NETLIPSE Foundation Zurich, 20 October 2008 Stuart Baker.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland ISPA Partners Meeting April 2003 Laurie Russell Strathclyde European Partnership.
Advertisements

LEADER Conference, Przemysl October 2007 Romanian National Rural Development Network Proposed structure Professor Michael Dower.
NETLIPSE Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool Stuart Baker, Deputy Director of National Rail Projects Department for Transport, UK Zagreb, November 10,
NEREUS General Assembly December NEREUS Strategy Consultation Management Board announced Strategy Review; Granada General Assembly; April 2010.
FP7 Preparations ISTC meeting 31 March Content FP7 preparation approach and timetable Context for FP7 and for ICT in FP7 Research in New Financial.
1-1 PRESENTER The Role of the Framework 7 Advisor Your Name Your Websites Websites
Funding Schemes. Legal and Financial Rules in the 7th Framework Programme PHOENIX Training Laulasmaa, 1 Sept 2007.
NETLIPSE Network & Special Interest Groups Pau Lian Staal NWM Vilnius, 18 th May 2010.
NETLIPSE Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool Professor Hans-Rudolf Schalcher, ETH Zürich Amsterdam, 21 April 2009.
EC -DG Research Dir. D : Human Factor, Mobility and Marie Curie Actions Certain elements of this presentation are subject to revision Human Resources and.
NETLIPSE Network & Introduction Special Interest Groups Pau Lian Staal NWM Zagreb, 9th November 2009.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
1 Roundtable Meeting of Quality Assurance Agencies of the Organisation of Islamic Conference Member Countries Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia November 2009.
1 7th Framework Programme Specific Programme “Ideas” European Commission Directorate B November 2005.
European Investment Bank Group
ERASMUS MUNDUS. Genesis Article 149 of EC Treaty: enhance quality education Political aims: Lisbon, Barcelona, Bologna... Communication on reinforcing.
Leendert Bouter and Marcel Hertogh Amsterdam, 20 April 2009 NETLIPSE Network for the dissemination of knowledge on the management and organisation of Large.
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
The Care Act 2014 Caroline Baria Service Director, Personal Care and Support Adult Social Care Health & Public Protection Department.
NETLIPSE Network for the dissemination of knowledge on the management and organisation of Large Infrastructure Projects in Europe Leendert Bouter and Marcel.
LIVING WELL FOUNDATION  Living Well Foundation was established to receive, invest and administer tax- deductible contributions for the benevolent support.
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
Presidents and Administration Mid America Council Friday, April 25th, 2014 Leadership Training Session.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Marcel Hertogh, Programme Director Zagreb, 10 November 2009 Network for the dissemination of knowledge on the management and organisation of Large Infrastructure.
Presentation by Lia van Ginneken – EMP Secretary & João Salazar – EMP Chairman 21st February 2009.
N° 1 The European railway Agency: an engine for the integrated railway area EFRTC, Vilamoura on June 24 TH 2005 Olivier PIRON 24 June 2005.
CEBS in Brief. The Lamfalussy approach The Lamfalussy approach was first implemented in the securities field following the recommendations of the Committee.
Designated County Partner Grassroots Grant Application.
Financing Schools in Europe: Mechanisms, Methods and Criteria in Public Funding May 2015, Bucharest Agenia Naională pentru Programe Comunitare în Domeniul.
A New Start for EUTO Redruth, 29 September 2012 Henk Schüller.
Strategic Plan th October Management and Governance “GeSCI’s corporate structures and management arrangements were appropriate for.
Building our Future: Programme Board TOR PURPOSE To be the governing forum for the design & effective delivery of the Building our Future Programme To.
Introduction to PROGRESS Community programme for Employment and Social Solidarity Finn Ola Jølstad Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion.
ESTELA Summer Workshop, 26 June 2013 The EU-SOLARIS project.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Wider Stakeholders Attend partnership events. Contribute ideas through local community networks. Act as ambassadors to promote the partnership and encourage.
December_2009 Partnership building. December_2009 Partnership building within the partnering process COREGROUPCOREGROUP FORMAL LAUNCH $ $ $ $ $ cost centre.
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
Genova 3-4/11/2011 DoCuP Presentation 1 Dissemination In order to assure the best information on the activities and the best dissemination of the results.
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI F3 European Rural Development Network
Delivering growth, improvement, & influence for our members EMITA going forward Donald van der Merwe Intevexis Sunday, 15 November 2015.
Legal and institutional foundation of economic statistics Overview of international experience Regional Workshop for African Countries on Compilation of.
Contributions from Permanent Observer Countries to the OAS 2012.
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme « RESEARCH POTENTIAL » « CAPACITIES » SPECIFIC.
The SaTH Foundation Trust Programme Deborah Shaw March 29th 2007.
Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism GR07 Research within.
Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation Herlitschka 1 Warsaw FP6 Launch Conference - 26 Nov Small and Medium Enterprises -
Setting up your project for success Afternoon session.
Regional Centers for Evaluation Capacity Development Regional Centers for Evaluation Capacity Development A Multilateral Initiative June 2009.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS JULIA LINARES. BACKGROUND The European Court of Auditors was established by the Treaty of Brussels of 22 July The Court.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
NETLIPSE 2 Network for the dissemination of knowledge on the management and organisation of Large Infrastructure Projects in Europe Marcel Hertogh Turin,
Scheme to Support National Organisations Application Guidance 19 th January, 2016 Pobal is a not-for-profit company that manages programmes on behalf of.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
Partnership Health: Evaluation and possibilities for an adapted structure Agenda item 11 Madhavi Bajekal, ONS (UK) PH coordinator Directors of Social Statistics.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
THE INTRODUCTION AND SUPPORT OF RESEARCH PROJECTS AS PART OF THE FUTURE ROLE OF THE RCARO Dr Waqar Ahmad Dr John Easey.
Specific Objectives  Coordinate the training of members from affiliates  Review and design new education training materials on labour education  Build.
The CFP AND the role of science, innovation and advice Tallinn 28 th May 2013 SCAR-Fish report:
REPARIS Workshop Vienna
Eurostat D2 – Regional Indicators and Geographical Information
Setting up an ERIC 11 May 2012 Richard Derksen
ESS Cooperation: New Financial supporting frameworks?
Strategic partnerships in the Netherlands with MMF & PSI & Interliaise
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)
Presentation transcript:

NETLIPSE Foundation Zurich, 20 October 2008 Stuart Baker

2 1.NETLIPSE Most suitable organisation form Criteria:  Clear and sharp governance  Effectiveness in case of acquisition and contracts of IPAT and other services  Effective management by a limited number of formal board members. Recommended decision: Foundation. Note:  There is an EU specific foundation, the EEIG (European Economic Interest Grouping), but it is not recommended, because it excludes non EU-countries (such as Switzerland, Norway and Turkey).

3 1.NETLIPSE Foundation Characteristics  Not for profit.  Open to many participants.  Finance from subsidy and orders.  Focus on knowledge development, as well as knowledge exchange and on marketing (think of IPAT and training programme).  EC and EIB could be both a participant and a client.

4 1.NETLIPSE Foundation Article 2: Objectives  The objectives of the Foundation are: to initiate, promote and encourage the successful development, delivery and operation of large infrastructure projects throughout Europe, aimed at positively influencing the living environment and economy in Europe.

5 1.Organisation Article 2: Objectives  The Foundation seeks to achieve these objects inter alia by:  developing an Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool (‘IPAT’) and training programmes and new research initiatives;  initiating, promoting and facilitating the development and exchange of knowledge on the management of large infrastructure projects;  promoting cooperation between public and private organisations and knowledge institutions,  other activities relating to these objectives.

6 2.Finances Proposal to EC, June 2008 Total: € 1.9 million (TEN-T Annual Work Programme call, Part B.2, 6.):  EC: 50%: € ,-  Partners: 50%: € ,- Prerequisite:  Member States and Government Agencies across Europe to play a key role in the Foundation.

7 2.Finances Funding from partners: money or time E.C. € Partners: Donation in the form of chargeable time and start up grant. Important:  Total amount of funding  Cash flow  The funding from partners (i.e. € ,-) proposes of partly cash and partly man hours (not charged). Current assumption: 50%-50%. €  This scheme assumes the current submission to EC is successful.

