Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 7 Clear Thinking and Clear Writing By David Kelsey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Thinking Through Intellectual Standards
Advertisements

Descartes’ rationalism
(It’s not that bad…). Error ID  They give you a sentence  Four sections are underlined  E is ALWAYS “No error”  Your job is to identify which one,
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 8 Moore’s Non-naturalism
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 6 Ayer and Emotivism By David Kelsey.
LANGUAGE AND DEFINITION
Gettier’s response to JTB. Gettier put forward many examples to show that JTB doesn’t always mean we have knowledge, that actually in fact sometimes it’s.
CAS LX 502 Semantics 1b. The Truth Ch. 1.
Teaching and Testing Pertemuan 13
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Communication Ms. Morris.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil By David Kelsey.
Ambiguity, Generality, and Definitions
Style, Grammar and Punctuation
What makes communication by language possible? Striking fact (a) If someone utters a sentence and you know which proposition her utterance expresses, then.
THE ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY An essay is argumentative when it argues in favor of a particular position. The essay’s arguments are designed to support the position.
Critical thinking: Ambiguity
Lecture 2: The nature and value of knowledge. Two kinds of knowledge Both philosophy and common sense draw a distinction between knowing how, and knowing.
Reason and Argument Chapter 11 (2/2). Ambiguity The vagueness/ambiguity distinction should be largely familiar by now, but here goes again: –A word or.
History of Philosophy Lecture 1-a What is philosophy? By David Kelsey.
Theme in Literature An Introduction.
Introductions & Conclusions
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
Conditional Statements CS 2312, Discrete Structures II Poorvi L. Vora, GW.
Find it fix it Using the Wrong Word. Using the wrong word It is very important to use the right word when writing. It adds clarity and authority to your.
Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.
Introduction to: Thesis Statements. Thesis Statements: Defined Basic definition: A statement that indicates the main idea or claim in a piece of writing.
CMPF144 FUNDAMENTALS OF COMPUTING THEORY Module 5: Classical Logic.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-a What is philosophy? By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1 (Intro.) By David Kelsey.
History of Philosophy Lecture 10 Writing Philosophy Papers By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 15 Writing Philosophy Papers By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Entity Theories of Meaning. Meaning Talk Theory should make sense of meaning talk Theory should make sense of meaning talk What sorts of things do we.
Chapter Two: Sentence Problems, Run-ons and Fragments The exercises in Chapter Two are based on the Going for the Look module.
Chapter 3 Logic and Language.
Critical Thinking Lecture 7 Clear Thinking and Clear Writing By David Kelsey.
Writing survey questions. What do you want to know?  Before you begin to compose your survey questions, you understand the purpose of your survey and.
The Justified True Belief Theory of Knowledge Today’s objectives: 1)To be able to explain the Justified True Belief theory of knowledge. 2)To learn the.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-a What is philosophy? By David Kelsey.
PART ONE CRITICAL INQUIRY. CHAPTER 1 OBJECTIVES Students will learn to: Define critical thinking Distinguish objective claims from subjective claims Understand.
KNOWLEDGE IS A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI By: Fatima Fuad Azeem.
Critical Thinking Lecture 7a Gettier
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1 By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Critical Thinking Lecture 7 Clear Thinking and Clear Writing By David Kelsey.
Meaning Analysis Ashley Lawrence. Meaning Analysis  Being able to think clearly is the central component of critical thinking  In order to answer a.
Knowledge LO: To understand the distinction between three different types of knowledge. To learn some basic epistemological distinctions. To understand.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1
Introduction to logic Lecture 6 Clear Thinking and Clear Writing By David Kelsey.
Philosophy of Science Lars-Göran Johansson Department of philosophy, Uppsala University
LOGIC, PHILOSOPHY AND HUMAN EXISTENCE
Active vs. Passive Voice. Active versus Passive Voice Many people are confused by whether they are using the active or passive voice when writing, and.
Academic Vocabulary (Words #23-28).
Dummett about realism and anti-realism
Writing Requirements Lecture # 23.
Critical Thinking Lecture 7 Clear Thinking and Clear Writing
Introduction to Humanities Lecture 12 Writing Philosophy Papers
"Developing reading skills: essential reading comprehension skills, reading for the main idea, determining meaning from the context, tips for vocabulary.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 11 Clear Writing
What can you remember? Why did we say Justification is necessary for knowledge? What did we say some of the issues with saying truth is necessary for.
Critical Thinking Lecture 7 Clear Thinking and Clear Writing
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1 What is philosophy?
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1a What is philosophy?
Critical thinking: Ambiguity
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1
Critical thinking: Ambiguity
Critical thinking: Ambiguity
Critical thinking: Ambiguity
Presentation transcript:

Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 7 Clear Thinking and Clear Writing By David Kelsey

Vagueness A vague statement is one whose meaning is indistinct, imprecise or lacks details. Degrees: Vagueness isn’t all or nothing. It comes in degrees. –Apartment example

Clarifying vagueness Desirable vagueness: sometimes vagueness is actually desirable. –Being Romantic Clarify: If we come across a vague statement we can simply try to clarify the lack of detail or indistinct-ness. –Job example

Vagueness and Propositions A vague statement –it is unclear what proposition the sentence asserts at all. –It could be any one of a number of propositions

Ambiguous Claims An ambiguous claim is one that is subject to more than one interpretation. Claim x   –P1 P2 –Jessica rents her house

Semantic Ambiguity A sentence that is semantically ambiguous is one which contains an ambiguous word or phrase. For example: –Jessica is cold. Fixing the ambiguous word

Syntactic Ambiguity A sentence is syntactically ambiguous when it is ambiguous because of its grammar or the way it has been structured or put together. –Susan saw the farmer with binoculars. –You will need a birth certificate or a driver’s license and other photo id. When you have come across a semantic ambiguity you can simply alter the grammar Or you might need to re-write the claim altogether.

Grouping Ambiguity Grouping ambiguity: –unclear whether some word in the sentence is referring to a group or an individual. –Secretaries and Physicians –Lawnmowers and dirt bikes

Composition and Division The fallacy of Division: –When we think that what is true of a group of things taken collectively is automatically true of the same things taken individually. –The Giants example: The fallacy of Composition: –When we think that what holds for a group of things individually holds automatically for the entire collective group. –The Patriots example:

Stipulating Definitions Stipulating definitions : –Terms are used that we don’t fully understand. –A term used is unusual or unfamiliar. –A brand new word –A familiar word is being used in a new way

Precising Definitions Precising definitions: –Used to reduce vagueness or to eliminate ambiguity. –Some examples: Justice: Permissible:

Definitions: by Example & by synonym Definition by example: –We define a term by example when we point to, name or describe one or more examples of something to which the defined term applies. Definition by synonym: –We define a term by synonym when we give another word or phrase that means the same thing as the term being defined. –Bachelors example

Analytical Definitions: their form An Analytical definition is composed of a definiendum and a definiens. –The definiendum: –The definiens: Form: the form of a definition is this: –X =df _____ Which is the definiendum and which is the definiens? –For example, Knowledge =df true belief

Necessary and sufficient conditions We can think of a definition as a set of necessary and sufficient conditions. –The definiens is a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the definiendum. X is a necessary condition of Y if and only if (or iff) we cannot have Y without also having X. –Oxygen and Combustion X is a sufficient condition of Y iff X is all that is needed to get Y. –Being born in the US and citizenship

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions #2 X is both a necessary and sufficient condition of Y iff both –1) we cannot have Y without also having X & –2) X is all that is needed to get Y. Knowledge is JTB

Correct Definitions For a definition to be adequate the definiendum and definiens must be co-extensive. For the defiendum and definiens of any definition to be co-extensive it must be the case that: –1) –2) –What is the extension of a concept?

Co-extensiveness: An example So if your definition of KNOWLEDGE as TRUE BELIEF is correct then: –Everything in the extension of KNOWLEDGE is in the extension of TRUE BELIEF and vice versa.

Testing definitions To determine if a definition is adequate: –determine if its definiendum and definiens are co-extensive. –Is there any item in the extension of one that isn’t in the extension of the other? –Example: Knowledge is true belief All Knowledge is true belief. All true belief is knowledge. Universal generalizations and counterexamples

Counterexamples A counterexample: a case that violates a universal generalization. If we define knowledge as true belief we just need one counterexample to show this definition inadequate. –We need to find a case of knowledge that isn’t what? –Or a case of true belief that isn’t what? –A counterexample: The Belief Game:

Counterexamples #2 Love: Say I define Love as a deep seated feeling composed of compassion & care which one can have for another human being. –Can anyone find a counterexample to this definition? We are looking for either: –a case of love that isn’t ____________ –a case of having this feeling for another human which isn’t ______________ –Any thoughts?