AYP Prediction By Diagnostics in the Educational Data Warehouse.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.

Advertisements

Closing the Achievement Gap Using Safe Harbor To Target Students Not Making AYP October 23, 2008 Information for this presentation are adapted from CDDRE.

FY2006 FCAT Results. Reading Grade 3 FCAT SSS Reading Percent Level 1 All Students Tested.

FY2007 FCAT SSS. Grade 3 FCAT SSS Reading Percent Level 1 All Students Tested.

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Track Performance Division of Performance Accountability.

No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.

ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.

1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.

Conditions Required to Make AYP include the following: Participation Rate on the State Assessment Graduation Rate Performance Levels * Minimum Targets.

Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Minnesota’s New Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”

Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.

Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.

Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)

OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”

School Improvement Plan Guidance Presented by the School Improvement And Educational Data Warehouse.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.

MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.

1 Putting It All Together Training August 18, 2009 School Name (and motto or theme) ODMS PD SIP.

Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.

Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement

1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.

1 Differentiated Accountability. 2 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability Model On July 28, 2008, Florida was named one of six states to pilot a differentiated.

Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.

DataDirector: Using Customized Reports for School Improvement Fall 2010 Jennifer DeGrie and Stan Masters Lenawee ISD.

The Many Meanings of “Multiple Measures” Susan Brookhart Volume 2009, Volume 67:3 ASCD, November 2009, pp

Created by Tammillye Ward Thinkgate Using Thinkgate to Answer the 4 Critical Questions of a PLC What do we want the students to learn? How will we know.

Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.

School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.

FCAT Update Grades FCAT Reading by Achievement Level Grades 3-10.

Annual Student Performance Report September

Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

The School Improvement Process LaSalle County ROE #35

Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.

Twin Rivers Unified School District

PVAAS School Consultation Guide Fall 2010 Session C: 9-12 High School – All Data Tools PVAAS Statewide Core Team

1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.

Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.

DRE Developing Achievement Levels for FCAT 2.0 and Algebra 1 A & S October 11, 2011.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

Adequate Yearly Progress By Allyson, Brette, and Riley.

Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – New Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in the school year, fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation.

University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.

C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.

Including analysis and self-help tools for coordination with Section 618: Table 6.

 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.

Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.

Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.

Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.

Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005

STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions

Wade Hayashida Local District 8

Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.

Solving the Riddle That Is APR Indicator 3

PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL

Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day

End of the Year 4TH GradeData Review

Presentation transcript:

AYP Prediction By Diagnostics in the Educational Data Warehouse

PURPOSE Assist schools with understanding the results of the SSS Diagnostics in relationship to the AYP Proficiency and Safe Harbor Targets.

AYP Prediction By Diagnostics SSS Diagnostic Assessments Results by NCLB Subgroups –Proficiency Targets –Safe Harbor Targets –Percents and Counts

FCAT Level 3 or Above Previous year’s AYP proficiency percentages by subgroups in Reading and Mathematics 51% 56%

Diagnostic Level 3 or Above 58%62% Current year’s AYP proficiency percentages by subgroups in Reading and Mathematics

Population Tested 95% of each subgroup should be tested in reading and mathematics

Percent to make Safe Harbor Diagnostic percentage tested is below 95% of current population.

School

ReadingMath Previous FCAT Percentages School Notice seven out of nine subgroups achieved the proficiency target criteria in reading.

School

SSS Diagnostic Proficient Current Year ReadingMath School Predicted Proficiency population according to Diagnostic results.

School

SSS Diagnostic Non-Proficient Current Year School ReadingMath Predicted Non- Proficient Students according to Diagnostic results.

School

SSS Diagnostic Not Tested Current Year ReadingMath School Monitor Participation Rates

School

SSS Diagnostic Proficiency Target Count ReadingMath Green - Number of students exceeding target Red – Number of students needed to meet target School

SSS Diagnostic Safe Harbor Count School ReadingMath Green: Number of students exceeding Safe Harbor target Red: (–) Number of students needed to meet Safe Harbor target

School District Home Page Educational Data Warehouse

EDW Report Availability

EDW Navigation Page Families >> Test Results >> Diagnostics >> AYP Prediction from Diagnostics – School and Grade Level

SSS Diagnostic Summary Report Diamond Report

New Columns & Icons

Diamond Report Click

Common Assessments

Reading Common Assessments

AYP What I know? What I want to know? What I learned? EDW AYP Reports ?

AYP What I know? What I want to know? What I learned? Formative Assessment 13.?14.?15. AYP & TPR