® Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011 QUAlity aware VIsualisation for the Global Earth Observation system of systems GEOVIQUA workshop February, the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
Advertisements

Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS/VIRS Data Record Structure.
EDUCE: WP 6 & 7 D evelopment of an Algorithm to Detect Spikes and Distortions in UV Spectra Charikleia Meleti, Alkis Bais Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Operational Quality Control in Helsinki Testbed Mesoscale Atmospheric Network Workshop University of Helsinki, 13 February 2007 Hannu Lahtela & Heikki.
Advanced Technology Center 1 HMI Rasmus Larsen / Processing Modules Stanford University HMI Team Meeting – May 2003 Processing Module Development Rasmus.
MWR Algorithms (Wentz): Provide and validate wind, rain and sea ice [TBD] retrieval algorithms for MWR data Between now and launch (April 2011) 1. In-orbit.
Field Project Planning, Operations and Data Services Jim Moore, EOL Field Project Services (FPS) Mike Daniels, EOL Computing, Data and Software (CDS) Facility.
Aerosol Climate Change Initiative Stratospheric activities around the Aerosol_CCI project C. Bingen, C. Robert, A. Bourrassa & Aerosol_CCI Team F. Vanhellemont,
FP OntoGrid: Paving the way for Knowledgeable Grid Services and Systems WP8: Use case 1: Quality Analysis for Satellite Missions.
D. McMahon Generation of Ground ODFs ESA ODF-CB 3-5 March 2004 Gerd Soellner (DLR/Col-CC) Co-author Nathalie Gérard.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
ENVISAT Validation Workshop - Frascati - 9–13 December 2002 Opening Session:  Welcome [G. Kohlhammer]  Workshop Objectives and Organisation [H. Laur]
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
Sentinel-3 Validation Team (S3VT) Meeting ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy, th November 2013 General Presentation Template for S3VT meeting Project name.
Data Management Subsystem Jeff Valenti (STScI). DMS Context PRDS - Project Reference Database PPS - Proposal and Planning OSS - Operations Scripts FOS.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
Generic Instrument Processing Facility Interface Specifications A. BuongiornoFrascati 12 /10/2012 ESA EOP-GS 1.
Y.J. Meijer, GECA, II GALION WS, ESA’s Generic Environment for Calibration/validation Analysis (GECA) Yasjka Meijer et al. European Space Agency.
MODIS Workshop An Introduction to NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS), Terra, and the MODIS Instrument Michele Thornton
® GRDC Hydrologic Metadata - core concepts - 5 th, WMO/OGC Hydrology DWG New York, CCNY, August 11 – 15, 2014 Irina Dornblut, GRDC of WMO at BfG Copyright.
Data discovery and data processing for environmental research infrastructures Roberto Cossu ENVRI WP4 leader ESA.
S&T in GEO FP7 projects Contributions and Benefits Maud van den Broek.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Developing GOES and POES Land Surface Temperature Products Yunyue Yu 1.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Aristeidis K. Georgoulias Contribution of Democritus University of Thrace-DUTH in AMFIC-Project Democritus University of Thrace Laboratory of Atmospheric.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Science instruments data pipeline G. Martucci.
Overview of progress towards a data quality assurance strategy to facilitate interoperability WGISS – May 11 th, 2009.
Implementation and Processing outline Processing Framework of VIIRS instrument monitoring System Processing Framework of VIIRS EV data Monitoring SD/SDSM.
Data Integrity # Best Practices & Lessons Learned. Does It Fit Your Organization?
A system for satellite LST product monitoring and retrieval algorithm evaluation Peng Yu 12, Yunyue Yu 2, Zhuo Wang 12, and Yuling Liu 12 1 ESSIC/CICS,
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Data Stewardship Interest Group WGISS-40 Meeting Preservation of SW & Documents at CEOS Agencies Approaches and Lessons.
Distributed Data Analysis & Dissemination System (D-DADS ) Special Interest Group on Data Integration June 2000.
August 2003 At A Glance The IRC is a platform independent, extensible, and adaptive framework that provides robust, interactive, and distributed control.
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information: 3 GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
EO Dataset Preservation Workflow Data Stewardship Interest Group WGISS-37 Meeting Cocoa Beach (Florida-US) - April 14-18, 2014.
EC Review – 01/03/2002 – WP9 – Earth Observation Applications – n° 1 WP9 Earth Observation Applications 1st Annual Review Report to the EU ESA, KNMI, IPSL,
2. WP9 – Earth Observation Applications ESA DataGrid Review Frascati, 10 June Welcome and introduction (15m) 2.WP9 – Earth Observation Applications.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Requirement: Provide information to air quality decision makers and improve.
EuroGOOS Arctic Task Team Workshop September 2006 Satellite data portals for Arctic monitoring Stein Sandven Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing.
The ESA call for the 9 th Earth Explorer mission (EE9)
15th CAA Cross-calibration workshop CIS archiving activities report University College of London 2012, April
QA4EO in 10 Minutes! A presentation to the 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting.
CIS Action Items 10 th Cross-Calibration Workshop Observatoire de Paris, Nov
ICWG: CGMS-43, May 2015, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Status report on the International Clouds.
New HR-DDS User Services David J. S. Poulter, National Oceanography Centre, UK
Double Star Active Archive - DWP/STAFF 1 Double Star Active Archive STAFF/DWP Keith Yearby and Hugo Alleyne University of Sheffield Nicole Cornilleau-Wehrlin.
Profiling: What is it? Notes and reflections on profiling and how it could be used in process mining.
Marianne König, Tim Hewison, Peter Miu
J. C. Stroeve, J. Box, F. Gao, S. Liang, A. Nolin, and C. Schaaf
Space Standardisation WS, ESRIN
INTAROS WP5 Data integration and management
20th CAA/DAA Cross Calibration Meeting
H. Rème, I.Dandouras and A. Barthe IRAP, Toulouse, France
KLAUS KDA4 – Solar Irradiance Monitoring Application
Technical Expectations from Organizers & Participants B. Fougnie, S
ECT data sharing plan Which products do you intend to make available for use by other teams in their data analysis? When will these products be available?
Analysis Ready Data ..
WGISS-WGCV Joint Session
GSICS Data Management and Availability to Users
Atmospheric Correction Inter-comparison eXercise
FDA Objectives and Implementation Planning
Ninghai Sun1, Lihang Zhou2, Mitch Goldberg3
NASA ROSES 2007: Decision Support through Earth Science Research Results Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite.
Joint Remote Sensing Research Program 2016 Research Updates
Open Archival Information System
Hot summary of the Fourth GSICS Users Workshop
Defining the Products: ‘GSICS Correction’
ESA and Mars Express archive activities
Presentation transcript:

