Heterosis-Ignored or Forgotten? (or did we ever believe in it to start with?) D. A. Daley California State University, Chico.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heterosis: Defined and Research Experience
Advertisements

Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Mongastric Production Swine Section Breeding and Selection of Swine.
Yearling heifer mating Rebecca Hickson. Profitability of calving heifers Beef cow efficiency Why calve heifers Why not calve heifers Performance of heifers.
Lecture 3-22 Exam 3 Breeds FineMediumCoarse Most important breeds? Why so many in US?
ROLE OF COMPOSITES IN CROSSBREEDING Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
The Future is Here Jim Gosey University of Nebraska “Show Me The Future” National Angus Conference & Tour, Sept.28, 2005 Kansas City, Mo.
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IS AI FOR YOU? PUREBRED COMMERCIAL.
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection Composite Populations Larry V. Cundiff ARS-USDA-U.S. Meat Animal Research Center 2008 Beef Cattle Production.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations.  Understand the reproduction cycle  Assess herd reproductive efficiency  Understand the decisions involved.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
Cow-Calf Operations Makenna Ramos April 10, 2012 Animal Science.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
By Payton Fehringer. Why Red Angus Genetics?  Superior maternal traits  Crossbreeding advantages  Promotional tools  Red Angus Association.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Developing Cattle Breeding Program Setting of goals is of major importance and includes goals for:
The Beef Industry. The average size beef herd is around 100 head.
Experiences with the Implementation of Stayability EPD Wade Shafer American Simmental Association Bozeman, MT.
Heterosis – The Forgotten Tool? Dr. Tom Field Colorado State University Dr. Andy Herring Texas A&M University Cattlemen’s College 2005 NCBA Meeting, San.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Dr. Gordon F. Jones Professor of Animal Science / Retired Western Kentucky University.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
Tools of the Trade Tom Field, PhD Andy Herring, PhD.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
Designing Genetics and Selection for Seedstock Breeders, Commercial Cattlemen and Show Ring Enthusiasts ASA Fall Focus 2015: Confidence Builds Success.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Chapters 13 & 14. Objectives Understanding of the concept of genetic variation Knowledge of quantitative vs. qualitative traits Appreciation for genetic.
Wade Shafer American Simmental Association. In the pursuit of genetic improvement all traits are antagonistically related to each other.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Identifying Genetic Antagonisms Megan Rolf Oklahoma State University.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Beef Cattle Production
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
1 Unit E Segments of the Animal Industry Lesson 1 Exploring the Cattle Industry.
Selecting Herd Bull Beef Production Game. What is the job of our bull? Produce sperm Pass on quality genetics of rate of gain, muscling, structure Physically.
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
Advanced Animal Breeding
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
David L. Thomas Department of Animal Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison Basics of Sheep Breeding for Commercial Flocks.
Sustainable Agriculture
The Beef Industry Original Power Point Created by Randal Cales
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Beef Cattle Production
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
Joe C. Paschal Livestock Specialist Texas AgriLife Extension
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
BEEF Cattle (Bovine) Nutrition Production Bi-Products Food Safety
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Using EPDs in Selection
Expected Progeny Differences
Developing Heifers Earl H. Ward.
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Unit 4: Genetic Selection & Mating
The Future of the U.S. Beef Cattle Industry HPJ 2019 Cattle U by Lee Leachman.
Presentation transcript:

Heterosis-Ignored or Forgotten? (or did we ever believe in it to start with?) D. A. Daley California State University, Chico

Why are we still talking about heterosis? The incredible value of the crossbred cow!

Heterosis--- “the only free lunch in the beef business”

Genetic Improvement Selection - within breed (use of genetic predictors (EPD’s and indices) Crossbreeding - heterosis / breed complementarity

Breed Complementarity The degree to which two breeds complement one another…..

Heterosis - the superiority of the crossbred progeny compared to the average of the parental breeds….. Maternal Heterosis - the increase in calf performance due to the maternal effect of a crossbred cow

Heterosis – what should we expect? Primary advantage in the “lowly heritable” traits --- “the non-additive genetic portion” Small, net positive effects in many traits Fitness traits---often difficult to measure and difficult to “visualize” success LARGE NET POSITIVE CUMULATIVE EFFECT.

