Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Triggering of New Madrid Seismicity by Late Pleistocene Erosion Eric Calais & Andy Freed Purdue University Roy Van Arsdale, University of Memphis Seth.
Advertisements

Geodetic Reference Frames In Presence of Crustal Deformations Martin Lidberg 1,2, Maaria Nordman 3, Jan M. Johansson 1,4, Glenn A Milne5, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
IAG Sub-Commission 1.3c Regional Reference Frames for North America 1 Regional Reference Frames for North America Current Status & Future Plans of Regional.
Challenges in Achieving Height Modernization in Alaska Crustal Deformation Has Invalidated Much of the Historical Data Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute,
Vertical Crustal Motion in the North Pacific and Implications for Tide Gauge Records and Sea Level Rise Jeff Freymueller and Christopher F. Larsen Geophysical.
Observing Glacial Rebound Using GPS Giovanni Sella and Seth Stein Northwestern University Michael Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada.
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
A Reference Frame for PBO: What do we Have; What do we Need? Geoff Blewitt Nevada Bureau of Mines & Geology, and Seismological Laboratory, University of.
Since New Madrid's not moving... A complex system view of midcontinental seismicity and hazards Seth Stein Northwestern Eric Calais Purdue Qingsong Li.
National Survey and Cadastre - Denmark Crustal deformations at permanent GPS sites in Denmark Shfaqat Abbas Khan and Per Knudsen, Geodetic Dept., Kort.
GPS – Global Positioning System Space segment Control segment user segment 32 satellites World wide monitor and control stations.
Using Geodetic Rates in Seismic Hazard Mapping March 30, Geodetic and Geologic slip rate estimates for earthquake hazard assessment in Southern California.
SOPAC's Instantaneous Global Plate Motion Model: Yehuda Bock, Linette Prawirodirdjo, Peng Fang, Paul Jamason, Shimon Wdowinski (TAU, UMiami) Scripps Orbit.
July 17, 2002Zambia GNSS Earth Science Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) for Earth Sciences Prof. Thomas Herring, Massachusetts Institute.
G21C-01: First Report of the Stable North America Reference Frame (SNARF) Working Group G21C-01: First Report of the Stable North America Reference Frame.
DGF – Santiago, Chile – Geodesy and Geodynamics By Christophe Vigny National Center for scientific Research (CNRS) & Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS)
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
Overview of the SNARF Working Group, its activities, and accomplishments Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group (SNARF) Chair: Geoff Blewitt.
GEOPH 300: Physics of the Earth Geodynamics (Physics of plate tectonics) – Spherical geometry, reconstruction of plate motion – Earth’s magnetic field.
The Hunting of the SNARF Giovanni F. Sella Seth Stein Northwestern University Timothy H. Dixon University of Miami "What's the good of Mercator's North.
SRI Seminar 2005 Time series of GPS stations For reference, monitoring and geophysics Günter Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
Background to >10 years of BIFROST activities Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck 1, Rüdiger Haas 1, Sten Bergstrand 1 Martin Lidberg 1,2, Lotti Jivall.
Observing Glacial Rebound Using GPS Giovanni Sella.
An improved and extended GPS derived velocity field of the postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia Martin Lidberg 1,3, Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
Using Flubber to Study Glaciers A Hands-on Experience.
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
A comparison of the ability of artificial neural network and polynomial fitting was carried out in order to model the horizontal deformation field. It.
GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D
First SNARF Workshop: Introduction Stable North America Working Group UNAVCO Inc., 27 Jan 2004 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Testing intraplate deformation in the North American plate interior E. Calais (Purdue Univ.), C. DeMets (U. Wisc.), J.M. Nocquet (Oxford and IGN) ● Is.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report
Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.
An updated Canadian GPS velocity field using NRCan’s Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Software – Plans and preliminary results J. Henton 1, M. Craymer 2,
Time-variable Deformation in the New Madrid Seismic Zone (why there, why now?) Eric Calais, Andy Freed, Purdue University Seth Stein, Northwestern University.
1 NAREF Analysis & ITRF2004 Densification Mike Craymer, Joe Henton Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 3rd SNARF Workshop Santa Ana Pueblo,
Jayne Bormann and Bill Hammond sent two velocity fields on a uniform grid constructed from their test exercise using CMM4. Hammond ’ s code.
Original objective = quantify intraplate deformation –Pros: Larger number of sites High density of sites in some areas Minimal cost… –Cons: Density varies.
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
The Plausible Range of GIA Contributions to 3-D Motions at GPS Sites in the SNARF Network 2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Mark Tamisiea 1, Jerry Mitrovica 2,
Present-day Kinematics of the East African Rift Sarah Stamps, Eric Calais (Purdue University, IN, USA - Elifuraha.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.
NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.
PBO Frame Definition using SNARF Version 1.0 Tom Herring MIT.
5/18/2994G21D-04 Spring AGU Realization of a Stable North America Reference Frame Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary, Sciences,
A GPS-based view of New Madrid earthquake hazard Seth Stein, Northwestern University Uncertainties permit wide range (3X) of hazard models, some higher.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea, James Davis, and Emma Hill Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Vertical velocities at tide gauges from a completely reprocessed global GPS network of stations: How well do they work? G. Wöppelmann 1, M-N. Bouin 2,
Introduction to the modelling of GPS results GPS provides Surface crustal velocities in a global reference frame, or with respect to a block, realized.
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.
Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Menlo Park GPS data processing and archiving J.L. Svarc, J.R. Murray, Fred Pollitz, Scott Haefner,
BREVIA Time-Variable Deformation in the New Madrid Seismic Zone Eric Calais 1 and Seth Stein 2 velocities relative to the rigid interior ofNorth Amer-
Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan
Velocities in ITRF – not appropriate for interpretation
Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
NRCan Velocity Fields & Comparisons to Some Plate Motion Estimates
Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group
Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1
Presentation transcript:

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, DeMets C, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, Nocquet JM, CNRS, Géoscience Azur, Valbonne, France, SNARF Workshop Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa November 16, 2006

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior - Most active tectonic motions happen along plate boundary. - However, elastic strain can accumulate along geological structures far from plate boundaries. - Evidence: earthquakes within stable plate interior. WHY deformation analysis in the “Stable” North American (NOAM) plate interior?

3 Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior - NOAM interior deforms under GIA (Glacial Isostatic Adjustment) - Deglaciation (removal of Laurentide ice sheet that covered Canada and part of the northern US until ~20,000 years ago) affects the present velocity field through incomplete viscoelastic response to the ice unloading. - Current GIA models are uncertain (ice history and mantle viscosity) - Precise Geodetic measurements could provide constraints to GIA models. WHY (cont’d)

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Continuous GPS network in NOAM - About 600 GPS stations are continuously observed. (~800 stations as of Oct 2006) - Sources: 1. CORS (National Geodetic Survey, NOAA) 2. IGS (International GPS Service) 3. NRCan (Natural Resources Canada) 4. Local campaign (e.g., GAMA)

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior GPS Data Process - Daily data since Jan. 1, 1993 have been processed at the University of Wisconsin using GIPSY-OASIS software (free-network satellite orbits and precise point positioning). - Data since Jan. 1, 1994 have been processed at Purdue University using GAMIT-GLOBK software (double difference phase measurement, network tied to 6 IGS reference stations). - Highly-frequent (continuous) data captures periodical signals  modeled and filtered with site-specific noise process.

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Combination & Precision - Multiple solutions (GIPSY, GAMIT, and IGS) are combined into a common reference frame defined by ITRF2000 (International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2000). - After combination, the WRMS for horizontal position 0.7~1.8mm, for vertical position 1.3~5.9 mm, for horizontal velocity 0.2~0.5 mm/yr, and for vertical velocity 0.5~2.0 mm/yr.

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Precision (temporal relation) - Velocity precision related to the observation time span. - Longer observation time span helps noise filtering, and gives better velocity estimates. - Older sites  stable monuments. Higher precision can be expected in the days to come.

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Results: Rigid motion of NOAM - The velocity field from this study: 1. Velocities w.r.t. ITRF2000 frame 2. Estimate angular rotation of rigid North America with a rigid- body motion model. Pole:

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Rigid motion of NOAM (cont’d) Rigid rotation pole of NOAM/ITRF200Residual velocities w.r.t. rigid NOAM Velocities subtract rigid rotation  residual velocities (relative deformations)

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Results: GIA signal?

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior GIA signal? (cont’d)

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior GIA signal? (cont’d) -Spatially-interpolated velocity field: - Systematic signals: GIA-like pattern. Hinge line at 2100 km.

Results: Vertical velocities - Also exhibits a GIA pattern. Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior

Results: Stain analysis - Strain rate of NOAM Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior

Results: Local stain & seismic hazardous analysis - Analysis on seismic hazardous of the New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ) - GPS: surface deformation < 0.7 mm/yr (1.4 mm/yr at 95% CI) - Paleoseismology: yrs repeat time of “large” events - GPS and Paleoseismology are consistent (with low M7 characteristic earthquakes). Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior

Conclusions - Improved quality on velocity field (<0.5mm/yr) helps to give better analysis on NOAM’s deformation behavior and seismological implications (e.g., NMSZ). - The first order deformation signal in NOAM likely comes from Glacier Isostatic Adjustment (clear pattern within 2100km range). - Further works on GIA modeling and its relation to surface strain. - Time works for us!! Longer observation Better coverage (new sites) Improved data process Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior

NOAM: Preliminary results of the latest combination (Oct 2006) Inputs: PUR_SNX (GAMIT solution): ~ 2006D219 CDM_SNX (GIPSY solution): ~ 2006D268 IGS solution: IGS06P36 Results: This combination (Oct 06): 565 sites in the final combination PUR CDM IGS ITR Previous combination (Sep 05): 367 sites in the final combination PUR CDM IGS ITR

This combination (Oct 06): Position Velocity 2D h 2D h PUR CDM IGS ITR Previous combination (Sep 05): Position Velocity 2D h 2D h PUR CDM IGS ITR NOAM: Preliminary results of the latest combination (Oct 2006) More sites with better accuracies are obtained in the new combination solution.