June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Detector Characterization Robot (Progress Since January 2001) Design (Already exists) Algorithmic and Statistical studies (In.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2003 Mateusz Żochowski, Marcin Borzymek Software Life Cycle Analysis.
Advertisements

ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: The Linear Prediction Model The Autocorrelation Method Levinson and Durbin.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
March 24-28, 2003Computing for High-Energy Physics Configuration Database for BaBar On-line Rainer Bartoldus, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, Yury Kolomensky,
Median Based Line Tracker Soumya D. Mohanty Max Planck Insitut für Gravitationsphysik LIGO-G Z.
Time Series Building 1. Model Identification
Introduction The aim the project is to analyse non real time EEG (Electroencephalogram) signal using different mathematical models in Matlab to predict.
1 Audio Compression Techniques MUMT 611, January 2005 Assignment 2 Paul Kolesnik.
Noise Floor Non-stationarity Monitor Roberto Grosso*, Soma Mukherjee + + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernburg, Germany Detector.
LIGO-G Z External Triggers Circulation only within LIGO I authorship list Status of the Triggered Burst Search (highlights from LIGO DCC# T Z,
The ICE Tool Feng Wen Qi Yuan Kin Wah Leung. Presentation Overview  Project goal  Interactive GUI  Introduce image enhancement techniques  Integration.
Viking Pump Flow Manager - Phase 2 Senior Design May
Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears
Soma Mukherjee, GWDAW7, Kyoto, Japan, 19/12/02, LIGO-G Z1 Robust Detection of Noise Floor Drifts in Interferometric Data Soma Mukherjee Max Planck.
Trigger design engineering tools. Data flow analysis Data flow analysis through the entire Trigger Processor allow us to refine the optimal architecture.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
 Explain the role of a system analyst.  Identify the important parts of SRS document.  Identify the important problems that an organization would face.
21 Feb 2002Soumya D. Mohanty, AEI1 DCR Plan of presentation Soumya Mohanty: Overview, aims & work done R. Balasubramanian: Details of Hardware, Database.
Usability Issues Documentation J. Apostolakis for Geant4 16 January 2009.
Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec '03 Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA University of Texas.
Stefan Hild Ilias WG1 meeting, Hannover, September 2004 DATA TOOLS ‚how can data exchange work?‘ Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut)
Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.
1/ , Graz, Austria Power Spectral Density of Convolutional Coded Pulse Interval Modulation Z. Ghassemlooy, S. K. Hashemi and M. Amiri Optical Communications.
Feb 20, 2002Soumya Mohanty, AEI1 GEO++ A general purpose C++ DSP library Plan of presentation Soumya Mohanty: Overview R. Balasubramanian: MPI Shell, Frame.
Image Restoration using Iterative Wiener Filter --- ECE533 Project Report Jing Liu, Yan Wu.
Software Project Planning Defining the Project Writing the Software Specification Planning the Development Stages Testing the Software.
We have developed a GUI-based user interface for Chandra data processing automation, data quality evaluation, and control of the system. This system, known.
Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from the fifth science run of LIGO Soma Mukherjee CGWA, UTB GWDAW11, Potsdam, 12/18/06 LIGO-G
Source catalog generation Aim: Build the LAT source catalog (1, 3, 5 years) Jean Ballet, CEA SaclayGSFC, 29 June 2005 Four main functions: Find unknown.
LIGO-G D Global Diagnostics and Detector Characterization 9 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Semi-Automatic patch upgrade kit
1 KFPA Critical Design Review – Fri., Jan. 30, 2009 KFPA Data Pipeline Bob Garwood- NRAO-CV.
