New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiochemical Methods and Data Evaluation
Advertisements

Quality is a Lousy Idea-
UNDERSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY/QC REPORTS Maya Murshak – Merit Laboratories, Inc.
1 Method Selection and Development l Initial Considerations n What does the method need to do? 3 What analyte/s need to be assayed? 3 What range or concentration.
Pilot-Scale Evaluation of MF-Ozone-BAC Process Train for Removal of Emerging Contaminants Vijay Sundaram Robert W. Emerick, Ph.D., P.E. John P. Enloe,
An Evaluation of Models to Predict the Activity of Environmental Estrogens Candice M. Johnson and Rominder Suri, Ph.D.,P.E. NSF Water and Environmental.
Summary Report Emerging Contaminants Program.
Errors in Chemical Analyses: Assessing the Quality of Results
Analysis of contaminants of emerging concerns in wastewater and the Maryland coastal bays Charniece C. Huff 1, Rehab Abass 2, Ali Ishaque 2 1 Department.
Result validation. Exercise 1 You’ve done an analysis to the best of your ability using the correct procedure. Is your answer correct? possibly, hopefully.
Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850)
Interpreting Your Lab Report & Quality Control Results
QA/QC Considerations for Sampling and Analysis Associated with EPA Method 1631 Chuck Wibby Wibby Environmental Seminar on Low Level Mercury Data and Analyses.
Waste Pharmaceuticals: The Road Forward Improving Patient Safety through Informed Medication Prescribing & Disposal Practices October 31, 2007 David P.
Workshop on Advanced Technologies in Real-time Monitoring and Modeling for Drinking Water Safety and Security Dr. David Lipsky Acting Director Drinking.
Use of Ozone for Disinfection and EDC Removal at CCWRD Doug Drury, Ph.D. Deputy General Manager Clark County Water Reclamation District Shane Snyder, Ph.D.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT Unit 4: Module 13, Lecture 2.
EPA/Office of Water’s Strategy for Contaminants of Emerging Concern Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water U.S. Environmental.
Quality Control In Measurements Tom Colella CLAS Goldwater Environmental Lab.
Field Analysis Quality Control
1 Full Scale and Pilot Scale Evaluation of Endocrine Disrupting Compound Removal Through WTP Processes Bob Raczko, P.E. United Water.
Lsfdlkdfj ;la;fkd theklekrj Girly Grass Dana Devin-Clarke. Sally Brown, Michael Muramoto*, and Michael Doubrava* University of Washington and *King County.
WWLC Standard Operating Procedures Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Bio-Stability of New York City’s Distribution Water Authors:
Survey of the New York City Watershed for the Presence of Pharmaceuticals 1 Center for Environmental Health, NYS Department of Health, Troy, NY 2 Wadsworth.
Laboratory Technical Issues Presentation to: KWWOA April 9, 2014 Department for Environmental Protection Environmental & Public Protection Cabinet To Protect.
HD 2007 Rule Diesel Fuel Sulfur Testing and Sampling Methods and Requirements US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality November 20, 2002.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
QA/QC and QUALIFIERS LOU ANN FISHER CITY OF STILLWATER, OK
1 / 9 ASTM D19 Method Validation Procedures William Lipps Analytical & Measuring Instrument Division July, 2015.
Assessment of Protozoa in New York City’s Hillview Reservoir Kerri A. Alderisio Steve S. DiLonardo Pathogen Research, Science and Research Division New.
Introduction The past, the present and the future.
PPCPs and the Environment By Group E. Introduction Modern medicine has undoubtedly changed the human race; pharmaceuticals have extended our life expectancy.
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Requirements of.
Emerging Contaminants in the Great Lakes Christina Pfouts.
Understanding Your QC Presentation to: KWWOA April 15, 2015 Department for Environmental Protection Energy & Environment Cabinet To Protect and Enhance.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Thuan Chau EMERGING CONTAMINANTS PHARMACEUTICALS AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS (PPCPs) “Contaminants of Emerging Concern” (CECs) – EPA University of Utah.
Introduction to Emerging Contaminants What are Emerging Contaminants?
ME551/GEO551 Introduction to Geology of Industrial Minerals Spring 2005 SAMPLING.
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
An Overview of EDC’s, Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Our Drinking Water Presented By: Roxanne Russell, Yuh-Chi Niou, Kris McArthur, Amelia.
5. Quality Assurance and Calibration Quality assurance is We do to get the right answer for our purpose. Have Sufficient accuracy and precision to support.
PPCPs: An Emerging Source of Chemical Pollution By: Arienne Barnes Nicolette Foster Aaron Stover Ingrid Tobar Sara Vogt Jennifer Wolfe.
Pharmaceuticals, Hormones, and Other Wastewater Contaminants in U.S. Streams Herb Buxton Coordinator, Toxic Substances Hydrology Program.
Advisory Panel on Emerging Contaminants Unregulated Chemical Contaminants APEC Update – September 27, 2013.
QC/QA.
Biodegradation of Emerging Contaminants by Pseudomonas butanorova Shervada Hall Houston Independent School District Empowerment College Preparatory High.
Biological & Research Programs. Overview Status Future Direction.
© 2015 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © 2015 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this presentation may be copied,
Data Quality Assurance/ Quality Control. QA/QC Requirements for RECAP Submittals Data generated using rigorous analytical methods Data must be analyte.
CHM 410/1410 Lecture 2 Environmental Sampling. Environmental sampling Two things to consider: 1.Size of the samples required 2.Number of samples required.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Why Should We Be Concerned About Wastewater Quality and Reuse? Fred Corson, Ph.D.
John D. Vargo 1 ; Michael Schueller 1 ; Mary Skopec 2 1 State Hygienic Laboratory at the University of Iowa, Coralville, IA; 2 Iowa Department of Natural.
Brian Cornwell NASA GSFC Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, VA
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Analysis of Pharmaceuticals & Personal Care Products
Status of EPA Method 1631 for the Determination of Low-Level Mercury
Overview of EPA Method 1631, Revision E By Roy W
Instrument Maintenance
EPA Method Equivalency
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
EPA Method Equivalency
Topics in Microbiology Quality Assurance Project Plan Essentials
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and Calibration Methods
Why Use Them? By: Marcy Bolek – Alloway
ME551/GEO551 Introduction to Geology of Industrial Minerals Spring 2007 SAMPLING.
NJ DWQI Testing Subcommittee
MARSOL Demonstrating Managed Aquifer Rescharchge as a Solution to Water Scarcity and Drought Christoph Schüth, Technische Universität Darmstadt.
Presentation transcript:

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products in the NYC Watershed David Lipsky, Ph.D., Q.E.P. Timothy Martin, M.P.A. Ian Hurley, Ph.D. Carla Glaser, M.E.M. Carla Glaser, M.E.M.

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Introduction Sampling and Analytical Approach Preliminary Conclusions Objectives

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Introduction PPCPs (pharmaceutical and personal care products) represent a subclass of organic compounds that have been detected in surface waters, groundwater, wastewaters and drinking water throughout world. Term “PPCP” is used loosely and is ill-defined; can include endocrine disrupting chemicals, xenobiotics, hormonally active chemicals, pesticides and newly emerging contaminants. Sources include wastewater, runoff from agricultural fields, biosolids, urban runoff, air, and other sources.

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Not a new issue, but a result of advances in analytical capabilities These advances now allow research scientists to reliably detect an increasing number of organic constituents at the ng/L (part per trillion) range However, there are only a few contract laboratories or water utility laboratories with such demonstrated capabilities No widely available standard methods Introduction (con’t)

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Different studies looked at different analytes with different methods No common assessment program defining procedures to follow for collecting samples and the specific PPCPs that should be targeted Introduction (con’t)

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Introduction (con’t) A recent study published in ES&T by Benotti, et.al., found PPCPs in the tap water of 19 U.S. water utilities The 11 most frequently detected compounds, all found at low levels included: atenolol, atrazine, carbamazepine, estrone, gemfibrozil, meprobamate, naproxen, phenytoin, sulfamethoxazole, TCEP, and trimethoprim

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Approach Utilize two contract labs to perform analyses Samples collected quarterly at source water keypoints (pre-chlorination) High degree of field and laboratory QA/QC

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Approach (con’t) 10 samples analyzed per quarter “Clean Hands” sampling technique QAPP USGS collects side by side samples for independent analysis

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Approach (con’t) Site CodeSite DescriptionReason for Site Selection CROGHCroton Gatehouse, untreated effluent from New Croton Reservoir Keypoint sampling location. Pre-chlorination. DEL18Delaware Aqueduct, Shaft 18 untreated effluent from Kensico Reservoir CATLEFFCatskill Aqueduct, lower effluent chamber, untreated Kensico Reservoir effluent PPCP Monitoring Sites

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality PPCP Monitoring Locations CROGH CATLEFF DEL18

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Approach (con’t) LocationSample Sample Dup Trip Blank Field Blank LFMLFMD CROGH XXX&X& X&X& X&X& X&X& DEL18 XX CATLEFF XX &: Taken at alternating locations for each sampling event Samples collected

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Selected PPCP Laboratory Analysis Methods Suite of PPCP compounds analyzed Appx. # of compounds in suite Description of compounds Phenolic Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals 10 Chemicals which may block or mimic natural hormones, thereby disrupting normal functioning of organs. Estrogens and other hormones10 Estrogens and other hormones which may affect the reproductive physiology of fish communities, and may pose a public health concern. Pharmaceutically Active Compounds (Positive/Negative) 40 Pharmaceutically active compounds such as pain relievers, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, replacement hormones, and chemicals related to coffee and tobacco. Pharmaceutically Active Compounds (Positive/Negative) 20 Same as above – using an alternative screening method.

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Laboratory Minimum Reporting Limits (MRLs) MRLs are the lowest reportable concentration for an analyte. Normally, an MRL will be above the amount found in a blank. Each lab must verify accuracy and precision of their results at MRLs. Lab regulators suggest ± 50 percent of the expected value as a reasonable goal at an MRL.

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Representative MRLs CompoundMRL (ng/L) Acetominophen1 Bis Phenol A (BPA)10 Caffeine3 Carbamazepine5 Cotinine1 DEET5 Diazepam1 Estradiol1 Estrone0.5 Ethinyl Estradiol - 17 alpha5 Fluoxetine5 Gemfibrozil1 Ibuprofen1 Iopromide5 Nicotine5 Perfluoro octanesulfonate-PFOS0.2 Progesterone0.1 Sulfamethoxazole1 Testosterone1 Triclosan5 Trimethoprim1

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality PPCP “clean hands” sampling technique “Dirty hands” assisting “clean hands” in removing sample bottle from inner/outer bag.

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality PPCP “clean hands” sampling technique “Clean hands” taking a field blank.

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality “Dirty hands” assisting “clean hands” with placing filled sample bottle back into inner/outer bag. CRO1T SAMPLING TAP PPCP “clean hands” sampling technique

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Laboratory QC Test-Specific Controls: “Blanks” – negative controls – 1 per batch of 20 samples or less Checks for target chemical picked up during lab processing of samples Must be “non-detected”

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality “LFB” – positive controls – 1 per batch of 20 samples or less All target compounds, at ng/L levels Checks for target chemical lost during processing Must be 70 – 130 percent of expected levels Test-Specific Controls: Laboratory QC

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Laboratory QC “Spikes” - known amounts of target compounds added to sample Checks for masking of target compounds by interferences in samples Check amount recovered after background is subtracted percent of expected levels Sample-Specific Controls:

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality “Duplicates” – 2 samples or 2 “spikes” Compare amounts of target compounds found in matched pairs Checks for reproducibility Less than 30 percent difference Sample-Specific Controls: Laboratory QC

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Laboratory QC “Internal standard” Compound NOT found in samples Added just before analysis Controls for short-term changes in instrument performance Added to all samples and QC:

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Laboratory QC “Surrogate” Compound NOT found in samples and chemically similar to target compounds Added before sample QC processing Controls for losses of target compounds during processing Added to all samples and QC:

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Decreasing as labs get more experience, modify methods QC Problems Date Number of QC problems LAB ALAB B January April July-09429

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality QC Problems Low recoveries of “surrogate” from samples (testosterone-d3, ibuprofen-d3, acetaminophen-d4) Low recoveries of target compounds from spikes (sulfamethoxazole, chlorotetracycline) Possible cause: background interference (with internal standards?) Common QC problems:

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality QC Problems Low recoveries of target compounds from “LFB” (fluoxetine, bacitracin) Possibly cause: loss during extraction from reagent water Less common QC problems:

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Program appears to be providing credible results –Good agreement among duplicates –Few detects in blanks –Clean hands technique more time consuming but advisable to reduce cross-contamination as a possible source of error –Good agreement between laboratories Conclusion

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Need detailed expert review of contract lab results Continues to require high degree of interaction between DEP and contract lab personnel to address QA/QC issues Need additional scientific/QA review before publishing results Conclusion (con’t)

New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Questions? Thank You