Aggregate patterns of linkage of nanotechnology engineering centers with industry Luciano Kay School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Romanian initiative in nanoscience and nanotechnology Dan Dascalu IMT-Bucharest.
Advertisements

Policy and Program Learning in U.S. Cluster Initiatives Presented by: Jennifer Auer, PhD Optimal Solutions Group, LLC June 5, 2013.
1 Coordinating and Financing R&D in Developing Countries-moving beyond PDP's The ANDI Experience Solomon Nwaka CEWG on R&D Financing & Coordination, April.
Principal Patent Analyst
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
Planning and running a regional evaluation system: the Madrid experience Beatriz Presmanes Coordinadora de Programas.
LOCAL SYSTEM OF INNOVATION CENTERED ON AUDIOVISUAL PRODUCTION Marcelo Matos Fluminense Federal University and RedeSist - IE/UFRJ.
Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center Performance on Societal Objectives Jan Youtie Georgia Institute of Technology American Evaluation Association.
Program Level Assessment of Outcomes and Impacts of Research of Centers Juan D. Rogers School of Public Policy Georgia Tech Project: Assessment of 15 Nanotechnology.
Universities as actors in the (regional) innovation system
Nanotechnology: The Public and Emerging Technologies Nanotechnology: Public Dr. William Y. B. Chang Director Beijing Office U.S. National Science Foundation.
Introduction Breadth How it Works The Next Steps.
Knowledge Translation: A View from a National Policy Perspective KU-02 Conference Oxford, England July 2, 2002.
Robert Huggins and Daniel Prokop Centre for International Competitiveness, Cardiff School of Management, University of Wales Institute, Cardiff Presentation.
TAFTIE Policy Forum „Measuring innovation” New trends and challenges in innovation measurement Fred Gault UNU-MERIT.
© 2006, Tod O’ Dot Productions Introducing EUI-Net: European University-Industry Network to Develop and Promote the Entrepreneurship of Students in Technology.
MEADOW: Guidelines for a European survey of organisations Nathalie Greenan CEE and TEPP-CNRS Exploring possibilities for the development of European data.
Sara Rauchwerger APEC 2011 Co-Incubation Conference 6-8 September Xian, China.
Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.
Chapter 9 New Business Development
Enabling a Global Vision for the Baltic cleantech industry: Latvia country case Dr.sc.eng. Juris Vanags Latvian Biotechnology association Interregional.
Centre for Earth Systems Engineering Research Infrastructure Transitions Research Consortium (ITRC) David Alderson & Stuart Barr What is the aim of ITRC?
1 Changing Paradigm of Cluster Development: Learning from Global Experiences Promoting Innovation in Clusters Prof. Christian Ketels President, TCI Network.
SRS Data and the SciSIP Initiative National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Lynda T. Carlson Division Director SBE Advisory.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Slide 1 Analysing diffusion of nanotechnology as a research field in Turkey: a social network analysis approach Hamid Derviş
Judie Kay & Peter Shadbolt Industry Liaison Beyond the Silos: Developing a Corporate Approach to Industry Engagement.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
Panagiotis KARNIOURAS NCP for SPACE / Technology Transfer Consultant PRAXI/ HELP-FORWARD Network … the Greek experience 9 October 2009.
North Carolina Innovation Initiative Position North Carolina as the leading location for innovation at all levels – entrepreneurial businesses, large businesses,
T2S Conference 2006 Policy and Networking: an RIS in Korea Yu Jin Jung School of Public Policy George Mason University.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Fraunhofer ISI Institute Systems and Innovation Research Trentino plus 10 Foresight Workshop July 2003 (Trento) Introductory notes on the Fraunhofer.
Integrated Technology Transfer Network Finalist - Outstanding Specialty Entrepreneurship Program.
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Research and Innovation How can networking in Science and Technology help SMEs.
Startup Ecosystem in Lithuania Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology 21/09/2015 Arūnas Karlonas.
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
Recent Research in Canadian Tech Transfer Kate Hoye, University of Waterloo Diane Isabelle, NRC, Carleton University Fred Pries, University of Waterloo.
WII Overview: The Western Innovation Initiative (WII) is organizing, coordinating, and managing resources from various locations for use across the group.
Robert Huggins Cardiff School of Management, University of Wales Institute, Cardiff Presentation at the ‘Higher Education – Making A Difference To Economies.
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal
Identifying the Impacts of Technology Transfer Beyond Commercialization FPTT National Meeting, June 12, 2007.
Nanotechnology Research and Innovation Systems Assessment Group Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University (NSEC # SES ) Authors:
Level 2 Unit 1 Exploring the Engineering World Engineering Diploma Level 2 Unit 1 Exploring the Engineering World In this unit, you will discover the world.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG The Use of Research Funding Databases for Research Assessment Information Systems Presented at the 8th international.
REGIONS AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Vangelis E.Katsaros Chemical Engineer NTUA PhD Candidate University of Thessaly Ioannis L. Bakouros Ass. Professor.
Technological Innovation and Competitiveness at the NSF Franklin Carrero-Martínez, Ph.D. International Science and Engineering National Science Foundation.
Professor Veena Sahajwalla ARC Laureate Fellow Director, Centre for Sustainable Materials Research & Technology Dealing with Industry Partners.
Working in Partnership
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J HOW RESEARCHERS FIND INFORMATION IN THE NEW DIGITAL AGE Gaynor Austen Director, Library Services.
Evaluating Research Dynamics Using Network Analysis (in the context of EU funded R&D) Frank Cunningham DG Information Society and Media European Commission.
ICSTI Conference Innovation infrastructure of the CR Pavel Švejda Association of Innovative Entrepreneurship of the CR Prague,
7 December 2007CERN-EU Office1 Svet Stavrev Office of EU Relations, CERN First FP7 Call for Integrating Activity projects*  IA as support to existing.
Value Chain Hub- Eastern & Southern Africa Hikuepi (Epi) Katjiuongua VC Hub Workshop 9-10th November 2015, Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Integration of peripheral regions in collaborative science: A bibliometric analysis of scientific activity and co-authorship at U.S. county level Presentation.
Balancing Objectives and Needs of Industry and Academia: the Role of Government Presentation by Mary Cryan Meeting of National Councils for S&T Policy.
Enabling Building Efficiency: The NYC Urban Technology Innovation Center TIMOTHY CROSS, COLUMBIA ENGINEERING IEEE INNOVATION DAY POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE.
Measuring the Innovation Potential of the Bulgarian Economy Establishing an IRC in Macedonia, Skopje, March 29, 2006 Ruslan Stefanov Economic Program Center.
Welcome to Atlanta and Georgia Tech Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology Association of University Research Parks October 26,
D Programme Level Cooperation analysis and evaluation report (DLR) Outline & main findings.
Collaborative Expedition Workshop #71 National Science Foundation
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Reflections on Lessons Learned: The Center for Innovative Learning Technologies Roy Pea Stanford University AERA 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
COMMERCILIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLANGES
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

