2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Student Classroom Engagement, Part I of II: The Three Components Dr. Jane J. Baskerville,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Purpose : To create a failsafe system of literacy so that all students have equal access to a standards based curriculum Result: Joyful, independent readers,
Advertisements

Developmentally Appropriate Practice
Session Two Review SEF analysis –Benefits –Issues.
Joshua W. Kestner. Mission Statement Effective schools require a sense of purpose and direction provided by well developed and clearly articulated vision.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Leadership #1 February 1, 2012 Presenters: Judy Johnston Vonnie Kunkel 1.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
1 © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1 Using the content-focused Coaching® Model to Support Early childhood Literacy and Language Development How to Teach.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Instructional Preparation, Part I of IV: Effective Teaming Dr. Jane J. Baskerville & Steve.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Remediation That Makes A Difference April 24, 2012 Dr. Dorothea Shannon, Thomasyne Beverly,
Why Inquiry? Inquiry is a process which naturally integrates cross-curricular competencies and the subject areas. Engages learners by making connections.
DED 101 Educational Psychology, Guidance And Counseling
Translating Standards Into Curriculum: The Lead Standards Approach.
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Promoting School Success Social-Emotional Skills Training Nicole Morrell University of Minnesota Early Risers “Skills for Success”
The Comprehensive School Health Education Curriculum:
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Elementary Scheduling Part II of II: Protecting Instructional Time Judy Johnston, LaVonne.
Dr. Sam Redding, Center for Instruction and Improvement.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Instructional Preparation, Part II of IV: Unit Planning Dr. Jane J. Baskerville & Steve.
1 The Virginia Model : Support for School Improvement Training for Instructional Leaders Session 1 July 29, 2009.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Leadership: Data Driven Leadership Part III of III Judy Johnston, LaVonne Kunkel, & Steve.
1. 2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Technical Team(DTAT) Video Series Instructional Preparation, Part III of IV: Differentiation of Instruction Dr.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Student Classroom Engagement, Part II of II: Student Autonomy Dr. Jane J. Baskerville,
2 Office of School Improvement Differentiated Video Series Differentiation of Instruction, Part III of III: Metacognition & Self-Directed Learning Dr.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Leadership: Teachers and Teams Part II of III Judy Johnston, LaVonne Kunkel, & Steve DeGaetani.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series A Framework for Formative Assessment November 15, 2011 Dr. Dorothea Shannon Dr. Greg Wheeler.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Elementary Scheduling Part I of II: First Steps Judy Johnston, LaVonne Kunkel, & Steve.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Formative Assessment October 3, 2011 Dr. Dorothea Shannon, Dr. Greg Wheeler, Mrs. Thomasyne.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Formative Assessment – Feedback February 28,2012 Dr. Dorothea Shannon, Thomasyne Beverly, Dr.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
2 Office of School Improvement Differentiated Video Series Differentiation of Instruction, Part II of III: The Learning Plan Grid Dr. Jane J. Baskerville,
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Instructional Delivery #2 January 18, 2012 Presenters: Judy Johnston Vonnie Kunkel 1.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Instructional Delivery Part I of III: Building a Foundation Judy Johnston, LaVonne Kunkel,
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Instructional Preparation, Part IV of IV: Collegial Coaching Dr. Jane J. Baskerville &
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Formative Assessment March 19, 2012 Dr. Dorothea Shannon, Mrs. Thomasyne Beverly 1.
Formative assessment and effective feedback at Manor Lakes College
Inquiry-Based Learning How It Looks, Sounds and Feels.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
2 Office of School Improvement Differentiated Video Series Differentiation of Instruction, Part I of III: Personalized/Tiered/Differentiated Instruction.
1 Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Instructional Preparation, Part I of IV: Effective Teaming Dr. Jane J. Baskerville & Steve.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Instructional Delivery #1 November 16 /17, 2011 Presenters: Judy Johnston Vonnie Kunkel 1.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Instructional Delivery Part II of III: A Framework Judy Johnston, LaVonne Kunkel, and Steve.
Transformative Classroom Management Webinar #9 of 12 Instruction – Assessment – Management Connection Virginia Department of Education Office of School.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Instructional Delivery Part III of III: Best Practices Judy Johnston, LaVonne Kunkel, and.
ISTE Standards for Teachers Anja Whitehead IDT 3600 Fall 2015.
Academic Choices Moore Public Schools. What is Academic Choice in public school and why should we try it?  Academic Choice is a way to structure lessons.
Agenda What is “learner-centered”? ~Think of Time Activity ~ Learner-Centered: In Our Own Words Effective Instructional Strategies for the Learner- Centered.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Formative Assessment – Assessment for Learning December 13, 2011 Dr. Dorothea Shannon Dr. Greg.
1 Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Instructional Preparation, Part III of IV: Differentiation of Instruction Dr. Jane J. Baskerville.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
The Teacher- Child Interaction Linking Developmentally Appropriate Practices to the Characteristics of Effective Instruction.
Chapter 12 Guiding Children’s Behavior Helping Children Act Their Best.
Incorporating Instructional Design into Library Instruction Classes NEFLIN Live Online July 7, 2011.
❧ Dialogic Reading March ❧ ❧ Dialogic Reading is an interactive shared picture book reading practice designed to enhance children’s language and.
1 Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Student Engagement, Part I of II: What is It? Dr. Jane J. Baskerville & Steve DeGaetani November.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Developmentally appropriate practices and specialized instruction are fundamentally dependent upon each other in early childhood special education. Record.
Previously Implemented Instructional Approaches
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
Presentation transcript:

