Results of TSA 2005 A Report on the Basic Competencies of Students at the End of Key Stages 1 and 2 in Chinese, English and Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Territory-wide System Assessment 2006 Primary 3 & 6 English Language.
Advertisements

1 Territory-wide System Assessment 2005 Analysis of School Reports.
Territory-wide System Assessment 2009 (Secondary Schools) Briefing on Online Submission and Special Arrangement Selection Briefing on Online Submission.
TSA 2011 Briefing Session on Oral, CAV & Written Assessments (Primary Schools) 7 April 2011.
Territory-wide System Assessment 年 全港性系統評估.
TSA 2010 Briefing Session on Oral, CAV & Written Assessments (Primary Schools) 26 April 2010.
第二章 研究主題(研究題 目)與研究問題.
輔仁大學 外語學院九十四學年度 翻譯學程 宗旨 本本本本學程之規劃旨在以跨語言學科 的整合性課程,強調在學生具有 相當外語能力基礎上,提升翻譯 能力訓練,擴大其外語能力競爭 優勢。
建立使用案例敘述 --Use Case Narrative
零歲至六歲兒童發展篩檢量表 編製者:黃惠玲.
指導老師: 蘇永盛 組員: 符子平 洪小雙 塗詩婷
HSR 課程介紹. 指定用書 Health Services Research Method Leiyu Shi 2008.
國立臺北科技大學進修部推廣教 育中心 生活美語會話 課程 英語課程說明 陳韻如 Melody.  課程目的:學生能夠使用簡單的英文以及在 一般英文會話中能夠自然應對並啟發學習英文 興趣  培養學生的聽、說、讀、寫基本能力,且琢 磨於文法、句型、字彙上的練習及應用使學生 透過老師的帶領,進行文化的體驗、發音的矯.
數位學習經驗分享 「 E 化教學教室與虛擬攝影棚」推廣經驗分享暨觀摩 高高屏活動 義守大學應用數學系郎正廉.
「大一新生英文能力分班及 英文能力檢測」 成果概要 97 學年度教學卓越計畫 97D 計畫簡介 ► 因應現行英文分班制度因課程內容調整, 已不再適合作為編班基礎,語言教學中心 特別研發「大一新生英文能力分班及英文 能力檢測」,製作具鑑別度之編班試題, 能夠將學生編入合適班級,並依據學生不.
1 真理大學運輸管理學系 實務實習說明 目錄  實務實習類別  實務實習條例  校外實習單位  實務實習成績計算方式  校外實習甄選 / 自洽申請流程  附錄:相關表格.
96 學年度日間部四技 英語能力測驗 外語中心 Foreign Language Center.  英語學習進路圖  測驗目的  測驗時間及方式  缺考影響及補考  測驗後補救教學  級別調整 大綱.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 肆 資料分析與表達.
真理大學航空運輸管理學系 實務實習說明. 實務實習部份 實務實習 校內實習 校外實習 實習時數必須在 300 小時 ( 含 ) 以上才承認 校內實習時數及實習成績。 二個寒假 各一個月 暑假兩個月.
99 學年度第 2 學期 英文能力統一會考說明 外語中心 Foreign Language Center.
國際學術交流介紹 主講者 : 陳明志 副教授
南投縣社區大學 Excel 實務應用入門 講師 : 林泉成
民意調查的分析 II 蔡佳泓 政大選舉研究中心 副研究員. 課程大綱 假設的檢定 研究假設 H1: 研究假設 ( 例: X 與 Y 相關 ) H0: 虛無假設 ( 例: X 與 Y 無關 ) 檢定結果:接受虛無假設或拒斥虛無假 設,但不代表接受研究假設.
資料處理 汪群超 2 這一年將學習到什麼? 網際網路:你在哪裡?瞭解你的角色、駕馭網路 。 Web 、 FTP 、 、 Proxy 、 Database Servers 記錄你的學習歷程、展現學習成果: Homepage 、 PowerPoint.
職場危害與管理 (VIII) 目標標的與管理計畫 張書奇 Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental Engineering 2 Division.
國立中央大學電機工程學系 99 學年度第 2 學期 助教會議 中央大學電機工程學系 工程認證 1.
論文研討 ( 一 ) B 組 課程簡介 劉美纓 / 尚榮安 / 胡凱傑 2009/09/17. 一、課程基本資料 科目名稱: ( 中文 ) 論文研討(一)B組 ( 英文 ) SEMINARS (I) 開課學期: 98 學年度第 1 學期 開課班級:企碩一 學 分 數: 2 學分 星期節次: 四 34.
香港中文大學校友會聯會陳震夏中學 簡介 2000 年開校 沙田馬鞍山頌安邨 六班中一級 學生人數: 243 人 教師人數: 16 人.
無邊落木蕭蕭下 不盡長江滾滾來.
: Ahoy, Pirates! ★★★★☆ 題組: Contest Archive with Online Judge 題號: 11402: Ahoy, Pirates! 解題者:李重儀 解題日期: 2008 年 8 月 26 日 題意:有一個海盜島有 N 個海盜,他們的編號 (id)
North Point Government Primary PM School 北角官立下午小學 應用 ‘ 基本能力學生評估 ’ 及 ‘ 網上學與教支援系統 ’ 經驗分享.
校務資訊系統 畢業離校操作說明 報告日期 : 務必先點選 ” 步驟一 ” 謝大美 大學部 中文系四年級 女 台中市北屯區 xx 路 xx 號 修改原留的資料 請點選此處 修改原留的資料 請點選此處.
語文補救教學助教心得分享 馬信鏘
交換生了沒 ? 研究事務與國際合作處 國際合作組. Who can be Exchange Student? 一對一交換學生 團體研修 ( 如:日文系、德文系 ) 雙聯學制 ( 如:美國雷鳥大學 1+1 、 4+1) 研究事務與國際合作處 國際合作組.
成本效能:教師的供求、 編制與薪級 黃炳文香港教育學院教育政策與行政系. 成本效能 (Cost Effectiveness) 目標 (Goals) 目標 (Goals) 方法 (Methods, Strategies) 方法 (Methods, Strategies) 評估 (Evaluation)
國科會 「九十四年度數位典藏國家型科技計畫」 應用服務分項 創意加值計畫 期中報告 利用台灣現有視障用數位典藏資料製作盲人電子書報告人:唐傳義 清華大學 資訊工程學系.