Aggregate patterns of linkage of nanotechnology engineering centers with industry Luciano Kay School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology and Georgia Tech Program in Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy Project: Assessment of 15 Nanotechnology Science and Engineering Centers’ (NSECs): Outcomes and Impacts: Their Contribution to NNI Objectives and Goals, NSF Juan D. Rogers (PI), Jan Youtie (Co-PI), Alan Porter (Co-PI), Philip Shapira (Co-PI) Evaluation 2011: Values and Valuing in Evaluation November 2-5, Anaheim, California

Presentation outline  NSEC centers and collaborations with industry  Expected center-industry relationships and our research  Findings  Implications for centers policy  Q&A 2

The case of NSEC centers and collaborations with industry  Nanotechnology Science and Engineering Centers (NSECs) program funded by National Science Foundation  Collaborations with industry are implicit in the four goals of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI)  Purpose: “the transfer of new technologies into products for commercial and public benefit”  The commercial potential of research on nanoscience and nanotechnology is one of the main justifications for its public support 3

Traditional expectations about centers’ interactions with industry  Interactions ~ proxy for commercialization  Linear process of research, technology development, and commercialization through spin-offs  Venture capital is a main component in this perspective  Large companies are considered to have their own R&D center Lack of understanding of capacity development in center- industry linkages 4

