1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership School Based Partnerships: Using Social Network Analysis to Measure Progress Towards Distributed Leadership Carl Hanssen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seizing An Opportunity To Build Teacher Content Knowledge: Lessons Learned From a Mathematician Who Learned Lessons From Teachers! Beth SchefelkerJulie.
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Mathematics for Elementary School Teaching:What Is It and How Do Teachers Learn It? Raven McCrory, Michigan State University Deborah Ball, University of.
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
Maximizing Evaluation Impact by Maximizing Methods: Social Network Analysis Combined with Traditional Methods for Measuring Collaboration Carl Hanssen,
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Mathematics Learning Walks: Focused Observations, Collaborative Conversations, and Effective Feedback Leading to School Improvement Beth SchefelkerLee.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Sharing in Leadership for Student Success Lead Partner:University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) Core Partners:Milwaukee.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 4 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation MSP Regional Conference November
Session Materials  Wiki
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Sharing in Leadership for Student Success National Science Foundation Site Visit, 8–10 June 2005.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Social Network Analysis for Evaluation: Open and Closed Approaches Carl Hanssen November 6, 2008 American Evaluation Association The Milwaukee Mathematics.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Portfolios: A Useful Resource For All Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Beth Schefelker The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee.
Cindy M. Walker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Louisiana Math & Science Teacher Institute (LaMSTI) Overview of External Evaluation and Development of Self-Report Measures of Instructional Leadership.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Update & Next Steps Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC April 2/3, 2009 The Milwaukee Mathematics.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
EVOLUTION OF A CONTINUUM OF MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP
From Compliance to Commitment: Implementing a District- wide Portfolio Initiative Astrid Fossum, Mathematics Teaching Specialist,
Charting the Course for Mathematics Leadership Continuum of Professional Work in a Large Urban District DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 4 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
The Impact of the MMP on Student Achievement Cindy M. Walker, PhD Jacqueline Gosz, MS University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
Welcome To The November MTL Meeting Please move as close to the center of the auditorium when selecting your seats.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Distributed Leadership for Mathematics Bringing Together District, School, & University Leadership to Support Highly Qualified Teachers University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 6 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Where on the World Are You? Supporting & Developing School Based Math Teacher Leaders NCSM Conference, Washington DC April 21, 2009 Astrid Fossum, Mathematics.
Collaboration for Mathematical Preparation and Development at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DeAnn Huinker, Mathematics Education Kevin McLeod,
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership A Path Model for Evaluating Teacher and Student Effects MSP Evaluation Summit II Carl E. Hanssen MMP External Evaluator.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership High School Labs Kevin McLeod and DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional.
Mathematical Preparation and Development of Teachers at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DeAnn Huinker, Mathematics Education Kevin McLeod, Mathematics.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 5 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership The Relationship between MMP Involvement and Student Achievement MPS Research Brief Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting,
Charting a Course for the Future: A Wisconsin Perspective Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Department of Mathematical Sciences MSP STEM Summit.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success MPS Principal Breakfast Milwaukee Public Schools 23 April 2008.
Gifted Academy 4 Day 4 5/2/13. Agenda Welcome Goal Check-in Tuning Protocol Program Evaluation – Principal Interviews Developing a Communication Plan.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Partnership & Institutionalization Carl Hanssen The Evaluation Center Western Michigan University.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Using Social Network Analysis to Understand Links Between Teacher Leader Roles and Student Achievement Carl Hanssen.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), Using Properties to Reason through Tough Questions.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Changes in School Learning Networks from 2006 to 2009 Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC DeAnn Huinker University.
Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special Education Learners Strengthening Content Knowledge and Collaboration of General and Special Education Teachers.
Internal Evaluation of MMP Cindy M. Walker Jacqueline Gosz Razia Azen University of Wisconsin Milwaukee.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Deepening Teacher Math Content Knowledge MMP Key Components of High Quality Professional Development DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
The Work of the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod UW-Milwaukee Ningbo University (China) Delegation Higher Education Workshop.
Building Effective Relationships That Lead to Instructional Change in Mathematics Classrooms National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics San Diego,
EVALUATING A MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH M.ED. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Knowledge, Pedagogy, Practice or Student Achievement:
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Comprehensive Planning
State Board of Education Progress Update
Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership School Based Partnerships: Using Social Network Analysis to Measure Progress Towards Distributed Leadership Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee MSP Learning Network Conference Washington, DC January 2008

2 Agenda  Context  Methods  Results  Conclusions

3 Evaluation Goals  Help the MMP better serve its constituents and improve its effectiveness  Serve the broader mathematics education community through documentation and dissemination of MMP activities

4 MMP Evaluation Logic Model Student Achievement Teacher Content & Pedagogical Knowledge Math Faculty Involvement Learning Team Effort School Buy-in Teacher Involvement New Courses District Buy-in MPA Ownership MATC Buy-In UWM Buy-In Classroom Practice MMP Activities Proximal Outcomes Distal Outcomes

5 Focus for this study Student Achievement Learning Team Efforts School Buy-in Teacher Involvement Classroom Practice Distributed Leadership

6 Method  20 Schools from 2006 & 2007  Purposefully selected for diversity in School Type Geography Student Achievement MMP Involvement

7 SNA Survey  Open survey approach Teachers & administrators Provide names of individuals with whom you communicated with about mathematics Demographics  Other data School staff lists Student achievement results in terms of % proficient

8 Analysis  Maps identify MTL MTS Teachers Principal Literacy Coach Others in school Others outside  Statistics Network density (%) In-Degree (z-score)

9 1a. 2006

10 1b. 2007

11 2a. 2006

12 2b. 2007

13 3a. 2006

14 3b. 2007

15 4a. 2006

16 4b. 2007

18 MMP Distributed Leadership Continuum LowHigh Loose Network MTL Not Central Few Links to MTL MTS Outside Few Links to MTS Tight Network MTL Central Many Links to MTL MTS Inside Many Links to MTS 12345

19 Distributed Leadership & Student Achievement This is the same school 2 years in a row!

20 Overall Conclusions  There is support for the argument that schools that have more fully adopted MMP principles are demonstrating stronger outcomes — distributed leadership is one manifestation of MMP adoption.  Creating distributed leadership in a school takes time—and communication is critical  There is tremendous variability across MPS in the extent to which schools have adopted MMP principles and ideas

21 Conclusion  No single factor—e.g., distributed leadership, teacher MKT, learning team performance—is sufficient for success, but all may be necessary  Schools that are performing well do many of the things MMP promotes well, and realize synergy between many of these activities and principles