AMFIC third progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
02/04/2009 University of Manchester ADIENT meeting 5 – Gareth Thomas, Maria Frontoso 1 WP 1.3: Satellite data in support of ADIENT aircraft flights Gareth.
Advertisements

Gerrit de Leeuw 1,2,3, Larisa Sogacheva1, Pekka Kolmonen 1, Anu-Maija Sundström 2, Edith Rodriguez 1 1 FMI, Climate Change Unit, Helsinki, Finland 2 Univ.
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
Surface UV radiation monitoring based on GOME and SCIAMACHY Jos van Geffen 1,2, Ronald van de A 1, Michiel van Weele 1, Marc Allaart 1, Henk Eskes 1 1)
JERAL ESTUPINAN National Weather Service, Miami, Florida DAN GREGORIA National Weather Service, Miami, Florida ROBERTO ARIAS University of Puerto Rico.
Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) nadir stare ozone profiles using ozonesonde measurements during Arctic Research on the Composition.
The EvK2 Pyramid and the AERONET network “Atmospheric Brown Cloud" Characterization via Sunphotometer Observations G.P. Gobbi, F. Barnaba, and F. Angelini.
Aerosol radiative effects from satellites Gareth Thomas Nicky Chalmers, Caroline Poulsen, Ellie Highwood, Don Grainger Gareth Thomas - NCEO/CEOI-ST Joint.
Indicators for policy support of atmosphere related environmental problems Robert Koelemeijer National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
An Introduction to Using Angular Information in Aerosol Remote Sensing Richard Kleidman SSAI/NASA Goddard Lorraine Remer UMBC / JCET Robert C. Levy NASA.
Dr. Natalia Chubarova Faculty of Geography, Moscow State University, , Moscow, Russia, 2012 Gregory G. Leptoukh Online Giovanni.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
M. Van Roozendael, AMFIC Final Meeting, 23 Oct 2009, Beijing, China1 MAXDOAS measurements in Beijing M. Van Roozendael 1, K. Clémer 1, C. Fayt 1, C. Hermans.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
AMFIC: Aerosol retrieval Gerrit de Leeuw, FMI/UHEL/TNO Pekka Kolmonen, FMI Anu-Maija Sundström, UHEL Larisa Sogacheva, UHEL Juha-Pekka Luntama, FMI Sini.
Tropospheric NO2 and ozone Ronald van der A, Michel Van Roozendael, Isabelle De Smedt, Jos de Laat, Ruud Dirksen, Folkert Boersma KNMI and BIRA-IASB Thessaloniki,
Tropospheric NO2 Ronald van der A, Michel Van Roozendael, Isabelle De Smedt, Ruud Dirksen, Folkert Boersma KNMI and BIRA-IASB Beijing, October 2008.
SO2 and HCHO data from satellite & MAXDOAS instrument in Beijing Jos van Geffen Michel Van Roozendael, Isabelle De Smedt BIRA-IASB 1st AMFIC progress meeting.
A. Bracher, L. N. Lamsal, M. Weber, J. P. Burrows University of Bremen, FB 1, Institute of Environmental Physics, P O Box , D Bremen, Germany.
Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 Measurements.
AMFIC second progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
SCIAMACHY long-term validation M. Weber, S. Mieruch, A. Rozanov, C. von Savigny, W. Chehade, R. Bauer, and H. Bovensmann Institut für Umweltphysik, Universität.
AMFIC final meeting LAP/Auth validation activities Dimitris Balis & MariLiza Koukouli Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
EXAMPLES OF PRODUCTS Climatology of aerosol index from POLDER Climatology of stratospheric aerosols Intercomparison of aerosol satellite climatologies.
About the status and outlook for OMI Surface UV product OMI Science Team Meeting Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008 Antti Arola.
Aristeidis K. Georgoulias Konstantinos Kourtidis Konstantinos Konstantinidis AMFIC Web Data Base AMFIC Annual Meeting - Beijing October 2008 Democritus.
Aerosol Optical Depth during the Northern CA Fires of 2008 In situ aerosol light scattering and absorption measurements in Reno Nevada, 2008, indicated.
Retrieval of Ozone Profiles from GOME (and SCIAMACHY, and OMI, and GOME2 ) Roeland van Oss Ronald van der A and Johan de Haan, Robert Voors, Robert Spurr.
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol measurements campaign.
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol campaign. RMI December.
Monitoring aerosols in China with AATSR Anu-Maija Sundström 2 Gerrit de Leeuw 1 Pekka Kolmonen 1, and Larisa Sogacheva 1 AMFIC , Barcelona 1:
Measuring UV aerosol absorption. Why is aerosol UV absorption important ? Change in boundary layer ozone mixing ratios as a result of direct aerosol forcing.
Air Quality Forecasting in China using a regional model Bas Mijling Ronald van der A Henk Eskes Hennie Kelder.
Investigation on the possibilities of trend detection of spectral irradiance Merle Glandorf and Gunther Seckmeyer Institute of Meteorology and Climatology.
UV Aerosol Product Status and Outlook Omar Torres and Changwoo Ahn OMI Science Team Meeting Outline -Status -Product Assessment OMI-MODIS Comparison OMI-Aeronet.
Fog- and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Thomas F. Eck (Code 618 NASA GSFC) and Brent N. Holben (Code.
Effect Assessment of Air Quality Ensuring Measures during Beijing Olympic Games from Satellite Observation Pucai Wang, Huan Yu, Zhaonan Cai, Xuemei Zong,
MAX-DOAS observations and their application to validations of satellite and model data in Wuxi, China 1) Satellite group, Max Planck institute for Chemistry,
Validation of OMI NO 2 data using ground-based spectrometric NO 2 measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia A.N. Gruzdev and A.S. Elokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute.
Introduction 1. Advantages and difficulties related to the use of optical data 2. Aerosol retrieval and comparison methodology 3. Results of the comparison.
AMFIC kick-off meeting Dimitris Balis & MariLiza Koukouli Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Validation of OMI total ozone using ground-based Brewer observations ESA Atmospheric Science Conference, 8-12 May 2006, Frascati, Italy Dimitris Balis.
OMI ST meeting KNMI Validation of OMI total ozone using ground-based Brewer and Dobson observations D. Balis 1, E. Brinksma 2, M. Kroon 2,V.
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
AGACC II: WP3: Aerosol properties and radiative forcing at Uccle Veerle De Bock Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
Tropospheric NO2 Ronald van der A, Michel Van Roozendael, Isabelle De Smedt, Ruud Dirksen, Folkert Boersma KNMI and BIRA-IASB Beijing, 23 October 2009.
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol campaign. RMI December.
AMFIC Progress Meeting, Barcelona, 24 June Space-nadir observations of formaldehyde, glyoxal and SO 2 columns with SCIAMACHY and GOME-2. Isabelle.
Relating Aerosol Mass and Optical Depth in the Southeastern U.S. C. A. Brock, N. L. Wagner, A. M. Middlebrook, T. D. Gordon, and D. M. Murphy Earth System.
II GALION workshop - Geneva, Switzerland – September 21-23, 2010 EARLINET contribution to SDS-WAS Europe – North Africa regional node Lucia Mona Istituto.
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
Tropospheric NO2 Ronald van der A, Michel Van Roozendael, Isabelle De Smedt, Ruud Dirksen, Folkert Boersma KNMI and BIRA-IASB Barcelona, June 2009.
Validation of OMI and SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO 2 columns using DANDELIONS ground-based data J. Hains 1, H. Volten 2, F. Boersma 1, F. Wittrock 3, A. Richter.
Modeling the emission, transport, and optical properties of Asian dust storms using coupled CAM/CARMA model Lin Su and Owen B. Toon Laboratory for Atmospheric.
SAGE III Aerosol Studies: Size Distribution Retrievals and Validation Mark Hervig GATS Inc.
ESA :DRAGON/ EU :AMFIC Air quality Monitoring and Forecasting In China Ronald van der A, KNMI Bas Mijling, KNMI Hennie Kelder KNMI, TUE DRAGON /AMFIC project.
MAX-DOAS observations of tropospheric aerosols and formaldehyde above China Tim Vlemmix Francois Hendrick Michel Van Roozendael Isabelle De Smedt Katrijn.
Upgrade from SGP V5.02 to V6.00: Conclusions from delta-validation of Diagnostic Data Set D. Hubert, A. Keppens, J. Granville, F. Hendrick, J.-C. Lambert.
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods Patrick J. McBride, Samuel LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt,
1 SO 2 Air Mass Factors for pollution and volcanic emissions OMI Science Team Meeting De Bilt, June 2006 Pieter Valks, Werner Thomas, Thilo Ebertseder,
Extinction measurements
Remote Sensing of Aerosols
Remote Sensing of Aerosols
Sentinel 5 Precursor Ozone Column products
Presentation transcript:

AMFIC third progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Task 3.1: Validation of satellite-retrieved aerosol properties over a wide range of geolocations over Europe and China using ground-based results from the AERONET network. Task 3.2: Validation of satellite-retrieved aerosol properties over the city of Thessaloniki using a dedicated ground-based Brewer spectrophotometer. Task 3.3: Validation of satellite-retrieved SO 2 pollution fields over a wide range of geolocations over Europe and China where ground- based Brewer spectrophotometers exist. Task 3.4: Validation of the satellite-retrieved SO 2 pollution fields over the city of Thessaloniki using the coincident to the satellite overpass ground-based Brewer spectrophotometers measurements. Task 3.5: Validation of satellite-retrieved tropospheric O 3 slant columns over selected Chinese and European stations that include ozone sondes. Work package 3: Validation of aerosol properties, SO 2 and O 3 amounts

Task 3.1: Validation of satellite-retrieved aerosol properties over a wide range of geolocations over Europe and China using ground-based results from the AERONET network. With Anu-Maija Sundström, Pekka Kolmonen and Gerrit de Leeuw

Aeronet data   AERONET provides globally distributed observations of spectral aerosol optical depth (AOD), inversion products, and precipitable water in diverse aerosol regimes. Aerosol optical depth data are computed for three data quality levels: Level 1.0 (unscreened), Level 1.5 (cloud-screened), and Level 2.0 (cloud-screened and quality- assured). AOD at 675nm & associated Angstrom Exponent

AATSR data provided by FMI  AODs from AATSR are at 555, 659 & 1060nm.  Data given for a 5km radius from the ground-based station.  27 European stations from AATSR for year 2006 with an average of 10 days of measurements per station.  6 China stations from AATSR analysis for one month in 2007 and three months in 2008, same issue as above was encountered.

Europe

Moldova: station possibly plagued by sulfate aerosols due to well-established SO 2 pollution.

Crete: station often affected by absorbing dust aerosol due to Saharan storms that plague the island.

All 27 European stations

China

China: dirty pollution, fine mode and neutral aerosol, coarse mode.

China: sulphate type, fine mode and mineral type, coarse mode

Conclusions – suggestions for the near future  More data from AATSR? -> infrastructure is ready and waiting!  Collaborate on the deliverable with FMI?

Task 3.2: Validation of satellite-retrieved aerosol properties over the city of Thessaloniki using a dedicated ground-based Brewer spectrophotometer.

Koukouli, et al., Investigation of the negative trend in the MODIS Aerosol Optical Depth over the Southern Balkans, submitted to Atmospheric Environment, 2009

Task 3.3: Validation of satellite-retrieved SO 2 pollution fields over a wide range of geolocations over Europe and China where ground-based Brewer spectrophotometers exist. With Jos van Geffen and Michel Van Roozendael

MaxDOAS in Beijing

Southern latitudes around Beijing, 100km

Northern latitudes around Beijing, 100km

All latitudes around Beijing, 100km

Investigating further into the South-North gradient issue

Task 3.4: Validation of the satellite-retrieved SO 2 pollution fields over the city of Thessaloniki using the coincident to the satellite overpass ground-based Brewer spectrophotometers measurements.