Chapter 3 Entropy : An Additional Balance Equation
國小語文科教材教法 主講者:義守大學通識教育中心 副教授 鄭瓊月. 壹、國小國語科課程標準與 語文教學的任務 一、國小語文科課程的演進 二、新頒課程標準的內容 三、國小語文教學的任務.
國中英文科教學活動設計 – 端午節 外文碩二 張維珊 外文碩二 聶欣瑩.
美研究:學樂器有助兒 童閱讀 天下雜誌教育基金會希望閱讀網站 =40288aed23a349cd0123a35f4e
中國語文科全港性系統評估 評估理念 校本處理 發展背景 為甚麼要設立「基本能力評估」 (BCA) ? 2000 年,教育統籌委員會《香 港教育制度改革建議》報告書 “ 協助教師及家長了解學生的 學習問題和需要,從而及早 提供適切的幫助;同時,透 過適切的教學措施,讓學生 有最大空間發揮潛能,既能.
Overview of TSA 2015 and onwards (for Primary Schools) Education Assessment Services Division 18 September 2014.
Introduction to New TSA Reporting Platform 18 th September, 2014.
Overview of TSA 2015 and onwards (for Secondary Schools) Education Assessment Services Division 18 September 2014.
筆試經驗分享 報告人蕭博文. 自我介紹  學歷 - 輔仁大學企管系  經歷  茂順密封元件 ( 股 ) 公司人資課課長 - 現職  茂順密封元件 ( 股 ) 公司人事企劃專員  OK 便利商店台中分公司人資專員.
南台科技大學 應用英語系碩士班 張孟文. 主題 : 1. 如何準備研究所考試 2. 現在修課情況.
實體關係模型 (ER Model).
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 肆 資料分析與表達.
TSA 2010 Briefing on Submission of School Data and Selection of Special Arrangements (Secondary Schools) 30 November 2009 EDB Kowloon Tong Education Services.
TSA 2012 Briefing Session on Oral, CAV & Written Assessments (Primary Schools) 16 April 2012.
Territory-wide System Assessment 2009 (Primary Schools) Briefing on Online Submission and Special Arrangement Selection Briefing on Online Submission and.
Chang Gung University 長庚大學 機械系 Pearson Education Taiwan HED Gino Kuo
TSA 2010 Briefing Session on Oral & Written Assessments (Secondary Schools) 30 March 2010.
Introductory Talk on JUPAS and University Study Programs.
ENGLISH. S.1 G.E. PAPER (1 st term test) ★ Duration minutes ★ Section A: Reading Comprehension (50-55%) ( 閱讀理解 ) ★ Section B: Usage (35-40%) (
Longman Elect 透過閱讀、聆聽、說話及寫作去學習句 式、文法及生字 Learn the sentence structures, grammar and vocabulary through reading, listening, speaking and writing.
English Language Secondary 3. Assessment for Learning Student Assessment Provides teachers with resources and data to improve student progress towards.
英華女學校 Ying Wa Girls’ School 中五學生升學輔導講座 S5 Careers Conference.
TSA 2012 Briefing Session on Oral & Written Assessments (Secondary Schools) 28 March 2012.
Findings & Discussion 1. What are the students' attitudes toward the current language-skill courses? 2. What are the students' attitudes toward the proposed.
Canossa School (H.K.) P.1 Parents’ Meeting English language curriculum ( 英語課程 )
Education Commission 11 December 2004 Progress of the Education Reform.
RFID 認證 1/99 建國科技大學資管系 饒瑞佶 RFID 認證 CompTIA RFID + ( 國際 ) EPC/RFID ( 台灣 ) RFID 工程師教育認證 ( 台灣 ) 2/99.
計劃深化推廣活動 深化推廣活動的目的是促進學校借鏡優良計 劃的成功經驗及加強協助參與學校試行成功 計劃的模式。 第一批獲邀請推行深化推廣活動的計劃:
Overview of TSA 5 nd October, Development in 2015 Interface with WebSAMS for student upload Support Google Chrome web browser Phase 2 of Online.
Overview of TSA 2015 and onwards (for Secondary Schools) Summary Education Assessment Services Division.
Territory-wide System Assessment 2009 (Primary Schools) Briefing on Oral, CAV & Written Assessments Briefing on Oral, CAV & Written Assessments 24 April.
English Language Secondary 3
Territory-wide System Assessment 2009 (Primary Schools)
Form 1 and 2 Parent’s Forum 9 March 2018
Presentation transcript:

Results of TSA 2005 A Report on the Basic Competencies of Students at the End of Key Stages 1 and 2 in Chinese, English and Mathematics

2 Background to the TSA The 2000 report of the Education Commission sets out detailed proposals for two kinds of basic competency assessment: –Student Assessment –System Assessment (now renamed ‘Territory-wide System Assessment’ (TSA)) HKEAA commissioned to develop and administer both projects for EMB

3 Purposes of the TSA Provide the Government and schools with information on standards Monitor the effectiveness of policies School improvement

4 Scope of TSA Chinese Language, English Language and Mathematics P3 in 2004 P3 and P6 in 2005 P3, P6 and S3 in 2006

5 Administration of the Assessment Written Assessments –68,000 P3 students and 78,000 P6 students from some 700 schools –Conducted over 2 days in July –Students randomly assigned Oral Assessment –12 or 24 students randomly selected from each school –Conducted over two days in May –Two oral assessors

6 Changes in 2005 All written papers centrally marked by an external panel of experienced teachers One internal and one external assessors to assess oral language

7 Setting the Standards P3 standards –Set in 2004 using expert panels and international benchmarking P6 standards –Set using expert panels to fine tune standards established empirically with reference to P3 standards

8 Territory-wide P3 Results Subject Percent Achieving Basic Competency Chinese Language (Listening, Reading & Writing) English Language (Listening, Reading & Writing) Mathematics

