2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Update. MPOs currently developing 2035 Regional Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTPs) LRTP represents a long-term.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Advertisements

Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
Elk Grove – Rancho Cordova – El Dorado Connector Project Elk Grove – Ranch Cordova – El Dorado Connector Joint Powers Authority Project Briefing JPA Board.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
2030 Long-Range Transportation Plan Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council Public MeetingFernando de Aragón TCPL October 15, 2008Staff Director.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands Sanibel City Council Update (November 17, 2009)
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Central California Planning Commissioners’ Workshop May 13, 2011 Barbara Steck, AICP, Deputy Director Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street,
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
“Connecting People and Places” REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN Future Scenarios October 19, 2009.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration DOT Livability Initiative Smart Mobility Framework Workshop June 16, 2009 Presented by:
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Oregon Transportation Options Plan Statewide TO Meeting September 27, 2013.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Lakes Region Transportation Workshop November 15, 2013.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Regional Visions: 50-Year Transportation Demand Modeling Florida Model Task Force Meeting December 13, 2006.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization Communities working together to meet Chittenden County’s transportation needs 30 Kimball Ave., Suite.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
Community Outreach Spring A New Way to Think Transportation vs. Mobility Photo credits: Top right, Richard Masoner, Flickr; bottom right: Wldehart,
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Project Overview – Phase 1
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
September 2011 Public Open Houses
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
When Big Data Meets Better Data
September 2011 Public Open Houses
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
MPO Board Presentation
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
Public Workshop September 26, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Update

MPOs currently developing 2035 Regional Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTPs) LRTP represents a long-term vision for the counties’ transportation systems = a blueprint for the future LRTP documents the transportation process of each county ensuring proper management and efficient transportation operations LRTP complements regional planning initiatives

Collier and Lee MPOs approved their 2030 LRTPs in 2005 (amended in 2007) Must update every 5 years Must look at a 20-year horizon to 2035 Will produce 2 separate LRTPs that present a transportation vision unique to each county Each will include a “regional” component that identifies bi-county highway needs to improve regional mobility

Support the economic vitality of each county Increase safety for motorized and non-motorized users Increase the security for motorized/non-motorized users Increase accessibility and mobility Protect and enhance the environment Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system Promote efficient system management and operation Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system

Identify Goals and Objectives Collect and Analyze Data Assess Needs & Identify Transportation Vision Define/Develop Projects Evaluate Projects Against Goals:  Financial Constraint  Environmental Justice  Air Quality Conformity Recommend Preferred Plan MPO Adoption/Implementation

Identify Goals and Objectives (G&Os) Sets the framework to guide the LRTP; reflects desires of community Use 2030 G&Os as base for developing new and/or refined G&Os Develop combined goals, which will be filtered through the TAC and CAC From there, develop county-wide G&Os Also consider new federal legislation (CLEAN-TEA) in framing G&Os

GOAL 1 - Multi-Modal A multi-modal transportation system that is balanced and integrated with all transportation modes to ensure safe and efficient movement of people and goods. GOAL 2 - Safety and Security A transportation system that is safe and secure. GOAL 3 - Emergency Responsiveness A transportation system that enhances emergency responsiveness and evacuation. GOAL 4 - Sensitive to Socio-Cultural Elements A transportation system that is sensitive to the effects to the socio-cultural elements of the communities, the community character and environmental resources.

GOAL 5 - Sustainability A sustainable transportation system that enhances economic growth and anticipates development demands. GOAL 6 - Optimize through Technology A transportation system that is maintained, optimized and expanded using the best available technologies and innovations. GOAL 7 - Financial Feasibility A transportation system that is financially feasible. GOAL 8 - Agency Coordination A transportation system that is coordinated through local, regional and state agencies and based on effective integration of transportation, land use, conservation and smart growth planning.

Develop a Public Involvement Plan (PIP) which is a guide to all outreach activities and communications Include a menu of tools to provide 2-way communication Include outreach to underserved, minority, tribal and low-income populations Develop community characteristics reports to understand their make-up Define means of tracking all activities and comments (Project Diary)

Population and Demographics County and State Comparison Household Characteristics Sales History Transportation Characteristics Currently available for Collier County; Lee County is in the process of finalizing.

