© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho STUDENT RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS Scott Bergstrom Institutional Research March 15, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation and Human Subjects Research Julie M. Aultman, Ph.D. Chair, Institutional Review Board Associate Professor, Family and Community Medicine Northeast.
Advertisements

IRB SUBMISSION PROCESS FOR SHB STUDIES Version 9/18/2013.
Introduction to Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan – Dearborn. Debra Schneider IRB Administrator (313)
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
Research Involving Human Subjects Review of Risk and Protection from Harm.
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
Cooperative Research IRB Brownbag, 3/4/08. ISU Policy Cooperative research projects are those projects which involve more than one institution. The official.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
Assessment Data Brigham Young University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering W. Spencer Guthrie March 20, 2008 Brigham Young University.
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA.
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011.
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
Research and AWC Faculty Seminar, February 19, 2009, Mary Schaal, M.Ed.
Using the Internet to Conduct Research What Investigators and IRB Members Should Know -- January 29, Lisa Shickle, MS Analyst, VCU Massey Cancer.
Research Methods in Psychology (Pp 1-31). Research Studies Pay particular attention to research studies cited throughout your textbook(s) as you prepare.
SMCC will participate in this national survey focusing on teaching, learning, and retention in community colleges It will be administered in classes randomly.
Chapter 13 Data Sources, Sampling, and Data Collection.
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
What you need to know about the Saint Leo IRB review process.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
 The WP IRB is concerned with Social- Behavioral and Biomedical research that is: A systematic investigation Designed to develop or contribute to generalizable.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
The Human Subjects Institutional Review Board Workshop Part 1: An Introduction to Human Subjects Research Ethics and the IRB Process Presented by Alena.
1 Ethics of Working with Human Subjects (BIOL/CHEM 397 ) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
 Lunch and Learn April 22, 2015 Office of Human Research.
Human Subject Research View from the IRB Anthony J. Filipovitch Minnesota State University Mankato.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP QA/QI Education Specialist Stanley Estime, MSCI QA/QI Specialist Interview, Survey, and Focus Group Research: IRB Processes and.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Student Proposal Preparation and IRB Basics Rebecca Novak UTSPH Office of Research October 20, 2015.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
Cultural Competence Considerations [and other alliterations] in International Research IRB 2 Continuing Education March 10, 2015.
The IRB Process Southern New Hampshire University.
Research Review Application Process. Required research approval All MSA 699 students are required to obtain research approval prior to collecting data.
Paul Hryvniak MS, CIP Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP September 30, 2014 Student Human Research Education Session Tel:
© 2015 Marketo, Inc. Marketo Proprietary and Confidential Page 1 Investigators’ Responsibilities in Conducting Human Subjects Research Office of the Vice.
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
 Empowered by the University to insure we are in compliance with Federal regulations  Guided by the standards in the Belmont Report and regulations.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Human Participants Research
Research Compliance: Protections for Research Subjects
Institutional Review Board
Presentation transcript:

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho STUDENT RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS Scott Bergstrom Institutional Research March 15,

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho 1. Why do we limit the number of subjects for student research? 2. What are the laws and local rules governing research activity on campus? 3. What resources are available to students? 4. What topics are out of bounds for student researchers? How do we handle student researchers who want to investigate sensitive topics? Agenda 2

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho 1. Why do we limit the number of subjects for student research? 3

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho 1. Why do we limit the number of subjects for student research? 4

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho 1. Why do we limit the number of subjects for student research? 5 Significance: 2 surveys per student each semester Plus 3 end-of-semester surveys: Housing Survey, Survey of Graduating Students, and Course Evaluations Plus a variety of administrative surveys throughout.

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho Practice: Student online surveys are given 100 to 300 subjects (i.e., addresses). Senior-level research classes are eligible for 400 to 500. Questions: Does this hurt your ability to teach students proper research methods? Is there a better way to allocate subjects? What happens when each student gets many more requests to participate in surveys in a semester? 1. Why do we limit the number of subjects for student research? 6

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho Do students really need to collect data or can they work from existing data sets? Can intercepts, observations, focus groups, interviews, or phone surveys work just as well? Do you ensure that your students are professional in their invitations to participate in research? Can students get by with a simple random sample instead of an esoteric stratified or cluster sample? How early in the semester can the survey be administered? (The last three weeks of the semester are very challenging) Will continued increases in online surveying degrade response rates and eventually “kill the goose that lays our golden eggs?” Considerations for Online Surveys 7

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho Federal Laws (45 CFR Part 46) 1. Research is “a systematic investigation…designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.” If study goes outside classroom, it involves generalizing knowledge. 2. The online registration process ensures proper oversight. Most student research is considered ‘exempt’ from IRB review. 3. Any research which targets minors or other vulnerable populations must be reviewed by the BYU-Idaho IRB. 4. Human subjects must be presented with some form of informed consent. 5. Researchers must understand and mitigate any potential risks and/or harm to their subjects. 2. What are the laws and rules? 8

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho University Rules 1. All studies using human subjects must be registered. 2. Students should not generate their own samples without permission. The university will generate random samples for the projects. 3. Students should not request class time for their research activity UNLESS it is part of the course curriculum or in harmony with department protocol. 4. Students are not allowed to mass employees. They can conduct limited phone or face-to-face interviews. 5. Intercepting or videotaping in the library is not allowed. 6. Students should avoid overly intrusive research activities. 2. What are the laws and rules? 9

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho Practice: Enforce the federal laws and university rules. Questions: Do you teach these to your students? Do students follow them? Do we need a centralized way of communicating these laws and rules to students? Example: a university-wide human subjects tutorial? Do any of local rules interfere with your ability to teach students proper research methods? 2. What are the laws and rules? 10

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho 3. What resources are available to students? 11 Qualtrics is available at no cost to BYU-Idaho students and faculty

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho Practice: Provide Qualtrics and samples. Questions: Are there other resources which the university could provide? Example: Access to data sets. 3. What resources are available to students? 12

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho Practice: Discourage research which investigates the religious, moral, or spiritual behaviors and attitudes of student body or Church members. Evaluate on a case-by-case basis. Questions: Have we been too restrictive? What topics are out of bounds for student researchers? How do we handle student researchers who want to investigate sensitive topics? 4. Sensitive topics? 13

© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho