Ecological Sites and the MLRA SSO Leader George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Development and Evolution of the Criteria and Indicators.
Advertisements

Rangeland Health United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management.
We Do Not See The Same Landscape Perspectives and Development of A Common Spatial Framework By Robert A. Washington-Allen Research and Development Staff.
DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.
MLRA-SSO Responsibilities for Ecological Site Inventory Curtis Talbot Rangeland Mgt Specialist National Soil Survey Center March 24, 2011.
ECOLOGICAL SITES EXPANDING the CONCEPTS and APPLICATIONS of ECOLOGICAL SITES Joel Brown USDA NRCS Jornada Experimental Range Las Cruces NM.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Ecological Systems Maintaining and Enhancing Natural Features and Minimizing Adverse Impacts of Infrastructure Projects Course Review.
MODELING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE – CHANGES MADE IN A SPECIES SPECIFIC MODELING SYSTEM Jim Chew, Kirk Moeller, Kirsten Ironside Invited presentation.
10/12/071 Managing succession in rangelands Optional Reading: Westoby et al., 1989, Opportunistic Management for Rangelands not at Equilibrium, J Range.
Part I: What’s the reference? ? 5 The rangeland health reference is based on what is possible (long-term ecological potential) for a particular.
Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class 1 Revised Draft for Longleaf Partnership Council Discussion Clay Ware April 7, 2014.
Ecological Sites and their Relationship to Soil Mapping Steve Campbell Soil Scientist USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service West National Technology.
Project Planning. Project Plans - Objective The participant will be able to understand the purpose of a Project Plan and how the Project Plan is integrated.
FIELD METHODS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources Division Forest and Rangeland.
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
Disturbance regimes in restoration ecology: novel effects and ecological complexity Sarah Marcinko November 11, 2005.
Some Major Problems In Managing Watersheds Of The Border Region Dr. M. Karl Wood, Director Water Resources Research Institute New Mexico State University.
n U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service National Plant Data Team (NPDT) NRCS: A repository of plant data P lant L ist.
2 Recognized by John C. Fremont as an area of interior drainage 145,546 square miles Precipitation, generally 7-12 inches annually Recognized by John.
Soil and Ecosystem Dynamics in Soil Survey
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Soil Data Join Recorrelation MO1 Approach to the Harmonization Process.
Theories of Vegetation Change Mort Kothmann Texas A&M University.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
NRCS National Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 18, 2013 George Peacock, Team Leader National Grazing Lands Team Central National Technology Support.
ECOLOGICAL SITES: DEVELOPMENT AND DESCRIPTION ESD Workshop Winnemuca NV 5 June 2012 Joel Brown USDA NRCS National Soil Survey Center /Jornada Experimental.
Impact of Climate Change on Plant Community Composition and Ecosystem Function in MOJN Parks Seth Munson, Jayne Belnap, Robert Webb (USGS) Nita Tallent.
Proposed Revisions Parts 601, 608, 610.  Decision memo signed by Chief on March 27, 2012 on regionalizing soil survey  Need to have agency directives.
Blending Science with Traditional Ecological Knowledge  Frank K. Lake  Environmental Science, Graduate Ph.D program  US Forest Service- Redwood Sciences.
T&E Species, Special Sites and HCVF! Sarah Crow ATFS Webinar Series May 16, 2013.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
NRCS Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 16, 2013 Susan Andrews, National Leader Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch National Soil Survey Center and.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Wayne A. Robbie, Supervisory Soil Scientist USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region Albuquerque, NM Common Elements: Ecological Sites Descriptions and.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
A Strategy for Coupled Vegetation and Soil Sampling to Develop Ecological Site Descriptions Brandon Bestelmeyer Arlene Tugel George Peacock Homer Sanchez.
Ecology: Community Structure & Ecosystem Services David Mellor, PhD Citizen Science Coordinator Virginia Master Naturalists.
Initiative to Integrate an Eco-Logical Approach to Infrastructure Development Air Quality Advisory Committee July 24, 2008.
Documenting Soil Change using Dynamic Soil Properties and Ecological Site Descriptions Skye Wills NCSS, 2011.
Ecological Succession Objectives 1.Explain what succession is 2.Explain the process of ecological succession 3.Explain the role that plants play in maintaining.
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
Interpreting Ecological Sites for Grazing Management.
The Garrigue of Mediterranean Europe. Introduction Garrigue is a low soft-leaved scrubland found on limestone soils around the Mediterranean Basin, generally.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
What’s the Reference?. Applying the Technique: 6 Steps 1. Identify the Evaluation Area 2. Obtain or develop Reference Worksheet 3. Obtain or develop Evaluation.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland. A0po&list=PL7CD3CD7A9350A858.
Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS.
Conservation Strategy Revisions: 1. Grassland Conservation Strategy Natural Temperate Grassland Button Wrinklewort Ginninderra Peppercress Baeuerlan’s.
What is Rangeland Management?. Rangeland Management is:  The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans.  A Planning.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey October 22, 2015 EROS Fire Science Understanding a Changing Earth.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
Environmental Science: Toward A Sustainable Future Chapter 4 Ecosystems: Populations and Succession.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
Rangeland NRI: 2002 and Beyond Presentation given to NRCS State Conservationists NRI Exec. Committee Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Bill Hubbard Southern Regional Extension Forester taking the urban forest to the next level.
Project Update SageCon, September 30, 2016
Tom Parker and Sarah Flynn Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Ungrazed deep grassland
The Urban Forest Management Plan
Rangeland Principles (Rem 151)
Patterns of Succession
Describing and Monitoring Rangelands:
Shortleaf Pine Demonstration Areas Assist Promoting Restoration
Presentation transcript:

Ecological Sites and the MLRA SSO Leader George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center and Susan Andrews, National Leader Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch National Soil Survey Center

Webinar Overview Brief History of Ecological Sites in NRCS Brief History of Ecological Sites in NRCS Ecological Site Definitions and Concepts Ecological Site Definitions and Concepts Why are Ecological Sites useful? Why are Ecological Sites useful? Operating Procedures Operating Procedures Project Steps Project Steps Goals and Expectations Goals and Expectations

Ecological Sites in NRCS In 1997, the Ecological site concept was introduced into NRCS manuals and handbooks Initial acceptance was slow No national strategy for development In 1997, the Ecological site concept was introduced into NRCS manuals and handbooks Initial acceptance was slow No national strategy for development In 2009, Chief White approved a Decision Memo to: Accelerate development of ESDs Improve quality and standardization of ESDs developed Joint effort between S&T and SS&RA In 2009, Chief White approved a Decision Memo to: Accelerate development of ESDs Improve quality and standardization of ESDs developed Joint effort between S&T and SS&RA

Ecological Site - Definition a conceptual division of the landscape that is defined as a distinctive kind of land based on recurring soil, landform, geological, and climatic characteristics that differs from other kinds of land in its ability to produce distinctive kinds and amounts of vegetation, and in its ability to respond similarly to management actions and natural disturbances. - Interagency ESD Handbook, 2011

Ecological Site - Definition a conceptual division of the landscape that is defined as a distinctive kind of land based on recurring soil, landform, geological, and climatic characteristics that differs from other kinds of land in its ability to produce distinctive kinds and amounts of vegetation, and in its ability to respond similarly to management actions and natural disturbances. - Interagency ESD Handbook, 2011

Ecological Site - Definition a conceptual division of the landscape that is defined as a distinctive kind of land based on recurring soil, landform, geological, and climatic characteristics that differs from other kinds of land in its ability to produce distinctive kinds and amounts of vegetation, and in its ability to respond similarly to management actions and natural disturbances. - Interagency ESD Handbook, 2011

Ecological Site - Definition a conceptual division of the landscape that is defined as a distinctive kind of land based on recurring soil, landform, geological, and climatic characteristics that differs from other kinds of land in its ability to produce distinctive kinds and amounts of vegetation, and in its ability to respond similarly to management actions and natural disturbances. - Interagency ESD Handbook, 2011

Distinctive Type of Land

Kinds and Amounts of Vegetation Significant differences in the species composition of the reference community Significant differences in the species composition of the reference community Significant differences in the relative proportions of species that are in the reference community Significant differences in the relative proportions of species that are in the reference community Significant differences in the total annual production of species that are in the reference community Significant differences in the total annual production of species that are in the reference community Significant differences in the species composition of the reference community Significant differences in the species composition of the reference community Significant differences in the relative proportions of species that are in the reference community Significant differences in the relative proportions of species that are in the reference community Significant differences in the total annual production of species that are in the reference community Significant differences in the total annual production of species that are in the reference community

Response to Management and Disturbance  Herbivory  Fire  Drought  Invasive Species  Cropping System  Herbivory  Fire  Drought  Invasive Species  Cropping System

Community Phase 1.1 Community Phase 1.2 State 1 State 2 Community Phase T1R2 State and Transition Diagram States States Communities phases Communities phases Community pathways Community pathways Transitions Transitions Restoration Pathways Restoration Pathways Narrative Narrative States States Communities phases Communities phases Community pathways Community pathways Transitions Transitions Restoration Pathways Restoration Pathways Narrative Narrative

Deep Redland Ecological Site MLRA 81C MLRA 81C Deep Redland Ecological Site MLRA 81C MLRA 81C

