The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Glenn-Marie Lange Environment Department, The World Bank
Advertisements

Slide1 Managing Flood Risk U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Steven L. Stockton, P.E. Director of Civil Works U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 14 July 2009 Presentation.
Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: MEANS-ENDS DIAGRAMS ACES Workshop 2014 Christy Ihlo,
USDA Forest Service Research and Development Tribal Engagement Roadmap Consultation - January 10 to May 11, 2014 [DATE of PRSTN]
West Coast Regional Marine Planning
The Ecosystem approach: from theory to application in England Tom Tew Natural England Delivering Nature’s Services.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com Methods.
Aligning Methods for Assessing Wetland Ecosystem Services Anthony Dvarskas NOAA Assessment and Restoration Division/IMSG CNREP 2010 New Orleans, LA.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS National Hydrography Dataset Stewardship in West Virginia George Heleine USGS NHD POC Region.
NAASF State Lands Management Committee Meeting November 4-6, 2014 Indianapolis, Indiana Northern Long-eared Bat: Conservation Challenges and Options for.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
Andes (Latin America). Current situation – Very high inequity indexes and high natural resources degradation rates – Water and Land tenure conflicts:
 Timber, wood fiber, fuel wood  Gas regulation and climate control  Carbon sequestration  Watershed services (water supply and quality)  Clean air.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.
Ecosystem Restoration Module ER4: Cost Effectiveness/Incremental Cost Analysis and the NER Plan BU ILDING STRONG SM.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
Knowledge on HIA IN CAMBODIA Constructing a Caring and Sharing Community Roles of HIA 4-6 October 2012 Bangkok.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Incorporating Spatial Heterogeneity in Temperature into Climate Vulnerability Assessments for Coastal Pacific Streams NOAA, UW, USGS This project will.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Emily Vuxton and Lauren Leuck U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources (IWR) Alexandria,
Results: Test-run in the Willamette Basin Some areas provide higher levels of services than others. The agriculture and timber maps show dollar values—high.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
© All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Project Outline: Wildlife Working Team 1 Rick & Lynne to edit by may meeting Team Scope Roundtable.
Modification of Interagency Strategy for the Implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy December 2008 Modification of Interagency Strategy.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com ASSESSMENT.
Setting Goals and Getting Started with Scenarios Emily McKenzie.
Engaging Communities in Developing a Sustainable Wood Products and Biomass Energy Industry By Gerry Gray Vice President for Policy American Forests.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Ecosystem Services & their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Suynik Province, Armenia Armenia.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook LINKING.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center Council for Data Integration Meeting Sept 16, 2009 U.S. Department of the.
Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook STAKEHOLDER.
January ‘06Advice to Minister1. January ‘06Advice to Minister2 Understanding Climate Change Climate Change Action Plan Elements Climate Change Action.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO) Presented to the 62 nd Annual Interstate Seafood Seminar Bob Connell New Jersey Department of Environmental.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
What Can We Say About the Economic, Institutional, and Legal Framework for Sustainable Forest Management in the United States? Roundtable on Sustainable.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Oregon Department of Forestry Kevin Birch Planning Coordinator Use of Criteria & Indicators and Sustainable Forest Management at Different Scales Oregon.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
Integrating Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation Dick Cameron Senior Conservation Planner The Nature Conservancy, California Program 1.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Marine Aquaculture in U.S.A. David O’Brien. 2 Today’s Talk U.S. Aquaculture NOAA’s Role Research Initiatives.
Establishing an Urban Research Agenda for Decision Ready Science: Priorities and Opportunities: From the Forest Perspective Sarah Low, Philadelphia Field.
Climate Change Response Framework projects Presentation to the Forest Community Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity in the Context of Climate Change Workshop.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
Incorporating cost-benefit analysis of REDD+ options into planning for REDD+ in Cambodia Mr Chivin Leng, Forestry Administration of Cambodia, 7 December.
SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.
Division of Federal Program Activities Sikes Act Coordination Activities Fish and Wildlife Service.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
Modification of Interagency Strategy for the Implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy February 2009 Modification of Interagency Strategy.
1 Child and Family Teaming Module 2 The Child and Family Team Meeting: Preparation, Facilitation, and Follow-up.
National Ecosystem Services Partnership: Supporting Federal Agencies Lydia Olander, Duke University, National Ecosystem Services Partnership & Nicholas.
STATE OF ALASKA PERMITTING PROCESS
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Mr Chivin Leng, Forestry Administration of Cambodia, 7 December 2015
The NOAA Climate Program: Research and Climate Services
Invasive Species National Assessment
Regional Restoration Planning for the Delaware Estuary
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Investing in Source Water Protection
Presentation transcript:

The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com

Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com U NDERSTAND THE M OTIVATION FOR AN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES APPROACH

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Common Categories Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 3 Provisioning Goods or products produced by ecosystems Regulating Natural processes regulated by ecosystems Cultural Non-material benefits obtained from ecosystems 3 Supporting Functions that maintain all other services Source of slide: Businesses for Social Responsibility

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com An Ecosystem Services Approach Katie Locklier, 2013 USDA, FS Tony Alter, Wikimedia Commons Katie Locklier, 2013 USDA FS Rob Haight, USFS N. Research Station Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com An Ecosystem Services Approach Alan Cressler, USGS U.S. EPA Shannon Bauer, USACE BLM Montana Office George Gentry, FWS Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Focus on Comparing Options Comparing the effects of changes in management on ecosystem service outcomes for options under consideration: – Alternative management options, sites, or scenarios – Prioritization across different project types or investments – Comparison of projected scenarios of alternative futures (regional or national scale)

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com When to Use and ES Approach Key questions to think about: What services are important? Are they already considered in planning processes? Would including ecosystem services….. Help resolve or reduce conflicts? Create opportunities for partnerships? Potentially lead to a different decision? An ecosystem services approach is not helpful in all contexts or situations.

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Potential Benefits A better assessment of impacts on human health, wealth, and well-being versus U.S. EPA Shannon Bauer, USACE BLM Montana Office George Gentry, FWS Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net Alan Cressler, USGS U.S. EPA BLM Montana Office

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Potential Benefits versus U.S. EPA Shannon Bauer, USACE BLM Montana Office George Gentry, FWS Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net Alan Cressler, USGS U.S. EPA BLM Montana Office An explicit assessment of tradeoffs

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Potential Benefits Reduced High Flows Crayfish Habitat Fish population Riparian Habitat Flood Zone versus BLM Montana Office A more holistic or complete assessment of how management will effect people and improved communications and stakeholder buy-in (etc.)

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Potential Benefits Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net versus U.S. EPA Shannon Bauer, USACE BLM Montana Office George Gentry, FWS Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net Alan Cressler, USGS U.S. EPA BLM Montana Office Inclusive of all ecosystem service benefits even if they are difficult to quantify

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Potential Benefits versus U.S. EPA Shannon Bauer, USACE BLM Montana Office George Gentry, FWS Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net Vera Kratovchil, PublicDomainPictures.net Alan Cressler, USGS U.S. EPA BLM Montana Office $500,000 $750,000 Ecosystem service benefits can sometimes be expressed in monetary terms improving cross comparison and communication

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Potential Benefits Analysis of who has access and benefits from changes in services can be the basis for understanding distributional or equity implications Alex Chuman

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Agencies are Seeing Benefits  Incorporates additional services into decision making – NOAA Blue Carbon  Can result in more efficient NEPA process – Deschutes National Forest, Marsh restoration project  Improves stakeholder engagement – California regional forest planning  Helps to identify potential partners to improve cost- effectiveness of management – USFS Forest to Faucets project  Identifies best options for supporting public welfare – EPA NOx and SOx standards

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Frequently Asked Questions Does this approach…. 1.Get used in all management decisions?  No 2.Replace assessments of traditional economic benefits?  No 3.Favor easy to quantify services?  No 4.Require monetization of all services?  No 5.Always change the outcome of a decision?  No 6.Replace existing agency priorities?  No An ecosystem services approach complements existing processes by providing additional information.

M OTIVATION Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook | nespguidebook.com Potential Challenges  Technical terminology may cause confusion  Gaps in data and modeling for ecosystem services could limit quantification  Insufficient in-house technical capacity  Managing greater engagement with a larger number of stakeholders  Concern that significant effort is required for potentially small impact on decisions

“Using an ecosystem services perspective is like moving from black and white to full spectrum color in terms of the richness of the analysis and the ability to communicate it to the public.” John Allen, Deschutes National Forest Supervisor Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com

For more information, contact Lydia Olander: Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com