9 Territory-wide P3 Results

10 Territory-wide P6 Results Subject Percent Achieving Basic Competency Chinese Language (Listening, Reading & Writing) 75.8 English Language (Listening, Reading & Writing) 70.5 Mathematics83.0

11 P3 versus P6

12 Absenteeism Rate A survey was conducted in August 2005 on absenteeism rates in primary schools by the HKEAA. The figures showed that the average daily absenteeism rate in the month of June was 1.5% but that the average absenteeism rate on the two days was 1.8%. A total of 58 schools were found to have absenteeism rates of 5% or more for P.3 written assessments, while 50 schools were found to have absenteeism rates of 5% or more for P.6 written assessments.

13 Absenteeism Rate Based on a worst-case scenario in which all absences over 1.5% were of students who would have failed to achieve basic competency The maximum distortion in the territory-wide estimates of the percent meeting the standard – around 0.3% for P.6 and around 0.6% for P.3.

14 Absenteeism Rate Schools with absenteeism rates of 5% or more may not truly reflect the percentages had they been in full attendance. Hence, these results are not recommended as the sole indicators for the development of learning and teaching programme.

15 Confidentiality EMB and HKEAA will maintain confidentiality of individual schools’ results at all times. School results are for school improvement purposes. Schools will be able to access their own results electronically via the internet, using confidentiality protocols.

Territory-wide System Assessment 2005 Release of Results 8 December 2005

TSA 2005 Results Results are released in the form of three reports: 1.School Report – Summary of school data with percentages of students achieving Basic Competency, and the average percentages for each of the subject papers.School Report 2.Item Analysis Report (sorted by Sub-paper) – detailed analysis of school percentages for each of the items, following the question paper sequence.Item Analysis Report (sorted by Sub-paper) 3.Item Analysis Report (sorted by Basic Competency) – detailed analysis of school percentages for each of the items, in sequence of Basic Competencies.Item Analysis Report (sorted by Basic Competency) Note: Reports excluding SEN to be released in mid-January

TSA 2005 Results – New Initiative in 2005 Results are released on the TSA website through online access to “ Schools can download the reports from the TSA website from 12 December 2005 to 31 January 2006.

TSA 2005 Results – Reports Security Schools will receive a sealed envelope through registered mail with the new passwords to access the website and the reports. 1.Logon User Name 2.Logon Password 3.PDF Password for downloading reports

TSA 2005 Results – Reports Security The PDF password, additional password on file level, provides greater security for the files. Reminder to Schools – Please keep all the passwords in a safe and secure place..

TSA 2005 Results – Reports Download Select ‘Login’

TSA 2005 Results – Reports Download Input the Login Name and User Password

TSA 2005 Results – Reports Download Procedure Select Download Assessment Reports

TSA 2005 Results – Reports Download Procedure Select the Report to be downloaded

TSA 2005 Results – Reports Download Procedure Read through the Protocol from EMB …

TSA 2005 Results – Reports Download Procedure And then click the ‘I Accept’ before downloading the report

TSA 2005 Results – Reports Download Procedure Then the system prompts for the file level password Input the PDF Password and then click ‘OK’ The report will then be displayed

TSA 2005 Results – Enquiries Three ways for enquiries: 1.Schools not yet receiving a sealed envelope through registered mail on 13 December or later – call Administrative Team at Technical problems during download – Call our hotline at Questions on school data – Fill in the Recheck Request Form (on the website) and fax to

TSA 2005 Report Details of the background to TSA, the development process, administration, marking and standards-setting Extensive competency-by-competency analyses of student performance in each subject, with exemplars Discussion of the way forward and proposed improvements for the future

Thank You

31 School Report 科目 Subject 完成紙筆評估的 學生人數 Number of students completing written assessment (A) 已達基本水平的 學生人數 Number of students achieving Basic Competency (B) 學校已達基本水平 的學生百分率 School percentage of students achieving Basic Competency (B/A  X  全港已達基本水平 的學生百分率 Territory-wide percentage of students achieving Basic Competency 中國語文 Chinese Language 英國語文 English Language 數學 Mathematics 學校 School: School A (hkp00998) 級別 Level: 小三