18/01/01GEO data analysis meeting, Golm Issues in GW bursts Detection Soumya D. Mohanty AEI Outline of the talk Transient Tests (Transient=Burst) Establishing.
Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas.
9-Nov-97Tri-Ada '971 TASH An Alternative to the Windows API TRI-Ada ‘97 Terry J. Westley
Lecture#10 Spectrum Estimation
21 Feb 2002Soumya D. Mohanty, AEI1 Detector/Data Characterization Robot Towards Data Mining Soumya D. Mohanty Max Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik.
LIGO-G Z Status of MNFTmon Soma Mukherjee +, Roberto Grosso* + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernberg, Germany LSC Detector.
HACR at Virgo: implementation and results Gabriele Vajente 12 th ILIAS WG1 meeting Geneva, March 29 th -30 th 2007.
GEO++ Online Detector Characterization System. LIGO-G Z GEO++ working group GEO++ working group Cardiff University: Birmingham University Cardiff.
A Data/Detector Characterization Pipeline (What is it and why we need one) Soumya D. Mohanty AEI January 18, 2001 Outline of the talk Functions of a Pipeline.
Topic 4 - Database Design Unit 1 – Database Analysis and Design Advanced Higher Information Systems St Kentigern’s Academy.
The GEO Online Detector Characterization System David Churches Cardiff University 21 st August 2003 LSC meeting – Hannover – 18,21 August 2003 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
GEO Online Detector Characterization System R. Balasubramanian Cardiff University LSC March 2003 LIGO-G Z.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
Multidimensional classification analysis of kleine Welle triggers in LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC University of Texas at Brownsville GWDAW12,
Impulse Response Measurement and Equalization Digital Signal Processing LPP Erasmus Program Aveiro 2012 Digital Signal Processing LPP Erasmus Program Aveiro.
Project Planning Defining the project Software specification Development stages Software testing.
Validation of realistically simulated non-stationary data. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville. GWDAW9,
Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, December'03 Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA Dept. of Physics.
Soma Mukherjee LSC, Hanford, Aug.19 '04 Generation of realistic data segments: production and application. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave.
The Effect of Data-Reuse Transformations on Multimedia Applications for Application Specific Processors N. Vassiliadis, A. Chormoviti, N. Kavvadias, S.
January 2010 – GEO-ISC KickOff meeting Christian Gräf, AEI 10 m Prototype Team State-of-the-art digital control: Introducing LIGO CDS.
2 June 2003Soumya D. Mohanty et al, LIGO-G D1 LASER INTERFEROMETER GRAVITATIONAL WAVE OBSERVATORY - LIGO – CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
LIGO- G Z Update on standalone power burst- detection code Patrick Brady University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Software Engineering Salihu Ibrahim Dasuki (PhD) CSC102 INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTER SCIENCE.
MNFT : Robust detection of slow nonstationarity in LIGO Science data Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Germany. LSC Meeting, Livingston,
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
Source catalog generation Aim: Build the LAT source catalog (1, 3, 5 years) Jean Ballet, CEA SaclaySLAC, 23 May 2005 Four main functions: Find unknown.
Methodologies and Algorithms
National Mathematics Day
Advanced Virgo Detector Monitoring and Data Quality
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
IM-pack: Software Installation Using Disk Images
CIS16 Application Development – Programming with Visual Basic
Govt. Polytechnic Dhangar(Fatehabad)
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
Presentation transcript:

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Detector Characterization Robot (Progress Since January 2001) Design (Already exists) Algorithmic and Statistical studies (In progress) Algorithm development and fast prototyping in MATLAB Soumya Mohanty, Soma Mukherjee Computational Implementaion issues (C++) Software Environment (Standalone) Hardware requirements Soumya Mohanty, B.Sathyaprakash, R.Balasubramanian, D.Churches Two Main Areas of Development Now

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop What are the Robot’s Functions? Detect Changes in the Multi-channel data produced by an interferometric detector. –Change in each channel by itself, – In the inter-dependence of channels. Each change point is of potential interest. –For Data analysts: Need to adjust GW search algorithm parameters/thresholds, –For Experimentalists: Change in behaviour of detector components or the detector’s environment. Perform with known reliability and sensitivity.

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop History (January 2001 – Present) MATLAB v6.0 acquired (May 2001): –Enhanced external interfaces (MEX), enhanced Signal Processing/Statistics Toolboxes and more. –Started developing better Matlab to Frame interface: frmake.c (MEX file) and frgui (GUI for browsing and executing FrDump). Changes made to line removal algorithm (MBLT) code. –Eliminated resizing of matrices inside for loops, Ways to make the code faster identified. –Present code is completely unoptimised and very slow. Investigation of alternatives to MBLT (Continuing). –Coding almost complete (Kernel Density Estimates, LOWESS). Time series modeling functionality of Matlab investigated. –Severely lacking compared to advanced statistical software such as SAS but sufficient to start with. –PBURG produces a fixed offset (30dB) in PSD irrespective of model order. Discussions started on Computational aspects. Several telecons held. Identified data set for experimentation: 40m Nov 1994 run. – Started generating data cleaned of lines using MBLT.

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Thinking on Computational Front Preliminary accounting shows DCR to be computationally expensive. –Mainly due to the line removing algorithm being used in the first stage. – The first stage line removal will be applied to several channels so one needs a model independent, transient resistant method. –However, much improvement is possible. Converging to a C++ Digital Signal Processing library (very focussed in the beginning). –C++ so that it can be merged, if required, with TRIANA, DMT, LDAS. –Want to make a portable, well-structured library (data structures based on the Standard Template Library and not custom built). –Will be useful when iterating over several DCR designs and for rapid prototyping. –Extensive search over the web for free software turned up only one such project (with only one author) without much development. –But bits and pieces exist: Especially DSP appropriate data structures based on STL. –Explored other options such as MATLAB C++ Math library or OCTAVE’s (free Matlab clone) library. MATLAB is very restrictive as far as sharing concerned. OCTAVE being explored by Stas Babak in a different context (?). Looking at Class hierarchy designs. (Book on C++ DSP algorithms found – not freely distributable software/more for teaching) Scoping for manpower and hardware requirements started.

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Plans on the design front Immediate plan is to manually execute the DCR on 0.5 hours of 40m data (locked section). –Writing a monolithic Matlab script not useful since algorithms are being updated and are being investigated individually. At least not yet. –Manual execution strictly follows the DCR implementation. There should be no hidden human help. Continue coding and development of alternative tools at every stage. –Exploring line removal alternatives. –noise floor PSD tracking alternatives: Median filtered PSD (New), Time-Frequency distributions. Refine algorithms and remove performance bottlenecks. –Example: In MBLT, Upsampling proving to be the main bottleneck in Matlab though it shouldn’t be. May have to write own MEX file. Apply DCR to several auxiliary channels also. –Note: simple problems take up time. Getting to know the channel names in old 40m data: FrDump of the old FrameLib version does not produce a list of channel names.

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Line Removal ( M edian B ased L ine T racker) Bandpas s & Demodu late Adjust Filter Delay Block wise median Upsamp le Modulat e Bandpas s & DM Adjust Filter Delay Block wise median Upsamp le Modulat e Bandpas s & DM Adjust Filter Delay Block wise median Upsamp le Modulat e Bandpas s & DM Adjust Filter Delay Block wise median Upsamp le Modulat e  - DATADATA -

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop f_info=[ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; One-time Database of frequencies, filterband limits, block sizes required 47 E n t r i e s

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Histograms: Original versus Residual data

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Time Series

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Autocorrelation Function

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Time series modeling: Estimate a filter function such that the observed time series is statistically (upto second moments) similar to white noise passed through this filter. –In general a zero-pole, stable, filter can be found. –Anything can be fit with a sufficiently large order: Therefore some penalty on model order needed (AIC,BIC,MLD,…). Parametric model of PSD obtained as a side benefit. Frequency resolution is not tied to data duration. Time evolution of Model coefficients should indicate non-stationarity (both short and long term). AR models (all pole) can model spectra with sharp spikes. –AR models only a special cases of more general models: ARMA (AR and Moving Average). –Restricted to AR right now because Matlab has only AR modeling. –System Identification Toolbox arrived yesterday! (Also Neural Net, Wavelet and Database). Tracking PSD variation: Time Series modeling New

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Order of fitted model: Necessity of line removal

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop Comparision with Spectrogram

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop

June 1, 2001GEO DC Workshop