SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006
2 2 SJR Models – Study Area Downstream DSM2-delta ECOMSED/RCA Tidal portion from Vernalis to Jersey Island Upstream DSM2-sjr Free-flowing portion from Stevinson to Vernalis Source: Kratzer, et al. (2004) USGS WRI
3 3 Model Grid R2 R5 TB RSAN058 R4 R3 R1
4 4 Modeling Effort Models calibrated/validated from on a continuous basis Hydrodynamic model includes tidal transport and calculation of temperature Water quality model uses tidal transport and includes the following parameters: EC, BOD, DO, eutrophication (nutrients & phytoplankton), TSS
5 5 Model Calibration Period Flows USGS Vernalis Gage Model Period Annual Average Summer Average (J-S)
6 6
7 7
8 8 DWSC Hydrodynamic Modeling Hydrodynamic model calibration: Model output compared to observed stage, flow & temperature Compares well with data and DSM2 output Reproduces daily temperature stratification Further work may be needed in the Turning Basin & near Old River/Mossdale
9 9 Temperature Calibration
10 Temperature Calibration 2002 Data near R Model near R5
11 Flow Calibration Increased Old River flow between Jun-Aug by 530 cfs
12 DWSC Water Quality Modeling Water quality model calibration: Model output compared to observed DO, BOD, nutrients, chl-a, TSS & EC Focus on reproducing low DO events, stratification & algal dynamics Includes a sediment flux submodel Post-processor to view output (HIMS) u Including web-based viewer
13 Light Extinction (Lehman, 2005) Ideally – light data with depth Determine Ke using: I = I o e -KeH Actuality – secchi depth data Determine Ke using: Ke = 1.8/secchi
14 Light Extinction Relationship Used coupled secchi, TSS & chla data to develop relationship (Di Toro, 1978) Ke = 0.052NVSS VSS Chla VSS = 0.2TSS (based on Vernalis data) Ke = TSS Chla Model calculates Ke as a function of modeled TSS and Chla
15 Spatial Variation Secchi depth increases in DWC (lower chla & TSS) Decreased Ke in DWSC vs upstream SJR
16 Algal Stoichiometry Data from Vernalis Limited POC data in DWSC Redfield ratios C/N = 5.7 (Data – 3.1) C/P = 41 (Data - 32) C/Chl Range = Data – 37, Lehman – 40 Used Redfield & C/Chl=40
17 Other Model Inputs Solar radiation – CIMIS Lodi West ly/d, variations due to weather events Boundary Conditions: Upstream based on Vernalis Downstream based on Jersey & Potato Pt Internal sloughs based on river data Atmospheric Reaeration Based on wind speed formula (Banks, 1975 & Banks & Herrera, 1977)
18 Hourly Wind Speed and KL at R&R Island Source: DWR
19 Model Settling/Deposition Water column settling – 2.5 m/d Deposition to sediment – variable DWSC: m/d (higher in TB) SJR: m/d w/ adjustments to assist in TSS & chla calibration Settling rates set based on calibration
20 Model Parameters
21 Stockton RWCF Effluent
22 DWSC SOD Data & Model Output (Litton, 2003)
23 DO & Chla Calibration Vernalis (BC) Mossdale
24 R1 R2
25 R3 R4
26 R5 R6
27 R7 R8
28 Spatial DO & Chla Transects (June-October Average)
29 Spatial Nutrient Transects
30 DO Deficit Components (R5) Source Sink Ka – Source SOD - Sink
31 Summary DWSC WQ Model calibration completed & final report issued (Task 4 – May 2006) Provides finer temporal & vertical resolution than previous modeling studies Stratification, diurnal variation, DO components Can be used to assess DO aeration device impacts (e.g., location, spreading, benefit) Links upstream & downstream water quality for assessing management alternatives
32 Recommendations Further testing of models to more recent DWSC data (hydro & WQ) Different flow regimes, DO levels, etc. More detailed data/modeling of the Mossdale/Old River area of the SJR Algal growth between Vernalis & Mossdale More information on carbon dynamics POC/DOC data, internal loads, DO effects
33 Recommendations Investigate algal dynamics (2 species) Studies have shown different algal species Include more than 1 species in model with different algal growth dynamics May help Vernalis-Mossdale algal growth Use models in adaptive management approach Use models (as currently calibrated) to investigate potential controls while still collecting data & completing modeling to improve the effective use of the DWSC model as a management tool
34 Questions & Answers Contact info: Andy Thuman Laurie De Rosa HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ (201) x7184
35 Light Extinction Comparison