Missouri Judicial Discipline System Mo Const. Art. 5 s. 24: Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline  6 Members  2 laypersons appointed by Gove.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Missouri Government. Louis Joliet and Father Jacques Marquette.
Advertisements

The Courtroom Work Group Judge Prosecutor Defense.
New Leader Training – FAAMA VI The Hatch Act In accordance with Federal Statutes: Lists prohibited political activities Lists permitted political activities.
Structure of MS Government
Courts and the Quest for Justice. In Theory: Courtroom Ideals  Courts have extensive powers in our criminal justice system.  The courts legitimacy is.
Branches of Texas Government
Chapter Eight: JUDGES.
Judicial Selection in Missouri Merit Selection and Retention through the The Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan.
The Intersection of the law and the 3 Branches of Government
Dheeraj Agarwal Ethics Advisor Health Resources and Services Administration U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Ethics and Disclosure Act W.S et. seq. Who does the act apply to All public officials, public members and public employees which includes District.
Mr. Marquina Somerset Silver Palms Civics
Mid-America Regulatory Conference Kansas City, Missouri June 8, 2010.
THE TENNESSEE BOARD OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Presented to the Tennessee Judicial Conference March 21, 2014 by Tim Discenza, Disciplinary Counsel Judge Chris.
1 State Courts Serving Colorado Our Courts. 2 Our State Courts are Busy Cases Filed—FY ,197 in County Courts 189,235 in District Courts 2,548.
The three branches of Texas State government
Ethical Standards For Consultants: do they exist?.
COURT CASES. There are two types of court cases: 1. Criminal: A case where someone is accused of breaking the law 2. Civil: A disagreement between two.
Welcome to our Quiz Show
Paid for by The Missouri Bar Sebrina Barrett, Executive Director PO Box 119 Jefferson City, MO
E thics 1 William (Bill) H. Poppler: (916) LT Brian E. Thomas: (916) LT Daniel W. Pauley: (916) SSgt Eric M. Kelly: (916)
Civics & Economics Top 100 What every student should know to pass the Civics & Economics EOC Goal 5.
Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.
Hosted by Mrs. LaSala OrganizationPreambleResponsibilities???
1 The Hatch Act in the Digital Age. 2 FEDERAL HATCH ACT 5 U.S.C. § § The Hatch Act: Who is covered?
The Ethical Price of Masking Traffic Violations John Vasquez Judge, Austin Municipal Court.
Orange County Charter Review Commission Orientation Open Government and Ethics Kate Latorre Assistant County Attorney February 12, 2015.
The Judicial System in the States Conflict between “independence” and “accountability”
Judicial Branch Facts. Main Courts 1. Supreme Court 2. Courts of Appeal 3. District Courts.
Chapter 12.4 The State Judicial Branch. Lower State Courts The state court system handles most of the nation’s legal matters. State courts interpret and.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.
Read the following situations, decide whether it is more likely to occur under a democratic or authoritarian government. 1.While voting in a national.
E. DISCIPLINE THE DISCIPLINARY SYSTEM IN MISSOURI  Structure: 4 S.Ct.- appointed agencies  Advisory Committee (AC) (state-wide jur.)  at least 6 lawyers.
ANSWERS TO SLIDE TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE Answer: You picked 1. Incorrect. Although you believe speaking at the event may further DoD’s mission, you.
THE TENNESSEE BOARD OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Presented to the Tennessee Municipal Judges Conference April, 2014 by Tim Discenza, Disciplinary Counsel Tennessee.
State Courts Ch. 11 Sec. 4 Pp What State Courts Do Most have trial courts, appeal courts, and a supreme court Hear civil and criminal cases.
The three branches of Texas State government Structured much like the Federal Government.
Congress Organization. Bicameral Legislature Two houses make up the US Congress- the House of Representatives and the Senate.
STANDARDS OF CONDUCT AND GOVERNMENT ETHICS
CALIFORNIA CODE OF JUDICIAL ETHICS Hon. Tom Hollenhorst Hon. Julie Conger Hon. Dodie Harman.
SOURCES OF RULES  ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct  1990 version (supplement)  Canon 3: Impartiality and Diligence  3(E): Disqualification (duty.
Why is the power of judicial review key to the system of checks and balances? Because the power of judicial review can declare that laws and actions of.
TOPIC K: JUDICIAL ETHICS P.R Prof. Janicke.
Unit 4 The British Judiciary. Separation of powers 3 forms of the state power The legislative power The executive power The judicial power.
The State Judicial Branch. What State Courts Do State courts act as a check on the other two branches of state government. For example, state courts may.
Georgia’s Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch Consists of the state’s courts Supreme Court Magistrate Court Probate Court Municipal Court Juvenile CourtState.
Civics & Economics Goal 4 Organization of Political Parties.
Illinois Constitution State since Dec. 3, History of Illinois Government 3 state capitals-Springfield 4 Constitutions-1970 Current 102 counties.
Advertising and Solicitation. MR 7.3(a) – p. 126 A lawyer shall not by in-person live telephone or real-time electronic contact solicit professional employment.
Unit The Informed Citizen.  The Canadian courts are the judicial branch of government.  There are three branches of government : executive, legislative.
Honorable Anne E. LazarusHonorable Robert A. Graci Superior Court of PennsylvaniaChief Counsel Chair, Judicial Conduct BoardJudicial Conduct Board Honorable.
Judicial Campaign Ethics for Magistrates The Rules Governing Judicial Conduct (22 NYCRR part 100) Laura L. Smith, Esq., Chief Counsel of the ACJE Sandra.
The Court System in Texas
Judges GOVT 2306, Module 9.
PRESENTED BY: JUDGE MARK A. SPEISER
Unit 4: Law & the Legal System
Judicial Conduct Commission
Chapter Eight: Judges.
organization and jurisdiction of the federal court system
WHAT LAWYERS SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRACY
Unit 12 The Executive Branch in the USA
Unit 4: Law & the Legal System
The Judicial Branch Chapter 7.
Judicial Branch Not Guilty!!!.
Judicial Branch Not Guilty!!!.
The State Judicial Branch
Joint Ethics Regulation DOD R
Factors that weaken democracies
PROMOTING JUDICIAL ETHICS IN THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF SURINAME
Presentation transcript:

Missouri Judicial Discipline System Mo Const. Art. 5 s. 24: Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline  6 Members  2 laypersons appointed by Gove  2 lawyers appointed by MoBar Bd of Governors  1 judge of Court of Appeals, selected by CofA judges (majority of those sitting)  1 circuit judge, selected by circuit judges (same maj.)  Procedure governed by MoSCt Rule 12  Jur. limited to conduct of sitting judges -- candidates bound by MCJC (MRPC 8.2), but disciplined as lawyers!  4 votes req. for removal, suspension, discipline or reprimand

Problem pp  (a) Actions of Calvin while a candidate for election as judge  membership in club that discriminates by gender – 1990 MCJC Canon 2(C) and commentary, 2008 MCJC Rule 3.6(A): no membership in any org that practices “invidious discrimination” for a judge; no such rule for a candidate not already a sitting judge  statement to club members that if teacher having sex relations w/ students came before him, she would get the max – specific case  this case likely to come before his court him?  general statement about sentencing: “almost every criminal who came before me” would get max  1990 Canon 5(A)(3)(d)(1): no “pledges, promises or commitments inconsistent with impartial performance of jud. duties”  20o8 Rule 4.1(A)(13) same  Is this such a commitment? Is it protected by White, n. 2 p. 523?

Problem p Q. (a) c’t’d  Allowing club members to form a campaign committee for him and receive large contributions from each member  1990 MCJC Canon 5(C)(2) permits the formation of such committees for elective judicial office  Allowing friends to write letters to the editor, etc., telling how tough on crime Calvin would be compared with opponent  do we know exactly what was said in these letters?  reproduce C’s statement to them about teacher?  misrepresentations of opponent? Canon 5(A)(3)(d)

Problem p c’t’d  participation in a fundraiser for wildlife support organization  1990 Canon 4(C)(3)(b): applies only to sitting judges : no personal solicitation of funds except among other judges not subordinate  Sexist jokes at that fundraiser  1990 Canon 5(A)(3)(a): maintain dignity appropriate to judicial office, act in manner consistent with impartiality, integrity, etc.  acceptance of gift of fishing equipment at that fundraiser – campaign contribution? If so, may not be accepted personally, MCJC Canon 5(C)(2), 2008 Rule 4.1(A)(8)

Problem pp c’t’d  (b) actions of Calvin as candidate for appointive judicial office: any difference?  1990 Canon 5(B)(1): no solicitation of funds, through committee or otherwise  Canon 5(B)(2): limits on political activity  may communicate with appointing authority  may solicit support of orgs. regularly making recommendations for such appointments  If not already sitting, may continue active membership in political organizations

Problem pp c’t’d  (c) actions of C as sitting judge candidate for re- election  discriminatory club membership – Canon 2(C) – 1 st A. Freedom of Association?  intimate, purely private activity?  comment on teacher: Canon 3(A)(9) -- is it public? Would it interfere with a fair trial or hearing?  Officership in wildlife organization? Canon 4(C)(3) – non-profit, charitable, civic, etc.?  Conduct at fundraiser?