HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 1April 22, 2004 Proposed US Role in ITER Diagnostics David Johnson, PPPL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Examples of ITER CODAC requirements for diagnostics
Advertisements

March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
Current status of H-mode/pedestal related experiments in JT-60U 14th meeting of the ITPA-TG on Pedestal&Edge Physics Group, General Atomics, April 29-May.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
David Johnson Diagnostics Team Leader
Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.
Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
Enabling Technology on Alcator C-Mod Jim Irby MIT-PSFC.
Intense Diagnostic Neutral Beam For Burning Plasmas Challenges for ITER and Opportunities for KSTAR Jaeyoung Park Glen Wurden and MFE team Los Alamos National.
ELM Filament Propogation Measurements on MAST A. Kirk a, N. B. Ayed b, B. Dudson c, R. Scannel d (a) UKAEA Culham, (b) University of York, (c) University.
ELECTRON CYCLOTRON SYSTEM FOR KSTAR US-Korea Workshop Opportunities for Expanded Fusion Science and Technology Collaborations with the KSTAR Project Presented.
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
Community Input on Plasma Materials Interactions Rajesh Maingi (PPPL), chair Steve Zinkle (UTK), co-chair Pete Pappano, FES program POC FESAC meeting Gaithersburg,
EFDA Fusion Roadmap Status of implementation Francesco Romanelli EFDA Leader.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Diagnostics for Benchmarking Experiments L. Van Woerkom The Ohio State University University of California, San Diego Center for Energy Research 3rd MEETING.
1 Brief Status of ITER TBM A High-Level Ad Hoc Group (AHG) met April 10-11, per request of the ITER Council. In that meeting, Parties intentions were stated,
IOS-5.2 Maintaining ICRH Coupling in expected ITER regime Spokes person: M. Goniche M.-L. Mayoral (JET), R. Pinsker (DIII-D), L. Colas (TS), V. Bobkov.
Collaborative Management Environment: Merging R&D Tracking and Electronic Proposal Submission R&D Council Meeting March 12, 1999 Dr. Thomas E. Potok.
Broader Approach Activities toward Fusion DEMO Reactors IT/E-2 IAEA 21 st Fusion Energy Conference (Chengdu 17 th October, 2006 ) Shinzaburo Matsuda Japan.
2D Position Sensitive Detector for Plasma diagnosis
The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.
Report of the Burning Plasma Program Advisory Committee S.C. Prager November, 2003.
US ITER Diagnostics ITPA10 Moscow April 13, 2006 Presented by David Johnson US ITER Project Activities –Near-term priorities and plans –US diagnostic packages.
Kaname Ikeda, October Status of the ITER Project Status of the ITER Project Kaname Ikeda ITER Nominee Director-General October 2006.
Measurement Requirements and Assessment of Measurement Capability David Johnson, Réjean Boivin, Ken Young.
Progress in Confinement & Heating Increasing laser energy nn Confinement Parameter & Temperature.
The principle of SAMI and some results in MAST 1. Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, , China 2. Culham Centre.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye for PPPL, U. Wisc., JHU, UCLA, UC Davis Groups NSTX-C-Mod Pedestal Workshop PPPL 7 Sept NSTX Capabilities.
D.GuilhemITER IR/VIS Diagnostic -- April 4th Cadarache Euratom 1/22 ITER wide-angle viewing thermographic and visible system Y.Corre, S.Droineau,
Characterization of core and edge turbulence in L- and H-mode Alcator C-Mod plasmas Outline: Alcator C-Mod tokamak Fluctuation diagnostics Low to high.