Research approach  Quantitative and qualitative analyses to establish program level patterns of linkage between centers and industry oPublication and patent data analysis oInterviews with centers’ participants oAnalysis of centers’ reports  Real-time assessment  Interest in emergent patterns of interaction amongst all centers and companies to map the network of relations oFocus beyond merely one-to-one instances of center-industry relations  Seek understanding centers-industry capacity development 5

1. NSEC centers produce spin-offs  Research activities have led to the creation of new companies to develop the commercial applications of those results  Several centers are creating new spin-off companies at a rate of more than one company a year  The rapid commercial viability of research results, however, is not universal across topics in a field so the differences across centers are mostly a function of their specialty 6

2. Industry co-authorships indicate integration of collaborative activities Total unique firms co-authoring articles with NSEC ( ): 146 Total unique firms maintaining other types of collaborations with NSEC (as of 2010): 275** Notes: * Publication data for this period not reported by all NSEC centers at time of data collection and the last year was incomplete in the databases; last column reports average annual change for rows with change data. **The type of collaborations are not specified by centers (only number of industry partners was provided). Source: ISI-WoS publication data based on NSEC annual reports by center and lists of industry partners provided by NSEC centers * * NSEC centers with publications NSEC publications (all centers) ,509 NSEC pubs. co-auth. with industry ▪ Annual change 8%23%6%106%49%46%-14%-48% 22% ▪ Share industry co-auth / all pubs.18%10%7%6%7%10%11%9% 10% Unique co-author firms ▪ Annual change 18%-31%78%94%-6%72%-14%-49% 20% 7

Notes: Node size represents number of publications in the period Edge size represents number of co-authorships. Red nodes represent 15 NSECs. Gray nodes represent industry partners. Green lines represent co-authorships. Blue lines represent other types of collaborations. Source: Analysis based on list of industry partners provided by NSEC centers as of 2010 and publications in ISI-WoS database for period Co-authorships and collaborations ( ) 421 unique companies 360 co-authored publications 3. The NSEC network involves diverse types of interactions with companies 8

Separating co-authorship network from other interactions shows diversity Co-authorships ( ) Other collaborations ( ) 9 Other collaborations include e.g. beta-testing of prototypes and materials, exploration of new ideas, development of standards.

Main industry co-authors are a few U.S. and foreign large companies Notes: Node size represents number of publications in the period Edge size represents number of co-authorships. Red nodes represent 15 NSECs. Gray nodes represent industry partners. Green lines represent co-authorships. Blue lines represent other types of collaborations. Labels are shown only for NSEC centers (anonymized) and top-25 industry partners according to number of co-authored publications. Source: Analysis based on list of industry partners provided by NSEC centers as of 2010 and publications in ISI-WoS database for period The graph only shows NSEC centers and top-15 industry collaborators in publications ( )

4. Some companies use NSEC centers as a network 421 unique companies ( ) 146 have co-authored with NSEC centers 275 maintained other collaborations Companies use multiple NSEC centers 11

Implications for Center Policy (I)  Expectations for center-industry collaborations should go beyond the traditional ones oCommercialization oCapacity development through various types of connections (still, further assessment requires time)  A centers program may become a key R&D resource for industry oNSEC centers and industry become interdependent oCenters offer unique infrastructure possibilities for industry  Leverage of resources for shared new facilities  Design and testing of new unique instruments and experimental organizational arrangements  Source for new ideas 12

Implications for Center Policy (II)  The diversity of center-industry collaborations reflects centers’ activities oNSEC centers’ research involves both foundational and emerging topical areas which correlate with diverse forms of industry collaborations  Complementarities emerge from the integration of both publication co-authorships and other activities oA core industry sector relies on the NSEC program as a network of centers, from previous evidence of companies having their own R&D center oA wide-array of other companies, including both large and SMEs, also collaborate in various forms 13

Thank you!  Q&A  Contact data: Luciano Kay Postdoctoral Fellow School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology and Georgia Tech Program in Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy 14