® Kick off meeting. February 17th, 2011 QUAlity aware VIsualisation for the Global Earth Observation system of systems GEOVIQUA workshop February, the 18th, 2011 Barcelona S&T experiences on data quality in Remote Sensing Joost Smeets

Contents Introduction to S&T background- experiences Overall approach to data quality control in Remote Sensing Types of data quality information Data quality concepts Quality Information and Action Protocol Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Relevant S&T data quality projects Development of routine calibration and quality monitoring systems for ESA Earth Observation satellite missions –Atmospheric sensors on ENVISAT (GOMOS, MIPAS, SCIAMACHY) –Earth Explorer missions: AEOLUS (wind speed), SWARM (magnetic field), CRYOSAT-2 (ice monitoring) IDEAS project –Harmonizing quality monitoring of different missions –Initial work on standardization for quality monitoring GECA project: Generic Environment for Cal/Val Analysis –Intercomparison tool chain of satellite data vs. correlative data –Development of Quality Information and Action Protocol (QIAP) –Contribution to major evolution of Generic Earth Observation Metadata Standard (GEOMS) Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Organisation of data quality control for remote sensing Kick off meeting. February 17th, Quality Monitoring Mission planning Mission operations Processing Archiving Processing Archiving Processing Archiving Processing Archiving Product QC Anomaly investigation Calibration processing Calibration monitoring Long-term monitoring Configuration monitoring Data flow monitoring PDGS performance Image: ESA

Data quality control loop Kick off meeting. February 17th, Image: ESA

Description of quality information Examples of quality information –Uncertainty represented by a standard deviation –A data validity flag that flags measurement data as valid/invalid –A combination of flags that signify special conditions on the data or the processing algorithms Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Description of quality information Examples of quality information (continued) –Secondary measurements and corresponding rules to derive quality of primary measurement Discard measurement if cloud detected (filtering) Measurements at solar zenith angles>80° should be discarded Model based uncertainty Ɛ x =f(x,y,z,...) Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Description of quality information Examples of quality information (continued) –Disclaimers Inform users on data quality aspects that are not in the product (non- integrated, typically becomes available only after data product has been delivered to users) Disclaimer example –Plots (example from GOMOS monthly report) Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Quality concepts – processing level Quality issues for different processing levels: –Level 0: Accumulation of downlinked data into “Raw” instrument data products Corrupted data issues (communication), Saturation of measurements, spikes, Signal-to-Noise Ratio, telemetry data –Level 1: Processing into calibrated (intermediate) physical quantities Application of calibration parameters and processing algorithms to raw data Updating of calibration parameters from special measurements (on- board calibration) –Level 2+: Processing into derived physical quantities that the user is interested in All kinds of processing, combination of data products Lower-level data quality indicators influence higher level data quality in a non-trivial way Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Quality concepts – data version Several values for a measurement at a specific time and place may exist due to different processing –Near real time processing: faster delivery of data to users at the expense of data quality –Consolidated processing: after an additional period, more accurate data become available due to more information about instrument characterisation (calibration) –Reprocessing: after even longer periods, intercomparison/ground based validation may lead to additional knowledge that is used to reprocess raw data into a new version of the measurement. A concept is needed to identify different versions of measurement data Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Quality concepts – data version Possible definition: “A data-version associated with measurement data is a textual identifier indicating a common configuration for these measurement data, for example because the data have been generated using the same data processor within the same processing centre and using the same procedure” Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Quality concepts -- metadata Different levels of specification of (quality) metadata –At measurement level (requires access to actual product data) –At product level (can be provided through catalogues) –At dataset level (e.g. for dataset selection) Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Quality concepts -- QIAP QIAP= Quality Information and Action Protocol QIAP study and implementation has been part of GECA project (Generic Environment for Cal/Val Analysis) Concept: moment of discovery of quality information with respect to data availability: –Integrated quality information: quality information that is included in the data processing and delivered with the data –Non-integrated: data quality information that becomes available only after a data product has been delivered to users QIAP is a means of: –Informing users about non-integrated data quality –Providing users with a correction/filtering mechanism to be applied to data products for improving data quality. Note: the correction should be able to be performed automatically by SW. Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Quality concepts -- QIAP Issues found during QIAP design: –Different notions of what quality information is/should be –As a consequence the scope of QIAP was initially unclear Therefore the QIAP design included a study that: –Captured different views on quality information –Defined clear vocabulary for describing quality information concepts that guided the final decision on the scope of QIAP Meanwhile QIAP has been successfully implemented as: –A defined protocol –A (pilot) Kick off meeting. February 17th,

Quality concepts QIAP Kick off meeting. February 17th, QIAP-server Product Quality Information database Product Data Quality information Correction/filtering info Initial productsCorrected products (data) User