2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Student Classroom Engagement, Part I of II: The Three Components Dr. Jane J. Baskerville, Steve DeGaetani, and Vonnie Kunkel

3 The ultimate goal in school improvement is for the people attached to the school to drive its continuous improvement for the sake of their own children and students. - Dr. Sam Redding

Student Classroom Engagement Session 1—The Three Components Session 2—Student Self-Directed Learning 4

5 Today’s Agenda 1.What does the research say about the power of teachers to influence “student engagement?” 2.Activity/Discussion: An Examination of Teacher Practices: What does engagement look like to the learner? to the principal?

Student Classroom Engagement Series  The sessions are designed to be used by individuals or in a group setting.  The sessions are sequential.  The Power Points and all materials may be downloaded from the VDOE Web site. 6

7 Purpose Series: To identify requisite teacher practices that influence student engagement and motivation, resulting from student relatedness, competence, and autonomy Today’s Video Presentation: To (a) define student engagement that is requisite to student performance and achievement and (b) examine teacher practices that influence engagement

8 What Are YOUR Thoughts?  As a student (past and present) what are some factors that affect/ed your engagement?  Why is your favorite teacher your favorite?  In your experience, what factors determine a student’s level of motivation or engagement?  WHO are Pauline Graham and Father Patrick Donahue?

Quote of the Day To the degree that his teacher addresses his individual psychological needs--relatedness, competence, and autonomy -a child can become engaged in learning. -Connell & Wellborn, 1991; Klem & Connell, 2004; Redding,

What the Research Says Student Engagement  Is a Meta construct that incorporates psychological, social, and educational domains (Guthrie & Wigfield, 2000). Per Connell and Wellborn (1991); Klem and Connell (2005); and Redding (2006), student engagement (also referred to as intrinsic motivation)  Is a student outcome that results from a confluence of teacher practices that address needs of psychological, social, and educational contexts relevant to learning: teacher involvement that influences student relatedness; teacher structure that influences student competence; and teacher autonomy support that influences student autonomy/relevance/voice.  Results from all needs being met—not just relatedness or competence or autonomy separately.  Results from one-on-one teacher/student relationships.  Is requisite to student performance and achievement. 10

