SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 1 SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing Remarks David MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Directory for PPA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Director’s Welcome Jonathan Dorfan 32 nd Annual SSRL Users Meeting October 17, 2005.
Advertisements

Position of the Czech Republic on the European Strategy in Particle Physics Current main activities in particle physics * Plans for the future Recommendations.
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
Randall Sobie The ATLAS Experiment Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN Laboratory ATLAS.
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting Vision for SLAC Science Persis S. Drell Director SLAC.
February 19, 2008 FACET Review 1 Lab Overview and Future Onsite Facilities Persis S. Drell DirectorSLAC.
This is the last message in this gathering of North American PI’s with an interest in the INFN hosted SuperB project. I will try to deal with issues on.
Planning for a Western Analysis Facility Richard P. Mount Planning for a Western Analysis FacilityPage 1.
TeV Particle Astrophysics 2009 Welcome & SLAC Connections David MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
June 12, 2007DOE Program Review1 Emergency Information Be aware of exits in your building Be aware of exits in your building –Speaker will indicate locations.
ATLAS users and SLAC Jason Nielsen Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics University of California, Santa Cruz SLAC Users Organization Meeting 7 February.
A Possible Strategy Towards a Future Lepton Collider Tor Raubenheimer SLUO Annual Meeting September 17, 2009.
1 Ideas About the Future of HPC in Europe “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 1 SLAC HEP Budget Meeting Summary Discussion Charts S. M. Kahn, D. B. MacFarlane, R. Alva SLAC Rev.
High Energy Physics Theory: Bigi, Delgado, Kolda –1 postdoc –5 students Experiment: Hildreth, Jessop, Lannon LoSecco, Ruchti, Wayne –3 research professors.
Performance Evaluations: PPA InterpretationsPage 1 Interpretations on Performance Evaluation Process D. MacFarlane June 4 th, 2009.
The SLAC ATLAS Program: Overview and BudgetPage 1 The SLAC ATLAS Program: Overview and Budget David MacFarlane For the SLAC ATLAS group.
Planning for the SLAC ATLAS Program Page 1 Planning for the SLAC ATLAS Program D. MacFarlane Deputy ALD for PPA.
International collaboration in high energy physics experiments  All large high energy physics experiments today are strongly international.  A necessary.
1 Albrecht Wagner, Snowmass 0805 Albrecht Wagner DESY and Hamburg University Challenges for Realising the ILC.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
DESY Participation in an External Experiment Joachim Mnich PRC Meeting
Long Range Planning Pier Oddone September 24, 2007.
A Communication Strategy for the FCC study James Gillies, Head of Communication, CERN FCC week 2015, 25 March 2015.
Planning for Discoveries in Particle Physics Michael Witherell EPP2010 May 16, 2005.
Physics Priorities S. Dawson July 11, 2007 Fermilab Steering Committee Meeting.
Helping Develop America’s Technological Workforce K. Whelan Oregon QuarkNet Meeting, June 2012 QuarkNet 101 Kris Whelan University of Washington.
ATTRACT – From Open Science to Open Innovation Information Sharing Meeting Brussels, June 19, 2014 Markus Nordberg (CERN) Development and Innovation Unit.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Meeting FY 2009 Budget Request.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, The CMS Physics Analysis Center - PAC Dan Green US CMS Program Manager Jan. 28, 2004.
1 HiGrade Kick-off Welcome to DESY Hamburg Zeuthen.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
Challenges & Issues for SBNE Nigel S. Lockyer 4/4/14.
11 DOE Office of Science High Energy Physics Program AAAC Meeting October 15, 2009 National Science Foundation Dennis Kovar Associate Director of the Office.
DESY Photon Science XFEL official start of project: 5 June 2007 FLASH upgrade to 1 GeV done, cool down started PETRA III construction started 2 July 2007.
P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC The Role of the LHC in US HEP Dan Green US CMS Program Manager January 28, 2003.
Summary Comments and Discussion Pier Oddone 40 th Anniversary Users’ Meeting June 8, 2007.
Slide David Britton, University of Glasgow IET, Oct 09 1 Prof. David Britton GridPP Project leader University of Glasgow UK-T0 Meeting 21 st Oct 2015 GridPP.
Outline  Introduction  Higgs Particle Searches for Origin of Mass  Grid Computing Effort  Linear Collider Detector R&D  Conclusions A Quest for the.
Sep/19/2008 Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation: Accelerator based Particle Physics1 Accelerator Based Particle Physics Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation.
U.S. ATLAS Computing Facilities Overview Bruce G. Gibbard Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. LHC Software and Computing Review Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
Glion Colloquium / June Accelerating Science and Innovation R.-D. Heuer, CERN HL-LHC, Aix-les-Bains, 1 Oct ECFA HL-LHC Experiments Workshop.
John Womersley 1/13 Fermilab’s Future John Womersley Fermilab May 2004.
SLAC and ILC Jonathan Dorfan, Director LCFOA, SLAC May 1, 2006 Particle & Particle Astrophysics.
DESY. Status and Perspectives in Particle Physics Albrecht Wagner Chair of the DESY Directorate.
BNL Overview DOE Annual HEP Program Review Brookhaven National Laboratory April 17-19, 2006 Sam Aronson.
Perspective on the Future of HEP By Jonathan Dorfan, SLAC Director Snowmass 2001 Sunday, July 1, 2001.
Philip Burrows HEP Forum, Coseners House, 6/05/06 Elementary Particle Physics in the 21 st Century Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
John Womersley PPD Staff Meeting 12 October 2005.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
FCPPL CPPM 15/01/08E. Kajfasz1 Welcome to CPPM ! 欢迎光临法国 ! 欢迎光临马赛 ! I won’t be able to make a comprehensive review of our activities. Apologies for those.
University Research Model Committee - Key points/issues - Other points/issues - New ideas - “University Model” issues in the report - Findings and Recommendations.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
CMS Crosscut Operations and Research, Theory, Computing, University Involvement C. Young and B. Zhou.
CPAD Instrumentation Frontier Meeting October 5-7, 2015 Glen Crawford, Helmut Marsiske Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy DOE Office of High.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
Cosmic Frontier Aspects of FNAL Program. The quality and significance of the laboratory’s recent scientific and technical accomplishments within each.
1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
Stanford Linear Accelerator
LHC Science Goals & Objectives
Electron Ion Collider New aspects of EIC experiment instrumentation and computing, as well as their possible impact on and context in society (B) COMPUTING.
Western Analysis Facility
John Womersley Super-B Workshop Oxford May 2011
Process of the 2nd update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics FCC week, 29 May 2017, Berlin Sijbrand de Jong, President of the CERN Council (slides.
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Presentation transcript:

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 1 SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing Remarks David MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Directory for PPA

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 2 Outline Why are meetings like this workshop important to SLAC and the US community? –Context, plans and possible areas of evolution for SLAC/ATLAS program and connections to US ambitions at the LHC Where should we go next? –Another important step along a path of creating a new paradigm for SLAC and the US-LHC community

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 3 SLAC Particle Physics & Astrophysics Accelerator-based particle physics: ATLAS & BABAR ATLAS upgrade Astrophysics & Cosmology: Fermi GST, DES Non-accelerator physics: EXO-200, CDMS GeODM SiD, SuperB CMB, AGIS EXO LSST, JDEM Linear Collider, Project-X Accelerator research: LHC, ILC, high-gradient, plasma-wakefield, laser LHC upgrades

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 4 Physics Opportunities Accelerator research: ILC, high-gradient, plasma-wakefield, laser Astrophysics & Cosmology: Fermi GST, DES Accelerator-based particle physics: ATLAS & BABAR Non-accelerator physics: EXO-200, CDMS Direct dark matter searches Energy & intensity frontiers Inflation, cosmic rays Higgs, SUSY, discovery physics Nature of the neutrino Dark matter & dark energy Future energy frontier facilities Discovery reach

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 5 Reminder: why did SLAC join ATLAS? The most compelling questions in particle physics can only be addressed at the energy frontier The best way of sustaining a vibrant energy frontier community for a future linear collider is to be engaged now ATLAS is the future for our accelerator-based program, and therefore the glue tying together the HEP program at SLAC The energy frontier is the highest priority program for the national user community & our traditional user base –This meeting is another important step is translating this idea into concrete terms and areas of engagement

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 6 Ongoing challenges and opportunities Late entry (2006) into a major worldwide collaboration with established players and institutional responsibilities –Major impact still achieved by operating in a service mode to resolve many real issues arising during commissioning over the last 3 years Core capabilities and unique expertise from constructing & operating BABAR are now being applied to ATLAS Gaining an understanding with OHEP about size and role for SLAC/ATLAS effort has been challenging –Our goal is to significantly strengthen the US ATLAS effort by the infusion of a large and experienced SLAC team Next decade will see operation & physics exploitation of ATLAS, as well as a very ambitious and challenging upgrade effort –Need to build on a common vision by US ATLAS community, US ATLAS management, SLAC and OHEP of the SLAC role

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 7 Present elements of SLAC/LHC plan LHC: LARP collimators, PS2 design, other opportunities ATLAS: Theme 1: Pixel System Theme 2: DAQ and trigger Theme 3: Simulations Theme 4: Tier 2 Center & potential Western Data Analysis Facility [future] Theme 5: The Bay Area as an ATLAS physics center [future]

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 8 Pixel System Development & critical service roles Stage 1: new inner layer Stage 2: full system upgrade Upgrade R&D What is the overall long-term SLAC/ATLAS plan? Trigger/DAQ System Development & critical service roles Stage 1: new architecture & incremental upgrades Stage 2: full system upgrade Upgrade R&D Physics engagement, computing and regional center growth SLAC a major partner in ATLAS, broadly supporting US ATLAS community

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 9 Exploring ideas for an Analysis Facility Future direction for ATLAS Tier 2 & 3 implementation may need to evolve after first data –Tier 2s may struggle to meet combined needs of simulation and data-intensive analysis, alignment, calibration & HLT validation –Hosting Tier 3 centers at SLAC may be an attractive option, both in terms of maintaining efficient operation and sharing CPU resources Option exists for a Western Data Analysis Facility at SLAC –Migration from BABAR dominated to ATLAS dominated computing hardware operation, within site power and cooling capabilities –Need to understand economies of sharing support personnel, CPU and disk hardware across Tier 2 and Tier 3 needs –Need to integrate into US ATLAS and ATLAS planning for Tier 2 & 3 planning and initial experience with data

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 10 The Bay Area as a west-coast ATLAS center CERN cannot host major portions of the LHC collaborations long term The Bay Area could play a leading role in supporting LHC physics –Concentration of expertise on computing, analysis and detector systems –Proximity of physics analysis support centers, capability for hosting workshops, tutorials and seminars –Attractive training centers due to a combination of tutorials, available expertise, & participation in upgrade activities –Strength of Theory Groups & their strong interest in LHC physics This is just a vision at the moment! –Would need to create a consensus in the US ATLAS community about a new paradigm for exploiting physics at the LHC

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 11 Regional Center What are possible elements of a regional center? Upgrade R&D and construction Remote monitoring & operations Strong Theory Group Significant computing resources & expertise Meeting rooms & user space Detector systems & operations expertise Physics tools expertise Similar to DESY Analysis Center, but with some important advantages

SLUO LHC Workshop: Closing RemarksPage 12 Where should we go next? Opportunity to define together a new paradigm for SLAC’s role as a national lab in support of the LHC as the highest priority element of the national program –Significantly enlarged SLAC/ATLAS program could provide an additional strong anchor on the west coast at a time when operations, physics and major upgrade needs are all converging –SLAC’s role should be driven by the real needs of the US community –Will only happen if the US community and SLAC speak to OHEP with one voice about a coherent vision for our role Need to turn ideas, e.g., enhanced computing role, regional center, upgrade R&D and future upgrade roles, benefits of laboratory infrastructure, into a common vision and a concrete implementation