State-and-Transition Definitions STATE - a recognizable, resistant and resilient complex of two ecosystem components: 1) the soil base 2) the vegetation structure Stringham, et al., 2003 Time Vegetation attribute(s) States

TRANSITION - the trajectory of a change - state changes are precipitated by natural events, management actions or both THRESHOLD – boundary in space and time between two states - irreversible for without significant inputs or possibly completely irreversible State-and-Transition Definitions Time Vegetation attribute(s) thresholds feedbackmechanisms restoration pathway transition

2.1 – Oak/Juniper Community Phase 1.1 – Oak Savannah Community Phase 1.2 – Oak/Grassland Community Phase 1.0 Reference State 2.0 Oak Juniper State 2.2 – Oak/Juniper Complex Community Phase 3.0 Open Grassland State 3.1 – Open Grassland Community Phase 1.1a 1.2a T1a R2a T1b T2b 2.1a 2.2a 3.2 – Open Grassland/Juniper Community Phase 3.1a 3.2a Deep Redland ES – MLRA 81C

Ecological Site Description (ESD) C omprehensive reference document containing : Site Characteristics (Abiotic) Site Characteristics (Abiotic) Physiographic Features Physiographic Features Climatic Features Climatic Features Water Features Water Features Soils Soils Plant Communities (Biotic) Plant Communities (Biotic) State and Transition Model State and Transition Model Site Interpretations Site Interpretations Supporting Information Supporting Information Site Characteristics (Abiotic) Site Characteristics (Abiotic) Physiographic Features Physiographic Features Climatic Features Climatic Features Water Features Water Features Soils Soils Plant Communities (Biotic) Plant Communities (Biotic) State and Transition Model State and Transition Model Site Interpretations Site Interpretations Supporting Information Supporting Information

Why are ESDs useful? Help predict the outcomes of major natural disturbances Help predict the outcomes of major natural disturbances Provide a roadmap for restoration Provide a roadmap for restoration Support agency initiatives Support agency initiatives Longleaf Pine Longleaf Pine Sage Grouse Sage Grouse Provide management interpretations (wildlife, grazing, wood products, hydrology, invasive plant control, etc.) Provide management interpretations (wildlife, grazing, wood products, hydrology, invasive plant control, etc.) Serve as a tool for conservation planning Serve as a tool for conservation planning

Conservation Planning Uses ESDs can be used to: Refine the planning unit to areas that respond similarly Refine the planning unit to areas that respond similarly Provide a quick reference for resource inventory and appropriate alternatives Provide a quick reference for resource inventory and appropriate alternatives Illustrate consequences of management actions Illustrate consequences of management actions guide to maintenance of existing condition guide to maintenance of existing condition Predict actions needed to transition to desired plant community Predict actions needed to transition to desired plant community

Operating Procedures

Project Management Board of Directors State Conservationists, grouped by MO Approve and review all ES Project Plans Approve and review all ES Project Plans Approve certified ES descriptions Approve certified ES descriptions Board of Directors State Conservationists, grouped by MO Approve and review all ES Project Plans Approve and review all ES Project Plans Approve certified ES descriptions Approve certified ES descriptions Management Team SSSs, SRCs, Tech Specialists, ES QA Specialists Reviews Project Plans Reviews Project Plans Prioritizes Plans Prioritizes Plans Management Team SSSs, SRCs, Tech Specialists, ES QA Specialists Reviews Project Plans Reviews Project Plans Prioritizes Plans Prioritizes Plans Technical Team MLRA ES QC Specialist, any needed regional, state or local specialists Develops Project Plans Develops Project Plans Accomplishes planned projects Accomplishes planned projects Technical Team MLRA ES QC Specialist, any needed regional, state or local specialists Develops Project Plans Develops Project Plans Accomplishes planned projects Accomplishes planned projects

Accomplishing the Project ESD Technical Team- identified in Project Plan MLRA ES (QC) Specialist Other NRCS Specialists Other Agency Specialists Partners Contractors or others ESD Technical Team- identified in Project Plan MLRA ES (QC) Specialist Other NRCS Specialists Other Agency Specialists Partners Contractors or others

Major Steps in ESD Development 1. Creation of initial Ecological Site concepts 2. Draft initial State and Transition Model 3. Testing Concepts-data collection & analysis 4. Refine State and Transition Model and Ecological Site concept (if needed) 5. High intensity data collection 6. Draft Ecological Site Description 1. Creation of initial Ecological Site concepts 2. Draft initial State and Transition Model 3. Testing Concepts-data collection & analysis 4. Refine State and Transition Model and Ecological Site concept (if needed) 5. High intensity data collection 6. Draft Ecological Site Description