What the Research Says A teacher can increase a student’s perception of self-efficacy (belief in his/her capabilities to be successful), thus elevating the student’s effort, persistence, and ultimate level of performance (Bandura, 1997; Schunk & Ertmer, 2000). Per Saphier, Haley-Speca, and Gower (2008, p.259), this can be done by  Building relationships.  Communicating belief and building confidence in students.  Constructing classroom climates of community, psychological safety, and ownership. 11

What the Research Says Empirical evidence finds that the effects of classroom practices, when added to those of other teacher characteristics, are comparable in size to those of student background, suggesting that teachers can contribute as much to student learning as the students themselves. -Wenglinsky,

Reflection Activity Teacher Practices Centering on Involvement That Influences Student Elatedness Relatedness: What it looks like/feels like to the student “I belong in this classroom…; my teacher lets me know it every day.” What might it look like to the principal? (Justify your response.) (Adapted from Pianta, Hamre, Haynes, Mintz, & La Paro, 2006) 13

14 EXHIBIT A The teacher…  Influences positive affect in the classroom.  Influences positive peer & teacher interactions.  Demonstrates interest in and care about lives of individual students.  Effects a one on one relationship with the individual learner for learner to feel sense of “relatedness.”

Reflection Activity--Continued Teacher Practices Centering on Structure (Implementing Best Practices) That Influences Student Competence: Competence: What It Looks Like/Feels Like to the Student: “I know I can be successful…;furthermore, my teacher thinks that I can and shows me that I can….” What Might It Look Like to the Principal? (Adapted from Pianta, Hamre, Haynes, Mintz, & La Paro, 2006) 15

16 EXHIBIT B The teacher…  Articulates and models clear expectations in the classroom.  Provides and explains student learning objectives – encouraging student discussion of objectives.  Links student background knowledge to new concepts; anchors new knowledge through guided practice and modeling of new steps.  Provides opportunities for students to gain competence through work time activities – after whole group instruction when students practice applying what they have just learned.  Demonstrates sensitivity to the needs of the students by providing differentiated instruction and assessment – all leading toward target level performance and beyond.

17 EXHIBIT B—Continued The teacher…  Models metacognitive processing (modeling how to think about thinking), i.e., the teacher says: “I would say to myself, Remember what strategy you used to solve this kind of problem before.”)  Provides ongoing assessment before, during, and after instruction.  Provides formative assessment and descriptive feedback for learning--not just acknowledging the “correct answer;” uses probing questions and hints, and scaffolds cues when encouraging students t o think about their answers.

Reflection Activity—Continued Teacher Practices Centering on Autonomy That Influence Student Autonomy Autonomy: What it looks like/feels like to the student “I have choices and can have some control over/responsibility toward my success…; furthermore, what I’m doing centers on my reality….” What might it look like to the principal? (Justify your response.) (Adapted from Pianta, Hamre, Haynes, Mintz, & La Paro, 2006) 18

19 EXHIBIT C  Facilitates student responsibility and relevance by providing choices within parameters.  Provides opportunities for student choice and voice.  Encourages student responsibility and relevance through the use of rubrics, self assessments, and student management of their learning objectives.* *(Refer to the Student Learning Plan – an individual student’s prescribed work time activities from Learning Plan Grid activities relevant to a unit of study.)

