MRAM. June 12th, 2014.  Last time: Discussed purpose for GIM1 Listed Proposal types to which we apply Review Criteria Covered Criteria in detail  Today:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Sponsored Programs VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY The Office of Sponsored Programs has upgraded COEUS to accommodate the new Grants.gov C-Forms About.
Advertisements

Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Presented by: OSP January MRAM 2012 Policy publication: January 16, 2012.
Find Funding Institutional Advancement (IA) has resources available to help you, including a Project Description Form to help you explain your ideas, online.
THE BASICS 2011 Office of Sponsored Programs. Craig Johnson OSP Administrator or Instructor.
Submission to Approval What happens to my protocol once I submit it to the HIC office.
Update on GIM 19 & What is “Ready To Submit”? Office of Sponsored Programs November 2012.
Proposal & Budget: Responding to the RFP Mary Gerrow, Principle Sponsored Projects Administrator.
Sponsored Projects Administration
Course Outline Process Overview for Course Convenors.
Guide to Allowability of Administrative/Clerical Costs on Federally Funded Grant Budgets Presented by: Ted Mordhorst, Assistant Director, Post Award Compliance,
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
A Tour of the RSP Portal for Research Support.   Jackie Frederick, Director of PreAward Services  Deborah Lundin, Associate Director of PreAward Services.
Grants.gov – What to Expect Presented by the Office for Research Cindy Hope, Director Office for Sponsored Programs.
California State University, Fresno – Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Grants.gov and eRA Commons Nancy Myers Sims, Grants & Contracts Development.
An Introduction to Grants.Gov Office of Sponsored Programs Virginia Commonwealth University Spring 2006.
by Nancy Abbott CANR Grants Development Office [GDO]
Electronic Grant Submissions and Jackie Hinton Grant Writer/Project Administrator Pediatrics Research Enterprise 801/
Proposal to Close Out Session One. Pre-Award Staff Michelle Smith (G&C Administrator) Budget development assistance Proposal submissions Process awards.
Streamlining the Grant Submission Process Jennifer Barrett Department of Medicine Sponsored Program Services Medical Center North D-3100
KUMC Research Institute S ponsored Programs Administration (SPA) How to complete an on-line NIH grant application?
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 SESSION 8 OF AAPLS – OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION FORMS AND MOST COMMON ERRORS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
CSBS Fourth Friday Faculty Workshop 1: Grant Management CSBS: Frances Solano ORSP: Stefanie Friesen TUC: Stacey Lord / Maryann Camarillo 1/23/
End User Changes GO LIVE May 13, 2010 PS Grants Implementation.
1. Proposal deadline 2. Timeline  A grant opportunity announcement will include a sponsor deadline for receipt of the proposal.  The instructions will.
Presented by: Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) and Office of Animal Welfare (OAW) OSP All-Staff Meeting October 2014.
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
MRAM. May 8, Review and Submission Requirements for Proposals Effective May 12, 2014.
Nuts and Bolts of Proposal Development Josie Causseaux May 24,
Presented by The Office of Research Development & Services.
Electronic Submissions of Grant Applications Muhsin Aboud Principal Investigator, IEARDA Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences.
OGCA Proposal process Series Submitting an R01 proposal.
Office of Sponsored Programs MRAM, October Areas Impacted Proposal Submission New and Revised Notices of Awards Existing Awards and Contracts Subawards.
Tracking & Review Attaching Documents, Proposal Review, and Submission Office of Grant & Contract Services 17 January 2012.
Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry Partnerships 1 Updates from NIH Conference April 2010 Cynthia Sylvester Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry.
QRAM FEBRUARY 2009 GRETCHEN DAVIS RICHEY OUTREACH & SUPPORT MANAGER SAGE Report.
OSP Updates MRAM May 2010 Office of Sponsored Programs May 13, 2010 Presented by: Casi Heintzman, Grant and Contract Administrator Carol Rhodes, Associate.
Reduced Responsibility Policy, Process and Status on Implementation Presented by: Carol Rhodes Associate Director Office of Sponsored Programs Michael.
FEDERAL UPDATE Jeff Warner Senior Contract and Grant Officer Alisia Ford Contract and Grant Officer Spring QRAM - Tuesday, March 12, 2013.
ESubmission Review Bringing the Key Points Home. For NIH opportunities, who registers in Grants.gov? Applicant Organizations –E-biz POC designated.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
ESubmission Review Bringing the Key Points Home. For NIH opportunities, who registers in Grants.gov? Applicant Organizations –E-biz POC designated.
GCO INFORMATION SESSION: YOU ASK, WE ANSWER NIH R01 A PPLICATION B ASICS P RESENTED BY : M ICHELLE H UMPHREYS G RANTS A NALYST II G RANTS AND C ONTRACTS.
The Basics Craig Johnson Grant Administrator Department of Medicine Instructor.
Capturing Changes to PAF after Proposal is Submitted to the Sponsor but PRIOR to Award Option 1 – Budget change =>20% ( or other triger) 1.PAF sent back.
 What is a Salary Transfer? Why do we do them?  What are best practices?  What makes a good justification?  Resources.
An Overview of the Pre-Award Grant Process
1 Mission Impossible: Understanding the Pre-Award Grant Process Monique Foxx, MHSA Manager, Office of Sponsored Programs Stephanie Bair, MS Grants Management.
WHAT THEY ARE, HOW THEY CHANGE MRAM MARCH 2014 OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS GRANTS INFORMATION MEMORANDA.
GCO INFORMATION SESSION: YOU ASK, WE ANSWER C OMMON R EASONS F UNDING P ROPOSALS (FP S ) ARE R ETURNED FOR C HANGES P RESENTED BY : M ICHELLE H UMPHREYS.
The MRAM PRAM Report Carol Rhodes, Associate Director, OSP January 16, 2014.
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop Preparing The Application These workshops are funded by the USDA’s Agricultural.
COBRE Post Award Management Christy Leake Grants Administration Branch National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH.
Submit Module Objectives 2  In this module you will learn how to:  Assess readiness and determine who can submit proposals  Submit a proposal.
An Administrator’s Guide to Grant Management Presented by WCRI Research Administration and WCH Finance Department Grant Management 201 new thinking.
PROPOSAL REVIEW AND SUBMISSION FYAP May 5, 2016 Julie Wammack Sponsored Research Administration.
FUSE TEMPUS Project Coordination Meeting Belgrade University, 27 and 28 November, 2014 INTERMEDIATE REPORT (IR) PREPARATION (+ Statement of the Costs Incurred.
“SPEAR” Workshop May 18, 2017 Julie Wammack
Getting Started with the Grants Portal Grants
Grants & Contracts Officer, III College of Arts and Sciences
Proposal & Budget: Responding to the RFP
Sponsored Programs (SP)
Unit 6D: Abstracts & Letters of Commitment
GMAS Preproposal Entry
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Just In Time Concepts & Review
I want to submit a grant. What do I do?
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic Research Administration Forum
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
Presentation transcript:

MRAM. June 12th, 2014

 Last time: Discussed purpose for GIM1 Listed Proposal types to which we apply Review Criteria Covered Criteria in detail  Today: Requirements to trigger our review OSP Procedures First look at data

 Meets GIM 19 deadlines (e.g. 7/3 day)  Has a proposal attached  Is in the status of “IN OSP” (e.g. not in “Routing” or “Withdrawn” status)

 We use the seven (7) criteria for review of competing proposals.  Comments by OSP are sent to the PI and Department Contacts after initial review: o Required changes – must take place prior to submission to the sponsor o Recommended changes – are recommended by OSP based on its review to enhance compliance or responsiveness

 If a proposal is reviewed and changes are requested, the proposal will be re-reviewed when it is routed back to OSP, but this is limited to: o Programmatic additions comply with formatting o OSP Reviewer Comments were addressed We encourage campus to acknowledge all changes (required and recommended) in the order they were presented in our Review.

1. OSP – Failure to received Limited Submission Committee approval will preclude submission of the application. Please attach the Committee’s approval to the eGC1. Campus – Please see letter now attached 2. OSP – Use of special characters in the File Name is known to cause Errors upon submission via Grants.gov, per SF424 Guide. Please rename. Campus – The attachment has been renamed and uploaded 3. OSP – Cost-share is prohibited by the sponsor per the funding announcement, however, the budget/budget justification reflects effort on the part of ___ without a commensurate request for salary. Please revise the budget to remove the cost- share commitment. Campus – We have included a salary request for ___’s effort 4. OSP - Missing Letter of Intent, signed by the authorized official, from Yale. A letter from Yale’s PI does not suffice. Campus – letter is now included (we were waiting on Yale)

OSP Review comments are provided or an OSP touchback to PI/dept is provided in 2 business days E.g. Arrives “In OSP” on Monday; response from OSP by end of business Wednesday, e.g.: o Full review with OSP Reviewer Comments o I am in the middle of reviewing your Proposal; I will provide reviewer comments momentarily o I have been assigned your proposal for review because I am on coverage for __. I will be providing my Review Comments shortly.

 Dept/PI must give OSP access to proposal in sponsor system, if applicable (e.g.Fastlane)  OSP will upload* copy of submitted version to eGC1; this is the system of record. *Sometimes we need the full submitted copy from PI/dept, if sponsor system precludes access to final submitted version by anyone other than PI.

 OSP is committed to continuous assessment of this procedure.  We will be reviewing a report on monthly basis, to analyze specifically:  Was the competing proposal attached to the eGC1 by the PI/dept?  When did OSP first review the competing proposal (or provide a “touchback”response to PI/dept)?  If there were review comments, were review comments provided in the Required/Recommended format?  Did PI/Dept respond accordingly?  Why look at this data?  Do we need to communicate requirements better?  Do we need to shift workload?  Are there unforeseen issues with certain sponsors/systems that impact the quality of review or time within which we do a review?  Are there additional process changes to consider?

Competing Proposal eGC1s (e.g. New, Resubmission, Competing Renewal, Competing Supplement, Competing Revision, Transfer to UW) Review Provided, or “Touchback” provided within 2 business days 37% Submission, no Reviewer Comments40% Review Provided 3+ days after “IN OSP”20% eGC1 is ATF or ISCT and 3+ days3%

 Grants.gov doesn’t like non-standard characters in fields.  Do not “cut and paste” content into Grants.gov fields; type it in – G.g. thinks a space is a non-standard character.  Avoid scanning documents to convert to PDF. Instead convert word doc to PDF using PDF software.  Resubmissions: SF424, field 4.a. – must contain ONLY the institution code (IC) and six digit number assigned by NIH from last submission. Do not include the entire grant number assigned from last submission.

Resources: GIM 1: Prepare Proposal Webpages (OSP website): epareProposal