201 529 5151 www.hydroqual.com SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Water Pollution
Advertisements

Use of Mechanistic Modeling to Enhance Derivation of Great Bay TN Criteria and Inform Restoration Strategy Thomas W. Gallagher,
©2010 Elsevier, Inc. Chapter 18 Trophic State and Eutrophication Dodds & Whiles.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 The Utility of the Bays Eutrophication Model in the Harbor Outfall Monitoring Program James Fitzpatrick HydroQual,
Recent enhancements of the OTIS model to simulate multi-species reactive transport in stream-aquifer systems. Ryan T. Bailey 1 Department of Civil & Environmental.
Design of Optimum Selective Withdrawal Operation for Temperature Management at Round Butte Dam, Lake Billy Chinook, Oregon Presentation to WEFTEC 2000.
Mechanistic crop modelling and climate reanalysis Tom Osborne Crops and Climate Group Depts. of Meteorology & Agriculture University of Reading.
SJR DO Depletion Modeling: Model Calibration, Adaptive Management, User Guidance Andy Thuman, P.E. (HydroQual) Laurie De.
Problem Description: Networked Aquatic Microbial Observing System (NAMOS) Problem Description: Networked Aquatic Microbial Observing System (NAMOS) Proposed.
Determination of sediment phosphorus concentrations in St. Albans Bay, Lake Champlain: Assessment of internal loading and seasonal variations of phosphorus.
Coupled physical-biogeochemical modeling of the Louisiana Dead Zone Katja Fennel Dalhousie University Rob Hetland Texas A&M Steve DiMarco.
St. Johns River Water Supply Impact Study by Getachew Belaineh Ph. D., P.H. 1 Brian McGurk P.G. 1 Louis Motz Ph. D., P.E 2 Follow up Review meeting March,
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
A T HREE- D IMENSIONAL W ATER Q UALITY M ODEL OF S OUTHERN P UGET S OUND Greg Pelletier, P.E., Mindy Roberts, P.E., Skip Albertson, P.E., and Jan Newton,
Neuse Estuary Eutrophication Model: Predictions of Water Quality Improvement By James D. Bowen UNC Charlotte.
Lower Cape Fear River Estuary Model Progress Report Jim Bowen, UNC Charlotte October 11, 2007 Charlotte, NC (via Centra)
Modeling Support for James River Chlorophyll Study Dave Jasinski, CEC Jim Fitzpatrick, HDR|HrydroQual Andrew Parker, Tetra Tech Harry Wang, VIMS Presentation.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Model Upgrade Projects Blue Plains Regional Committee Briefing November 30, 2004 Presented by: Steve Bieber Metropolitan Washington.
Development of a Watershed-to- Very-Near-Shore Model for Pathogen Fate and Transport Sheridan K. Haack Atiq U. Syed Joseph W. Duris USGS, Lansing, MI.
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
SJR DO Depletion Modeling Progress Update Andy Thuman, P.E. (HydroQual) Laurie De Rosa (HydroQual) Russ Brown, Ph.D. (Jones.
Focus Group Meeting: September 27, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
Third annual CarboOcean meeting, 4.-7.December 2007, Bremen, Segschneider et al. Uncertainties of model simulations of anthropogenic carbon uptake J. Segschneider,
Update on Chesapeake Bay Model Upgrade Projects Briefing to Potomac River Integrated Monitoring Stakeholders March 20, 2006 Presented by: Steve Bieber.
Jeff Forbes (CU), Xiaoli Zhang (CU), Sean Bruinsma (CNES), Jens Oberheide (Clemson U), Jason Leonard (CU) 1 Coupling to the Lower Atmosphere, an Observation-Based.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE To identify and evaluate a suite of management scenarios to address the Old Tampa Bay issues using integrated modeling tools.
Water Quality Modeling of Bonnet Carré Freshwater Flows in the Pontchartrain Estuary Rachel Roblin Alex McCorquodale Ioannis Georgiou.
