Wed. Apr. 9. Durfee v Duke (US 1963) Clarke v. Clarke (US 1900)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assignment for Next Class Full Faith & Credit Clause and 27 USC § 1738 (CB ) Notes on the next slide Fauntleroy v Lum (CB504-9) Baker v GM (CB521-35)
Advertisements

Tues. Sept. 25. aggregation v. supplemental jurisdiction.
Agenda for 9 th Class Jurisdiction in divorce cases Recognition of Judgments – Full Faith & Credit: Constitution & Statute – Fauntleroy v Lum – Baker v.
Mon. Apr. 14. same-sex marriage and full faith and credit.
1 Relationship between collective agreement/arbitration and law.
Suing the Federal Government. 2 History Traditional Sovereign Immunity US Constitution "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence.
Fauntleroy v Lum (US 1908). Yarborough v Yarborough (US 1933)
An overview by Professor M. R. Franks Copyright © 2009, M. R. Franks
Mon. Mar. 24. complex litigation cyberspace Constitutional Restrictions on Choice of Law.
Section 3: Interstate Relations
Constitutional Restrictions on Choice of Law. Home Ins. Co. v Dick (US 1930)
Broderick v Rosner NY law allows piercing the corporate veil concerning NY banks to get to shareholders NJ doesn’t like this and wants to protect NJ shareholders.
Renvoi désistement. complex litigation In re Air Crash Disaster near Chicago (7 th Cir. 1981)
Domicile. “Even when the point of destination is not reached, domicile may shift in itinere, if the abandonment of the old domicile and the setting out.
Article IV Section 1. Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And.
“Federalism” Article IV: Interstate Relations. Why are “Interstate Relations” Important? Can you think of examples? What if Ohioans were not allowed to.
STANDARD(S): 12.1 Students explain the fundamental principles and moral values of American democracy. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT 1.Explain why States.
Article IV- Relations Among the States
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hague (US 1981). member of Minn workforce – commuted to work there Allstate present and doing business in Minn Post-event move of.
McMillan v McMillan (Va. 1979). JONES v RS JONES & Assoc (Va. 1993)
Grant v McAuliffe (Cal 1953). P ships goods in Mass using D as transport P received printed bill of lading which contains limitations on liability Under.
Yarborough v Yarborough (US 1933). Durfee v Duke (US 1963)
Federalism Good Morning 9/26/14 Read Chapter 4 section 1 & 2
Thurs. Sept. 13. constitutional restrictions on service.
Constitutional Restrictions on Choice of Law. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hague (US 1981)
Substance/procedure. A NY state court wants to know whether it should use PA’s statute of limitations (damages limitations, burden of proof, evidentiary.
Tuesday, Nov. 13. necessary parties Rule 19. Required Joinder of Parties (a) Persons Required to Be Joined if Feasible. (1) Required Party. A person.
AP Government and Politics Chapter 19: Wilson Homework: Study for Multiple Choice Exam What level of scrutiny should be applied to laws that classify gays.
Wed. Apr. 2. Hughes v Fetter (US 1951) Tennessee Coal, Iron & RR Co v George (US 1914)
Interstate Relations Chapter 4 Section 3.
Mon. Apr. 7. Privileges & Immunities Clause State cannot withhold from non-residents something important (something bearing on the vitality of the nation.
Chapter 4 Section 3.  Interstate Compact = Agreements among States ◦ States are NOT allowed to enter into treaties or compacts with foreign nations.
Tues., Oct. 21. practice midterm Wed. 10/ Room 119 Thurs 10/ Room 141 Thurs 10/ Room 127.
1 Agenda for 6th Class Choice of law clauses (continued) –Restatement 2 nd § 187 (review) –Cases involving covenants not to compete Marriage –Introduction.
SAME SEX MARRIAGE WHERE DO YOU STAND?. SAME SEX MARRIAGE What’s Love got to do with it?
Wed. Jan. 22. domicile White v Tennant (W.Va. 1888)
14. Relations Among the States. Article IV of the Constitution requires states to do the following three things 1 Full Faith and Credit.
CHAPTER 4 SECTION 3 Interstate Relations. Objective Students will understand why State’s make interstate compacts; Students will understand the purpose.
Clarke v. Clarke (US 1900). “This is but to contend that what cannot be done directly can be accomplished by indirection, and that the fundamental principle.
Thurs. Feb. 4. substance/procedure Question of interpretation under 1 st Rest 1) caps on damages 2) certain rules of evidence or burdens of proof 3)
Thurs. Feb. 11. Holzer Buchanan v. Doe (Va. 1993)
§ 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory.
Tues. Apr. 19. Full Faith and Credit state for sister state – Art. IV, sect. 1 federal for state – 28 U.S. Code § 1738 state for federal – Supremacy Clause?
Thurs. Apr. 14. Preclusion Res Judicata Fauntleroy v Lum (US 1908)
Thurs. Apr. 21. Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt (U.S. Apr. 19, 2016)
Tues. Feb. 16. pleading and proving foreign law Fact approach to content of foreign law.
Tues. Apr. 12. Constitutional Restrictions on Choice of Law.
Mon. Apr. 17.
Wed. Apr. 19.
Tues., Sept. 23.
Wed. Apr. 12.
Wed. Mar. 29.
Wed. Feb. 15.
Paula sues Daniel, a New York domiciliary, in Hawaii state court
Federalism Scenarios.
FEDERALISM Interstate relations and National Governments obligations to the states.
Lecture 22 Apr. 2, 2018.
Lecture 24 Apr. 9, 2018.
Lecture 21 Mar. 28, 2018.
Lecture 14 Oct. 22, 2018.
Mon., Nov. 19.
Mon., Sep. 24.
Lecture 19 Nov. 7, 2018.
Lecture 23 Apr. 4, 2018.
Lorrin Evert 5th Period Forensics
Lecture 9 Feb. 7, 2018.
Lecture 7 9/24/18.
Lecture 24 Dec. 5, 2018.
Tues., Nov. 4.
Mon., Oct. 28.
Presentation transcript:

Wed. Apr. 9

Durfee v Duke (US 1963)

Clarke v. Clarke (US 1900)

Fall v Eastin (US 1909)

Baker v Gen Motors (US 1998)

Assume that in Michigan state court General Motors had brought a declaratory judgment action against the Bakers to determine whether Ewell could testify in any suit they might bring. What result?

African-American applicants to a fire dept sue the department The court enters a decree for an affirmative action program in hiring Subsequently white applicants to the fire department sue the department challenging the program Are they precluded?

Anglo-Am Provision v Davis (US 1903) NY ct allowed to refuse suit on foreign judgment between 2 foreign corps when judgment arose from cause of action arising out of state

Kenney v Supreme Lodge (US 1920) Ill ct refused jurisdiction for suit on Alabama wrongful death judgment against an Illinoisan basis was statute forbidding actions for death outside state

“Full faith and credit, however, does not mean that States must adopt the practices of other States regarding the time, manner, and mechanisms for enforcing judgments. Enforcement measures do not travel with the sister state judgment as preclusive effects do; such measures remain subject to the even-handed control of forum law.”

“Orders commanding action or inaction have been denied enforcement in a sister State when they purported to accomplish an official act within the exclusive province of that other State or interfered with litigation over which the ordering State had no authority.”

same-sex marriage and full faith and credit

why aren’t marriages judgments?

Assume all credit card contracts with Citibank are entered into before a justice of the peace in South Dakota, which has no anti- usury law Must all states recognize the validity of the contracts, no matter what their usury law is?

Assume two Californians get into a marriage in Louisiana, which has covenant marriage – which does not allow a subsequent divorce They then return to California Is a California court prohibited from allowing them to get divorced?

DOMA: No State … shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State … respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State…or right or claim arising from such relationship.

In MA, D (a domiciliary of VA) injures X (a domiciliary of MA, who is in a same-sex marriage with P). P sues D in MA and gets a judgment for loss of consortium. May a VA ct refuse to recognize the judgment under DOMA?

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

same-sex divorce

Chambers v. Ormiston (R.I. 2007)