8 2.Finances Funding from partners: two levels Two levels:  Founding Fathers, Sponsors: Organisations that fund a substantial amount of the start up funding (from around € – ,-).  Participants: Pay a yearly contribution of approximately €5.000,- to €10.000,- per year. A business plan is being developed.  Income: potential contracts through assessments and review of projects, training programmes, donations and other sources.

9 2.Finances Principles  Funding from ‘cash’ and ‘man hours’.  Organisations invest in man hours:  Knowledge development.  Participation in network meetings, special interest groups etc.  Contributors to Netlipse work are reimbursed for:  Contribution man hours exceeds agreed commitment.  Programme management.  Expenses: Network meetings, accommodation etc.  Support services to the Foundation: marketing, communications and legal.

10 3.Organisation Chart Supervisory Board Programme Management Team Clients, Sponsors Support services Administration Communication Foundation Scientific Board Advisory Committee

11 Main responsibility of the Supervisory Board:  Formal governance of the NETLIPSE Foundation and the accomplishment of its objectives (legally and properly);  authorise the annual plan and budget, as well as the annual report and the annual account;  appoint the Foundation Management;  ensure specific client objectives are duly executed;  be accountable for the formal governance of the Foundation and the accomplishment of the objectives. The Supervisory Board:  must carry out an annual yearly review of activities, achievements, financial statement and future objectives;  reports on the review at the annual yearly Foundation meeting (typically within a network meeting). 4.Supervisory Board

12 4.Supervisory Board The Supervisory Board consists of:  6 to 10 members.  partly representing the spectrum across: countries, organisations and activities. 2 options: a person or representative of an organisation. →Choice: Person. Members Supervisory Board:  Specially appointed members (because of knowledge, network etc.).  Members drawn from participating parties.  An annual review of members is carried out by the Supervisory Board.

13 4.Supervisory Board Initial members:  Stuart BakerUnited Kingdom  Leendert BouterThe Netherlands  Hans-Rudolf SchalcherSwitzerland  Saverio PalchettiItaly  Marian Hantak (tbc.)Poland (United Nations)  …

14  The Foundation Management ensures the successful management of the Foundation and the realisation of its objectives:  managing and improving the NETLIPSE network;  developing and marketing the IPAT.  The Programme Management Team provides the day-to-day management of the Foundation. 5.Programme Management Team

15 5.Programme Management Team The Programme Management Team is primarily responsible for five main activities: No.Activity title Activity 1Establishing the Foundation Activity 2Expanding the NETLIPSE network and knowledge exchange Activity 3Developing the Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool (IPAT) Activity 4Developing Training Programmes Activity 5Overall administration

16 Initial arrangements – people:  Programme Director: Marcel Hertogh  Business Co-ordinator: Mirjam Cauvern  Network Manager: Pau Lian Staal-Ong Website & Newsletter: Tony Francis Marketing and Communications Team  Finance: Jan-Floor Troost-Oppelaar 5.Executive Team

17  The Scientific Board is responsible for maintaining a high scientific level of all NETLIPSE products:  guards the scientific level of all products realised;  delivers scientific expertise;  advises on specific deliverables (i.e. IPAT).  Chairman:  Prof. Hans-Rudolf Schalcher, ETH Zurich  IPAT:  Prof. Geert Teisman, Erasmus University, Rotterdam (Lead for IPAT development) 6.Scientific Board

18 Advisory Committee:  Represents participants and founding fathers.  Advises the Supervisory Board and the Programme Management Team (PMT) as required.  Gives advice on quality, progress, support, acquisition. Participants in the Advisory Committee:  Representing the spectrum across: countries, organisations and activities.  Potential members of the Advisory Committee are invited on a yearly basis by the Supervisory Board because of their position.  E.C., EIB and similar organisations: ex officio. 7.Advisory Committee

19 Participants:  Have access to the closed section of the website.  Annual meeting to advise the Supervisory Board and Programme Management Team.  Have the first right to participate in the development of services and participation in contracts. 7.Advisory Committee

20 8.Next Steps Main Activities forthcoming months:  21, 22 Oct. 2008Network Meeting Zurich Start Special Interest Groups?  Nov./ Dec. 2008Establishment of the Foundation.  Jan. 2009Start development of IPAT.  Feb. 2009Bi-annual Newsletter 2009 #1  March 2009Decision EC on Annual Call  March 2009Network Meeting in The Netherlands  April 2009Start development general training

21 NETLIPSE Foundation