2, m s1, m, I, L, e215s1, m s1,s2, I, L, e237s1, s2 s1,s2, m, L, e2711none s1,s2, m, I, e2913none s1,s2, m, I, L2913none For each voter, we count the number of times that voter is critical to some coalition ….

Banzhaf Power Index – An example Results: S1 is critical 16 times, S2 is critical 16 times, and M is critical 16 times. Neither I, L or E are ever critical. Conclusion: For the voting system given by [ 16 : 9, 9, 7, 3, 1, 1 ] we have determined that the Banzhaf power index for this system is given by ( 32, 32, 32, 0, 0, 0 ). Significance: This implies that Dr.’s Ruth and Ralph Smith and Dr. Mansfield share power equally in this system while neither of Dr.’s Ide, Lambert or Edwards have any power. Even though the nominal power of Dr. Mansfield is less than the Smiths, he has equal Banzhaf power in this system. Dr. Ide, Dr. Lambert and Dr. Edwards are dummy voters ( their vote is of no significance.)