1 Earthquake Hazard Update April 21, 2015 NMSZ ROC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS RUSSIA PART 3: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Advertisements

WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
Application of GIS for Seismic Observation in Papua New Guinea
Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.
1 SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT Dr. Carlos E. Ventura Kate Thibert & Hugón Juárez García February 26 th, 2007.
Earthquake Hazards in the Central U.S. Brian Blake Central U.S. Earthquake Consortium MEMA SAR Planning Meeting July 24, 2013 Senatobia, Mississippi.
THE NEPAL EARTHQUAKE OF APRIL 25,2015 Part 9: It Could Have Been Worse Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA Walter.
Earthquakes Presented you to by the Hazard Committee Madeline Galac Nicole Barstrom.
Abstract Detection of active faults and seismic hazards in the Seattle area is problematic, owing to thick surficial deposits and abundant vegetative cover.
Fall 2006 MUSE 11B Catastrophic Earthquakes. There are many types of catastrophic events Both natural and manmade.
Time-dependent seismic hazard maps for the New Madrid seismic zone and Charleston, South Carolina areas James Hebden Seth Stein Department of Earth and.
California Earthquakes. Sylmar Earthquake About: When: 6:00 A.M. February 9, 1971 Where: San Fernando Valley What: Ruptured segment of the San Fernando.
Abstract Earthquakes are one of the most powerful natural disasters that occur in the world. Ground motion and shaking during an earthquake can be detected.
By virtue of the sloping topography of the region and the quality of the soil, as well as its proximity to the Dead Sea fault, region is exposed to.
Application of HAZUS TM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project Prepared for: Federal Emergency Management Agency Central US Earthquake Consortium Prepared.
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS A KEY ELEMENT OF BECOMING DISASTER RESILIENT Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina,
PRIMER Dr. Walter Hays Global Alliance For Disaster Reduction
2007 NSTA: St. Louis, Missouri Earthquake Prediction and Forecasting: A Case Study of the San Andreas and New Madrid Faults Sponsored by: IRIS (Incorporated.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part III Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
 New Zealand Earthquake New Zealand Earthquake  6.3 Magnitude Earthquake  185 Deaths  injuries  Over 1,400 buildings were red or yellow tagged.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. THE PHILIPPINES
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
LOMA PRIETA EARTHQUAKE OF WHAT WAS IT? The Loma Prieta earthquake, also known as the World Series earthquake, was a major earthquake that struck.
Earthquakes. Describing Earthquakes Intensity vs. Magnitude.
New Madrid Earthquake By: Julie Dillon and Caroline Miller.
Chapter 5 EARTHQUAKES and ENVIRONMENT. Earthquakes Violent ground-shaking phenomenon by the sudden release of strain energy stored in rocks One of the.
A 21 ST CENTURY LOOKBACK WILL SUSTAIN A COMMUNITY’S FOCUS ON DISASTER RESILIENCE Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
Natural Disasters What is an Earthquake? Ground movement caused by the sudden release of seismic energy due to tectonic forces. The focus of an earthquake.
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
Ashes, ashes, we all fall Lou Romig MD, FAAP, FACEP Miami Children’s Hospital FL-5 DMAT.
Missouri Geological Survey Joe Gillman The Central U.S. is Earthquake Country: The Science Behind Earthquakes Hazard Preparedness Response.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
Zack Bick Erin Riggs Alicia Helton Cara Dickerson Presentation by:
Earthquake Hazards And Earthquake Risks in the Central US Or, What Keeps Geologists Awake at Night….
Natural Hazards and Our Dynamic Planet LAB 7 What natural hazards do dynamic events cause? Our planet is dynamic because it is powerful, active Our planet.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
Location and map of region Tectonic activities Mechanism of earthquake Damage Risks.
MAGNITUDE 6.3 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES TAIWAN (7:02 pm, October 31, 2013) Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Earthquakes in Missouri
MAEviz Terry McLaren Project Manager, Cyberenvironment Technologies (CET), National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA), University of Illinois.
THE ART AND SCIENCE OF IDENTIFYING AND ELIMINATING VULNERABILITIES TO EARTHQUAKES IN A COMMUNITY’S BUILT ENVIRONMENT Walter Hays, Global Alliance for.
Disaster Risks in Central Asia Michael Thurman Regional Disaster Risk Reduction Advisor, ECIS "Improving Regional Coordination in Managing Compound Risks.
Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
Earthquakes. Sounds of Earthquakes nds.phphttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/listen/allsou nds.php.
THE MAGNITUDE 6.0 NAPA, CA EARTHQUAKE 3:20 AM, AUGUST 24, 2014 Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
Tri-State Seismic Hazard Mapping -Kentucky Plan
MAGNITUDE 6.7 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES CENTRAL JAPAN Saturday, November 22, 2014 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS PART II A– PAKISTAN’S EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. TAIWAN PART I: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Earthquake Words. Earthquake damage - San Andreas Fault or San Francisco’s fault?  To understand how humans can influence the effects of an earthquake.
New Madrid Seismic Zone and it’s impacts. History  “Major” earthquakes in the New Madrid region occurred on Dec. 16, 1811; Jan. 23, 1812; and Feb. 7,
 Chapter 5 Section 4.  Liquefaction  Aftershock  Tsunami  Base-isolated Building.
TOWARDS PRE-EARTHQUAKE PLANNING FOR POST-EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY (PEPPER) EXAMPLES: TOKAI, JAPAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazards are those Earth processes that are harmful to humans and/or their property. Includes: Earthquakes Volcanic eruptions.
Magnitude 7.2 Metro Manila
M7.1 RABOSA EARTHQUAKE 1:15 PM; September 19, 2017
Section 4: Earthquakes and Society
TOWARDS A NEW NORTHRIDGE AFTER THE JANUARY 17, 1994 EARTHQUAKE
MODERATE-MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKE IMPACTS GREECE AND TURKEY 1:30 AM local time Friday, July 21, 2017 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
Risk Assessment Maps for Seaside OR
Section 4: Earthquakes and Society
Application of HAZUSTM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project
Presentation to Coachella’s City Council October 8, 2014
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Presentation transcript:

1 Earthquake Hazard Update April 21, 2015 NMSZ ROC

Earthquake Risk Factors in the Central US Area is subject to infrequent, large earthquake sequences Low Attenuation = larger damage area compared to similar magnitude quakes in California Most buildings and infrastructural elements were not designed for earthquakes 11 million people live in the New Madrid seismic zone Ground motions at soft soil sites can be amplified significantly Public Awareness is low National impact of widespread infrastructure damage Many socially vulnerable communities exist

Plate Boundaries and Earthquakes Source: USGS

The New Madrid Earthquake Sequence of

New Madrid Earthquake Chronology Since 2000 B.C.

NMSZ Earthquake Probabilities If we consider NMSZ historical earthquake sequences as one event: % chance of a magnitude 6.0 or greater in a 50-year time window 7 – 10% chance of a magnitude 7.0 or greater in a 50-year time window However these sequences actually represent 8, possibly 9, large earthquakes.

Liquefaction near Umedpar, India, 2001

2004 Liquefaction Potential Map 2014 Liquefaction Potential Map

1999 MUSHMP Deterministic Ground Motion2014 MAEHMP Deterministic Ground Motion Seismic Hazard Map Updates

CERI/USGS Seismic Stations

M 5.0, March 25, 1976: A different kind of quake

Magnitude Verification from the 2001 Gujarat Earthquake Source: Sue Hough, USGS

Central US Geology and the Reelfoot Rift Source: USGS

Paleozoic rock Cretaceous sediments Memphis Sand Eocene Memphis Mississippi River floodplain The Geology of the Mississippi Embayment Source: P. Bodin, CERI

Crude, Petrochemical, and Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure Vulnerability

August 2002 Wolf River Landslide Downtown Memphis

“Estimate” of Economic Losses and Mississippi River Dredging Costs Due to EQ-Induced Landslides Dredging costs $1.1 million per mile = $11 to 22 million in dredging costs Economic loss due to reduction in barge traffic If we assume that 10 dredges would be utilized to clear the main channel of the Mississippi between Cairo, Il and Tunica, MS the River would not be open to barge commerce for approximately 60 days: $2-4 million/day 60 days = $ million in indirect economic losses.

Regional EQ Scenario Results 500,000 buildings at least moderately damaged – 13% of inventory 225,000 buildings beyond repair 15% of manufactured housing at least extensive damage 270 Bridges completely damaged 65% of hospital beds unavailable at Day schools w/complete damage 400K Households w/out Water 1 Million w/out Electric Service ***All figures are approximate and are intended to be used for planning or illustrative purposes only*** ***Based on a NMSZ 7.7 SW Segment event 2:00PM ***

Regional Scenario Results 250,000 Households Displaced 17,000 Hospitalized – Hospitals will be overrun with patients 4,300 Fatalities*** – 1,836 in Katrina – 2,996 on 9/11 $ Billion in building and lifeline losses $70 Billion in building only – Non-Structural Components account for nearly $32 billion in damages ***Based on a NMSZ 7.7 SW Segment event 2:00PM *** ***All figures are approximate and are intended to be used for planning or illustrative purposes only***

Producer/Director: Kip Cole Pale Moon Media Executive Producer: Gary Patterson Digital Animation: Eric Bouchoc AnimMan Studios New Madrid: The Earthquakes of vimeo.com/