John Steele. Model Rules Framework  1.7 – Current Client Conflicts  1.8 – List of Current Client Conflicts  1.9 – Former Client Conflicts  1.10 –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wayne County Pro Bono Conference August 15, 2012 Ethics and Assisted Pro Se Representation.
Advertisements

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Barry M. Klayman (TBA) & Eric A. Tilles Arkema Inc.
Chapter Four Conflicts of Interest In this chapter, you will learn about: Rules governing conflicts involving clients, including simultaneous and successive.
Professional Ethical Issues in Third Party Litigation Financing ABA Section on International Law Fall Meeting -- October 30, 2009 Nathan M. Crystal Charleston.
Rule 1.11, Subsection (a) Applies to FORMER service as public officer or government employee. Standard of Review – PERSONALLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY participated.
John Steele, Attorney at Law
(1) WITHDRAWAL MRPC 1.16 (addressed to lawyer!): structure (a) Mandatory withdrawal (or prohibited acceptance) (b) Permissive withdrawal (i) w/o material.
Economics of the Legal Process. Car Accident  I hit you with my car and cause $10,000 in damages  We both believe that there’s an 80% chance I’ll be.
© 2005 by Thomson DelmarLearning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION ETHICS IN LITIGATION.
Law 20 Conflicts of Interest. o Based on duties of o Loyalty o Confidentiality o Rules cover: o Concurrent representation of adverse clients o Representation.
BELMONT UNIVERSITY AMERICAN INN OF COURT SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 PRESENTED BY KRISANN HODGES DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL - LITIGATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL.
John Steele, Attorney at Law
Two Hats, One Lawyer: Demystifying Privilege & Confidentiality Stuart I. Teicher, Esq.
The rule in paragraph 1.10(a) also does not prohibit representation by others in the law firm where the person prohibited from involvement in a matter.
Legal Ethics for Social Services Attorneys Institute of Government 2006.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
Conflicts and the Duty to Supervise for In-House Counsel Brian McCormac BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
Louisiana Association for Justice Ethics Webinar December 5, 2013 Robert E. Kleinpeter Yigal Bander.
ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Secrets, Lies, And Money! Ethical Rules For Interacting With Non-Lawyers In Litigation And Transactions.
John Steele (Steele Ethics LLC)
Ethics and Technology: PALawHELP.org and PAProbono.net Pro Bono Primer: Tools and Information for the Pro Bono Lawyer June 27, 2008.
FRCP & Ethics Money & Ethics Technology & Ethics USPTO & Ethics Advertising Ethics
Serving those who serve the public Professional Responsibility & Social Networking Presented July 16, 2011 by Joe Lauber Missouri Municipal Attorneys Association.
Professional Responsibility Law 115 Wed., Nov. 14.
Ethical Pitfalls of Representing Multiple Clients in a Transaction Presented by Suzanne Raggio Westerheim, Attorney, Mediator, and Counselor to the Legal.
Chapter 2 - Rules The Basic Elements of Law Practice.
Professional Responsibility Law 115 Wed., Nov. 7.
Chapter 3. Purpose: Solving legal disputes and upholding legal rights.
Week 9.  Arising out of prior or simultaneous representation of another party in the case  Arising out of relationship with opposing attorneys  Arising.
Goals: The students will 1. Continue with their study of case briefing. 2. Learn about legal ethics and the Model Rules.
1 DUTY OF LOYALTY (conflicts of interest). 2 Conflicts concerning current clients.
John Steele, Attorney at Law
Do You Have One?. “I represent the city as an organization and I do not represent you and I cannot guarantee the confidentiality of what you tell me.”
Unit 5 Midterm Review. What are some of the components of the ABA?
Requirements for a Retainer Agreement Start with a Written Contract! ALWAYS!
John Steele, Attorney at Law. 2 Confidentiality 3 Topics 1. Definitions 2. Comparison 3. ABA Approach 1. Rule; Exceptions; Other rules 4. California.
PA 305 Law Office Management Unit 3 Seminar Conflicts of Interest
Conflict of Interest - Examples
A Response to SEC Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami’s June 1, 2011 Speech Barry J. Mandel Foley & Lardner LLP November 2, 2011 Chair of Foley & Lardner’s.
TOPIC G: CLIENTS’ RIGHTS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
TOPIC J: DUTIES TO FORMER CLIENTS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
TOPIC Q: (1) RELATIONSHIP WITH A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT (2) TERMINATING EXISTING CLIENT RELATIONSHIPS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
Problem pp a)Asst. AG in charge of state securities div. leaves and joins private firm, is asked to represent P in suit against D for sec. law violation;
Professional Responsibility Law 115 Wed., Nov. 28.
TOPIC H: CLIENT-LAWYER CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
Orlik: Ethics for the Legal Professional, 6 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Chapter 4 Conflicts of.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
Section 285 Litigation Ethics Conflicts of Interest Prosecution Bars Grab bag
It is All About the Kids: The Nobility of Amateurism.
Variation By Agreement: UCC Article 9 © Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. All rights reserved.
Beginning and Ending the Lawyer-Client Relationship.
Fairness in Litigation. MR 3.5 – p. 88 A lawyer shall not: (a) seek to influence a judge, juror, prospective juror or other official by means prohibited.
Competence, Diligence, and Unauthorized Practice.
Midterm Review 1.  Lawyers have ethical obligations that are required by the organizations to which they belong.  Lawyers are “members of the bar”,
1 Ethical Lawyering Fall, 2006 Class 4. 2 MODELS OF THE RELATIONSHIP Traditional Model Participatory Model Hired Gun Model.
1 Ethical Lawyering Fall, 2006 Class MR 1.5 (a) A lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable.
Simple Rule(s) BIG COMPLICATIONS
Ethics Considerations for Patent Practitioners
CIPA Visit to ASPA 5 October 2016
What are the rules that apply? What are duties of the lawyer?
Slicing the Pufferfish: An Update on Risk Management in a Firm in Light of Legal and Business Conflicts Ava K. Doppelt, Esq. Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath.
Chapter Three Ethics and Professional Responsibility
TOPIC J: DUTIES TO FORMER CLIENTS
Moderator: Brittany Kauffman, IAALS
Justice and Technology Practicum
Professional Responsibility
Mediation: An Alternative Way of Resolving Disputes
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION INITIATING THE CLIENT RELATIONSHIP
BIAS Fundamentals of Law Practice
Ethical Representation of Landlords and Tenants
Presentation transcript:

John Steele

Model Rules Framework  1.7 – Current Client Conflicts  1.8 – List of Current Client Conflicts  1.9 – Former Client Conflicts  1.10 – Imputation Rule (the “New Rule”)  1.11 – Government Lawyers  1.12 – Neutrals (Judges)

MR 1.7  “Directly adverse”  Lawsuit  Negotiate directly across from  “Materially limited”  Substantial risk of material limitation  Sister-in-law example  Representing several founders of business  Severe personal views about matter?

Basic Concepts  Current Client vs. Former Client  DQ applies to lawyers  DQ is/isn’t imputed to others  Conflicts: Avoided/Resolved  Don’t take on the matter  Get a waiver  Equitable defenses

MR 1.7: Consent  Reasonably believe can fulfill duties?  Not prohibited by law?  Not two adverse parties in one litigation?  “informed consent, confirmed in writing”  ICCW  No writing strictly required from client  Two main methods

MR 1.7: Consents Formulas  ICCW : for most 1.7 and 1.9 conflicts  WSC : Writing signed by client; for contingency fees (1.5); doing business with the client (1.8(a)); and aggregate settlements (1.8(g))  AIWDSAILC + Opportunity : doing business with client (1.8(a)); settling client’s liability claims against lawyer (1.8(h)(2))  See Appendix A to Outline

MR 1.8  Ten sub-paragraphs  Different consent formulas

MR 1.8  1.8(a) – Doing business with the client  1.8(b) – Using client information  1.8(c) – Soliciting gifts; writing wills  1.8(d) – Literary rights  1.8(e) – Financial assistance to the client  1.8(f) – Payment from non-clients  1.8(g) – Aggregate settlements

MR 1.8  1.8(h) – Lawyer’s liability to client  1.8(i) – Proprietary interest in subject matter  1.8(j) – Sexual relations with client  1.8(k) – Imputation for 1.8 conflicts

MR 1.9  Three paragraphs  “Same or substantially related”  Relates to confidences  Flexible term of art

MR 1.9’s Subsections  1.9(a): previously represented  1.9(b):  1.9(c): catch-all

MR 1.10  1.10(a) – The New Rule  1.10(a) – The Old Rule  1.10(b) – “Re-growing the firm’s ability to be adverse  1.10(c) – Waivers (ICCW)  1.10(d) – Government lawyers

MR 1.10: Whose Conflicts Matter?  Lawyers  Non-lawyers  Summer Associates  Law Clerks  Secretaries/Admins  Paralegals

California Rules Framework

MR 1.7 vs. California  California: laundry list  California: two levels of conflicts  California: resolving the conflicts  Writing from client  Notice to client