WATERS Network MISSION STATEMENT: To transform understanding of the Earth’s water and related cycles across spatial and temporal scales to enable forecasting.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
Review of DWSC Modeling- what should we do next? Russ Brown, Jones & Stokes DO-TMDL Technical Work Group May 16,2006.
Effects of Climate Change on Ecosystems and Natural Resources of the Yukon River Basin.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
 Instrumentation  CTD  Dissolved Oxygen Sensor  ADCP/ Current Meters  Oxygen Titrations  Nutrient Concentrations Circulation and Chemical Tracer.
Ice Cover in New York City Drinking Water Reservoirs: Modeling Simulations and Observations NIHAR R. SAMAL, Institute for Sustainable Cities, City University.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Hydrodynamic, Water Quality, and Ecological Modeling to Assess System-wide Impacts.
Vientiane – Nong Khai modelling status National consultation with TNMC 20th of April 2006, Bangkok MRCS WUP-FIN.
January 27, 2011 Summary Background on Delta Flow and Habitat Relationships Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Panut Manoonvoravong Bureau of research development and hydrology Department of water resources.
Applying WARMF to the SJR Replaces DSM2 from Bear Creek to Mossdale Replaces DSM2 from Bear Creek to Mossdale Offers expanded model domain, including tributaries.
WLRD Science Seminar Sammamish River Water Quality Model Status Report November 19, 2002.
NYWEA WSTC at West Point, NY September 15, 2009 The Impacts of Reservoir Drawdown on Water Quality in NYC’s Catskill and Delaware Reservoirs by L. Janus,
Development of the Neuse Estuary Eutrophication Model: Background and Calibration By James D. Bowen UNC Charlotte.
Development, Testing and Application of the Multi-Block LTFATE Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Model Earl J. Hayter See instructions for customizing.
Focus Group Meeting: November 12, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
DSM2 Analysis of Water Level and Water Quality in the South Delta Presented to California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum February 26, 2007 Fingerprinting.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Regional Hydro-Ecologic Simulation System (RHESSys) Christina Tague Bren School of environmental science and management University of California, Santa.
San Joaquin River Water Quality Modeling- A Beginning SJR-DO TMDL Technical Work Group Presentation Russ Brown- Jones & Stokes January 20, 2005.
Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Review – Ann Arbor, MI November 15-18, Invasive Species Process Studies —the foundation of ecosystem.
Technical Support in Engineering Construction Phase of Craney Island Eastward Expansion Mac Sisson, Harry Wang, Jian Shen, Albert Kuo, and Wenping Gong.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
What is the Bradshaw model?
Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California
High Rock Lake, Yadkin River Basin Scoping Monitoring Study
Theme 1: Biological uptake and trace element bioavailability
Light and Primary Production in Shallow, Turbid Tributaries
Comparison of modeled and observed bed erodibility in the York River estuary, Virginia, over varying time scales Danielle Tarpley, Courtney K. Harris,
Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)
AQUATOX v. 3.1 Host Institution/URL
in the Neversink River Basin, New York
San Luis Drain Shutoff Simulations and Link-Node Recalibration
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Image courtesy of NASA/GSFC
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Complex Estuarine Dynamics
SJR Technical Working Group March 25, 2004
Typology and classification of coastal waters in Estonia
A Few Model Calibration Ideas
Presentation transcript:

SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006

2 2 SJR Models – Study Area Downstream  DSM2-delta  ECOMSED/RCA  Tidal portion from Vernalis to Jersey Island Upstream  DSM2-sjr  Free-flowing portion from Stevinson to Vernalis Source: Kratzer, et al. (2004) USGS WRI

3 3 Model Grid R2 R5 TB RSAN058 R4 R3 R1

4 4 Modeling Effort Models calibrated/validated from on a continuous basis Hydrodynamic model includes tidal transport and calculation of temperature Water quality model uses tidal transport and includes the following parameters:  EC, BOD, DO, eutrophication (nutrients & phytoplankton), TSS

5 5 Model Calibration Period Flows USGS Vernalis Gage Model Period Annual Average Summer Average (J-S)

6 6

7 7

8 8 DWSC Hydrodynamic Modeling Hydrodynamic model calibration:  Model output compared to observed stage, flow & temperature  Compares well with data and DSM2 output  Reproduces daily temperature stratification  Further work may be needed in the Turning Basin & near Old River/Mossdale

9 9 Temperature Calibration

10 Temperature Calibration 2002 Data near R Model near R5

11 Flow Calibration Increased Old River flow between Jun-Aug by 530 cfs

12 DWSC Water Quality Modeling Water quality model calibration:  Model output compared to observed DO, BOD, nutrients, chl-a, TSS & EC  Focus on reproducing low DO events, stratification & algal dynamics  Includes a sediment flux submodel  Post-processor to view output (HIMS) u Including web-based viewer

13 Light Extinction (Lehman, 2005) Ideally – light data with depth Determine Ke using:  I = I o e -KeH Actuality – secchi depth data Determine Ke using:  Ke = 1.8/secchi

14 Light Extinction Relationship Used coupled secchi, TSS & chla data to develop relationship (Di Toro, 1978)  Ke = 0.052NVSS VSS Chla  VSS = 0.2TSS (based on Vernalis data)  Ke = TSS Chla Model calculates Ke as a function of modeled TSS and Chla

15 Spatial Variation Secchi depth increases in DWC (lower chla & TSS) Decreased Ke in DWSC vs upstream SJR

16 Algal Stoichiometry Data from Vernalis  Limited POC data in DWSC Redfield ratios  C/N = 5.7 (Data – 3.1)  C/P = 41 (Data - 32) C/Chl Range =  Data – 37, Lehman – 40 Used Redfield & C/Chl=40

17 Other Model Inputs Solar radiation – CIMIS Lodi West  ly/d, variations due to weather events Boundary Conditions:  Upstream based on Vernalis  Downstream based on Jersey & Potato Pt  Internal sloughs based on river data Atmospheric Reaeration  Based on wind speed formula (Banks, 1975 & Banks & Herrera, 1977)

18 Hourly Wind Speed and KL at R&R Island Source: DWR

19 Model Settling/Deposition Water column settling – 2.5 m/d Deposition to sediment – variable  DWSC: m/d (higher in TB)  SJR: m/d w/ adjustments to assist in TSS & chla calibration Settling rates set based on calibration

20 Model Parameters

21 Stockton RWCF Effluent

22 DWSC SOD Data & Model Output (Litton, 2003)

23 DO & Chla Calibration Vernalis (BC) Mossdale

24 R1 R2

25 R3 R4

26 R5 R6

27 R7 R8

28 Spatial DO & Chla Transects (June-October Average)

29 Spatial Nutrient Transects

30 DO Deficit Components (R5) Source Sink Ka – Source SOD - Sink

31 Summary DWSC WQ Model calibration completed & final report issued (Task 4 – May 2006) Provides finer temporal & vertical resolution than previous modeling studies  Stratification, diurnal variation, DO components Can be used to assess DO aeration device impacts (e.g., location, spreading, benefit) Links upstream & downstream water quality for assessing management alternatives

32 Recommendations Further testing of models to more recent DWSC data (hydro & WQ)  Different flow regimes, DO levels, etc. More detailed data/modeling of the Mossdale/Old River area of the SJR  Algal growth between Vernalis & Mossdale More information on carbon dynamics  POC/DOC data, internal loads, DO effects

33 Recommendations Investigate algal dynamics (2 species)  Studies have shown different algal species  Include more than 1 species in model with different algal growth dynamics  May help Vernalis-Mossdale algal growth Use models in adaptive management approach  Use models (as currently calibrated) to investigate potential controls while still collecting data & completing modeling to improve the effective use of the DWSC model as a management tool

34 Questions & Answers Contact info: Andy Thuman Laurie De Rosa HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ (201) x7184

35 Light Extinction Comparison