NSTX Effects of NTSX Upgrades on DiagnosticsFebruary 8, NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
DESY_ILCW07 Global Design Effort-CF&S 1 Beam Delivery System & Interaction Region Fred Asiri CF&S Point of Contact.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science 20 th Meeting of the IEA Large Tokamak ExCo, May th Meeting of the IEA Poloidal Divertor ExCo, May.
Report on Developing Industrial Cost Estimates for ITER Systems of Possible Interest to the US For Discussion with FESAC Gaithersburg, MD March 5, 2003.
PPPL International Collaboration Activities J. R. Wilson Head Off-site Research Department Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 4th US-PRC Magnetic Fusion.
ITER Project Status Ned Sauthoff Project Manager U.S. ITER Project Office FESAC 7/27/04 “preparing for an efficient start of ITER construction”
ITPA12 Diagnostics - PPPL - 3/26-30/07 1 US ITER Project Plans David Johnson Diagnostics Team Leader March 26, 2007 ITPA12 Design Basis US Scope Port Plugs.
Edge characterization experiments in the National Spherical Torus Experiment V. A. Soukhanovskii and NSTX Research Team Session CO1 - NSTX ORAL session,
U.S. Fusion Energy Sciences Program Fusion Program Summary for Program Leaders February 7, 2005 E xcellent S cience in S upport of A ttractive E nergy.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GOVERNOR ’ S TASK FORCE ON CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT REVIEW Report Overview PD Customer Forum September 2002.
Bosna i Hercegovina Agencija za statistiku Bosne i Hercegovine Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina Donor coordination.
ITER-China Project Huo YuPing PT Leader, ITER-China Chief scientist.
Charles C. Baker Deputy US ITER Planning Officer presented at the Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting and Symposium Washington, DC November, 2003.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
M. Ono NSTX FWP 2014 Budget Planning Meeting Apr. 15, 2012 Chapter 10. NSTX-U Facility Status and Proposed Upgrades Text, figures – mostly there except.
Martin Peng NSTX Program Advisory Committee Meeting (PAC-14) January 21 – 22, 2003 PPPL Princeton, NJ PAC-13 Action Items Supported by Columbia U Dartmouth.
FY WEP TSG Goals & WEP-Relevant Diagnostic Upgrades NSTX Supported by WEP TSG Meeting September 14,
1 Preparation and Positioning of Korea for the ITER Project 2004 KSTAR US-Korea Workshop May 19-20, General Atomics.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
1 NSTX EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL - OP-XP-712 Title: HHFW Power Balance Optimization at High B Field J. Hosea, R. Bell, S. Bernabei, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S.
Boundary Physics Breakout Session was a Good Start Breadth of topics: many issues pointed out in three plenary talks: pedestal, SOL/div/PFC, and technology,
CPUC/CEC Adaptation Working Group Guido Franco Kristin Ralff-Douglas Team Lead Senior Policy Analyst Energy Commission Public Utilities Commission Climate.
Proposed Offset Mirror System
GHz reflectometer to be operated in X-mode
Status of Equatorial CXRS System Development
Status of Vertical Neutron Camera Integration
Development and Analysis of Gas Puff CXRS in SOL
J.R. Wilson, R.J. Goldston, J.C. Hosea ReNew Theme III Workshop
Measurement Innovation Program
Remarks on US Costing Activities for the US ITER-TBM
Proposal for setting up a RDG Task Force on Cooperation Models
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Reflectometry measurements of turbulence in Alcator C-Mod plasmas
Presentation transcript:

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 1April 22, 2004 Proposed US Role in ITER Diagnostics David Johnson, PPPL

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 2April 22, 2004 Defining US Role in ITER Diagnostics Highlights of the Last Year Opportunities for US Diagnostic Participation in ITER - A White Paper to the Department of Energy (Réjean Boivin) May 2003 Gave preliminary assessments of “interest” high, medium, low, fractional ITER Forum Presentation and discussion on Diagnostic Opportunities on ITER - (D. Johnson) - May 8-9, 2003 US assessment of cost of ITER diagnostics (PPPL, LLNL, GA) At the ITER NSSG-10 meeting held 23 September, the US share of ITER diagnostics was agreed in global terms to be ~15%. ITER Diagnostics Working Group was formed to consider repackaging of diagnostics into port-based packages and formulate a proposal for party sharing of diagnostics. An assessment of US preferences for diagnostics was done by a group of US experts. A prioritized preference list was supplied to the DWG in mid-January. The DWG arrived at a sharing proposal and it has been approved by the PT and IT leaders. Forwarded to Negotiators for final approval.

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 3April 22, 2004 Party Allocations for Diagnostics At the ITER NSSG-10 meeting held 23 September, the cost sharing for diagnostics was agreed in global terms: –EU / JA = 20% (host) or 15% (non-host) + 5% flexibility –US = 15% –RF = 13% TOTAL = 100% –CN = KO = 4% –FUND = 24%

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 4April 22, 2004 Assessment Criteria

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 5April 22, 2004 Assessment Criteria (2)

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 6April 22, 2004 Rating ITER Diagnostics The package consisting of – descriptions of 20 ITER diagnostics where US had significant interest – listing of the assessment criteria – instructions on rating distribution – rating ‘scorecard’ was sent to: Steve Allen (LLNL) Dmitri Mossessian (MIT) Réjean Boivin (GA) Tony Peebles (UCLA) Don Hillis (ORNL) Glen Wurden (LANL) David Johnson (PPPL) Jim Terry (MIT) George McKee (U. Wisc.)Ken Young (PPPL)

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 7April 22, 2004

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 8April 22, 2004 US Preferences Supplied to DWG

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 9April 22, 2004 Proposed US ITER Diagnostic Packages This set of diagnostics provides a reasonable balance in: –Physics areas addressed –Plasma regions probed –US capabilities utilized –Level of risk confronted –Diagnostic ‘real estate’ integrated

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 10April 22, 2004 Electron Cyclotron Emission (equatorial port) Two receiving antennas, vertically offset to provide core measurements for a variety of plasma shapes. In-situ calibration sources Mature design, robust in ITER environment.

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 11April 22, 2004 Tangential Interferometer/Polarimeter (part of the ECE package 13) Probably a two-color CO 2 system with retro-reflectors on the outer midplane wall. Will likely need real-time alignment

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 12April 22, 2004 Main Plasma Reflectometer (LFS) (package includes upper port) Shares an equatorial port with x-ray crystal and NPA X and O mode launchers provide SOL and pedestal density profiles, MHD mode information and density fluctuation measurements. Mature design, robust in ITER environment.

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 13April 22, 2004 Motional Stark Effect (equatorial port) Two views, each viewing a different heating beam, to provide adequate edge and core spatial resolution. Six mirror optical labyrinth will make precision polarimetry difficult. Real time calibration may be necessary. Obtaining adequate optical throughput will be challenging, as will background due to bright bremsstrahlung and wall reflections.. E3 E1

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 14April 22, 2004 Upper Visible/IR Cameras (upper port) Six camera systems in every other upper port provide complete coverage of divertor region and provide nearly full coverage of inside wall along with 4 equatorial systems. Well integrated design, prototyped on JET.

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 15April 22, 2004 Divertor Interferometer (divertor port) Originally conceived as a microwave system capable of reflectometry, ECA and interferometry, will more likely be an CO 2 interferometer system.

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 16April 22, 2004 Upper Port Allocation

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 17April 22, 2004 Equatorial Port Allocation

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 18April 22, 2004 Lower Port Allocation

HTPD ITER Satellite Meeting 19April 22, 2004 What may happen in next 1-2 years? (If site is selected) ITER Project –Selection of host laboratory for US ITER Domestic Agency –Formation of ITER Legal Entity –Construction Agreement ITER Diagnostics –US will participate in ‘Port-Plug Task Force’ being formed –Definition of competitive process for selection of US providers Expressions of interest, formation of teams Decisions on packages for labs and industry/university Etc…. –Selection of US providing teams –Identification of R&D tasks needed to support US diagnostic efforts