32 School Report 科目 Subject 完成紙筆評估的 學生人數 Number of students completing written assessment (A) 已達基本水平的 學生人數 Number of students achieving Basic Competency (B) 學校已達基本水平 的學生百分率 School percentage of students achieving Basic Competency (B/A  X  全港已達基本水平 的學生百分率 Territory-wide percentage of students achieving Basic Competency 中國語文 Chinese Language 英國語文 English Language 數學 Mathematics 學校 School: School B (hkp00999) 級別 Level: 小六

33 School Report 學校 School: School B (hkp00999) 中國語文 Chinese Language 卷別 : 能力或範疇 Paper: Skill or Dimension 學生人數 Number of students 滿分 Maximum score (A) 學校平均分 School Average Score (B) 學校答對率 School average as a % of maximum score (B/A X  全港答對率 Territory-wide average as a % of maximum score 3CL1: 聆聽 Listening CL2: 聆聽 Listening CR1: 閱讀 Reading CR2: 閱讀 Reading CR3: 閱讀 Reading

34 School Report 卷別 : 能力或範疇 Paper: Skill or Dimension 學生人數 Number of students 滿分 Maximum score (A) 學校平均分 School Average Score (B) 學校答對率 School average as a % of maximum score (B/A X  全港答對率 Territory-wide average as a % of maximum score 3CW1: 寫作 Writing CW2: 寫作 Writing CW3: 寫作 Writing 學校 School: School B (hkp00999) 中國語文 Chinese Language

35 School Report 學校 School: School B (hkp00999) 中國語文 Chinese Language 卷別 : 能力或範疇 Paper: Skill or Dimension 學生人數 Number of students 滿分 Maximum score (A) 學校平均分 School Average Score (B) 學校答對率 School average as a % of maximum score (B/A X  全港答對率 Territory- wide average as a % of maximum score 說話 ( 個人 ) Speaking (Individual) 說話 ( 小組 ) Speaking (Group) CAV: 視聽資訊 Audio-visual Information

36 Item Analysis by Sub-paper 題號 Item no. 選項 Option 得分 / 等級 Score/Grade 學校百分率 School percentage 全港百分率 Territory-wide percentage Q01A B C D * U# 13.5% 16.2% 0.0% 70.3% 0.0% 5.1% 9.1% 2.6% 83.1% 0.1% Q110 1 U# 40.5% 59.5% 0.0% 27.9% 72.0% 0.1% 題目分析報告 ( 以卷別為序 ) Item Analysis Report (Sorted by Sub-paper) 中國語文 Chinese Language ( 分卷 : 3CL1 聆聽評估 ) * 正確答案 Correct answer # 沒有答題或答案無效 No or invalid 不屬於第一學習階段的「基本能力」範圍 Not included in BC descriptors at KS1 由兩名評審員評估 ( 寫作及說話 ) Rated by two assessors (Writing & Speaking) 學校 School: School B (hkp00999) 級別 Level: 小三

37 Item Analysis by Basic Competency 範疇 Skill 基本能力 Basic Competency 卷別 Sub- paper 題號 Item no. 選項 Option 得分 / 等級 Score/ Grade 學校百分 率 School percentage 全港百分率 Territory-wide percentage ReadingL2-R-5-P3BC Using a small range of reading strategies to understanding the meaning of short and simple texts with the help of cues 3ERW1 3ERW3 P2A Q01 P4A Q01 A B C * D U# 12.0% 16.0% 60.0% 4.0% 8.0% 7.4% 3.5% 85.1% 1.3% 2.8% 3ERW1P4 Q040 1 U# 93.3% 7.7% 0.0% 79.2% 19.2% 1.7% 學校 School: School B (hkp00999) 級別 Level: 小三 * 正確答案 Correct answer # 沒有答題或答案無效 No or invalid answer 由兩名評審員評估 ( 寫作及說話 ) Rated by two assessors (Writing & Speaking) 題目分析報告 ( 以基本能力為序 ) Item Analysis Report (Sorted by Basic Competency) 英國語文 English Language