If you had $100, how would you spend it? Comments ModeAmount Highway Transit Bicycle Pedestrian Air $ $ $ $ $

Meet with ALL Stakeholders through various mediums Agency and Organization meetings Public Workshops Project Website Grass Roots outreach Newsletters Community presentations

Review data from existing LRTPs and related documents, traffic model, land uses and socioeconomic conditions to ensure validity Validate existing model data (2007), i.e., validate ability to replicate actual travel behavior As needed, change data/inputs that go into traffic model (dwelling units, population, employment, land use, road network characteristics, etc.) to reflect reality Evaluate demographic data and travel trends

852, % 597, %

Assess Needs/Identify Transportation Vision Assess needs based on travel demand, financial feasibility, efficient movement (of people and freight), satisfying G&Os Identify initial set of projects Present projects to public at workshop (planned for Spring 2010) Provide ample opportunities for comment Identify problem areas and projects which concern the public Begin to identify transportation vision

Define and Develop Projects Use projects from 2030 LRTP as a base Include all modes of transportation, intermodal facilities and connectors, regional outlooks Determine those that are cost feasible, i.e., “what can be built using available funding”? Include projects that meet a regional demand

Safety of drivers Improved traffic flow Consider neighborhood concerns Consider environmentally-sensitive areas Improve existing highways before building new highways Emergency access/evacuation Regional connections Delivering goods/freight movement Cost-Effective

Provides travel option to non-drivers Reduces # of automobiles on road Provides connections to urban employment centers and major destinations Meets travel needs of those near bus stops Better for air quality Can provide service-oriented uses near bus stops/station areas Provides interregional connections and identifies premium express corridors Cost-Effective

Provides connections to existing bikeways and bus services Improves current bike and sidewalk conditions Draws community support Provides health benefits Better for air quality Works well with good land use planning Provides needed connections to schools, parks, shops, etc. Cost-Effective

Determine whether the projects meet G&Os Consider other criteria, including traffic demand, air quality, socioeconomics, environmental impacts, noise, costs, etc. The travel demand model is critical at this point, as well as public input Begins the process of developing the cost feasible plan

Recommend Preferred Projects/Plan The recommended Plan includes all modes of transportation and adheres to federal requirements Must meet criteria of building “safe and efficient transportation systems” Through a collaborative effort between the MPOs and public, begin to develop a Cost Feasible Plan

Boards Adopt and Implement LRTPs The recommended LRTP will be presented to MPO Boards in late 2010 The MPO Boards adopt the Plan When adopted, the LRTP becomes the basis from which individual projects are developed The Plans may be amended as conditions change and/or if new legislation comes into effect

Federal State County Municipalities Transportation Authorities

Lee County 2030 Financial Feasible Plan (Highway)

Collier County 2030 Constrained Financially Feasible Plan

COLLIER NEEDS COLLIER FINANCIAL FEASIBLE LEE NEEDS LEE FINANCIAL FEASIBLE Highway$ 2.8B$ 1.1B$ 5.97B$ 2.2B Operations & Maintenance $ 1.5B $ 94M Unfunded CMS/Bridge Needs $ 160MN/AIncluded in Hwy. Unfunded Transit Needs $ 293MN/A$1.3B$ 490M Unfunded Bike/Pedestrian Needs $ 318MN/A$ 34M$ 23M Enhanced Rehab/Reconstruction N/A$ 300MN/A TOTAL$ 5.1B$ 2.9B$ 8.55B$ 3.86B

You now understand the components and tasks that go into completing an LRTP You will be able to provide knowledgeable input to the LRTP process Through our communication process, major milestones, workshops, meetings will be identified You will be able to view comments and/or changes to project tasks Joint Collier/Lee MPO website:

Project Kickoff Meeting February 19, 2009 Goals & Objectives May 2009 Develop Public Involvement PlansMay/June 2009 Public Involvement Program April 2009 – November 2010 Model Development June 2009 – March 2010 LRTP Workshop June 17, 2009 Newsletter #1September 2009 Develop Needs Plan March 2010 – June 2010 Workshop #1 – Lee Spring 2010 Workshop #1 – Collier Spring 2010 Develop Cost Feasible Plan July 2010 – September 2010 Newsletter #2August 2010 Workshop #2 – Lee October 2010 Workshop #2 – Collier October 2010 Present Year 2035 LRTP to Lee and Collier MPO BoardsNovember 2010

Collier MPO Mr. Phillip Tindall, AICP, Director 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL Lee MPO Mr. Don Scott, AICP, Director 1926 Victoria Avenue Ft. Myers, FL DRMP, Inc. - Consultant Mr. Robert Rutledge, AICP 3816 W. Linebaugh Avenue, Suite 400 Tampa, FL Joint Collier/Lee MPO website:

Questions or comments? SAFETEA-LU