Steps in ESD Development  Creation of initial Ecological Site concepts  Reconnaissance  Literature review  Clearly specify the what distinguishes the site from others  Use existing vegetation as a guide to site characteristics (but not primary criterion)  Initial site concepts represent a hypothesis that can be tested  Creation of initial Ecological Site concepts  Reconnaissance  Literature review  Clearly specify the what distinguishes the site from others  Use existing vegetation as a guide to site characteristics (but not primary criterion)  Initial site concepts represent a hypothesis that can be tested

Involve experts from the area and other interested parties to develop the State and Transition Model to develop the State and Transition Model

2.1 - One-seed juniper > 4’ tall Shrubs warm season tall and mid grasses Warm season mid and tall grasses and one-seed juniper < 4’ tall Shrubs 1.1 Warm season mid and tall grasses 1.0 Reference State 2.0 Juniper/Shrub State One-seed juniper Shrubs and warm season mid grasses 3.0 Eroded State One-seed juniper active wind and water erosion 1.0 Reference State: Two community phases Indicators: High perennial grass cover and production. Surface soil stability > 3.4. One-seed juniper < 4’ tall. Feedbacks: Organic matter inputs allows for increased soil moisture, herbaceous production, root turnover and litter increasing soil surface stability, infiltration and nutrient cycling. Management: Management actions focus on activities that maintain herbaceous production and organic matter inputs. Prescribed burning or other actions to limit juniper establishment and growth are necessary. Transition 1a: Triggers: Change in fire frequency interval causing increase in juniper establishment and growth. Threshold: Surface soil stability 24%, juniper >4’. 1.1a1.2a T1aR2a 2.2a2.1a T2a R3a

Levels of Intensity for Data Collection

Accomplishing the Task Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary Interagency effort Interagency effort Involve others groups such as university, research, private groups, etc. Involve others groups such as university, research, private groups, etc. Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary Interagency effort Interagency effort Involve others groups such as university, research, private groups, etc. Involve others groups such as university, research, private groups, etc.

Linking Scientific Knowledge with Local Knowledge Local KnowledgeLinking Scientific Knowledge with Local Knowledge Local Knowledge

Role of MLRA-SSO Leader Develop Long-range plan, project and annual plans Develop Long-range plan, project and annual plans Provide leadership for technical team Provide leadership for technical team Update of soil surveys Update of soil surveys Keep maps and data current Keep maps and data current Management of activities Management of activities Supervision of QC specialist Supervision of QC specialist Follow standards, policy, & procedure Follow standards, policy, & procedure Support NCSS initiatives Support NCSS initiatives

Approval & Certification Certification of quality control: SSO Leader Certification of quality control: SSO Leader Quality control review: MRLA ES (QC) specialist Quality control review: MRLA ES (QC) specialist Content review: Vegetation specialist Content review: Vegetation specialist Certification of ESD: MO Leader Certification of ESD: MO Leader Quality Assurance: MO ES (QA) Specialist Quality Assurance: MO ES (QA) Specialist Content approval: SSS & SRC (or designee) Content approval: SSS & SRC (or designee) Approval for use in state: State Conservationist Approval for use in state: State Conservationist

Goals and Expectations Project progress will be measured using percent completion of Project Milestones Project progress will be measured using percent completion of Project Milestones Milestones are significant accomplishments of a project Milestones are significant accomplishments of a project Acreage will only be counted for completed ESDs Acreage will only be counted for completed ESDs Expect a minimum of one project per SSO with an MLRA ES (QC) Specialist Expect a minimum of one project per SSO with an MLRA ES (QC) Specialist

Prioritization Guidelines for Ecological Site Projects Chief’s or NRCS’ Initiatives Chief’s or NRCS’ Initiatives Ecological significance, such as: Ecological significance, such as: At risk areas At risk areas Critical habitat Critical habitat T&E species T&E species Benchmark ecological sites Benchmark ecological sites Benchmark soils Benchmark soils Major land uses Major land uses

Finally…Finally… Detailed information on a relatively few ecological sites can provide information for large areas of land Detailed information on a relatively few ecological sites can provide information for large areas of land A combination of expert knowledge, historical data and inventory provides defensible science for conservation planning A combination of expert knowledge, historical data and inventory provides defensible science for conservation planning Must include soil AND vegetation experts to succeed! Must include soil AND vegetation experts to succeed! Detailed information on a relatively few ecological sites can provide information for large areas of land Detailed information on a relatively few ecological sites can provide information for large areas of land A combination of expert knowledge, historical data and inventory provides defensible science for conservation planning A combination of expert knowledge, historical data and inventory provides defensible science for conservation planning Must include soil AND vegetation experts to succeed! Must include soil AND vegetation experts to succeed!

Questions?Questions? Contact Information: 402) (817)