Koukouli, et al., SO 2 atmospheric loading revealed through ground-based and satellite measurements, International Conference On Space Technology, August 2009.

Task 3.5: Validation of satellite-retrieved tropospheric O 3 slant columns over selected Chinese and European stations that include ozonesondes. With Ronald van der A, Olaf Tuinder and Jacob van Peet

Ozonesonde sites around the globe

The datasets  GOME-2 : tropospheric O 3 profiles provided from to  Ground-based: 29 ozonesonde stations have coincident measurements within the GOME 2 time frame. Since so few data points exist, all available ozonesondes are used in this study. The ozonesondes provide high resolution vertical ozone profiles.

The methodology  First comparison: 1. The height of the tropopause is found, in order to integrate the ozonesonde vertical profile into a tropospheric ozone column [TOC]. 2. The two quantities are then directly compared, i.e. the GOME-2 TOC to the ozonesonde integrated TOC. This comparison will be called : without AK treatment

The methodology  Second comparison: 1. The ozonesonde profile is convolved into a new profile using the apriori ozone profile and averaging kernels that were used in the GOME-2 analysis as follows: X’ OZONESONDE = X APRIORI + AK * [X OZONESONDE -X APRIORI ] 2. This convolved profile is then integrated up to the tropopause level to a new TOC. 3. The new convolved TOC is compared to the GOME-2 TOC. This comparison will be called : with AK treatment

Comparing tropopause levels for four different ozonesondes: 21-EDMONTON, 221-LEGIONOWO, 242-PRAHA, 308-MADRID

Typical example – Hohenpeissenberg Without AK treatmentWith AK treatment Mean difference 10%, no common variability. Mean difference 30%, common variability.

Dependency on the latitude & SZA. Without AK treatmentWith AK treatment

Dependency on the distance from ground-station & on the tropopause height. Without AK treatment With AK treatment

O 3 -Saf GOME2 validation of tropospheric O 3 profiles UTLS consistent overestimation Work of: Andy Delcloo, Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium

Conclusions - I  No dependency on cloud parameters, total ozone, distance from ground-based station.  Some dependency on solar zenith angle with smaller angles giving less satellite overestimation.  Strong dependency of final convolved ozonesonde TOC on the apriori & averaging kernel.

Comparing the apriori and the convolved ozonesonde TOC for all data points

Comparing the GOME-2 and the convolved ozonesonde TOC for all data points

Dependency of convolved ozonesonde TOC on apriori used

Conclusions - II  Another main problem seem to be the number of measurements in total.

Conclusions – Next steps  New averaging kernel treatment to allow the convolved ozonesonde profile to approach the original ozonesonde profile and not follow the apriori profile shape.  More months of data which will improve the statistics and permit the assessment of both satellite and ground-based measurements.

Status of Work package 3: Validation of aerosol properties, SO 2 and O 3 amounts Task 3.1: Validation of satellite-retrieved aerosol properties over a wide range of geolocations over Europe and China using ground-based results from the AERONET network. Task 3.2: Validation of satellite-retrieved aerosol properties over the city of Thessaloniki using a dedicated ground-based Brewer spectrophotometer. Task 3.1: Work in progress. Task 3.2: Work in progress [completed for MODIS data].

Status of Work package 3: Validation of aerosol properties, SO 2 and O 3 amounts Task 3.3: Validation of satellite-retrieved SO 2 pollution fields over a wide range of geolocations over Europe and China where ground-based Brewer spectrophotometers exist. Task 3.4: Validation of the satellite-retrieved SO 2 pollution fields over the city of Thessaloniki using the coincident to the satellite overpass ground-based Brewer spectrophotometers measurements. Task 3.3: Completed. Task 3.2: Completed.

Status of Work package 3: Validation of aerosol properties, SO 2 and O 3 amounts Task 3.5: Validation of satellite-retrieved tropospheric O 3 slant columns over selected Chinese and European stations that include ozone sondes. Task 3.5: Work in progress.