Direct (individual) vs. maternal heterosis ----Heterosis of the calf = 8.5% (individual) ----Heterosis of the calf = 8.5% (individual) ----Heterosis of the F1 = 14.5% (maternal) ----Heterosis of the F1 = 14.5% (maternal)

Heterosis Effects – individual (crossbred calves) Calving rate 4.4% Survival to weaning 1.9% Weaning weight 3.9% Postweaning ADG 2.6% Yearling weight 3.8% Feed conversion 2.2%.

Heterosis effects – maternal Crossbred cows Calving rate 3.7% Survival to weaning 1.5% Weaning weight 3.9% Longevity 38% Number of Calves 17.0% CUMULATIVE WEANING WT. 25.3%.

But do we really believe in crossbreeding? “Can’t straightbred cows do the same job in a commercial setting with a more consistent product?”

“Crossbreeding has caused our lack of uniformity, inconsistency, and tremendous variability! No wonder we have lost market share. We have too many breeds. What happened to the good old days of straightbred, predictable cattle?”

The Perception of Crossbreeding increase variability lack of consistency “mongerelize” the nation’s cow herd “too many breeds” lack of predictability.

Utilizing heterosis and selection

It is not the fault of crossbreeding…..it is the fault of the crossbreeder…… thethe

Lifetime Membership in “The Breed of the Month Club”

Crossbreeding systems- historical pitfalls Complicated systems Lack of understanding of basic genetics Poor utilization of breed diversity Poor selection of genetic inputs No long range genetic plan!

The lack of implementation of well planned crossbreeding systems is the result of…… Early failures because of the wrong genetic inputs……. Purebred breeders………. Culture…………… We measure the wrong traits!

Planned Crossbreeding Programs Systematic – utilize resource base Retain HETEROSIS Breed complementarity SIMPLEMarketability MATCH COWS TO THEIR ENVIRONMENT MEASURE PROFIT.

What is a “good cow”? Born in bad leg at weaning Tried to cull in 96.. Calf in 97 Calf in 98 Open in 99? –sent her as a cull to AI school She had twins!!!! Calf in 00 Calf in 01 Calf in 02 Calf in 03 Twins in 04 Calf in 05 Calf in calves by the time she was 10…….

Heterosis – Ignored or Forgotten? 1. A cultural bias that clearly reflects “purebreds are better!”

Heterosis – Ignored or Forgotten? 2. Our predilection for single trait selection focusing on “bigger is better.”

Heterosis – Ignored or Forgotten? 3. We have decided that measuring outputs is more meaningful than measuring inputs---and easier! Average daily gain Average daily gain Ribeye area Ribeye area Quality grade Quality grade Feed efficiency Feed efficiency Conception rate Conception rate Weaning weight Weaning weight ….and the list goes on………. ….and the list goes on……….

Heterosis – Ignored or Forgotten? 4. Uniform phenotypes for qualitative traits (color) have a distinct and real marketing advantage that is difficult to ignore.

Heterosis – Ignored or Forgotten? 5. Heterosis is very difficult to visualize and even more difficult to measure. longevity longevity morbidity morbidity livability livability age at puberty age at puberty lifetime productivity lifetime productivity

6. The presentation of complicated crossbreeding systems as a “normal practice” to diverse cattle operations, especially the countless small beef herds in the United States. Heterosis – Ignored or Forgotten?

7. Our penchant for telling people how to modify their environment in order to “get heavier calves, higher percent calf crop and more total pounds.”

Heterosis – Ignored or Forgotten? 8. Historically, there has been active resistance to crossbreeding from some traditional marketing outlets, some purebred producers and (in some cases) breed associations.

Heterosis – Ignored or Forgotten? 9. Inappropriate use of breed diversity.

Heterosis – Ignored or Forgotten? 10. Our industry and University systems have focused on individual trait measurement for over fifty years.