Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Degree SLO Workshop 17 Sept Workshop Learning Outcomes Faculty who participate in the Workshop will: – Know the accreditation requirements and timeline.

Advertisements

Student Services Student Learning Outcomes Becky Reetz, SS SLO Facilitator Dr. Chialin Hsieh, Director of PRIE April 4, /4/12PRIE & SSSLO1.

Convocation Fall 2010 E lauhoe mai na wa’a, i ke ka, i ka hoe; i ka hoe, i ke ka; pae aku i ka aina. Everybody paddle the canoes together; bail and paddle,

Institutional Effectiveness Committee January

The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.

The ACCJC Rubric and Beyond Julie Bruno, Sierra College Susan Clifford, ACCJC Fred Hochstaedter Monterey Peninsula College.

Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo College Carlotta Campbell, College of Alameda Lesley Kawaguchi, Santa Monica College.

Assessment of Learning at the Peralta Community Colleges Engaging the College Community in Assessment Opportunities and Transforming the Institutional.

Ivy Tech and the HLC Assessment Academy Learning College Conference February 26-27, 2009.

System Office Performance Management

WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.

Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.

Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.

Program Assessment, WASC and Cal Poly Pomona Bob Hurt Faculty Associate for Program Assessment and Academic Program Review.

To 2012… and Beyond Finishing what we have started…

ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.

All College Day August 24, Accreditation is for everyone REAFFIRMED.

Presenters: Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Tracy Schneider, Solano College Facilitator: Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest.

Institutional Effectiveness and Student Learning: Integration of Student and Learning Support Services ASCCC Accreditation Institute 2013 Kevin Bontenbal,

Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.

Proficiency level for Student Learning Outcomes - March 15, 2013  ACCJC College Status Report on Student Learning Outcomes Implementation  Respond to.

August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.

Peralta Community Colleges: Environments of Effective Learning and Innovation. January

ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.

PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.

Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)

Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.

Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.

All College Day August 23, 2013 The Homestretch to Reaffirmation! REAFFIRMED.

Assessment Workshop College of San Mateo February 2006.

Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.

Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.

ASCCC Accreditation InstituteFebruary 10, APPLYING ACCJC GUIDELINES TO SLO/ASSESSMENT: 2012 PROFICIENCY INTO PRACTICE Marcy Alancraig,

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Peralta Community Colleges: Environments of Effective Learning and Innovation. January

Mary Pape Toño Ramirez SLO Progress Report.

Strengthening Student Success Summit Strengthening Student Success Summit November 17, Student Services and Student Success Assessment, Dialogue.

S LOs What is New and Due in the Assessment Process: A focus on continued improvement in academic year NOTE: For reference, hyperlinks to resources.

MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.

Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”

STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.

Ben Clark Training Center February 2,  Course – measures student learning upon completion of a particular course  Program – measures student learning.

Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.

Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,

Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.

What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.

Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.

Closing the Loop: SLOs, GE SLOs, Assessment, Curriculum, Program Review, Planning, and Budgeting Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo College Janet Fulks, Bakersfield.

Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.

FLEX Day August 23, Moreno Valley Assessment Committee  Larissa Broyles – HSS  Dan Clark – COMM  Lisa Hausladen – HHPS  Cheryl Honore – BITS.

A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.

Program SLOACs Sponsored by Staff Development Presented by Alice Mecom Student Center October 15 and November 5 1 – 4 pm.

An Analysis of the Grade 3 Department of Basic Education workbooks as curriculum tools Ursula Hoadley & Jaamia Galant University of Cape Town Presentation.

SLO P ROCESSES G UIDE This guide is a compilation of a series of SLO presentations over the last several years. This guide will serve as a review or for.

Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.

4/16/07 SACS Reaffirmation Process Susan P. Himburg SACS Director of Reaffirmation of Accreditation.

Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.

Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.

1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.

Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair

Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015

Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.

Still Lovin’ those Outcomes

PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017

Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007

Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)

Hot Topics! Accreditation and the 2012 Standards What’s New?

Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance

Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.

Peralta Community Colleges: Environments of Effective Learning and Innovation. January 2012.

Presentation transcript:

Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee

ACCJC Accreditation Rubric for Institutional Effectiveness Overview

Three Areas of the Rubric Three areas have consistently emerged as difficult for colleges and visiting teams in the past I. Program Review II. Planning III. Student Learning Outcomes

Purpose of the Rubric Provide “common language” for what is meant by full compliance with the standards Increase consistency across college self study narratives and visiting team evaluations

Additional Guidance Rubrics do not set new criteria or standards by which an institution is evaluated Rather, listed behaviors are meant to be examples of behavior that is indicative of implementation stage

Levels of Implementation for Each of the Three Areas

Sample Page

Real Expectations

What’s expected? Program Review PlanningSLOs Level 1: Awareness Level 2: Development Level 3: Proficiency Level 4: Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement

Program Review: Level 4 Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement Program review processes are ongoing, systematic. Program review processes are refined to improve institutional effectiveness. Results of program review are used to continually refine and improve program practices.

What’s expected? Program Review PlanningSLOs Level 1: Awareness Level 2: Development Level 3: Proficiency Level 4: Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement

Planning: Level 4 Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement The institution uses ongoing and systematic evaluation and planning to refine its key processes. There is ongoing dialogue about institutional effectiveness; data and analyses are widely distributed and used.

Planning: Level 4 Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement There is ongoing review and adaptation of evaluation and planning processes There is consistent and continuous commitment to improving student learning

What’s expected? Program Review PlanningSLOs Level 1: Awareness Level 2: Development Level 3: Proficiency Level 4: Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement

Student Learning Outcomes: Level 3 Proficiency SLOs and authentic assessment are in place for courses, programs and degrees. Results of assessment are being used for improvement. There is widespread institutional dialogue about the results. Decision-making includes dialogue on the results of assessment

Student Learning Outcomes: Level 3 Proficiency Comprehensive assessment reports exist and are completed on a regular basis. Course SLOs are aligned with degree SLOs. Students demonstrate awareness of goals and purposes of courses and programs in which they are enrolled.

Key Messages Colleges should engage in ongoing and systematic assessment of all processes Colleges should have clear and meaningful linkage between Student Learning Outcomes Program Review Planning and Resource Allocation

Key Messages

What do we do with this Rubric? Use it to guide activities and timelines Will your college be engaged at the appropriate level by Fall 2011? Is your program or service engaged at the appropriate level? If not, what can be done now to get there?

What do we do with this Rubric?

What can YOU do?