Heppner Jr/Sr High School Credit for Proficiency in the Classroom (C4P) Clearing Up the Target!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
MTSS Trainers: Janet Stephenson Melissa Long School Psychologist: Griselle Zeno.
A NEW MODEL OF TIERED INTERVENTION REQUIRED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT AS OF JULY 1, PRESENTED BY JESS GRAYUM Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Theory of Action If teachers…. Curriculum: Teach targeted guided Math lessons based on reading data. Ensure student with disabilities are in the general.
Parents as Partners in Education
Developing, Implementing, and Monitoring Interventions Janice Garland Lynn Sodat OSI Focus Schools Conference September 17-18, 2012.
Central Union High School District Board of Trustees Meeting April 16, 2013.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Standards help teachers ensure their students have the skills and knowledge they need by providing clear goals for student learning. Common standards.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Puzzle of an Elementary Master Schedule Putting the Pieces Together!
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
RTI at the High School Level JoAnne Malloy, MSW Project Director Institute on Disability/UCED University of New Hampshire Maria Agorastou, MSW Research.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Supporting K-12 Mathematics Intervention Presenter: Jameson Rienick, Mathematics Project Specialist
Overview of School Improvement Process
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
The Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum January 29, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
D62 Response to Intervention
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL OUR STORY… RTI Success in a REAL Comprehensive High School John Jorgensen, Curriculum Director Karinne Tharaldson Jones, Principal.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
Strengths Challenges  Helped to organize thoughts and activities  Gave better direction  Opportunity to share with fellow counselors and county officials.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
ASSESSMENT Parkway Academic Assessment: Federal and State Influences on the Parkway School District Curriculum Council Parkway School District January.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Improving Math and Science Achievement in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools: Implications for Professional.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
2  Tier 1: › Is for ALL students › Is highly effective teaching and learning › Contains the core curriculum › Includes differentiated learning › Formatively.
Scaling Up: Responding to Financial Constraints Through the Lens of Implementation North Santiam School District Fall Conference 2010.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
How North Clackamas Has Implemented RTI September 30, 2010 at the Eugene Hilton  Vivian Garrison, Director of Special Education  Matt McDermott, TOSA.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Student Growth Goals for Coaching Conversations. Requirements for Student Growth Goals Time line Reference to an Enduring Skill Proficiency and Growth.
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
Documented District Support Needs
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Local Control Accountability Plan
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Comprehensive Planning
Presentation transcript:

Heppner Jr/Sr High School Credit for Proficiency in the Classroom (C4P) Clearing Up the Target!

The Target? The Target?

Background  7-12 Comprehensive School  245 kids to 190 kids  14.5 FTE  97% White  75% College Bound- 100% graduation rate  40% Free and Reduced Lunches  Very Supportive Community

Why?   Shrinking- need 8 period day   Pressure- get better   Staff/Contract- willing and able to change   Systematic approach to learning   One language   Grading fidelity   Flexibility

Proficiency at HHS  Loose vs. Tight  Grading Policy  Training  Built while flying  Defined targets  Assessments/Rubrics  Sufficiency/Proficiency  Teaching vs. Learning

Nuts and Bolts  Multiple Assessments- some color coded  Tutorial- contract time  Created Study Guides- no gotchas  Progress to semester  Directly assesses target/standard  Clear Correlation- practice and assessments  ABCI- advisory  85% Threshold

Nuts and Bolts Cont.  Numerous interventions  Formative assessment  Hybrid Block  Extension classes  Syllabi  Incompletes- communication  Eligibility

Together We Believe  This is what we do- it is our #1 priority!  Power in the developed!  You practice until you can’t get it wrong!  The C4P system is for all kids to be able to demonstrate their skills in a measurable way.  Skills are directly assessed to meeting the Essential Skills component of the new graduation requirements and job/industry standards and requirements!

We Believe Continued  C4P brings focus to the standards (targets) further than ever before by aligning our grading practices to individual standards (targets).  It is a way to challenge students in a new manner that has tangible results that can be measured with grades.  Easier way of monitoring student progress so interventions can be put in place earlier.  Students will be evaluated on success using performance/project assessments- and not sit and get lecture.

HHS Good To Great  Cleared the Target- no surprises  Everything we do has a systems based approach  4 th year of implementation- no student fails  Assess the standard and not the activity  Learning is driven by rubrics and study guides  Focused instruction through differentiation, making outcomes more viable for all students- kind of an IEP for each student  Career Related Learning Standards- embedded 10% of grade

Results?  Proficiency (system) and Sufficiency (craft/art)  Communication with parents and students (ongoing)  Building assessments/structure (finally)  Tracking students (unlike never before)  Interventions in place (not more of the same)  More upper level classes (5 AP and 10 Honors- Eastern Promise)

Results Cont.  Improved Test Scores  System Fidelity (have consistency)  Professional Development (continued plan)  Teacher Leadership (our teachers are district leaders with academic achievement)  Change is nothing (bring on Common Core )  Teamwork/Collaboration (beyond belief)  Problem Solving (stretches staff)

System Scores 2009/102010/112011/12 Math82%66%80% Reading77%73%83% Attendance94%95%96%

System Results Cont. 2009/ / /12 Special Education Grades Behavior Referrals Grades

Make it Simple- Clear the Target!

Contact Daye Stone- Principal ex Troy Morgan- Math Teacher ex. 2516