20 Learning Plan Grid Standard/Benchmark Code: _5.5 b & c_* *These SOL have been taught separately first. Assessment Level Code: U Target Objective Code: Red Enhanced Objective Code: Yellow Prerequisite Code: Green Using the Character & Plot Chart, Target group will justify choices made in the student-directed group. SOL 5.5 b & c ALC: U IndependentComputer Based Student-Directed Group Teacher-Directed Group Homework Enhanced: TSW read & demonstrate comprehension of fiction b. Describe character development in fiction and poetry selections. c. Describe the development of plot and explain how conflicts are resolved. In your journal: Write why and how you might have changed the character development of the main character in the play, The Catch of the Day OR Write why you would not have changed it. With a partner at the computer station, choose two fiction selections (one poem) and compare how the authors developed the main character and the conflict and how s/he resolved the conflict. * *Character vs. Character? *Character vs. Society? *Character vs. Nature? Self? In your 12 noon cooperative group (interests), use the Character & Plot Development Rubric to write and present a skit that portrays a character & plot similar to those in the play, The Catch of the Day. The 12 noon cooperative group will review the rubric and expectations with the teacher before writing the skit as the student- directed activity. Be prepared to defend or criticize how the media might develop a cartoon character or a movie plot of your choice). List specific examples/actions. Target b. Describe character development in fiction and poetry selections. c. Describe the development of plot and explain how conflicts are resolved. In your journal, write two strategies that you would use in developing someone ’ s character. Explain why you would use those strategies. At the computer station read poem # 5, and tell how or if the author resolved the conflict of the main character. (Teacher has bookmarked selections from Using PX Books to Teach Plot Conflict for students to use as references.) In your 12 noon group, review the play, The Catch of the Day, list the five most important actions that develop the plot. Justify choices & list them in the Character & Plot Chart to discuss with teacher. Be prepared to discuss how you or the media might develop a cartoon character or a movie plot of your choice). List specific examples/actions. Prerequisite b. Describe character development in fiction and poetry selections. c. Describe the development of plot and explain how conflicts are resolved. From the assignment you completed with your partner at the computer, illustrate in sequence the actions that lead to resolution of the conflict. At the computer station, review with a partner your choice of a story (in TITYS folder) that shows how the author develops a character, a conflict, and a resolution of the conflict. Using the Character & Plot Chart, list in sequence the important actions that lead to the resolution. From Using PX Books to Teach.)Plot.) In your 12 noon cooperative group, compare what you wrote/discussed with your partner with what the other members of the group wrote/discussed with their partners. The group will review with the teacher ways that an author might develop a fictional character and conflict and resolve the character ’ s conflict. (See Using Picture Books to Teach Plot Conflict; Conflict Map. Be prepared to defend your illustration – why you represented the characters the way you did, why you sequenced the actions the way you did, etc. Talk about how the media might do the same type thing. CharacterPlot/Actio n

21 What was one idea I learned during today’s webinar that I plan to share with teachers at my school?

22 Application Activity A.When conducting classroom observations and/or walk-throughs during the next month, list specific teacher practices that appear to motivate and engage students. B.Categorize the practices under the three factors of student relatedness—influenced by teacher involvement; student competence— influenced by teacher structure/implementation of best practices; and student autonomy—influenced by teacher support of autonomy. C.Discuss with a colleague or reflect on your own: 1.How often were students observed demonstrating autonomy or self-direction? 2.What small steps could your teachers take to increase the frequency with which their students can be self-directed?

23 Questions? If you come up with a question today, or even later please contact the OSI staff at or call

Additional Resources Erwin, J. (2004). The classroom of choice: Giving students what they need and getting what you want. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Kryza, K., Duncan, A., and Stevens, S. (2009). Inspiring elementary learners, nurturing the whole child in a differentiated classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Nussbaum, P., and Daggett, W. (2008). What brain research teaches about rigor, relevance, and relationships. Rexford, NY: International Center for Leadership in Education. Pink, D. (2009). Drive, The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York, NY: Penguin Press. Sullo, J. (2007). Activating the desire to learn. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. 24

Additional Resources  Wise Ways: Center on Innovation & Improvement, (2008)  Virginia Support for School Improvement: Effective Teaming & Instructional Planning (2008)  Redding, S. (2006). The Mega System. Deciding. Learning. Connecting. A handbook for continuous improvement within a community of the school. Lincoln, IL: Academic Development Institute. 25

Student Classroom Engagement -Next Video Session Session 1—The Three Components Session 2– Student Self-Directed Learning 26